
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Climate professor Orrin Pilkey thinks it is wrong to rebuild after major storms – though so far coastal communities whom he has advised have not been receptive to his wisdom.
Beyond Evacuations: Climate Change May Mean Abandoning Our Coasts Forever
By Casey Williams
Sep 14 2018, 8:10amA climate scientist thinks that we aren’t taking major storms like Florence seriously enough.
Get out, and stay out. Or at least, don’t come back and build a high-rise. That’s the message Orrin Pilkey, a climate scientist and emeritus professor at Duke University, hopes Hurricane Florence will send lawmakers and coastal residents when it smashes the southeastern US this week. As climate change warms the oceans, swells the seas, and makes deadly hurricanes a fixture of American life, a massive and permanent retreat from the coasts may be the only way to protect lives and livelihoods in the long run, Pilkey says.
In his 2016 book Retreat from a Rising Sea, Pilkey, whose family’s Mississippi home was destroyed by Hurricane Camille in 1969, argues that unchecked climate change could make coastal regions uninhabitable sooner than we think. He thinks coastal communities should respond to this threat by moving away from the ocean now, before it’s too late. Pilkey takes particular aim at post-storm “urban renewal” projects—replacing modest homes with high-rises and mansions, for instance—that swell coastal populations. But even ordinary residents might have to give up the comforting dream of rebuilding after the storm.
Sooner or later, he says, coastal communities will have to choose from two bad options: hunker down beyond proliferating seawalls, or pick up stakes and move inland, forever. As Florence approached, I talked with Pilkey about his thoughts on the storm, climate change and “managed retreat.”
…
For a lot of people living on the coast, the idea of retreating—giving up their homes, their way of life—is going to be a tough pill to swallow. They’re going to swallow it sooner or later. The sooner they swallow it, the better off they’re going to be. I understand completely. When I’ve talked to people on the coast, I’ve been told to go jump in a lake, and a lot worse than that. In many of the communities on the coast, their beaches will become unstable. And if they don’t want to lose their buildings, they’re going to have to rely on a seawall. So, you’ll have a tourist community without a beach. That’s already happening. For instance, Miami Beach is considerably narrower than it was.
…
In the midst of a major flooding event like Hurricane Florence its easy to forget that living on the coast often provides protection against severe flood damage. The reason is flood water drains back into the sea far more easily if you live on the coast, than if you live inland. Coastal floods are usually very short lived, often lasting minutes rather than days, peaking at high tide.
You can usually protect a home against a brief flood, the way I once did, by covering the doors in waterproof tape and using non-setting plumber’s putty to seal any leaks we missed. Coastal houses can also be built to resist short floods, the house I protected had telescopic air vents, vents which had been deliberately set a lot higher than normal so they were less likely to become inundated by floodwater. Other houses on the same street were elevated on stilts, or set back a little from the water, to provide a buffer.
Houses further inland during that particular event were in a heap of trouble – their flood lasted days rather than minutes. Instead of their floodwater draining away back into the sea as rapidly as it had arrived, the inland floodwater was trapped in slow moving river systems. It is far more difficult to protect a house against prolonged flooding than against a brief coastal inundation.
Obviously a very large large storm surge can overturn the flood advantages of low lying coastal properties. The protective measures I describe don’t work if your near sea level house is buried under 20ft of water. But such severe storm events also affect inland properties, sometimes even worse than properties in coastal communities.
In my experience as a former and current coast dweller, blanket advice to “abandon the coasts” is nonsense.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
What is all the excitement about?
All POTUS has to do is name Obama his Chief Climate Negotiator and on that day he’ll announce that this is the day the earth begins to heal and the oceans begin to recede.
Again.
I’m going to go with neither of Orrin Pilkey’s choices. I prefer choices based on reason not hyperbole.
By Pilkey’s logic all small to medium islands should be completely evacuated and no-one should live where their might be cyclones, typhoons or tornadoes, any earthquake zone, near a volcano (active or dormant), wildfire regions, rivers prone to flooding – which doesn’t leave much.
Well reasoned.
Um, professor graybeard, Nincompoop….we just experienced one of the greatest lulls in US history for lack of CAT3 or greater gracing our shores, all at a time when temperatures are supposedly the HOTTEST they’ve ever been since the dawn of man, which is a lie on its face you blithering idiot!
In otherwords, are you saying because we have hurricanes we should not build at the coast? Because there is NOTHING unusual about a strong hurricane hitting the Carolina’s. Now stroke that beard and look important.
It is apparent that the learned professor’s knowledge does NOT extend to economics. Coastal communities form because that is where trade occurs and wealth is created. As more people move there the price of the more wanted property – on the coast where there is a view, etc, etc – increases in value. Does the professor have ANY idea of the reluctance of a politically powerful and very rich populace to watch the value of their property go to zero because the government took his advice and prevented him from selling!
Isn’t there a way of removing their professorships when they go senile?
like Tom Harris?
