Harvard: global warming to dull future wine varietals

From HARVARD UNIVERSITY, where you can’t tell them much.

A changing climate, changing wine

To adapt to warmer temperatures, winemakers may have to plant lesser known grape varieties, study suggests

Cambridge, MA (January 2, 2018) — If you want to buy good wine, Elizabeth Wolkovich says stop looking at labels and listen to your taste buds.

An Assistant Professor of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Wolkovich is among the co-authors of a new study, which suggests that, though vineyards might be able to counteract some of the effects of climate change by planting lesser-known grape varieties, scientists and vintners need to better understand the wide diversity of grapes and their adaptions to different climates. The study is described in a January 2 paper in Nature Climate Change.

“It’s going to be very hard, given the amount of warming we’ve already committed to…for many regions to continue growing the exact varieties they’ve grown in the past,” Wolkovich said. “But what we’re interested in talking about is how much more diversity of grape varieties do we have, and could we potentially be using that diversity to adapt to climate change.

“The Old World has a huge diversity of winegrapes – there are over planted 1,000 varieties – and some of them are better adapted to hotter climates and have higher drought tolerance than the 12 varieties now making up over 80% of the wine market in many countries,” she continued. “We should be studying and exploring these varieties to prepare for climate change.”

Unfortunately, Wolkovich said, convincing wine producers to try different grape varieties is difficult at best, and the reason often comes down to the current concept of terroir.

Terroir is the notion that a wine’s flavor is a reflection of where, which and how the grapes were grown. Thus, as currently understood, only certain traditional or existing varieties are part of each terroir, leaving little room for change.

“There’s a real issue in the premier wine-growing regions that historical terroir is what makes great wine, and if you acknowledge in any way that you have climate change, you acknowledge that your terroir is changing,” Wolkovich said. “So in many of those regions there is not much of an appetite to talk about changing varieties.”

But even if that appetite existed, Wolkovich said, researchers don’t yet have enough data to say whether other varieties would be able to adapt to climate change.

“Part of what this paper sets up is the question of how much more do we need to know if we want to understand whether there is enough diversity in this crop to adapt wine regions to climate change in place,” said Ignacio Morales-Castilla, a co-author of the study and Fellow at the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University who investigates which winegrape varieties will adequately mature where under climate change. “Right now we know we have this diversity, but we have little information on how to use it. One of our other suggestions is for growers to start setting aside parts of vineyards to grow some other varieties to see which ones are working.”

But even if researchers came to the table armed with information about grape diversity, Wolkovich said the industry – both in the traditional winegrowing centers of Europe and around the world – still faces hurdles when it comes to making changes.

In Europe, she said, growers have the advantage of tremendous diversity. They have more than 1,000 grape varieties to choose from, research repositories such as INRA’s Domaine de Vassal that study this diversity, and expertise in how to grow different varieties. Yet strict labeling laws have created restrictions on their ability to take advantage of this diversity.

For example, just three varieties of grapes can be labeled as Champagne or four for Burgundy. Similar restrictions have been enacted in many European regions- all of which force growers to focus on a small handful of grape varieties.

“The more you are locked into what you have to grow, the less room you have to adapt to climate change,” Wolkovich said. “So there’s this big pool of knowledge, and massive diversity, growers have maintained an amazing amount of genetic and climactic response diversity…but if they changed those laws in any way in relation to climate change, that’s acknowledging that the terroir of the region is changing, and many growers don’t want to do that.”

New World winegrowers, meanwhile, must grapple with the opposite problem – while there are few, if any, restrictions on which grape varieties may be grown in a given region, growers have little experience with the diverse – and potentially more climate change adaptable – varieties of grapes found in Europe.

Just 12 varieties account for more than 80 percent of the grapes grown in Australian vineyards, Wolkovich said, more than 75% percent of all the grapes grown in China are Cabernet Sauvignon – and the chief reason why has to do with consumers.

“They have all the freedom in the world to import new varieties and think about how to make great wines from a grape variety you’ve never heard of, but they’re not doing it because the consumer hasn’t heard of it,” Wolkovich said. “In Europe, people do blend wines…but in the New World, we’ve gotten really focused on specific varieties: ‘I want a bottle of Pinot Noir,’ or ‘I want a bottle of Cabernet.’

“We’ve been taught to recognize the varieties we think we like,” she said. “People buy Pinot even though it can taste totally different depending on where it’s grown. It might taste absolutely awful from certain regions, but if you think you like Pinot, you’re only buying that.”

As Wolkovich sees it, wine producers now face a choice: proactively experiment with new varieties, or risk suffering the negative consequences of climate change.

