Electric Cars: Will Any Auto Company Make Money?

By Steve Goreham

Republished with the permission of The Washington Times

Tesla reported second quarter results earlier this month. Despite losing $718 million during the quarter, Tesla shares rose 16 percent on renewed promises of profitability. Driven by government incentives and mandates, world automakers have announced big electric car introduction plans. But will any electric car firm be able to make money?

Start-up automobile companies face long odds. Over the last ten years, Tesla posted cumulative losses of over $3 billion. In the second quarter, Tesla began to ramp production of its new Model 3 sedan, producing more than 50,000 cars. Tesla also promises to attain profitability in the near future, but the firm is about to face rapidly growing electric car competition.

World auto makers have not only embraced electric cars, but now appear to be competing to introduce the most electric models. More than 400 fully electric or hybrid electric vehicles have been announced. BMW plans to introduce 12 all electric and 13 hybrids into its lineup by 2025. Ford announced an $11 billion investment, 16 fully electric, and 24 plug-in hybrid electric cars by 2022. Toyota, Volkswagen, General Motors, and others appear to be all in for electrics.

Hybrid electric vehicles, such as the Toyota Prius, use a conventional internal combustion engine along with an electric motor system to improve mileage. Hybrids can’t be plugged-in and charged. After ten years of production, Toyota was finally able to turn a profit on the hybrid Prius. Hybrid electric cars, which do not suffer the range limitation of fully electric cars, grew to about three percent of global vehicle sales in 2017.

Plug-in hybrid electrics, such as the Chevrolet Volt, can plug-in and run wholly on electric batteries but also use a gasoline engine for longer trips. Battery electric vehicles, such as the Tesla Model S and the Nissan Leaf, are fully electric and run only on batteries. Neither plug-in hybrid electrics nor fully electric vehicles are yet profitable.

UBS analysts estimate that General Motors loses $7,000 on every one of its new Bolt battery electric cars. The Bolt battery pack costs about $10,000‒$12,000, or up to one-third of the Bolt price tag. Daimler, Peugeot, Honda, and other auto makers warn of looming electric car losses.

Where is the demand to support all these new electric car models? Entrepreneurs and new companies traditionally achieve success by meeting a market need (market-pull strategy), or by developing a new technology to create a new market (technology-push strategy). An example of market-pull was the digital camera, which addressed the need for a camera able to take endless pictures that could be displayed almost immediately. Touch screen technology now found in PDAs, smart-phones, and computers is an example of technology-push. The electric car craze may be neither market-pull nor technology push, but instead is driven by government incentives and mandates.

Over the last decade, world nations established large financial incentives to promote electric vehicle adoption. Australia, China, India, Japan, the US, more than 20 nations in Europe, and others offered tax credits, deductions, and subsidies to consumers and businesses, but electric car growth has been disappointing. Battery electric vehicles comprised only 0.8 percent of the 86 million cars and light trucks sold globally in 2017.

Even this small consumer demand for electric cars is thin. When tax benefits are cut, demand plunges. A reduction in electric car vehicle registration taxes in Hong Kong and Denmark caused demand to drop more than 80 percent in those nations.

With subsidies largely ineffective, governments in Europe now plan to ban internal combustion engine car sales in the name of saving the environment. Bans on the sale of gasoline and diesel cars have now been adopted in France, Germany, Netherlands, and Norway, to begin in 2030 or 2040. California, other locations, and other nations are considering similar bans.

Are consumers going to be forced to shift to electrics? Electric cars have advantages of fast acceleration, lower maintenance costs, and lower fuel cost. But the fuel cost advantage will narrow when governments impose vehicle and fuel taxes as electric car penetration grows. Electric car deficiencies are major, including high purchase price, short driving range, small carrying capacity, lack of charging stations, long charging times, and expensive battery packs that need to be replaced during the life of the vehicle.

Auto makers are in a tough position. Demand for electric cars is small, but governments intend to force auto firms to convert their car lines to electrics. Hundreds of new car models chasing only five percent of the market is a recipe for financial debacle.

Look for big auto company electric car losses and a growing resale market for traditional gasoline and diesel vehicles.


Steve Goreham is a speaker on the environment, business, and public policy and author of the book Outside the Green Box: Rethinking Sustainable Development.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
493 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steven Mosher
August 24, 2018 1:28 pm

Typical bad research here at wuwt.

if you want to understand the future of EVs
start with BYD.

largest in the world.
a local company here in China.

ah..

warren buffet has owned 10% since 2008

John Endicott
Reply to  Steven Mosher
August 24, 2018 6:32 pm

Typical drive-by post from Mosh.

If you have a problem with the article
try articulating what the article got wrong in your opinion.

ah…

but it’s easier to toss meaningless barbs instead.

steven mosher
Reply to  John Endicott
August 25, 2018 5:05 am

i did.
the article failed to cover the lsrgest EV maker.

duh.

and buffet knows better than you.

duh.

John Endicott
Reply to  steven mosher
August 25, 2018 12:30 pm

I don’t think you are qualified to speak on behalf of Buffet.

duh.

And you still haven’t articulated any problems with the article. How exactly does not mentioning BYD change anything about the article?

hint: it doesn’t, so just more meaningless drive-by posting from Mosh

duh.