Spread this far and wide, get people to move away from the coast! Property values there will plummet, and I can afford the house by the sea that I’ve always wanted. Another plus for climate change!
“Beyond Evacuations: Climate Change May Mean Abandoning Our Coasts”
Beyond climate science. The scientific method may mean abandoning our activism and advocacy and returning to objective scientific inquiry.
Beyond catastrophism. Actual academic standards may mean abandoning our easy alarmism and returning to hard work.
Actually, perhaps permanent evacuation of both coasts is not a bad idea if we can send them to Mexico and Canada, permanently. The remainder of the country voted correctly in the last election, overwhelmingly I believe. If we could just do the big cities even better. Why punish all the good people on the coasts? Then if we could somehow deal with the Chicago, Cleveland, etc. types in the central part of the country we’d be in the clover. Thank god for the electoral college.
Another member of the parasite class. (Don’t get me wrong, we definitely need scholars). But as a guy who’s never had a productive job, never produced anything, he should keep his advice to himself.
When have hurricanes not been deadly, or a fixture of American life?
Just end the National Flood Insurance program.
“Sooner or later, he says, coastal communities will have to choose from two bad options: hunker down beyond proliferating seawalls, or pick up stakes and move inland, forever. ‘
That’s what they said 15,000 years ago and 400 ft of sealevel rise ago. /s
The problem is that as the current interglacial period ends and the next ice age begins to develop, Sea levels will lower and coastal areas will move farther away by themselves without us having to do anything about it.
The real problem for the elitist Left is that too many of the unwashed masses owns prime beach front real estate that they want free and clear without the riff raff.
They want the beachfront, but they want to buy it at a fire sale rice from owners who have been duped on climate change and SLR.
Anthony,
Did you change stuff up on posting?
No more thumbs up/down?
And posted comments are now disapearring into the ether.
Did you piss off the Google gods?
“Get out, and stay out. Or at least, don’t come back and build a high-rise.”
Good scheme, why doesn’t he do that instead of expecting other people to do it.
This is what gets up my nose, people like this who expect everyone to do his bidding.
There is still free speech – give us your message and then go home.
Here is an organization who will tell him to bugger off!
https://thedemiseofchristchurch.wordpress.com/2016/05/06/un-headquarters-and-usd1-2-billion-upgrade-and-rising/
Cheers
Roger
Calling him a climate scientist is pushing it a lot. Maybe an oceanographer. Whoops, I meant ocean scientist. Forgot, for a moment, how untrendy it was to be post-fixed by -ologist or -ographer. Now that physics envy is de rigueur.
This is truly amazing even for the Guardian. Grounds for complaint to the Press Commission perhaps? Hard not to conclude that it is deliberately misleading about trends in storm frequency and intensity. Note the one clear claim – that there has been a rise in ‘named storms’ since 1900.
“Based on the total number of named storms, there has been an increase since the start of the 20th century.”
https://www.theguardian.com/weather/ng-interactive/2018/sep/11/atlantic-hurricanes-are-storms-getting-worse
I store interesting sayings that one comes across in life. One such is:
“The time to buy property is when there is blood on the streets”
Opportunities abound 🙂
M
Strong downpours in North Carolina.

Federal flood insurance only covers the first $250,000 of value. The ‘uber-wealthy’ are self insuring.
And if you have a history of claims they eventually deny coverage.
Hurricanes Katrina, Harvey, Sandy, Andrew and Irma, the 5 most damaging ones in US history cost an estimated 455 B$, (including, I believe, the 1000 bucks the last one cost me personally).
This amounts to 2.4% of the US GBP of 17 768 B$.
Or less than 10% of the estimated dotcom crash investor loss. (approx 5 000 B$ + 17 years of inflation).
True to form the BBC are making out Florence to be a direct result of AGW! Every warmist in the Carolinas has been shipped in by them to put in their two cents worth! I hope the real people of the Carolinas face this with typical American stoicism, & they will rise & rebuild, & carry on as normal! GBA!
He’s lost it.
Paranoid in the generally accepted sense.
Keep well clear in case it’s infectious.
(haha, I’ve *just* ‘got it’= Let’s all move to the coast)
Are these people stupid or what? Never heard of dikes & dams?
Just hire some Dutch, cheaper than insurance (in the long run) or not being insured (in the long & short run).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Works
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuiderzee_Works
“The aim of the dams, sluices, and storm surge barriers was to shorten the Dutch coastline, thus reducing the number of dikes that had to be raised. Along with the Zuiderzee Works, the Delta Works have been declared one of the Seven Wonders of the Modern World by the American Society of Civil Engineers.”
Exactly! The inundation of 1953 killed 2,551 people – result the best Sea Works in the world. After Katrina a US commission went to Holland for advice, in spite of the Administration. After that and Houston the Army Corps. of Engineers should have been given full support.
Trump’s infrastructure initiative is being undermined by advisors PPP pipedreams.