“With continued climate change, certain varieties in certain regions will start to fail – that’s my expectation,” she said. “The solution we’re offering is how do you start thinking of varietal diversity. Maybe the grapes grown widely today were the ones that are easiest to grow and tasted the best in historical climates, but I think we’re missing a lot of great grapes better suited for the future.”

###

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

90 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jclarke341
January 3, 2018 6:15 am

I can’t stand it anymore! If we really could control the climate, and we wanted to make everything better for people and the biosphere in general, WE WOULD MAKE IT WARMER! Especially, at night and in the higher latitudes! Such a thing would be absolutely fabulous for nearly everyone and everything, including wine! Constantly spinning something that is obviously wonderful into unending tails of doom and gloom, must be some kind of mental illness.

Too bad the warming is not going to happen nearly as much as they keep predicting, and periods of ‘global cooling’ are very likely in the mix.

Hugs
Reply to  jclarke341
January 3, 2018 7:19 am

Nonono, the delicate balance of Nature, poor people in the developing countries, and polar bears. We need to keep the climate exactly as it was, including variance and natural disasters.

Talking about conservative? The people who talk for conservation are conservatives, for real. So called conservatives are often utilitarians, ready for a good change.

Ian_UK
January 3, 2018 6:27 am

In the last few days there was a piece on, I think, UK’s Sky News, where the future of French Champagne was claimed to be in doubt because the warming climate means the grapes ripen earlier and are sweeter. Poor things are going to have to adjust their processing methods. Funny how this is a crisis but the ability of entrepreneurs in northern England, at a latitude of 53N and 260m elevation and on NW-facing slopes to boot is seen as good news.

Ian_UK
Reply to  Ian_UK
January 3, 2018 6:29 am

I should have written “… but the ability of entrepreneurs in northern England …”.

Ian_UK
Reply to  Ian_UK
January 3, 2018 6:30 am

” SHOULD have written “… but the ability of entrepreneurs in northern England TO GROW WINE SUCCESSFULLY AND PROFITABLY…”. Clearly, too much wine!

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Ian_UK
January 3, 2018 9:25 am

See my comment above at 10:37. – – – reconfiguring Champagné

MarkW
January 3, 2018 6:32 am

100 years ago, wine experts laughed at the notion of high quality California wines.
If the quality of existing vinyards goes down, other regions will step in to pick up the slack.
Ain’t the free market wonderful.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  MarkW
January 3, 2018 9:56 am

Find and read about:
The Paris Wine Tasting of 1976 — known as the Judgment of Paris
Here is one: Stag’s Leap

Sara
Reply to  MarkW
January 3, 2018 10:35 am

I find wine from the Rapel Valley in Chile to have a certain friendliness to it. It ain’t just for France any more, y’know.

arthur4563
January 3, 2018 7:07 am

If it comes down to it, which I doubt, I would assume that if it’s too warm in a region for a grape, why don’t they simply grow the grape at a higher latitute? Porbablt some esoteric reason not to, knowing the wine people, who generally I consider jerks and frauds. Wine sucks anyway. I never buy the stuff.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  arthur4563
January 3, 2018 9:32 am

Wine is quite useful in places where the water is likely to kill you. The history of wine is fascinating.
Some say milk is good for you. I can’t vouch for that. And you can cook with milk too!

Walter Sobchak
January 3, 2018 7:22 am

Translated from the original Harvardese: Oh, no. Farmers are going to have to think and adapt to changing conditions, but they are so stupid — none of them went to Harvard — they will never be able to figure it out.

For the record, I have advocated for the Federal government to shut Harvard down, apply its endowment to the Federal Debt, and use the dormitories to house poor senior citizens.

Pat B.
January 3, 2018 7:25 am

What does this mean? “It’s going to be very hard, given the amount of warming we’ve already committed to…

Hartley
Reply to  Pat B.
January 3, 2018 9:24 am

I saw that, too, Pat – a really odd turn of phrase. As near as I can tell, what it means is “we the consensus, have agreed that the climate is going to warm by X (large number) therefore it will actually happen..” Seems a bit presumptuous to me.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Pat B.
January 3, 2018 9:41 am

The phrase “the amount of warming we’ve already committed to…” means someone believes the carbon dioxide already released will stay in in “cycle” for a very long time and its damage will be cumulative. Further, if humans stop all GHG (sic) emissions today, the heating of the atmosphere will continue because of the “blanket” effect.
This is all in the Hansen/Mann/Gore Katechism (HMGK), that I guess you haven’t read.

Auto
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 3, 2018 11:21 am

. . . or believed, anyway!

Auto

Hartley
Reply to  John F. Hultquist
January 3, 2018 5:02 pm

I guess…that seems even more presumptuous then my impression – so it’s probably true. No, I’m unlikely to read that much BS, I have a life.

