Miniaturized weather satellites?

CubeSat to Test Miniaturized Weather Satellite

From NASA Goddard SpaceFlight Center – Behind every weather forecast—from your local, five-day prediction to a late-breaking hurricane track update—are the satellites that make them possible. Government agencies depend on observations from weather satellites to inform forecast models that help us prepare for approaching storms and identify areas that need evacuating or emergency first responders. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Elizabeth Willaman (Willaman Creative): Lead Producer Andrea S. Martin (SGT): Producer Kerri Cahoy (MIT)

Weather satellites have traditionally been large, both in the effort needed to build them and in actual size. They can take several years to build and can be as big as a small school bus. But all of that could change in the future with the help of a shoebox-sized satellite that will start orbiting Earth later this month.

The NASA-funded CubeSat, called Microwave Radiometer Technology Acceleration (MiRaTA), will be launched into Earth’s orbit from the rocket carrying the next big U.S. weather satellite (NOAA’s JPSS-1) into space. MiRaTA is designed to demonstrate that a small satellite can carry instrument technology that’s capable of reducing the cost and size of future weather satellites and has the potential to routinely collect reliable weather data.

Microwave radiometers are one of the workhorse instruments aboard today’s weather satellites. These sensitive instruments measure radio frequency signals related to the thermal radiation emitted by atmospheric gases, such as molecular oxygen and water vapor, and also detect particles such as cloud ice. These data are key inputs for models that track storms and other weather events. Calibrating these radiometers is important for keeping them from drifting so their data can be used for accurate weather and climate models. Therefore, a calibration target is usually included in the satellite to help the radiometer maintain its accuracy.

Miniaturizing microwave radiometer instruments to fit on a CubeSat leads to the challenge of finding a calibration instrument that is not only accurate but also compact, said Kerri Cahoy, principal investigator for MiRaTA and an associate professor in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “You don’t have room for the bulky calibration targets that you would normally use on larger satellites,” Cahoy said. “Microwave radiometer calibration targets on larger satellites can be the size of a toaster, but for CubeSats, it would have to be the size of a deck of cards.”

Cahoy and her colleague William Blackwell, the microwave radiometer instrument lead at MIT Lincoln Laboratory, have come up with a solution based on a technique she studied in graduate school called radio occultation (RO), whereby radio signals received from GPS satellites in a higher orbit are used to measure the temperature of the same volume of atmosphere that the radiometer is viewing. The GPS-RO temperature measurement can then be used for calibrating the radiometer.

“In physics class, you learn that a pencil submerged in water looks like it’s broken in half because light bends differently in the water than in the air,” Cahoy said. “Radio waves are like light in that they refract when they go through changing densities of air, and we can use the magnitude of the refraction to calculate the temperature of the surrounding atmosphere with near-perfect accuracy and use this to calibrate a radiometer.”

In 2012 NASA’s In-Space Validation of Earth Science Technologies (InVEST) program issued a request for technology demonstration proposals, which prompted Blackwell and Cahoy, who was then teaching at MIT, put their theory to the test by offering a project to Cahoy’s students in her sensors and instrumentation class to determine if the idea was feasible. When two students demonstrated through computer modeling that radio occultation could indeed function for radiometer calibration, Cahoy and Blackwell asked The Aerospace Corporation’s Rebecca Bishop, who has developed GPS-RO receivers for CubeSats, to join the team. They then submitted a full proposal for MiRaTA to NASA, which gave the greenlight for funding in the spring of 2013.

Building MiRaTA was a team effort. Bishop modified an off-the-shelf, low-cost GPS receiver to make the radio occultation measurements for calibration; MIT Lincoln Laboratory and University of Massachusetts Amherst applied their engineering skills to further miniaturize the microwave radiometer; and Cahoy and her student team, guided by expert mentors at MIT Lincoln, built the satellite that would house everything.

“Building a CubeSat can be hard because you have to put batteries, a radio, a computer, your instruments, wheels that you spin to tip and turn your satellite, and folded solar panels and antennas all into a very small space,” Cahoy said. “And you’re using the space equivalent of scotch tape and super glue to constrain this mess of wires and connectors and get it into its housing.

“But,” Cahoy added, “the hard work will really pay off in great science data if it all goes as planned.”

In the best-case scenario, three weeks after launch MiRaTA will be fully operational, and within three months the team will have obtained validation data from both the radiometer and the GPS receiver. The big goal for the mission–declaring the technology demonstration a success–would be confirmed a bit farther down the road, at least half a year away, following the data analysis.

If MiRaTA’s technology validation is successful, Cahoy said she envisions an eventual constellation of these CubeSats orbiting the entire Earth, taking snapshots of the state of the atmosphere and weather every 15 minutes–frequent enough to track storms, from blizzards to hurricanes, in real time. “Our goal is to have our radiometers perform just as well as those on current weather satellites and be able to provide the kind of data that helps agencies and people in the path of a natural disaster prepare early and wisely,” she said.

“This is a very exciting mission as it will be the first on-orbit demonstration of an all-weather, three-frequency radiometer CubeSat using atmospheric GPS-RO-based calibration,” said NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Charles Norton, a program associate in NASA’s Earth Science Technology Office (ESTO) and the task manager for MiRaTA. “It’s a true testament to the creativity and innovation of the teams involved that they’re advancing measurement technologies for future small satellite constellation missions,” he said, while adding that Utah State University’s Space Dynamics Laboratory and NASA Wallops Flight Facility are supporting ground station and mission operations for the CubeSat.

