Like the recent smackdown of the “plankton are declining” nonsense, compare the new paper from OSU below to this reporting from 2008:

From Oregon State University:
Catastrophic amphibian declines have multiple causes, no simple solution
CORVALLIS, Ore. – Amphibian declines around the world have forced many species to the brink of extinction, are much more complex than realized and have multiple causes that are still not fully understood, researchers conclude in a new report.
The search for a single causative factor is often missing the larger picture, they said, and approaches to address the crisis may fail if they don’t consider the totality of causes – or could even make things worse.
No one issue can explain all of the population declines that are occurring at an unprecedented rate, and much faster in amphibians than most other animals, the scientists conclude in a study just published in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
The amphibian declines are linked to natural forces such as competition, predation, reproduction and disease, as well as human-induced stresses such as habitat destruction, environmental contamination, invasive species and climate change, researchers said.
“An enormous rate of change has occurred in the last 100 years, and amphibians are not evolving fast enough to keep up with it,” said Andrew Blaustein, a professor of zoology at Oregon State University and an international leader in the study of amphibian declines.
“We’re now realizing that it’s not just one thing, it’s a whole range of things,” Blaustein said.
“With a permeable skin and exposure to both aquatic and terrestrial problems, amphibians face a double whammy,” he said. “Because of this, mammals, fish and birds have not experienced population impacts as severely as amphibians – at least, not yet.”
The totality of these changes leads these researchers to believe that the Earth is now in a major extinction episode similar to five other mass extinction events in the planet’s history. And amphibians are leading the field – one estimate indicates they are disappearing at more than 200 times that of the average extinction rate.
Efforts to understand these events, especially in the study of amphibians, have often focused on one cause or another, such as fungal diseases, invasive species, an increase in ultraviolet radiation due to ozone depletion, pollution, global warming, and others. All of these and more play a role in the amphibian declines, but the scope of the crisis can only be understood from the perspective of many causes, often overlapping. And efforts that address only one cause risk failure or even compounding the problems, the researchers said.
“Given that many stressors are acting simultaneously on amphibians, we suggest that single-factor explanations for amphibian population declines are likely the exception rather than the rule,” the researchers wrote in their report. “Studies focused on single causes may miss complex interrelationships involving multiple factors and indirect effects.”
One example is the fungus B. dendrobatidis, which has been implicated in the collapse of many frog populations around the world. However, in some populations the fungus causes no problems for years until a lethal threshold is reached, studies have shown.
And while this fungus disrupts electrolyte balance, other pathogens can have different effects such as a parasitic trematode that can cause severe limb malformations, and a nematode that can cause kidney damage. The combination and severity of these pathogens together in a single host, rather than any one individually, are all playing a role in dwindling frog populations.
Past studies at OSU have found a synergistic impact from ultraviolet radiation, which by itself can harm amphibians, and a pathogenic water mold that infects amphibian embryos. And they linked the whole process to water depths at egg-laying sites, which in turn are affected by winter precipitation in the Oregon Cascade Range that is related to climate change.
The problems facing amphibians are a particular concern, scientists say, because they have been one of Earth’s great survivors – evolving about 400 million years ago before the dinosaurs, persisting through ice ages, asteroid impacts, and myriad other ecological and climatic changes.
Their rapid disappearance now suggests that the variety and rate of change exceeds anything they have faced before, the researchers said.
“Modern selection pressures, especially those associated with human activity, may be too severe and may have arisen too rapidly for amphibians to evolve adaptations to overcome them,” the researchers concluded.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Other collaborators on the study were from the University of Colorado, University of Georgia, University of Pittsburgh, and Pepperdine University.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
What will they say in five years when populations are exploding? All plants and animals surge and decline, and we can’t always figure out why.
Cane toads down under don’t seem to be suffering too badly 🙁
It’s worse than we thought, and we’re not really sure why!
Do they enumerate all possible problems an amphibian can encounter in its life to mask the fact that it were the researchers who spread the deadly fungus around the world?
If amphibians don’t even taste nice, what is the point of them?
Sounds like the kind of story the MSM will jump all over. /sarc
“The totality of these changes leads these researchers to believe that the Earth is now in a major extinction episode similar to five other mass extinction events in the planet’s history. And amphibians are leading the field – one estimate indicates they are disappearing at more than 200 times that of the average extinction rate.”
Who in their right mind would write this or publish it? Someone should do an article on Earth’s five great episodes of hysteria. I think the present episode would qualify as number one.
I used to hang out with some major frog researchers. It seems that frogs suffer catastrophe every few years. The last time I had inside information on an “episode” was the great ozone scare of the late Eighties. It seemed that frogs were dying by the bushel and surely the culprit must be increased UV radiation. Never mind that there was no correlation between the locations of increased UV radiation and locations where frogs were dying.
