The March Against Science

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

Well, I wrote about this crazy March For Science idea two months ago, but the story just gets better. Far and away the most insightful comment I’ve read on this goofy idea of marching was from a climate scientist I respect, Dr. Roger Pielke Jr., who said:

The smartest people on the planet want to oppose Trump & the best they can come up with is a march in support of themselves?

Hard to argue with that … but since then there have been two developments.

One was the announcement that the March For Science will be led by none other than Bill Nye the Science Guy. We’ve discussed his wondrous views about science before.

Bill Nye and Partner from DWTS

Of course, this appointment of Bill Nye led to many people pointing and laughing. With all of the distinguished scientists in the country, the idea of picking Bill Nye as the honorary poster boy for the march is hilarious.

But wait, it gets better. In the sadly common Blue-On-Blue violence of identity politics, there’s been a new protest. This protest is not because Bill Nye lacks credibility. Nor is the protest because Bill Nye lacks credentials or cranial horsepower. And the protest is not because Bill Nye lacks support in the scientific community.

Nope.

This protest is because Bill Nye lacks melanin.

Seriously. You can’t possibly make this up. If I were Bill Nye, I’d go straight to the ACLU and get them to file an anti-discrimination lawsuit. What the organizers have done is a criminal offense under the ADA, the Americans with Disabilities Act. It’s clearly against the law to discriminate against the melanin-deficient, that’s just cruel.

It gets better. The protest is not just because Bill Nye lacks melanin. He’s also guilty of being short of another even more important requirement.

Bill Nye lacks that scientific necessity, the vital XX chromosome.

So in the wonderful American non-tradition of everyone getting a Participation Trophy, the March Organizing Committee has added two more “Honorary Co-Poster Children” or some title like that as Co-Leaderpersons of the March. Of course, neither of these new Co-Coordinationizers lacks those vital scientific elements of melanin and XX chromosomes.

Now, please be clear what I’m saying. I’m not dissing the two new Co-Non-Gender-Titled-People in any sense. I’m sure that both of the women named as Honorary Co-Chairpersonages, Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha, the Iraqi-English pediatrician who exposed the Flint lead contamination, and Dr. Lydia Villa-Komaroff, a Hispanic biologist and businesswoman, are good scientists and well-intentioned people.

I’m just pointing out that this is another in the many pieces of evidence that this is a March For Political Correctness, not a March For Science in any sense. Opportunity wasted. Get ready for impassioned speeches from all the extremely scientific co-ordinatrices.

Prepare for impassioned speeches from a bunch of extremely scientific spokesdudes and spokesmodels on how Trump hates water and air, and how spending $ Trillions with a T to cool the earth by 0.1°C in fifty years is a scientifically brilliant plan supported by 97% of all true moral noble and upstanding humanoids everywhere. Amen.

Oh, and if you disagree, think of the grandchildren, because compassion, and besides you’re just a hater and a scientific troglodyte, because 97%.

I put the over/under of someone passing out white lab coats along the march route at 100%.

March for science? … I don’t think so.

A rainy day here, more rain on the way. The forest is happy. The cat is not happy.

Me, I’m overjoyed, and I can only wish the same for you.

w.

PS—When you comment on someone’s ideas, I request that you please QUOTE THE EXACT WORDS YOU ARE REFERRING TO. That way, we can all understand what you are discussing. I can defend my words. I can’t defend your words about my words.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
289 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ted
April 6, 2017 2:15 pm

Non sensical. Bill would be XY not lacking a Y. He would not have a pair of Xs. The women do of course.

Ted
Reply to  Ted
April 6, 2017 2:37 pm

Its still not fixed. 4 lines down… Coordinators should end …melanin and double X chromosomes.

Bryan A
Reply to  Ted
April 6, 2017 8:30 pm

It is a regular March of Crimes

Mark
Reply to  Ted
April 9, 2017 7:24 am

Agreed… This is an important error that destroys the credibility of the author. Needs to be fixed ASAP!!

Mark
Reply to  Ted
April 9, 2017 7:32 am

Ah! Fixed! The old version appeared in my news feed and I reacted! Please feel free to delete my responses 🙂

Fraizer
Reply to  Ted
April 6, 2017 4:15 pm

Correct. Bill does not have a pair.

curly
Reply to  Fraizer
April 6, 2017 6:18 pm

+1000
And you were way ahead of the crowd.