MiRaTA and other Earth science InVEST missions are funded and managed by NASA’s ESTO program in NASA’s Earth Science Division. ESTO supports technologists at NASA centers, industry and academia to develop, refine and demonstrate new methods for observing Earth from space, from information systems to new components and instruments.

Small satellites, including CubeSats, are playing an increasingly larger role in exploration, technology demonstration, scientific research and educational investigations at NASA, including: planetary space exploration; Earth observations; fundamental Earth and space science; and developing precursor science instruments like cutting-edge laser communications, satellite-to-satellite communications and autonomous movement capabilities.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 10, 2017 7:39 am

“your local, five-day prediction”

I’d be happy with an accurate two day weather forecast. Name another career where you can be wrong 50% of the time and still keep your job?

Reply to  ScienceABC123
November 10, 2017 7:53 am

Name another career where you can be wrong 50% of the time and still keep your job?

Horse racing odds-maker.
Not all science is “climate science”, a lot of good stuff gets done in other areas by way of hard work.

Reply to  TonyL
November 10, 2017 4:19 pm

Odds making is a science, with some art.
If the bookie profits, the odds maker keeps his job.
My lad did this for about eight years.

I’ve done it for – much simpler – closed races, and that is basic arithmetic.

For ‘real’ races, where the favourite [UK Spelling], could stumble, say, the bookie looks at the net profit (or, rarely) loss for a meeting, or season.

Getting one real race wrong is – emphatically – not a job-losing event.


Reply to  ScienceABC123
November 11, 2017 5:48 pm

If you can hit .400 in major league baseball, you will become a millionaire.

November 10, 2017 8:44 am

This seems to be another of those interesting but not particularly useful NASA boondoggles. As is evident from here in hurricane country, we do not lack for space based weather inputs. An explanation of how a bunch of CubeSats could improve the numerical weather forecast models is utterly lacking. Until that assertion has meat on the bone, I will remain dubious about the utility of this science.

Reply to  ristvan
November 10, 2017 9:21 am

IOW, the more complete 3D view of the atmosphere, the more accurate the model initialization, the better the forecast. I would think nadir sounding would be much more precise than limb sounding and nadir sounding is already done by both polar & geostationary satellites. Too bad the planned hyperspectral sounder instrument didn’t make it on the new GOES-R series.

Jeff in Calgary
Reply to  ristvan
November 10, 2017 1:36 pm

ristvan, I agree. I was in Orlando for hurricane Irma, and they forecast was so poor, even during the Sunday the hurricane went through Florida.

Don K
Reply to  ristvan
November 10, 2017 2:00 pm

The big advantage I see to CubeSats is that they are cheap. In principle, you can load a bunch of different CubeSats onto every launch that has a bit of unused capacity and quit having to worry so much about the long term impact of a billion dollar multipurpose satellite ending up in the South Atlantic when something goes wrong during launch.

Other than that, they are cute.

Drawback — a bit more spacejunk.

Don K
Reply to  Don K
November 11, 2017 5:12 pm

After thinking a bit, I’m more skeptical of the utility of CubeSats for serious work than I was initially. There’s a bunch of challenging problems. How do you keep the satellite pointed ‘down’ with minimum mass,space,power to work with? You can’t realistically do station keeping? Can existing tracking/commanding/ground telemetry resources handle a bunch of these things? You’re limited to passive observation (i.e. no Radar Altimetry or Microwave Sounding?).

Still. They may well be useful for some missions today. And every decade, we’re able to jam more capability and less power consumption into less and less space.

Don K
Reply to  Don K
November 11, 2017 5:22 pm

Ooops. MSUs are passive instruments. At least conceptually, one could put an MSU into a CubeSat. I think.

Reply to  ristvan
November 10, 2017 4:57 pm

“An explanation of how a bunch of CubeSats could improve the numerical weather forecast models is utterly lacking”

It’s pretty obvious.

November 10, 2017 10:11 am

I’ll be happy if small weather sats can provide enough data for weather forecasting and save money through bigger, multimillion weather sats.

Neither one is going to solve the global warming problem, including whether or not there is any.

November 10, 2017 4:57 pm

My concern is resolution. Imaging cube sats are good for 3 to 5 meter resolution. However, the satellites going the 30 cm resolution are the size of an SUV and have a 110 cm mirror pointed down at us.

November 10, 2017 5:56 pm

So what do we have up there already…..a few $trillion?

…and that hasn’t ‘improved’ forecasting one bit

More space junk is not going to improve anything……they need to learn from what they have already

Reply to  Latitude
November 10, 2017 7:33 pm

More better data. Data good.

Reply to  Steven Mosher
November 11, 2017 4:34 am

no where does it say better…….it says a different way of getting the same thing

F. Leghorn
November 10, 2017 6:23 pm

Seems to me that the more eyes the better, as far as science is concerned. And when my tax dollars are involved less is more.

November 11, 2017 12:45 pm

This is a positive development.
Would such cube-sats be able to communicate with eachother, and in so doing improve their calibration and data processing? Like an intelligent swarm?

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights