More entries for ‘worse than we thought week’: climate change could accelerate by mid-century

From the UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE and the “Aliens could also descend upon us and eat our brains by mid century” department comes this science press release with “beware” right up front. Of course, AGU17 is in session, also known as ‘worse than we thought week’ where scientists compete for headlines. Of course, the headline they use, seen below, doesn’t tell you the study only covers a tiny place; the Upper Merrimack River watershed in New Hampshire, with a focus on “backyard amenities”, whatever that is.

Fig. 5. Time series of climate environmental indicators for Backyard Amenities / High Emissions and Small Community Amenities / Low Emission scenarios through 2100 for (a) Very Hot days (days per year), (b) Comfortable days (days per year), and (c) Snow Cover days (days per year).

UNH researchers find effects of climate change could accelerate by mid-century

DURHAM, N.H. – Nature lovers beware, environmental models used by researchers at the University of New Hampshire are showing that the effects of climate change could be much stronger by the middle of the 21st century, and a number of ecosystem and weather conditions could consistently decline even more in the future. If carbon dioxide emissions continue at the current rate, they report that scenarios of future conditions could not only lead to a significant decrease in snow days, but also an increase in the number of summer days over 90 degrees and a drastic decline in stream habitat with 40 percent not suitable for cold water fish.

“While this research was applied to New Hampshire, the approach can be generally applied, and a number of things that people care about will worsen due to climate change,” said Wilfred Wollheim, associate professor in the department of natural resources and the environment and one of the study’s authors. “For example, right now the average number of snow days is 60 per year, but in 20 to 30 years the models show that the number of snow days could be as low as 18 days per year.”

The research, published recently in the journal Ecology and Society, used models bench marked to field measurements to evaluate the Merrimack River watershed in New Hampshire. They found that along with a decrease in snow cover in the winter, other potential impacts could include up to 70 hot summer days per year with temperatures of 90 degrees or more by the end of century, a greater probability of flooding, a considerable loss of cold water fish habitat, and accelerated nitrogen inputs to coastal areas which could lead to eutrophication, an abnormal amount of nutrients which can pollute the water and deplete fish species. Researchers say that the biggest impact will be around urban areas, near where people live.

“Land use and population growth interacting with climate change are also important drivers,” said Wollheim. “These models can help guide efforts to make plans to adapt to the changing climate. Alterations in land use policy could reduce these impacts. In particular, prevention of sprawl and investment in storm and waste water infrastructure would further maintain more ecosystem services. Implementing policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions are essential to limit even further changes.”

The researchers say this study is the first time a model like this has been applied to New England watersheds that consistently account for climate change, land use change, forest ecosystem processes and aquatic ecosystem processes, including variability in weather that occurs within years (seasonal and storm) and across years, to assess a whole suite of changes at the same time.

###

The paper: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art18/

A coupled terrestrial and aquatic biogeophysical model of the Upper Merrimack River watershed, New Hampshire, to inform ecosystem services evaluation and management under climate and land-cover change

ABSTRACT

Accurate quantification of ecosystem services (ES) at regional scales is increasingly important for making informed decisions in the face of environmental change. We linked terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem process models to simulate the spatial and temporal distribution of hydrological and water quality characteristics related to ecosystem services. The linked model integrates two existing models (a forest ecosystem model and a river network model) to establish consistent responses to changing drivers across climate, terrestrial, and aquatic domains. The linked model is spatially distributed, accounts for terrestrial–aquatic and upstream–downstream linkages, and operates on a daily time-step, all characteristics needed to understand regional responses. The model was applied to the diverse landscapes of the Upper Merrimack River watershed, New Hampshire, USA. Potential changes in future environmental functions were evaluated using statistically downscaled global climate model simulations (both a high and low emission scenario) coupled with scenarios of changing land cover (centralized vs. dispersed land development) for the time period of 1980–2099. Projections of climate, land cover, and water quality were translated into a suite of environmental indicators that represent conditions relevant to important ecosystem services and were designed to be readily understood by the public. Model projections show that climate will have a greater influence on future aquatic ecosystem services (flooding, drinking water, fish habitat, and nitrogen export) than plausible changes in land cover. Minimal changes in aquatic environmental indicators are predicted through 2050, after which the high emissions scenarios show intensifying impacts. The spatially distributed modeling approach indicates that heavily populated portions of the watershed will show the strongest responses. Management of land cover could attenuate some of the changes associated with climate change and should be considered in future planning for the region.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

100 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ptolemy2
December 14, 2017 4:13 pm

It will accelerate. The cooling will be unmistakable by then.

AndyG55
Reply to  Ptolemy2
December 14, 2017 4:20 pm

Yep, A cooling trend is looking more and more likely, starting within a few months even.

I wish it didn’t have to be, but a protracted cooling trend might be the only way to put and end to the manic CO2-hatred from the climate alarmists.

We just have to make sure we don’t allow them to turn it around to say CO2 causes cooling !!

