Cooling Deep Oceans – and the Earth’s General Background Temperature

Guest Post by Wim Röst

Introduction

Five million years ago, average temperatures were higher than they are now. During the Pliocene, the era just before the period of the Quaternary Ice Ages, ‘glacials’ did not yet exist because temperatures were too high. As cooling of the deep seas continued, temperatures became that low that large surfaces of the Northern Hemisphere became covered with snow. The earth’s albedo grew fast and large ice sheets started to develop. Only short warm interglacials separated the glacials. The emergence of the interglacials first showed a 41,000-year period (as proposed by Milankovitch) and in the last part of the Quaternary they showed a 100,000-year pattern. A difference that so far is not well understood. Here it is suggested that the continued cooling of deep sea temperatures is the cause of that diminished frequency of interglacials. Colder deep-sea temperatures resulted in lower sea surface temperatures that lowered the atmospheric temperatures. The general background temperature of the Earth became lower and lower, changing climate processes like the glacial – interglacial rhythm. As oceans cooled, atmospheric temperatures lowered and more energy was needed to get out of the glacial state. The extra energy came from combined favourable orbital circumstances, which only happens roughly once in 100,000 years.

5 Million years of ever lower temperatures

As figure 1 shows, during the last 5 million years, deep sea temperatures are falling. This cooling does not seem to be spectacular, deep sea temperatures are going down from an average of plus 2 degrees Celsius to minus 0.25 degrees Celsius, but – as will be argued – this lowering is of the utmost importance for the development of the Earth’s climate. At certain times the lowering of deep sea temperatures is important, even when the lowering is only fractional.

Figure 1: Falling deep ocean temperatures from Pliocene (to the left) into the Pleistocene (to the right in the figure). Time from left to right, in millions of years.

Source

As shown in previous posts, the deep sea is directly connected with the sea surface by a process calledocean upwelling’ sometimes shortened to simply ‘upwelling’. The ever colder deep ocean waters are welling up into the ocean surface layer in large quantities (more than a million cubic kilometres every year). This is a relatively slow process where the cold upwelling waters are warmed by the sun.

But, the lower the starting temperature of the upwelling waters, the colder the surface layer will be. The deep sea cooled more than two degrees Celsius during this period and therefore the sea surface has also cooled.

The world ocean surface comprises 71% of the Earth’s surface and it is generally accepted that the surface (air) temperatures at sea adapt to the temperature of the underlying sea surface water. Therefore, as sea surface waters cool, the atmosphere above 71% of the Earth is cooling. Colder currents will flow to the poles and colder air will be transported to poles and continents, diminishing the warming of those surfaces too. Convection will transport less and colder air upwards. In this way, the colder deep-sea temperatures end up not only in lower sea surface temperatures but also in a colder atmosphere – all other things remaining the same.

Figure 2: Estimate of global surface temperatures from the Pliocene into the Pleistocene, in degrees Celsius. In this figure, we see the same trend in figure 1.

Source

A Deep Sea / Surface temperature Amplifier

It is interesting to see that a two degree C drop in deep sea temperature (figure 1) ends up as a 5 degree C lower surface temperature as shown in figure 2. This is a drop from 17 to 12 degrees Celsius. In this period, we see a large ‘amplification factor’ of around 2.5. A deep-sea temperature that is 0.2°C lower/higher, corresponds with a 0.5°C lower/higher surface temperature. As we shall see, the existence of this ´deep sea / surface temperature amplifier´ is important.

The ‘Earth’s General Background Temperature’

All climate processes on earth are taking place in a setting of a certain background temperature. As argued here, that general background temperature is set by the deep oceans connected with the surface layer that is connected with the atmosphere. The colder deep ocean is the cause of a colder atmosphere. Fluctuations (seasonal, annual, decadal, multidecadal, centennial, millennial) all occur against this ‘background temperature’ of the deep ocean.

The warm deep oceans fifty million years ago had an average temperature of more than 12°C (see figure 3). Those warm oceans created a completely different background temperature than our present deep oceans do. The present average temperature of all our ocean water (inclusive the warm surface layer) is only 3.9°C, the deep oceans themselves are several degrees colder. A difference of around 10°C. Therefore, our present ‘general background temperature’ is very low. Our cold oceans are even allowing glacial periods – that wouldn’t have occurred when the oceans were warmer. Our cold oceans brought us, or perhaps allowed us to have our very cold Pleistocene era. Figure 3.

(Remaining question: what made sea temperatures ending that many degrees lower after 55 million years? More about a possible / probable answer: in future posts)

Figure 3: Estimated deep ocean temperature in the last 65 million years by James Hansen et. al. 2013 Deep sea temperatures were highest 55 million years ago. In the last fifteen million years there is a nearly continuous downward trend.

