From the EUROPEAN GEOSCIENCES UNION and the “climate refugees” department comes this piece of work.
Climate changes triggered immigration to America in the 19th century
In the 19th century, over 5 million Germans moved to North America. It was not only a century of poverty, war and revolutions in what is now Germany, but also of variable climate. Starting at the tail end of the cold period known as the Little Ice Age, the century saw glacier advances in the Alps, and a number of chilly winters and cool summers, as well as other extreme weather events such as droughts and floods.
“Overall, we found that climate indirectly explains up to 20-30% of migration from Southwest Germany to North America in the 19th century,” says Rüdiger Glaser, a professor at the University of Freiburg, Germany, and lead-author of the Climate of the Past study.
The researchers could see a climate signature in most major migration waves from Southwest Germany during the 19th century. “The chain of effects is clearly visible: poor climate conditions lead to low crop yields, rising cereal prices and finally emigration,” says Glaser. “But it is only one piece of the puzzle.”
“Our results show that the influence of climate was marked differently during the different migration waves,” adds Iso Himmelsbach, another of the researchers at the University of Freiburg who took part in the study.
The team studied official migration statistics and population data from the 19th century, as well as weather data, harvest figures and cereal-price records. They focused on the region that is now the Baden-Württemberg state, where many of the migrants – such as Charles Pfizer of pharmaceutical fame – originated from. They started by identifying the major migration waves and then investigated to what extent climate played a role in driving people to North America during each of them.
This is a video summary of the EGU press release, ‘Climate changes triggered immigration to America in the 19th century’. It highlights the main points of the Climate of the Past study entitled ‘Climate of migration? How climate triggered migration from Southwest Germany into North America during the 19th century’.
The first wave followed the eruption of the Tambora volcano in Indonesia in 1815. The volcanic ash and gases spewed into the atmosphere caused temperatures to drop around the world for a few years after the eruption. The ‘year without summer’, 1816, was wet and cold causing widespread crop failures, famine and emigration.
“Another peak-migration year, 1846, had an extremely hot and dry summer leading to bad harvests and high food prices,” says Annette Bösmeier, a researcher at the University of Freiburg who also involved in the study. “These two years of high migration numbers appear to be quite strongly influenced by climate changes, while for other migration waves other circumstances appeared to be more important,” she adds.
Climate was a less significant factor in driving the largest emigration wave, from 1850 to 1855, the researchers found. While unfavourable weather affected crops resulting in low harvests during this time, other factors also drove up food prices. During the Crimean War (1853-1856), for example, France banned food exports, putting pressure on the German grain markets. At the time, the authorities of Baden also paid the poorest people to leave the country in an attempt to prevent uprisings and save on welfare. This, too, drove up emigration numbers.
“Migration in the 19th century was a complex process influenced by multiple factors. Lack of economic perspectives, social pressure, population development, religious and political disputes, warfare, family ties and the promotion of emigration from different sides influenced people’s decision to leave their home country,” concludes Glaser. “Nevertheless, we see clearly that climate was a major factor.”
In the past few years, climate has taken a central stage in migration discussions since future climate change is expected to lead to mass migration (‘climate refugees’), as sea levels rise and extreme weather events, such as floods, droughts and hurricanes, become more frequent. The team hope their study can shed some light on the various factors influencing migration and how important climate can be in triggering mass movements of people.
Study: https://www.clim-past.net/13/1573/2017/
###
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

“It was not only a century of poverty, war and revolutions in what is now Germany”
The years between 1815 and 1914 were actually rather peaceful in Germany, with only a few short wars.
More important: population increase in Germany, while population numbers in France remained flat.
Germany did not have an important number of colonies like France, Britain or the Netherlands.
Germany is a relatively cool country. If it warms in coming years, I suppose the European Geosciences Union should predict a reverse migration. Then of course the German migration could have been caused by political and religious oppression (Lutherans vs Catholics), warring among the many German principalities during the time of maximum emigration, the class system of all European countries of the time that denied ordinary people reasonable jobs, land, and liberty and probably lots of other political and cultural reasons. At least, that is what my German family members told me. No one ever told me it was because of bad weather.
A lot of Germans came here to avoid the Kaiser and Bismarck’s draft, before and after the unification of the German Empire under Prussia.
Previously, German immigrants were often socialists and communists fleeing the aftermath of the failed revolutions of 1848. The Union army was riddled with communists, including some prominent German generals. Marx himself reported on the war.
Irish refugees from the potato famine and British suppression of revolts served on both sides in the American War of Southern Secession (not technically a civil war).
Also known as “The War of Northern Aggression.”
Many others also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_the_American_Civil_War
I don’t like “War Between the States”, which only works grammatically if “States” refers to the United States of America v. the Confederate States of America.
I know a lot of people who favor “The War of Northern Aggression”.
Lincoln could easily have avoided war by withdrawing Union troops from Ft. Sumter, as had already been done at other coastal defenses in the South. But he wanted the war. Had he not called for 75,000 volunteers to invade and subdue the seceded states, previously unseceded Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Arkansas wouldn’t have joined those which had already voted to leave the Union before Ft. Sumter. Lincoln suckered the fire-breathing South Carolinian secessionists into firing the first shot.
Oh my God. Calling Lincoln’s declining to walk away from a federal fort “aggression” is an abuse of the language.
The confederacy was never accepred internationally, had little industry, little rail, a morally bankrupt position, and terrible finances.
It was a violent rebellion led by hotheads and led to tragedy after tragedy.
It still pollutes our nation today.
That may well be perfectly valid analysis. Global cooling would reduce crops yields worldwide, and probably more in poorer areas than in richer. Global warming would of course cause crop yields to increase, and thus reduce immigration.