Ben Gunn
Reply to  Fraizer
April 6, 2017 6:58 pm

HAHAHAHA Good one Ted

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Fraizer
April 6, 2017 7:08 pm

Speak up for Bill. Doesn’t mentally handicapped count for something in this popularity contest?

Mickey Reno
Reply to  Fraizer
April 8, 2017 9:26 am

Bill, if he really wanted to lead the march, had many options open. He could just get billy goat stubborn and sue, claiming reverse discrimination. This would have been highly appropriate, as his name is Bill. In the middle of the difficultly scale, he could snip off his package, cut the testicles off and throw them in the trash, and some new silicone breast implants, a very good total body waxing, a beautiful wig, a good waxing, and he could lead the march as an ugly white woman. On the easy end of the scale, he could just change his name to Loretta Dolezal and claim that he’s a cis/trans/xyz black woman, and no one had any right or authority to say otherwise. All the methods have a downside, of course. The reason Bill Nye wouldn’t want to take the easy, surgery free route, is because Loretta Dolezal the Science Guy doesn’t rhyme.

April 6, 2017 2:16 pm

Why doesn’t Nye simply Identify as Black? Problem Solved.

Taphonomic
Reply to  Mike
April 6, 2017 3:52 pm

He could identify as a black, female. And for good measure, a black, female, transgender, lesbian. That should cover all bases.

toorightmate
Reply to  Taphonomic
April 6, 2017 4:11 pm

And carry the Koran.

Joseppe
Reply to  Taphonomic
April 6, 2017 5:37 pm

LGBT? Isn’t that liquor, guns, beer and tater tots?

drednicolson
Reply to  Taphonomic
April 6, 2017 7:13 pm

Rednecks Support L.G.B.T.
(Lots of Guns, Beer, and Trucks)

Reply to  Taphonomic
April 7, 2017 1:32 pm

He might as well include his Native American identification (like gender “We don’t need no stinkin’ birth certificates”).

george e. smith
Reply to  Taphonomic
April 7, 2017 3:26 pm

Nah ! still excludes hermaphrodites.

g

April 6, 2017 2:17 pm

And… wear a skirt?

MarkW
Reply to  Mike
April 6, 2017 2:20 pm

If I were in high school I would tell the administrators that I self identify as a woman so that I can do PE with the girls and shower with them when it’s over.

Joe Crawford
Reply to  MarkW
April 6, 2017 2:46 pm

You might think twice about that shower, especially after a ball game. They can sometimes leave a bigger mess than the guys.

Menicholas
Reply to  MarkW
April 6, 2017 7:31 pm

If I was ever thrown in prison I would become transgender and demand I be put in a women’s prison…then be a lesbian.
That is how real men of genius roll.

Reply to  MarkW
April 6, 2017 8:07 pm
MarkW
Reply to  MarkW
April 7, 2017 8:09 am

Joe; yes, but they look good doing it.

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  MarkW
April 7, 2017 11:22 am

I think high school showers have been abandoned in most districts. This policy gives after gym classes a distinct aroma.

jim heath
Reply to  Mike
April 6, 2017 6:02 pm

You forgot the lisp

Reply to  Mike
April 7, 2017 9:18 am

He has to go full Godfrey Elfwick and identify as a black gender queer atheist Muslim and wear a burka-pussyhat combo.

Dave Fair
Reply to  Nathanael C. Love
April 8, 2017 9:51 am

Please, no micro aggressions. Be PC: That’s vaghat, bro.

Reply to  Mike
April 7, 2017 10:02 am

Or underwear …

MarkW
April 6, 2017 2:18 pm

There was a time when judging someone’s worth by the color of their skin was considered racist.
I guess that we as a society have finally outgrown such nonsense.

The Badger
Reply to  MarkW
April 6, 2017 3:19 pm

Dream on !

Roy
Reply to  MarkW
April 6, 2017 5:20 pm

For shame! Don’t try and expose the ludicrous liberal self-hatred and hypocrisy.