From here, it is but a small step to find the solution for the 41,000 – 100,000-year problem.

The 41,000 – 100,000-year interglacial problem

During the first period of the Pleistocene interglacials, there was a 41,000-year glacial/interglacial cycle but during the last million years there was only a warmer period once every 100,000 years. See figure 4.

Figure 4: Temperature development in the last five million years according to the Antarctic Vostok Ice Core. The green lines show the 41,000 and the 100,000-year periods in the Pleistocene. The left side of the graph is the warmer Pliocene, the period that was still too warm to permit ice ages.

Source

Milankovitch’ cycles played the dominant role in taking the Earth out of the glacial state. The glacial state is the normal state in the Pleistocene. Eight or nine of every 10 years in the Pleistocene were ‘glacial years’. Very cold. With rough and very changeable weather and climates, as is shown by the high variance in temperaturereflecting frequent and turbulent climate changes.

Javier explains the change in the frequency of interglacials as follows: “The 100 kyr problem is solved because there is no 100 kyr cycle, just a 41 kyr cycle that skips one or two beats.” Italics added.

The question remains: And what causes the skipping of one or two beats?

The answer is: it is the ever lower deep ocean temperature that is translated into ever lower atmospheric temperatures that makes it more difficult to come out of that ever more dominating glacial state. Renee Hannon recently: The past four glacial cycles are increasing in duration from 89 kyrs to 119 kyrs.”

In the end of the period, because of the extreme cold of the deep sea, only the most favourable (combined) orbital conditions allow a glacial to enter the warmer interglacial state, which has more stable temperatures.

Mechanism

The difference between ‘snow’ and ‘water’ might be only one or two tenths of a degree Celsius. A temperature of + 0.1 °C means ‘melt’ and ‘rain’. A temperature of – 0.1 °C means ‘snow’ and ‘ice’.

The above-mentioned amplification factor comes into mind. Deep sea temperatures relate to (surface) air temperatures but with an amplification factor of around 2.5 for surface air. A 0.2 °C lower deep sea temperature is translated into a half degree Celsius lower atmospheric temperature. Therefore, even a difference of less than one tenth of a degree of the temperature of the deep sea can make a substantial difference in the presence of ice and snow over large Northern Hemisphere land areas. Areas that are covered with ice and snow have a much higher albedo. A rising albedo will further cool the Earth.

In this way, at a certain point, a fractional lowering of deep sea temperatures results in enhanced lowering of the Earth surface temperatures. First, because of the deep sea / surface amplification factor, and second, because of the additional ice and snow albedo amplification.

Once more the development of deep sea temperatures: figure 5.

Figure 5: Glacials and falling deep ocean temperatures from Pliocene into the Pleistocene. Glacials developed from a certain low deep ocean temperature. As cooling continued, interglacials switched their cycle from once per 41,000 years to once per 100,000 years. Added in the figure: squares and the corresponding periods below in the figure.

Source

At the start of the Pleistocene, every obliquity cycle resulted in an interglacial. But later in the period the warming effects by obliquity alone were not enough to compensate the effect of the further cooling deep sea. Some help from other factors (eccentricity, precession and possibly non-orbital factors) was needed to reach that warmer and more stable ‘interglacial state’. As Renee Hannon concludes: “During the last 450 kyrs, the five major warm onsets with rapidly increasing temperatures are triggered by increases in the eccentricity, obliquity, and precession of Earth’s orbit. The nearly concurrent increase in these three astronomical forces appears a necessary component for a major warm onset”. Italics added.

The ‘Earth’s General Background Temperature’ continuously went down. The oceans cooled and processes changed.

Holocene

The oceans gained heat content during the Holocene: deep sea temperatures rose. But since the Holocene Optimum the ocean heat uptake showed a diminishing trend. During the Little Ice Age, the oceans even experienced a net loss in heat content. Important, because now we know at what average temperatures the Earth starts cooling her oceans. Figure 6.

Figure 6: Holocene reconstructions of intermediate water temperatures. (C) Changes in Intermediate Water Temperatures (IWT) at 500 m, and (D) changes in IWT at 600 to 900 m. All anomalies are calculated relative to the temperature at 1850 to 1880 CE. Shaded bands represent T1 SD. Note the different temperature scales. Source: Rosenthal et al.

Future

Only when the trend of continuously falling deep sea temperatures ends, the Earth will continue to be able to get out of a next glacial state. But, if this ever lower deep-sea temperature trend is not changed into a stable or a rising temperature, a ‘constant glacial state’ is what we can expect somewhere in the future.