So, according to the Alarmists, if only the weather and climate had been a bit warmer, the immigrants would have all stayed at home and been happy and participated in peaceful society. Thus Global Warming causes a peaceful society.
Yeah, and the current migration to Australia is because people are desperate to get away from all that hot climate in Europe….
Cut and pasted from…
http://www.pascalbonenfant.com/18c/weather.html
BLIGHT & CROP FAILURE ACROSS EUROPE
1. Notably cold weather July to September. The summer of 1845 (June, July & August) had a mean CET=14.2degC, around a degree below the all-series mean. Specifically, August 1845 was over 2 degC colder than average. This summer was part of a run of poor such seasons from 1843 to 1845, with significantly below average temperatures using the CET series.
2. Persistent / often heavy rains over Ireland accompanied by depressed temperatures during the second half of the summer, precipitated the start of a great famine. The failure was caused by rotting of the potato (a staple food for poor families in the island) in the ground – the weather conditions (cold / damp) being ideal for spread of the spores which caused the Blight. By October of 1845, there had been a total collapse of the Irish potato source. The situation was made worse because of the failure of the corn harvest in Britain and western Europe, and the indifference of both the government in Westminster [ Ireland was at this time part of the United Kingdom ] & of the land-owners, many of whom were English, or Anglo-Irish.
Lots of “events” have happened in history.
Lots of complex causes.
Emigration to the US in the the 19th century. Lots of complex causes. Desire for freedom? A new start? “The Law” was after them? The Irish potato blight?
Lot’s of “dots” sprinkle history.
This tries to simplify histrory’s events, “dots”, into the kid’s game of “connect the dots” to spell out (man-made) “Climate Change!”
one of the editors from that rag publisher is a PAGES loser . ugh
Guaranteed any old crap that says climate change is real, no matter how ludicrous, will get published
PAGES are nothing but hockeystick generators
Interesting. So the Climate Change attacked Southwest Germany, but if you moved to America, all was fine. Hmmmm…
The German’s moved to escape the “Little Ice Age” to…….Wisconsin?!
Yep, and millions of Italians emigrated to Canada.
There are thousands of true climate refugees in the US…. Canadians going to Florida and Phoenix for the winter….
More fake news or deliberate falsehood?
Possibly the climate refugees left Europe because of cold weather between 1778 and 1885. The abrupt cold began around 1878 and recovery from the cold began in 1885.
https://tinyurl.com/zgnvj6m
Northern Hemisphere (NH) temperature recovered to “normal” about 1900, after which the NH continued to warm until about 1942 when the NH reached about the same level as in 1984 After about 1942 the NH began to cool again.
Study:
Some Considerations Relevant to Computing Average Hemispheric Temperature Anomalies, S. L. Grotch (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California)
Monthly Weather Review (MWR), American Meteorological Society (AMS)
https://tinyurl.com/yb2ak5up
Published online on 1 July, 1987. Data from Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK
See discussion of Stanley Grotch’s paper in the Youtubevideo:
Global Warming, Lysenkoism, Eugenics by Prof Richard Lindzen, at 30:37.
URL: https://tinyurl.com/gpldg5f
Discussion of this paper based on mention by Richard Lindzen presentation
https://tinyurl.com/h3kjeew
The publication in an obscure minor journal of the AMS effectively buried Grotch’s paper until Richard Lindzen displayed his graph of CRU temperature in his lecture,
To report this study (as has been done elsewhere) without mentioning that it was Northern Hemisphere COOLING that was the driver of emigration would be downright misleading.
But was it climate change or merely the result of fluctuations cause by the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and together with a very strong Ls Nina from about 1980?
The AMO cycle would be about 60 years from peak to peak, 1880, 1940, 2000. We might expect the trough around 2030 and another peak around 2060. Some people reading this might experience both.
Climate of migration? How climate triggered migration from southwest Germany to North America during the 19th century, Rüdiger Glaser, Iso Himmelsbach, and Annette Bösmeier, Physical Geography, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
“The century investigated was in general characterized by the Little Ice Age with three distinct cooling periods, causing major glacier advances in the alpine regions and numerous climatic extremes such as major floods, droughts and severe winter.”
https://tinyurl.com/yafrfna3
The following is the correct URL for Stanley Grotch’s paper:
Some Considerations Relevant to Computing Average Hemispheric Temperature Anomalies
S. L. Grotch Published online on 1 July, 1987.
https://tinyurl.com/y75z8n82
Their countryman Eduard Bruckner got there first in 1915: ” The settlement of the US as controlled by climate and climatic oscillations”
As were the Goths, Ostragoths, Vandals, & Huns ‘climate refugees’ the migration was triggered by the end of the ‘Roman Warm Period’ when tribes north of the Goths/Germanic pushed into Goth/Germanic territory because of crop & game failures further north.
And obviously that could have been avoided if only they would have used renewables and electric cars.
I guess if you stretch the definition enough almost anyone becomes a “climate refugee”, and this is then politicized in order to gain money, influence and moral points.
“I moved here partly because I like the weather more”
“So you are a climate refugee!”
The problem seems to be that if this happened before any major CO2 emissions, how can we be sure that it’s manmade? Doesn’t this mean that nature does this stuff all the time and the best thing we can do is to prepare for them with adaptation, and not by sacrificing our wealth which ironically means we would be more vulnerable to nature? Unfortunately many greens have come to worship the Mother Nature as a goddess who apparently never does anything bad. The climate was 100% perfect and everyone lived in a disney land until evil humies came and ruined everything. Of course nature made us humans too, but you know, details…
Pretty weak article!
What about the early 18th century German climate refugees, from the Great Frost of 1709, toward the end of the Maunder Minimum, in the depths of the LIA?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Palatines