Editor
January 3, 2018 8:03 am

Now THAT WILL BE A DISASTER for the 1% and ever-bleeding-heart Hollywood millionaires — all the effort they’ve put in to remember the names of three or four “prestigious” wines and their grape varieties will be wasted if things change!

They might even have to memorize new wine names…..

ResourceGuy
January 3, 2018 8:06 am

You can’t dull the vineyard quality if it is already killed off by the cold.

Svend Ferdinandsen
January 3, 2018 9:44 am

The variation in temperature or climate from year to year is far larger than what you can expect even over ten years of climate change.
But you can use it as an excuse when you produce a crap wine. Stop using your SUV, then my wine will improve.

Sara
January 3, 2018 10:46 am

Obviously, Ms. Wolkovich doesn’t understand agriculture, viticulture or biology at all. I doubt she even knows what a good glass of wine really is. I would be willing to bet that the closest she gets to knowing anything about wine at all is when someone hands her a glass of it at a party and tells her to drink it while it’s still cold, when we all know that the bouquet blossoms when you let your hands warm it.

Definitely not an oenophile. She should stick to her chosen field of Organismics (almost left some letters out of that!) and stay in her corner. I’d listen to an old homme de pays before I’d pay attention to anything she says. What a silly cow.

ResourceGuy
January 3, 2018 10:49 am

Who will win the 2018 Jeffrey Sachs Award in waste of time and pseudo-research efforts? This study is in the running.

Kenji
January 3, 2018 12:00 pm

… and if the Queen had balls, she … MAY … be King.

More of the same “may” “what if” “could be” … “science” of Global Warming

tty
January 3, 2018 1:32 pm

They should read Leroy Laduries classic “Times of feast times of famine, a history of climate since the year 1000”. One of the main climate proxies used is the date of the grape harvest and the quality of the vintage which is known since ‘way back in France as You might imagine. The equation is: warm year = early ripening and good wine.

Sara
January 3, 2018 1:52 pm

To misquote that fellow from Rosebud, I will diss no wine before suppertime.

Mountain Man
January 3, 2018 2:50 pm

Made many drunkable wines at home. And some not so. The wild fox grapes were my favorite. Hot and dry summers made the high sugar content and large yield as long as I got to them before the wild turkeys. Second best was dandelion as long as I kept the flower pickers away from the big plants next to the fence posts.

Quilter52
January 3, 2018 4:04 pm

Don’t you just love the priorities of global warming alarmism – screw the peasants, we are worried about the wine. Very Marie Antoinette – let them eat cake! In the event that CAGW was real, its nice to know what he Harvard luvvies priority is!

Michael S. Kelly
January 3, 2018 5:20 pm

This is an amazing example of elitism. Someone who goes to great lengths to say that “we” have too little data to decide this or that must nevertheless convince people in a particular business to change their ways.

I know people who own vineyards, one of them in Maryland (of all places). Their knowledge of horticulture in general, and wine making in particular, probably exceeds the knowledge of “climate” “scientists” on all of the subjects they purport to know of, combined. Amateur scientists who merely ask well thought-out questions about climate science are pilloried as “deniers.” But amateur viniculturists who throw their climate “science” weight around are treated seriously.

This one deserves to go in the trash bin.

ptolemy2
January 3, 2018 9:06 pm

More nonsense from the “Climate Change To (I’m a twat)” department.

Back in the real world winter COLD and late frosts are killing wine grape 🍇 production:

https://www.iceagenow.info/burgundy-wine-growers-verge-bankruptcy/

https://www.iceagenow.info/france-worst-wine-harvest-since-1945/

ptolemy2
January 3, 2018 9:18 pm

Quoted from JimBob, Gerry, England:

The Grape vine is one of the few fruiting plants domesticated by man that is heavily climate change intolerant, the potato is another.
It will grow in cooler climates but not fruit as well, as in the warmer temperate climates such as central southern Europe.

My garden in the English midland is currently at its Northern edge. If AGW had been based on real, proven science instead of a politisized ologists fraud we should have expected grapes to be harvested in the Central belt of Scotland within 10 to 15 years. Unfortunately, back in the real world, the opposite is happening. Encroaching cold is reducing the range where wine 🍷 grapes can be grown. As Gerry, England reports:

The 2017 cold spring and late frosts “Hit us in the south-east of England where most wine is produced. A local I spoke said he lost 75% of blossom but said there could be a second one but not as good as the first. What caused this were TWO – yes just 2 – heavy frosts in mid April. Damaged other plants, even oak trees showed leaf damage.”

January 3, 2018 9:29 pm

More drip feed ‘climate change will affect’ when there is really no significant climate change.

Verified by MonsterInsights