Betapug
Reply to  MarkW
April 6, 2017 5:25 pm

It is still racist Mark but here in the twilight zone the shadows change the landscape. Black is the new black and white is just bad taste.

drednicolson
Reply to  MarkW
April 6, 2017 7:29 pm

Silly rabbit, racism is for white people. ;|

Menicholas
Reply to  drednicolson
April 6, 2017 7:34 pm

It would be funny if a large number of people did not insist it to be true.
Instead, the “Only white people can be racists” meme is in fact the most racist thing I have ever heard in my entire life.

Resourceguy
April 6, 2017 2:20 pm

It’s actually a remake of the movie Ghost Busters in the works.

Roger Dewhurst
April 6, 2017 2:22 pm

Perhaps he could have his testicles removed?

Reply to  Roger Dewhurst
April 6, 2017 2:42 pm

He still has them?

April 6, 2017 2:24 pm

If Bill Nye can identify as a scientist, then Pluto can identify as a planet.

photios
Reply to  Ike Kiefer
April 6, 2017 5:10 pm

,,,or a dawg!

Pop Piasa
Reply to  photios
April 7, 2017 9:28 am

Oh, that Pluto? He’s already more qualified in Nye’s “mickey mouse science”. He was in Fantasia and Nye wasn’t, IIRC.

April 6, 2017 2:30 pm

Another PC Green tantrum to amuse the Deplorables.

PiperPaul
Reply to  ristvan
April 6, 2017 2:59 pm

And of course it will be elevated, amplified and celebrated by the main stream meediots.

gnomish
Reply to  ristvan
April 6, 2017 6:03 pm

say what you will about political correctness, but the coolest troll the skeptic gang ever pulled was the unabomber billboard and we know what happened there. nothing more pc than a guy with pussy cancer.

Menicholas
Reply to  gnomish
April 6, 2017 7:37 pm

Hey, man…I would appreciate a trigger warning the next time to microaggress me to such a macro extent.

April 6, 2017 2:32 pm

I’m an HR Pufnstuf guy myself. Bill Nye has no gravitas. he’s pretty much a girlie Max Headroom

Reply to  Scott Frasier
April 6, 2017 8:49 pm

Please, don’t insult M-m-m-m-ax H-h-h-h-eadroom

PiperPaul
April 6, 2017 2:33 pm

What idiot chose the color blue to represent the leftist party, CNN?

Reply to  PiperPaul
April 6, 2017 2:47 pm

Rumor has it that Tim Russert of NBC set the color convention, or overturned the previous convention, in October 2000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states

Tom Konerman
Reply to  Stephen Rasey
April 6, 2017 3:23 pm

I wonder how long Dave Leips Atlas has been around.
http://uselectionatlas.org/2012.php

Neil Jordan
Reply to  PiperPaul
April 6, 2017 2:49 pm

The color is from the color of the pills that the party members take. Recall blue pill/red pill from Matrix.https://www.google.com/search?q=matrix+pills&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Quote:
“You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” The term redpill refers to a human that is aware of the true nature of the Matrix.

scarletmacaw
Reply to  PiperPaul
April 6, 2017 6:56 pm

Using red to represent the Democrats was hitting too close to home.

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  scarletmacaw
April 7, 2017 11:26 am

That’s the truth.

Roy Spencer
April 6, 2017 2:35 pm

Someday, I’ll also have a white lab coat.

PiperPaul
Reply to  Roy Spencer
April 6, 2017 3:05 pm

I think you might have to graduate from vagina costume first.

PiperPaul
Reply to  PiperPaul
April 6, 2017 3:05 pm

Err, that didn’t come out right, sorry.

Michael 2
Reply to  Roy Spencer
April 6, 2017 3:22 pm

I’ve got my white lab coat, scooter, fart blaster, rubber boots, rubber gloves and welding goggles (Dr. Nefario, “Despicable Me”). The fart blaster is handy on the occasional conference call.

Rick C PE
Reply to  Roy Spencer
April 6, 2017 3:27 pm

I worked in laboratories my entire 40+ year career. The only time I wore a white lab coat was for marketing photos (in 1982 I think).

SMC
Reply to  Roy Spencer
April 6, 2017 6:09 pm

I wore a white coat, once. It didn’t have any sleeves. And my lab had a bouncy floor and walls.

noaaprogrammer
Reply to  SMC
April 6, 2017 8:46 pm

White straight jacket?

MarkW
Reply to  SMC
April 7, 2017 6:30 am

Straight jacket qualifies as a micro aggression.