There have already been several attempts.

afonzarelli
Reply to  AndyG55
December 14, 2017 4:49 pm

Andy, it won’t matter. We’ve heard thirty years of them crying, “warming, WARMING, WARMING!” So if they turn and say that warming causes cooling, well, that boat just ain’t gonna float…

yarpos
Reply to  AndyG55
December 14, 2017 9:58 pm

an easy spin, we have just staved off a warming spike but extreme weather caused by “carbon” has plunged us into cooling, this is just cycle and the warming trend will be back by 2075! urgent action is needed now!!

johchi7
Reply to  yarpos
December 14, 2017 11:02 pm

Yep. Just like the last 6 months of a warming trend have entered a cooling trend here in Arizona. Amazing how a variation in miles from the Sun can make a difference in temperatures and the CO2 hasn’t changed very much in its increasing as more flora becomes dormant. But, in a few months it will start warming again. Who knew that the Sun could be the driver of the climate. [sarcasm]

Reply to  Ptolemy2
December 15, 2017 9:24 am

Look at the headline. It is the “climate change” which will accelerate, sending temperatures soaring to 120F and falling to -30F within hours, minutes even! Weather will have become a moot concept. Whatta world!

December 14, 2017 4:50 pm

The models use the perception CO2 has an effect on climate. It doesn’t.

Proof that CO2 has no significant effect on climate has been hiding in plain sight. The ‘notch’ is centered on CO2 at wavenumber 667 in TOA graphics such as Fig 1 in my blog/analysis. Fig 1 was copied from http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/schmidt_05/curve_s.gif.

Areas on Fig 1 represent energy. Where did the energy go that is missing, resulting in the notch? The only thing that makes sense is it got redirected to the lower energy (longer wavelength) photons emitted by water vapor molecules. This appears to be corroborated by the graphics produced by Hitran2012 as shown at Figs 0.4 and 0.5 in my blog/analysis

The energy entering the atmosphere from the surface matches very closely the Planck spectrum for the temperature of the surface and emissivity about 0.99. For the range wavenumbers ~ 600-750 cm^-1 the power (energy rate) is about 0.42 W / m^2 / cm^-1 * 150 cm^-1 = 60 W/m^2. The power leaving at the notch is about 0.2 W /m^2 / cm^-1 * 150 cm^-1 = 30 W/m^2. The 60 – 30 = 30 W/m^2 that is not emitted at the wavenumber range 600-750 has to be emitted at other wavenumbers. The power which is emitted in the wavenumber range 600-750 could be from both CO2 and water vapor as a result of what I have been calling reverse-thermalization occurring at higher altitudes (above 10 km or so).

John Brodman
Reply to  Dan Pangburn
December 14, 2017 6:15 pm

I’m an alumni, and I’m embarrassed. I guess the ski team will go downhill from here. JB

Richmond
December 14, 2017 5:00 pm

Why is it always worse than we thought?

“Aliens could also descend upon us and eat our brains by mid century”

That would be a change, most people are sick and tired of the ones that come to do those weird probes that certain types have claimed happened.

So, why are the pessimists in charge?

paqyfelyc
Reply to  Richmond
December 15, 2017 2:39 am

To be in charge, you need to believe something needs to be fixed, and that you can fix it.
Optimist don’t think it need to be fixed, or they believe it will fix itself without them having to act.

Edward Katz
December 14, 2017 6:20 pm

I’d like to see one of theses alarmist sites predict that climate change/global warming “could” be much less than they predicted by mid-century. That would be a new all-time first in the doom&gloom category.

yarpos
December 14, 2017 9:55 pm

Incredible isnt it that the catastrophe is always just over the time horizon and the solution is always more research/money. What about all the previous studies that said variously that the ocean would be frozen, boiling and 8ft over 5th Avenue?

John
December 15, 2017 4:01 am

The more the research grants are threatened, the greater the doomsday predictions.

Bruce Cobb
December 15, 2017 5:29 am

They don’t seem to understand the actual meaning of “snow day”:

In any case, their use of a mythical threat to snow is classic emotionalism. We New Englanders as children love snow, and many maintain that love of snow into adulthood, although it can become somewhat love-hate after the fourth or fifth snowstorm.

Lifewithporpoise
December 15, 2017 9:07 am

What is meant by “climate change could accelerate”? Does it mean more frequent oscillation or greater movement in one direction (presumably warming)?

Matt G
December 16, 2017 7:17 pm

“climate change could accelerate by mid-century”

Right, yet you don’t have a clue why it hasn’t already so you don’t know if it will in future.

Why after nearly 150 years will it accelerate when for 120 years there has been no change?

CO2 is not a magical gas that suddenly effects things many decades later. Increasing CO2 has been going on for too long now to not show all its effect it will ever have.

The basic science that suggests the more CO2 the less effect it has, seems to be ignored when for the agenda science doesn’t matter.

Where is the mechanism and scientific evidence for this?

NONSENSE, sums it up.

The AMO will likely become negative for a few decades before then, causing Arctic sea ice to increase and global temperatures to fall.