Guest post by David Middleton
I didn’t realize this was “Apocalypse Week”….
Nasa’s ambitious plan to save Earth from a supervolcano
With an eruption brewing, it may be the only way to prevent the extinction of the human race.
17 August 2017
Lying beneath the tranquil settings of Yellowstone National Park in the US lies an enormous magma chamber. It’s responsible for the geysers and hot springs that define the area, but for scientists at Nasa, it’s also one of the greatest natural threats to human civilisation as we know it: a potential supervolcano.
Following an article we published about supervolcanoes last month, a group of Nasa researchers got in touch to share a report previously unseen outside the space agency about the threat – and what could be done about it.
“I was a member of the Nasa Advisory Council on Planetary Defense which studied ways for Nasa to defend the planet from asteroids and comets,” explains Brian Wilcox of Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) at the California Institute of Technology. “I came to the conclusion during that study that the supervolcano threat is substantially greater than the asteroid or comet threat.”
[…]
Notes to the Beeb:
- It’s NASA, not Nasa.
- Civilization has a “z” in it.
- Yellowstone is a supervolcano, not a potential supervolcano.
If “the supervolcano threat is substantially greater than the asteroid or comet threat,” does this mean we can stop fretting about Gorebal Warming and the Sixth Mass Extinction? Is NASA really moving on to actual threats to the planet? Well, not threats to the planet… The planet has handled supervolcanoes, asteroids and comets quite well over its 4.5 billion year lifespan.
I’ll rephrase the question: Is NASA actually taking on genuine threats to humanity? Or at least threats to these United States? Let’s return to the article and find out…
READ MORE:
- Would a supervolcano wipe us out?
- The greatest threats to humanity as we know it
- The atomic bomb too big to use
There are around 20 known supervolcanoes on Earth, with major eruptions occurring on average once every 100,000 years. One of the greatest threats an eruption may pose is thought to be starvation, with a prolonged volcanic winter potentially prohibiting civilisation from having enough food for the current population. In 2012, the United Nations estimated that food reserves worldwide would last 74 days.
[…]
That’s “funny.” One of the “solutions” proposed for Gorebal Warming is geoengineering a volcanic winter by pumping sulfate aerosols into the upper atmosphere. Maybe we just need to ramp up GHG emissions now, so that when Yellowstone does pop off another Ultra-Plinian eruption, Earth will be warm enough to handle a volcanic winter. A more pertinent concern is how we’ll handle having much of our nation covered with volcanic ash…


As bad as the eruption and lava flows would be, the tephra deposition would be even worse.
From Mastin et al., 2014: “Table 3. Average, Maximum, and Minimum Deposit Thicknesses at Selected Cities, From Simulations Illustrated in Figures 6-8a”
| City | Distance km | Longitude | Latitude | Thickness (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Minimum | Maximum | ||||
|
||||||
| Albuquerque | 1091 | −106.61 | 35.111 | 24.9 | 4.1 | 73.9 |
| Atlanta | 2556 | −84.387 | 33.748 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 6.5 |
| Austin | 1942 | −97.743 | 30.267 | 2 | 0.1 | 4.2 |
| Billings | 227 | −108.501 | 45.783 | 1429.5 | 1028.7 | 1785.6 |
| Boise | 452 | −116.215 | 43.619 | 144.8 | 26.9 | 347.9 |
| Calgary | 777 | −114.058 | 51.045 | 32.8 | 1.8 | 68.2 |
| Casper | 391 | −106.313 | 42.867 | 516.9 | 325.9 | 844.3 |
| Cheyenne | 600 | −104.82 | 41.14 | 152.9 | 96.3 | 274.4 |
| Chicago | 1887 | −87.63 | 41.877 | 14.9 | 5.5 | 29.4 |
| Denver | 700 | −104.985 | 39.737 | 98.1 | 63.6 | 131.9 |
| Des Moines | 1420 | −93.609 | 41.601 | 40 | 19.9 | 59.6 |
| Fargo | 1111 | −96.789 | 46.877 | 57.7 | 22.9 | 78.6 |
| Flagstaff | 1028 | −111.639 | 35.201 | 16.3 | 0 | 50.6 |
| Kansas City | 1454 | −94.621 | 39.114 | 31.7 | 7 | 57.2 |
| Knoxville | 2455 | −83.92 | 35.96 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 10.5 |
| Lincoln | 1211 | −96.682 | 40.807 | 52.9 | 22.6 | 88.5 |
| Little Rock | 1905 | −92.289 | 34.746 | 8.4 | 1.6 | 25.2 |
| Los Angeles | 1323 | −118.244 | 34.052 | 5.2 | 0 | 27 |
| Miami | 3453 | −80.226 | 25.788 | 0.5 | 0 | 1.7 |
| Minneapolis | 1374 | −93.267 | 44.983 | 39.2 | 23.2 | 53.5 |
| Missoula | 375 | −114.019 | 46.86 | 240.6 | 48 | 474.4 |
| Mobile | 2508 | −88.043 | 30.694 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 3.9 |