Just saying “you didn’t mention X” isn’t articulating anything, it’s just a non sequitur.

duh.

MarkW
Reply to  John Endicott
August 27, 2018 1:29 pm

I strongly suspect that Buffet’s ownership is part of a larger political deal.
It’s China after all.

Reply to  Steven Mosher
August 25, 2018 12:15 pm

So the future of EVs is that of in-town taxis capable of less than a 200-mile range, and a 100% quick-charge time of 40 minutes?
Your future of EVs is bleaker than most here.

Michael Schäfer
August 24, 2018 3:31 pm

If you are really interested in purchasing a fully electric car, just wait a few more years, and there will be a deluge of yet-unsalable electric cars at dealers’ lots for yet-unheard-of discount prices to choose from for the sensible consumer. The writing is on the wall with bright red, ten feet high letters. Everyone not seeing this and willing to pay the full price now for any of the actual or coming fully electric cars is an absolute fool.

Eric A Porter
August 24, 2018 3:58 pm

Tesla didn’t produce 50K cars in Q2. It was about 28K.

Derek Colman
August 24, 2018 5:46 pm

If I wrote an article about electric cars, it would exactly mimic this one. As has been demonstrated, sales plummet when the government subsidy is removed. What would happen if the manufacturer’s $5,000 to $7,000 subsidy isv also removed? No one in government is able to accept the truth that the public does not perceive EVs as a practical substitute for conventional cars. They only suit a niche market which is people who only make short journeys and happen to live in a dwelling which can accommodate a charging facility.

MarkW
Reply to  Derek Colman
August 27, 2018 1:30 pm

Manufacturers are willing to sell EVs at a loss because of the very large CAFE credits they get from them.

Then there is the fact that they use the roads without paying any road taxes.

michael hart
August 25, 2018 3:35 am

“Hybrids can’t be plugged-in and charged.”

??? You contradict that in the next paragraph.

John Endicott
Reply to  michael hart
August 25, 2018 12:45 pm

He’s talking about two different types of Hybrids there.

Type I hybrids, like the Prius, are known as Hybrid Electric Vehicles (or HEV)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_electric_vehicle They don’t get plugged in and charged.

Type II hybrids, like the Volt, are Known as Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (or PHEV)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug-in_hybrid They can be plugged in.

John Endicott
Reply to  michael hart
August 25, 2018 1:03 pm

Perhaps he should have included (HEV) and (PHEV) in the respective paragraphs when he named the type of vehicles he was talking about at the start of those two paragraphs in order to avoid your confusion.

so the starting sentences should have read:
Hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), such as the Toyota Prius, …

Plug-in hybrid electrics (PHEV), such as the Chevrolet Volt, …

feliksch
August 25, 2018 8:50 am

At least in the EU no car company can fulfill present or future CO2-emission requirements – that is why they pay fines, without making a fuss about it. Every electric car sold counts as one or even two zero-emitting cars, which lowers the total fleet emission.
That is the main reason for producing electric cars.

CCB
August 25, 2018 10:33 am

Won’t we be needing more power stations to be built very soon (saw some estimates of 3 to 10 new builds required) to charge all these electric vehicles just in the UK by 2030 when petrol banned; efficiency lower than petrol and diesel (https://www.finitespaces.com/2018/02/14/electric-cars-use-twice-as-much-oil-as-diesel-vehicles)

Jake J
Reply to  CCB
August 27, 2018 10:43 am

Most EVs get charged at night. Shouldn’t require more power plants. By the way, the efficiency numbers quoted in your link are wildly inaccurate.

Today, the efficiency numbers are:

– Gasoline 22%
– Diesel ~30%
– Electric 47%

Gasoline is poised for a major increase that will surpass diesel and challenge electric, but your link’s quotes are wrong. I’ve researched this side of things in detail, using industry numbers and Dept. of Energy numbers.

Larry Butler
August 28, 2018 5:50 pm

I sure hope EVs fail. The USA is thousands of megawatt-hours BEHIND the power it can produce, every day. We import huge amounts of electric power from Canada and Mexico, mostly Canada, each day to keep our antequated grid shored up with enough power to run your houses. Follow eia.gov’s statistics on your computers to see the truth about electric power generation vs. power consumption. Add a few million charging EVs at 60 KW a piece and it will bring our old grid to its knees. Once electric power is SCARCE, economics 101 kicks in and you’ll be paying $5/KwH to cool your house!
How stupid……..

Mark Hotz
September 5, 2018 7:03 am

I don’t think many green energy programs are going to last much longer. Didn’t Germany already announce that green energy programs will no longer be subsidized soon? I know the new provincial government in Ontario (Canada) has already announced that the green energy programs there (primarily wind and solar) will be scrapped. I believe that was that premier’s first announcement after taking office this year. I also know that without those subsidies that things like solar energy would be way out of my price range…but a pretty useless investment where I live too :-).

What worries me too is that in spite of major subsidies in the EV industry, and many rebate incentives, these vehicles are still at least 30% more expensive than standard ones. Of course, mass production may correct this in the future (if the industry ever reaches that level of sales of course)…but after watching what has been going on in the auto industry over the years I don’t see any vehicle becoming “less” expensive to purchase :-).