Then glacials could continue without being interrupted by an interglacial and they could keep the Earth cold for a very long time – millions of years – in a barren glacial state. Which probably will be more severe than our Last Glacial Maximum, because the strong cooling during the glacial trend will not be ended by a warming climate state that could raise the deep-sea temperature to warm the Earth for a longer period.

Perhaps our Pleistocene glacial – interglacial rhythm was just a transition period to a more constant glacial state. The 41,000 → 100,000 trend might indicate such a future.

Conclusions

During the last 15 million years deep sea temperatures were continuously falling. Because of the process of oceanic upwelling the falling deep sea temperatures made sea surface temperatures fall as well. In turn, sea surface temperatures lowered atmospheric temperatures. A small decrease in deep sea temperatures resulted in an amplified surface temperature response. Surface temperatures responded 2.5 times the deep-sea response, such that a 0.2°C cooler deep sea resulted in a 0.5°C cooler surface temperature.

At a certain point, the falling deep sea temperatures resulted in atmospheric temperatures that enabled the development of large scale Northern Hemisphere snow and ice surfaces that increased the albedo of the Earth. That albedo caused a further cooling and resulted in even more snow and ice; another amplifier. Continental ice sheets developed. That was the moment the warm Pliocene terminated and the colder Pleistocene started.

Within the Pleistocene, short warmer and more stable periods – the interglacials – were alternating with glacial periods. During an interglacial the Earth reaches the more favourable ‘normal’ pre-Pleistocene state and is warmer and much more stable. Those interglacials first happened every 41,000 years, but as the deep-sea temperatures (and so atmospheric temperatures) decreased, more favourable orbital circumstances, rather than only increasing obliquity, were needed to get out of the cold glacial climate state. Because of the colder deep oceans during the last part of the Pleistocene the Earth only succeeded every 100,000 years in creating an interglacial.

If the 15-million-year trend of ever decreasing deep sea temperatures is going to continue, somewhere in the future the Earth will not be able to create a next interglacial. Millions of years of a deep and continuing glacial state might be in the future.


With regards to commenting: please adhere to the rules known for this site: quote and react, not personal.

In commenting: please remind you are on an international website: for foreigners, it is difficult to understand abbreviations. Foreigners only understand words and (within the context) easy to guess abbreviations like ’60N’ or ‘SH’.

About the author: Wim Röst studied human geography in Utrecht, the Netherlands. The above is his personal view. He is not connected to firms or foundations nor is he funded by government(s).

Andy May was so kind to read the original text and improve the English where necessary. Thanks Andy!

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
191 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 15, 2017 10:31 am

Wim this is a bit off-topic but does involve warm intrusions into the Arctic Ocean in 1990 -93, 2004-07 below the ice causing a loss of ice. According to the hypothesis changes in the lunar orbit affect gravitational attraction and results in a 72 year cycle which gives two 9 year pulses of warm water under the Arctic Ice causing ice loss. Hope you don’t mind but I thought you might find it interesting as I think it might have some bearing on what you’re working on.
The source on this is former NOAA Meteorologist David Dilly.

If you put this together with the effects of the Sun taking a nap right now it looks as if we may be in for a bit of a double whammy. Assuming the information is correct of course.

BobG
August 15, 2017 11:18 am

I noticed and probably thousands of others have noticed previously the gradual cooling of the oceans and the world. And from that it was an obvious hypothesis that the longer periods between ice ages were due to the gradual cooling of the oceans. Therefore, it takes more energy to bring the world out of the ice age.
What is not obvious though is whether or not the temperature during interglacials will stabilize so that we will remain in the ~ 100k year between interglacials or not or the world will enter into a permanent ice age condition.
One of your conclusions that is not obvious to me is this one: “It is interesting to see that a two degree C drop in deep sea temperature (figure 1) ends up as a 5 degree C lower surface temperature as shown in figure 2. This is a drop from 17 to 12 degrees Celsius. In this period, we see a large ‘amplification factor’ of around 2.5. A deep-sea temperature that is 0.2°C lower/higher, corresponds with a 0.5°C lower/higher surface temperature. As we shall see, the existence of this ´deep sea / surface temperature amplifier´ is important.”
Is the ‘amplification factor’ real and does it exist at all temperature conditions such as the current one in this interglacial? I don’t see any real evidence one way or another in your paper.