| New York | 3025 | −74.004 | 40.714 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 3.7 |
| Portland | 950 | −122.676 | 45.523 | 8.3 | 0 | 30.6 |
| Raleigh | 2884 | −78.639 | 35.772 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 4.5 |
| Rapid City | 593 | −103.231 | 44.08 | 208.3 | 168.2 | 330.2 |
| St. Louis | 1819 | −90.199 | 38.627 | 15.3 | 3 | 32.5 |
| Salt Lake City | 419 | −111.891 | 40.761 | 247.9 | 124.9 | 408.3 |
| San Francisco | 1229 | −122.419 | 37.775 | 8.5 | 0 | 44.7 |
| Seattle | 966 | −122.332 | 47.606 | 9.2 | 0 | 41.2 |
| Toronto | 2498 | −79.383 | 43.653 | 3.7 | 2 | 6.2 |
| Washington DC | 2855 | −77.036 | 38.907 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 4.4 |
| Winnipeg | 1188 | −97.137 | 49.899 | 37.9 | 14.3 | 59.1 |
A Plinian or Ultra-Plinian eruption of Yellowstone would be really bad.

So… How does NASA plan to save us from this? Back to the Beeb:
When Nasa scientists came to consider the problem, they found that the most logical solution could simply be to cool a supervolcano down. A volcano the size of Yellowstone is essentially a gigantic heat generator, equivalent to six industrial power plants. Yellowstone currently leaks about 60-70% of the heat coming up from below into the atmosphere, via water which seeps into the magma chamber through cracks. The remainder builds up inside the magma, enabling it to dissolve more and more volatile gases and surrounding rocks. Once this heat reaches a certain threshold, then an explosive eruption is inevitable.
But if more of the heat could be extracted, then the supervolcano would never erupt. Nasa estimates that if a 35% increase in heat transfer could be achieved from its magma chamber, Yellowstone would no longer pose a threat. The only question is how?
[…]
Instead Nasa have conceived a very different plan. They believe the most viable solution could be to drill up to 10km down into the supervolcano, and pump down water at high pressure. The circulating water would return at a temperature of around 350C (662F), thus slowly day by day extracting heat from the volcano. And while such a project would come at an estimated cost of around $3.46bn (£2.69bn), it comes with an enticing catch which could convince politicians to make the investment.
“Yellowstone currently leaks around 6GW in heat,” Wilcox says. “Through drilling in this way, it could be used to create a geothermal plant, which generates electric power at extremely competitive prices of around $0.10/kWh. You would have to give the geothermal companies incentives to drill somewhat deeper and use hotter water than they usually would, but you would pay back your initial investment, and get electricity which can power the surrounding area for a period of potentially tens of thousands of years. And the long-term benefit is that you prevent a future supervolcano eruption which would devastate humanity.”
[…]
Sounds like a win-win! Save humanity from both Yellowstone and from solar power!
So… What’s the catch?
But drilling into a supervolcano does not come without certain risks. Namely triggering the eruption you’re intending to prevent.
“The most important thing with this is to do no harm,” Wilcox says. “If you drill into the top of the magma chamber and try and cool it from there, this would be very risky. This could make the cap over the magma chamber more brittle and prone to fracture. And you might trigger the release of harmful volatile gases in the magma at the top of the chamber which would otherwise not be released.”
So… NASA proposes to drill these geothermal wells under the magma chamber and extract the heat from below. Sounds like they need to hire the world’s best “deep core drillers”… Again…
Instead, the idea is to drill in from the supervolcano from the lower sides, starting outside the boundaries of Yellowstone National Park, and extracting the heat from the underside of the magma chamber. “This way you’re preventing the heat coming up from below from ever reaching the top of the chamber which is where the real threat arises,” Wilcox says.
However those who instigate such a project will never see it to completion, or even have an idea whether it might be successful within their lifetime. Cooling Yellowstone in this manner would happen at a rate of one metre a year, taking of the order of tens of thousands of years until just cold rock was left. Although Yellowstone’s magma chamber would not need to be frozen solid to reach the point where it no longer posed a threat, there would be no guarantee that the endeavour would ultimately be successful for at least hundreds and possibly thousands of years.