MarkW
Reply to  Roy Spencer
April 7, 2017 6:29 am

Just make sure it doesn’t have extra long sleeves.

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Roy Spencer
April 7, 2017 11:28 am

I still have my dad’s white coats. All I need is a butterfly net and I can go on the march, too.

Latitude
April 6, 2017 2:38 pm

…do you get a pink hat with that?

Oswald Thake
Reply to  Latitude
April 7, 2017 5:57 am

Er…it’s ‘strait-jacket,’ chaps.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Oswald Thake
April 7, 2017 9:37 am

Details… they always ruin the punchlines.

Gloateus
April 6, 2017 2:41 pm

Shouldn’t the march be led by female polar bears? Or a polar bear and a black bear, for melaninic balance. No doubt CACA has negatively impacted black bears as well. Although more berry bushes one must admit is a good thing.

Steamboat Jon
Reply to  Gloateus
April 6, 2017 4:54 pm

As I understand it, polar bears actually have black skin and the hair is not white but pigment free/transparent (with a hollow structure), the “white” light effect is due to a visible light scattering effect of the hollow hair. So a female polar bear hits two protected classes when applying an anthropomorphic PC viewing angle. (Or is that three protected classes when including their threatened species listing?)

Gloateus
Reply to  Steamboat Jon
April 6, 2017 6:59 pm

You are correct as to polar bear skin. The white hairs conduct photons to the absorbent surface.

Which makes your conclusion correct as well, in the bizarro world of PCism.

Gloateus
Reply to  Steamboat Jon
April 6, 2017 7:00 pm

Especially if she identifies as a male polar bear.

Mumbles McGuirck
Reply to  Steamboat Jon
April 7, 2017 9:39 am

You’ve given me a great idea! Show up at the March for Science dressed as a cuddly polar bear, but then start biting and mauling people. Truth in advertising.

Tom Halla
April 6, 2017 2:41 pm

We have no idea of what Bill Nye’s sexual preference or gender identity is, so he may very well be a representative of those various groupings.

April 6, 2017 2:50 pm

Its just a publicity stunt signifying nothing.

Georg Devrie Klein, PhD, PG, FGSA

gnomish
Reply to  George Devries Klein
April 6, 2017 5:27 pm

let Boston Antifa know! They’ll definitely want to contribute.
i know a guy with 3 X chromosomes tht i’m trying to get him to do a video warning about global warming.
if it works out… lulz

billk
Reply to  gnomish
April 7, 2017 8:18 am

I suppose the “Super Males” are 2 Y’s to join the march.

MarkW
Reply to  gnomish
April 7, 2017 12:52 pm

+97

Perry
Reply to  gnomish
April 7, 2017 10:41 pm

Supermen are XYY & upwards. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XYY_syndrome

Scott
April 6, 2017 2:51 pm

I think the real reason why many people are skeptical about CAGW is because we haven’t seen scientists marching around doing the “Hey Hey. Ho Ho” chant.

I bet if people see a few Phds chanting “Hey Hey. Ho Ho. Climate skepticism has gotta go” the skeptical holdouts and lukewarmers will instantly turn into true believers. Nothing changes minds like chanting marchers. Bank on it.

kokoda - the most deplorable
Reply to  Scott
April 6, 2017 3:35 pm

Awesome

ossqss
April 6, 2017 2:57 pm

comment image

old construction worker
April 6, 2017 3:08 pm

I wonder how many will be “rent a scientist” protester?

MarkW
Reply to  old construction worker
April 7, 2017 6:32 am

97%

Daryl Ritchie
Reply to  MarkW
April 7, 2017 12:51 pm

+97

Pop Piasa
Reply to  old construction worker
April 7, 2017 10:21 am

Gives jobs to the homeless.

Reg Nelson
April 6, 2017 3:12 pm

Slightly O/T. Colin Kaepernick the former San Francisco 49rs’ QB drew a lot of media attention when he refused to stand for the National Anthem last season. He also pledged $100K a month for ten months back to the community.

I checked his foundation website to see how the money was being spent, was surprised to see $17.5K went to 350.org to be used for “People’s Climate Mobilization March. Transportation, food, overnight accommodations, and other hard costs”

http://kaepernick7.com/ck7-january-2017-donations/

LewSkannen
Reply to  Reg Nelson
April 6, 2017 3:20 pm

Has he been selected yet? Might want to claw back some of that cash.