Wim Röst
Reply to  BobG
August 15, 2017 5:06 pm

BobG: “Is the ‘amplification factor’ real and does it exist at all temperature conditions such as the current one in this interglacial?”
WR: I must rely on the correctness of the data of figure 1 and 2. If those data are correct, the averages show the amplification factor.
There is a possible explanation for the amplification as well, your question made me think about that. It is an interesting option that could be the correct one. It seems logical. The explanation is the following.
It is easiest to tell what happens as the sea warms. As the deep sea warms with one degree, the amplification factor says the surface is warming with 2.5 degrees. So what could be the reason.
We all know that CO2 is just a minor greenhouse gas. The main greenhouse gas is water vapour. 75-90% of the total greenhouse effect is said to be the result of water vapour. WHERE is that effect visible?
As the surface of the oceans warms, the oceans are evaporating more. The air will contain more water vapour. Because water vapour enhances convection as well, the content of water vapour in the whole atmosphere will raise even more. Water vapour will be brought to greater height and it will be spread better over the whole Earth, especially poleward.
Water vapour is our main greenhouse gas, so extra water vapour MUST add extra temperature to the one degree of sensible heat that already is going to be added by the warmer ocean. And that ‘extra temperature’ will enhance evaporation etc.
When my guess is right than this would be the theoretical base for the amplification factor as observed for the last 5 million years: the effect of our main greenhouse gas ‘water vapour’. I suppose this will be the explanation for at least a part of that amplification factor.

BobG
Reply to  Wim Röst
August 16, 2017 9:05 am

“WR: I must rely on the correctness of the data of figure 1 and 2. If those data are correct, the averages show the amplification factor. ”
The data shows that there is a correlation that could be an amplification factor. But could also be due to something else entirely.
About 2.8 million years ago, the Isthmus of Panama closed changing ocean circulation patterns. Prior to this, the oceans were gradually cooling due to the break up of the super-continent Godwana and due to the drift of the continental plate holding Antarctica to the Southern polar region.

August 15, 2017 1:11 pm

Wim this may be slightly off-topic as it involves warm intrusions into the Arctic Ocean in 1990 -93, 2004-07 below the ice causing a loss of ice. According to the hypothesis changes in the lunar orbit affect gravitational attraction and results in a 72 year cycle which gives two 9 year pulses of warm water under the Arctic Ice causing ice loss.
The point is that, according to the hypothesis, cooling follows these pulses.
The source on this is former NOAA Meteorologist David Dilly.

If you put this together with the effects of the Sun taking a nap right now it looks as if we may be in for a bit of a double whammy. Assuming the hypothesis is correct of course.

Wim Röst
Reply to  Michael Keal
August 15, 2017 5:16 pm

Michael, I don’t know about the 72 year cycle you describe, but I know there have been two massive warm water pulses from the Atlantic into the Arctic basin, that raised the temperature of the intermediate waters below the top layer with one degree. An important degree, when the average temperture was + 2 degree Celsius and after the warm pulses became + 3 °C. The ice melt we have seen might well be caused (for a large part) by this extra oceanic energy. After about ten years the heat of the warm water pulses is released and the effect will be gone. When you are correct that we only have to expect two warm water pulses, cooling indeed can follow in the Arctic.

gary gulrud
August 18, 2017 6:33 pm

A very persuasive presentation of the hypothesis explaining lengthened glaciations during the current regime.
Note that Laki may again be rousing at the outset of a grand minimum.

August 20, 2017 12:37 am

Since no more reaction seems to be coming I assume you accept that upwelling waters do not come from the DEEP oceans.
Leaves two questions I posed a while back unanswered:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/08/13/cooling-deep-oceans-and-the-earths-general-background-temperature/comment-page-1/#comment-2580423
According the GHE the atmosphere increases the surface temperatures some 33K above the 255K Effective temperature. How does that energy travel down to the deep oceans below the permanent thermocline?
Note the deep ocean temperatures are some 15-20K above the 255K the sun is supposedly causing.
(see http://oceanmotion.org/html/background/ocean-vertical-structure.htm
especially

The ocean’s three-layer structure is an example of how gravity separates a fluid into layers such that the density of each layer is less than the density of the layer below it. More dense fluids sink and less dense fluids rise. The ocean’s pycnocline is very stable thus suppressing mixing between the mixed layer and deep layer; that is, the pycnocline acts as a barrier to vertical motion within the ocean.

Furthermore in your text you state

The world ocean surface comprises 71% of the Earth’s surface and it is generally accepted that the surface (air) temperatures at sea adapt to the temperature of the underlying sea surface water.

How does this square with the GHE?

Wim Röst
Reply to  Ben Wouters
August 20, 2017 2:00 am

Ben Wouters: “Since no more reaction seems to be coming I assume you accept that upwelling waters do not come from the DEEP oceans.”
WR: Wrong! I am not obliged to give a reaction. No reaction could also mean that I am busy or that I think I already have spent too mucht time in reacting on statements that missed a good basis.