[…]
Such a plan could be potentially applied to every active supervolcano on the planet, and Nasa’s scientists are hoping that their blueprints will encourage more practical scientific discussion and debate for tackling the threat.
[…]
It’s “meter,” not metre and there’s no “u” in endeavor… And such a plan might not cool the magma chamber at all…

The lower part of the magma chamber is about 10 miles deep. The magma reservoir goes down to the top of the mantle (~30 miles deep). The deepest geothermal well drilled to date, only goes down a bit over 3 miles.
Iceland is drilling the world’s deepest geothermal well
By Kesavan Unnikrishnan Jan 22, 2017 in Technology
Iceland is digging world’s deepest geothermal borehole into the heart of a volcano at a depth of 3.10 miles (5 km) to tap renewable energy. The extreme pressure and heat at such depths could derive 30 to 50 MW of electricity from one geothermal well.
[…]
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/tech-and-science/technology/iceland-is-drilling-the-world-s-hottest-geothermal-well/article/484178#ixzz4q6rLq5Xs
10 miles is 52,800 feet. The deepest well ever drilled for any reason, the Kola Superdeep Borehole in Russia, only went down 40,230 feet. Prior to this, the deepest well was the 31,441 feet deep Lone Star Producing Co. 1–27 Bertha Rogers well in Washita County, Oklahoma. In a note of totally unrelated trivia: Lone Star Producing became Enserch Exploration, my first employer in the oil “bidness.” The Bertha Rogers TD’ed (reached total depth) in molten sulfur. Enserch’s executives all had sulfur paperweights from the Bertha Rogers.
While I am happy to find out that at least some folks at NASA are actually considering genuine threats to this nation and the other people on this planet… Their proposed solution to the supervolcano threat appears to be straight out of Fantasy Land.
Note: Yes, I know the BBC is British and that we are “two peoples separated by a common language.” I just like poking fun at the way they misspell so many words.
Reference
[1] Mastin L. G. Van Eaton A. R. Lowenstern J. B. (2014). Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 15, 3459–3475.
Further Reading
[1] Kummer, Larry (2017). Geologists warn us about dangerous volcanoes. Will we spend pennies for warnings? Watts Up With That?
I get really nervous about letting a government agency drill anything designed to ‘fix’ a problem.
Here in Colorado the EPA decided to save us from the Gold King Mine toxins with a little drilling project.
It triggered a true catastrophe, the very thing we wanted to avoid.
My suggestion is for these agencies to eat a few more donuts and file some memos for their bosses and wait for retirement.
You say you are writing in America,.Mr Middleton. But the internet is not in America.,!
English is spoken in the Commonwealth but American is only spoken on the television here. And a lot of it is foul language. It has degenerated under the influence of Hollywood. An American institution!
The Internet is an American invention…
https://youtu.be/BnFJ8cHAlco
😆
BBC uses their own style guide, similar to Guardian and Observer, I believe
“However, our style is to use lower case with an initial cap for acronyms, where you would normally pronounce the set of letters as a word (eg Aids, Farc, Eta, Nafta, Nasa, Opec, Apec).” http://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/journalism/news-style-guide/article/art20130702112133530
The critique on the “z” of civilization and the definition of supervolcano here simply refers to a potential *eruption* which is a valid way of using it.
Not a good start for any article to show uninformedness on both style and substance right off the bat!
My facetious sarcasm regarding British bastardizarion of the English language notwithstanding… Yellowstone is not a *potential* supervolcano. It is, by definition, an actual supervolcano.
https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/yellowstone/yellowstone_sub_page_49.html
Maybe the Beeb should have consulted with the USGS instead of NASA.
Yep. Old Faithful is still pretty faithful too. Stood for 45 minutes to get some pics of her blowing. New “mud volcanos” and geysers still appear at times and there have been some more active than usual “earth quake swarms” (really tremors) there recently.
http://quake.utah.edu/press/yellowstone-swarm-continues-with-m-3-6-felt-near-west-yellowstone-mt
The lake is still continuing to tilt due to uplift. The smell of Sulphur abounds in various areas.
” I just like poking fun at the way they misspell so many words”
How about pronunciation? Have you noticed that they pronounce Jaguar as “Jag-you-are?” And Nicaragua comes out as “Nick-are-agh-you-ah”
And then there’s al-you-minium, instead of aluminum… 😆
Thankfully, the recent proliferation of subtitles has opened up a whole new world of British Television entertainment.