Reg Nelson
Reply to  LewSkannen
April 6, 2017 3:56 pm

No, he opted out of a $17 million dollar contract with the 49er’s, though the team also had the option to release him.

In a way, he has clawed back — his agent has said he won’t be protesting the anthem this year. Of course, because he landed with a team, people are claiming his being black balled, even though RG III and Cutler haven’t been signed any team either.

M Courtney
April 6, 2017 3:15 pm

The new series of Dr Who starts in a week or so.
The new assistant is not merely a woman (done, repeatedly) or black (done, more than once) or even homosexual (done, J Harkness).
The new assistant hits the trifecta; black lesbian.
Of course the soap opera is irrelevant. The science and people matters in science fiction, as in society.
But it raises an interesting question.
Where do we go from here?
Or will there be a reaction?

Reply to  M Courtney
April 7, 2017 10:15 am

Sheep

Pop Piasa
Reply to  M Courtney
April 7, 2017 10:26 am

…And you’d think he’d snazzy up the ol’ TARDIS abit.

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  M Courtney
April 7, 2017 11:33 am

The new, revised Tardis (or Re-Tardis) will be unveiled in 2017 or 2018.

Auto
Reply to  M Courtney
April 7, 2017 1:33 pm

You don’t suppose there is a possibility that Doctor Who’s following companion will be a robot – think Star Wars or Hitchhiker’s Guide – or, fantastically, a person of substantially-enhanced life-experience (‘old’) – or do you?
The fastest growing section of the population, I understand, is the over 100s.
Should be scope for selecting an over-80 . . . .
Needs to be able to climb stairs to evade daleks [unless the flying daleks have purged the others!].

Auto – defiantly under-70 for a good few years yet!

Michael 2
April 6, 2017 3:16 pm

I’m trying to think of something wittier than “LOL” but it hasn’t popped into my mind.

LewSkannen
April 6, 2017 3:18 pm

Lacks cranial horsepower?
I don’t think so.
Bill is as smart as any horse i know.

Paul Penrose
Reply to  LewSkannen
April 6, 2017 3:28 pm

Mr. Ed was smarter. Or at least more entertaining. Wiiiilllllbbbbeeeerrrr!

LewSkannen
Reply to  Paul Penrose
April 6, 2017 3:33 pm

LOL. I knew that someone would bring up Mr Ed! OK. You got me.. Apart from Mr Ed…

PaulH
Reply to  LewSkannen
April 6, 2017 4:20 pm

A day spent with a horse is never wasted. A day with Bill Nye and his cronies, however…

Mumbles McGuirck
Reply to  PaulH
April 7, 2017 9:47 am

Depends if you like your ‘road apples’ the physical ones or philosophical ones. They both stink but the former are easier to clean up after.

Curious George
April 6, 2017 3:20 pm

Easily correctable. In the name of DIVERSITY, there should not be one leader, there should be one Steering Committee. That way you can adjust the proportion of chromosomes and of melanin to any value divined by the DNC. And the march will be much more life-like.

LewSkannen
Reply to  Curious George
April 6, 2017 3:34 pm

Why only one steering committee?
Why not a continuous spectrum of steering committees?

Rhoda R
Reply to  LewSkannen
April 6, 2017 6:39 pm

Don’t all of the 39 gender-identities need to be recognized? Definitely need more than one committee.

Oldseadog
Reply to  LewSkannen
April 7, 2017 2:41 am

Rhoda R;
You mean there aren’t 97 gender-identities?

sz939
April 6, 2017 3:40 pm

Bill Nye channels Jerry Lewis as the Nutty Professor far more than he does Don Herbert (Mr. Wizard)! He even looks like the Lewis Character.

Bryan A
Reply to  sz939
April 6, 2017 8:38 pm

Then a March of Crimes Telethon can’t be that far off

Reply to  sz939
April 6, 2017 10:32 pm

I wish my grandkids had a Mr. Wizard like the last one. Fools like Bill Nye are a hazzard to navgation. Something I just thought of that’s not too far OT. I went to Berkeley CA high school 1959 to 1963. They were transitioning from the “old” chemistry to the “new” chemistry wherein you memorized Bohr orbits, etc . I was in the last “old” chemistry class. Also in the class were the kids of three professors at UC Berkeley. Including a very nice young lady whose father was the head of the Chemistry department at UC Berkeley and had a real Nobel prize in Chemistry. Those parents cold have their kids in either the old or the new. They chose old. Maybe they understood just how damaking the new educational fads would prove to be.