Why are none of the scientists publishing hysterical articles about the decline in birthrates among the human populations of Europe and North America? (The decline that I refer to excludes recent immigrants.) Humans don’t count for Greens?
Maybe there was something that allowed a population explosion…
..and now, different parasites, disease, etc are exploding because of that
nawwww, every thing was perfect until “scientists” started counting
and it’s all been down hill since………
(am broke, send money)
ew-3 says:
April 25, 2011 at 5:42 pm
Sounds like the kind of story the MSM will jump all over. /sarc>>>>
Yes it does. Makes me hopping mad just thinking about it.
OSU. Let’s see, that’s the university that is kicking out PHD students because their Dad is a conservative politician?
This is such a total crock. Last August I had a clay dam built across our little “branch” here in NC. When the small pond filled up in about a week, I stocked it with 25 channel catfish and 3 lbs. of minnows.
This spring, the channel cats are no where to be seen, but we have literally thousands of tadpoles, and numerous salamanders. We even have water snakes feasting on the tadpoles. When the snakes appeared, the minnows went into hiding.
If amphibians are disappearing in Yellowstone, it must be because they’re all here in my pond at the moment.
Will this end like the recent salmon story?
“Three years after government regulators proclaimed the devastated Pacific salmon fishery a federal disaster, commercial fishermen on Wednesday got word to start untangling their nets and greasing their reels.
The prized king salmon fishery is back, and in numbers that ensure plenty will remain to spawn in freshwater streams this fall, experts say.”
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/14/MND31J042V.DTL#ixzz1KaRdRpWl
Dirk H. -exactly. When this was first noted, I remember that there was similar but not as precipitous decline back in the 60’s but cannot remember the name of the researcher who found that there was a fungal vector responsible. I wonder how much is due to the spread by”eco-tourism”?
“The totality of these changes leads these researchers to believe that the Earth is now in a major extinction episode similar to five other mass extinction events in the planet’s history. And amphibians are leading the field – one estimate indicates they are disappearing at more than 200 times that of the average extinction rate.”
Seems like the Greens were right all along, Human activity is negatively effecting the eco-system that is vital to the existence of the entirety of Humanity, we either change our support system, or the future will belong to a very small population basically living indoors due to a no longer
I live in Oregon and I like OSU, but I am now very sick about some shennanigans there: http://sppiblog.org/news/political-payback-%E2%80%93-oregon-style
Unfortunately, it now looks like at least part of OSU (including the President) is an arm of the “politically correct” leftist state. So, right now, I would take this “study” with a grain of feces.
Forgot to give reasons for skepticism about “report:” I see no link to the “report” or any indication that it is peer reviewed (even though that means nothing in climate science) or any data or anything else to make me think there is any “beef” there…
OOps, forgive me, a link to a peer-reviewed article is provided. My blindness.
Funded by the Packard Foundation… nough said.
Sorry, I’m still recoiling from the firing of Oregon’s State Climatologist, George Taylor for his “failure” to toe the line on AGW. He was also at OSU.
Easy PhD’s. Just write something and blame it all on Climate Change and presto, you’re now a Doctor. And don’t forget to pass the Kool Aid.
What’s the test here?
When the climate cools off (as in Global Warming causes Global Cooling) the frogs will recover? No, because there is no proof that Global Warming caused Global Cooling due to no way to discern between AGW cooling and natural cooling.
A perfect hypothesis that has no test. Like Epicycles, they will last 2,000 years.
BS.
Maybe they’re starving because the warmists stole all the bugs they could find and put them in their computer models.
Over the years, we have learned to dismiss self-serving, invariably spurious Warmist alarums out-of-hand. Vast libraries of coherent, valid data exist worldwide, and rationally interpreting their contents is no more difficult than conducting forensic audits on Wall Street. (Stock-jobbers at least base their scams on market prices.)
Climate hysterics by now have been so thoroughly and universally discredited that only grant-gobbling college administrators give ’em the time of day. Having utterly ruined their profession, blighted the careers of any upcoming acolytes caught in Warmist toils, poseurs of Santer’s ilk will eventually sink back into the obscurity they so deserve.
here’s a shocking story about that Univ
http://townhall.com/columnists/pauldriessen/2011/04/23/political_payback_%e2%80%93_oregon_style/page/full/
Also on a post here:
http://joannenova.com.au/2011/04/the-moment-to-test-what-we-are-made-of-is-here/
Ah yes. The heady days of 2008 when they got away with all of the BS they spouted. How they must long for those days again…