All started when them there Britains tried, and darn nearly succeeded, to control all the trade worldwide. From the start of British colonialism as early as the 16th Century, it gathered speed and momentum between the 18th and 20th Century, spreadin’ the Anglish language and acquiring new words, meanings, and grammatical forms along the way.
The English colonization of North America had begun as early as 1600. Jamestown, Virginia was founded in 1607, and the Pilgrim Fathers settled in Plymouth, Massachusetts in 1620. The first settlers were, then, contemporaries of Shakespeare (1564-1616), Bacon (1561-1626) and Donne (1572-1631), and would have spoken a similar dialect. However the French, Spanish, Dutch and American native were also there and they influenced the language at every pow-wow they had….
For more see — http://thehistoryofenglish.com/history_late_modern.html
One lesser known finding from the research is the transfer of government powers to Sacramento from DC.
In the US Constitution the “United States” is referred to as “them” and not “it” as well. So the US is a plural entity, but that is another discussion…
Yes, it is a peculiarity of British usage to refer to corporate entities as a plural, as in “General Electric are” rather than “General Electric is”.
These United States of America comprise the union.
To paraphrase Irving Berlin…
But how will cool that other pup?
The one that heats the magma up.
Dang…
How will WE cool the other pup
Notwithstanding Mosher’s critique, I found this article and the thread it generated a very amusing read for an hour this morning.
I consider The Three Stooges and Adam Sandler movies as sophisticated comedy… Hence, my sense of humor is often lost on some people.
I really have nothing to add to this, but one of my favorite movies when I was young was a campy sci-fi thriller, of which this article reminds me.
You will thank God its only a movie…so far.
I’ll throw a cold wet towel on this plan because of something completely pedestrian: legal and political liability. Who would have the courage to undertake an endeavor that might carry a risk of triggering the thing it is supposed to prevent? Human beings are not wired properly to allow themselves to apply logic on the knife-edge of a scale, to come to consensus on two alternatives balanced on a knife-edge. They will not act, and oppose those who do intend to act with everything up to physical violence.
The only credible response to the Yellowstone threat is unfortunately boring and unpopular. It is the same response for asteroid impact (elsewhere) or global nuclear war, or anything that would trigger a climate-changing aerosol event or poisonous fallout: we should prepare to survive a long harsh Winter with as many survivors as possible.
This means directly today, that we must [1] fast-track Energy From Thorium LFTR to power the grid and [2] build a series of underground primary HVDC loops across the continent to feed and interconnect legacy grids, to achieve the specific goal of electricity delivered everywhere, without sunlight or reliance on rail transportation or natural gas pipelines. To survive we must also be prepared to take our animals and plants indoors or underground, to survive cold and particulate extremes. If done right it could be the difference between 50% survival or 5% drawn out death. Harnessing nuclear/Thorium and girding the grid in anticipation of a long Winter is win/win. It revitalizes our infrastructure while presenting the human race with a precious gift, unbounded energy. There is no downside, no perpetual war for remaining fossil fuels, no need to burn wind and solar hipsters for heat or satisfaction.
The language used in the UK is called English, not American.
Therefore you are incorrect with your snark about spelling. Embarrassingly so.
Snark, by definition, can’t be incorrect…
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/snark
Unless it’s politically incorrect.
The Beeb article had a picture of an “Indonesian volcano” erupting. Looked just like the volcano looming out my kitchen window that happens to be Mt. Pinatubo. The Beeb had placed Pinatubo in Indonesia. Close enough for Beeb purposes I guess.
Sounds like the plot for one of those “SY-FY” Channel movies 😀
Loving the ding-dong regarding spelling. A large part of my military service was spent alongside the Yanks and what a pleasure and a privilege it was too. We used to enjoy winding each other up about language trying to bamboozle the ‘other side’ by using obscure words. For some reason, the word my US colleagues found the most hilarious was the British term ‘bloke’ meaning ‘man’.
Great times.
Shag some flies… a common drill in baseball practice. A whole other meaning in the UK.
Confusion also abounded over the use of the word ‘fanny’.
Fanny gets a bum wrap here in the States.
So they think one drill hole would be enough to drain away the heat?
It doesn’t take a genius to see that would be like trying to drain Lake Michigan through a straw.
Studying is what they for a living DC to consume the budget given to them. Accomplishing something in DC is quite another matter and on par with 100 year climate change predictions. You just have to understand that strange budget ecosystem of looking busy and marking time and looking official.