Brian R
April 6, 2017 3:40 pm

If they are going to scream about not have a person of color and a woman leading their march, then someone should point they are missing the all important LGBTQ scientist contingent. Maybe they are worried people would confuse their march with a PRIDE march.

Bruce
April 6, 2017 3:44 pm

You’re a fcukwit.

Michael darby
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 4:35 pm

Reminds me of the penetrating and insightful comment by an the person that posts: I think you are a jerkwagon https://judithcurry.com/2017/03/20/discussion-thread-improving-the-interface-between-climate-science-and-policy/#comment-842749

Michael darby
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 4:53 pm

People that live in glass houses……..besides, how do you know that what Bruce posted isn’t the truth?

Michael darby
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 5:03 pm

“Instead, you decided to be a jerkwagon and just start running your mouth ”
..
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/03/19/corporate-average-fuel-economy-cafe-sux

Michael 2
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 5:17 pm

I was giving my daughter a ride home from having visited her boyfriend. On the way she was texting. Suddenly my phone buzzed and on it was a text message from her phone: “My dad is an asshat”. I had no idea (still don’t, sounds like something from Harry Potter).

She explained that it really came from someone else that had borrowed her phone earlier and only now arrived on my phone. Besides being an asshat, maybe I’m stupid. But as a network engineer, maybe not THAT stupid. She meant to send the text to someone else 🙂

Michael darby
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 5:08 pm
Michael darby
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 5:10 pm

Recognize a pattern here??? “If you’re going to be a jerkwagon, at least be consistent.”
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/03/28/sea-water-level-fresh-water-tilted

Owen in GA
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 6:24 pm

Bruce’s comment was that of an immature internet twit, but Michael darby reveals the mind of a shriveled internet troll. Neither added one wit to the conversation. One showed himself to be dim, while the other showed he has little class.

Oldseadog
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 7, 2017 2:46 am

Aw, come on, Willis, maybe Bruce just didn’t learn to spell at school. They will correct this next year when he goes into second grade.

billk
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 7, 2017 8:26 am

Owen in GA: “Neither added one wit to the conversation.” But together they added one wit — which makes each of them …

Reply to  Bruce
April 7, 2017 10:20 am

Hi Griff! You’re going to need to extend your commentary a bit or you’ll miss this week’s target! Has the rate increaed any this year or is it still 5 cents a word?

Bruce Cobb
April 6, 2017 3:53 pm

With any luck, it will be rainy, windy, and cold that day.

EternalOptimist
April 6, 2017 4:02 pm

One of my testicles just jumped straight out of my trousers and onto my mousepad. It looked me square in the eye and screeched ‘from now on , I identify as a xxx chromo’

I was dumbfounded. speechless. We have been good friends for most of my life. ‘balls’ , was the best I could muster.

‘Not any more’, it said.

So that’s it for me. Bill Nye is right and I now believe in CAGW. And other talking bollocks.

Reply to  EternalOptimist
April 6, 2017 6:14 pm

EternalOptimist April 6, 2017 at 4:02 pm

You have been good friends? Just goes to show ya, you can’t rust anyone anymore…Give your xxx chromo a participation trophy and send it toa safe space.

Butch
April 6, 2017 4:18 pm

..Real scientists getting back to real science ! Wahooooooooo…………
“Event Horizon Telescope to try to capture images of elusive black hole edge”

https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/science-ticker/event-horizon-telescope-try-capture-images-elusive-black-hole-edge

THAT is something worth spending billions on !!

Richard G
Reply to  Butch
April 6, 2017 8:42 pm

We could use the money from all the CAGW funding that falls into a black hole here on Earth to study one in Space.

troe
April 6, 2017 4:19 pm

Now if we can figure out a way to get them to carry placards with Mao, Stalin, Lysenko, and Che.

These folks are similtaneously clownish and dangerous. Usually the worst sort.

Roger Knights
Reply to  troe
April 6, 2017 9:30 pm

At the Copenhagen confab, Chavez and Mugabe too over-spoke their time-limits and drew standing ovations for their anti-West screeds. Videos of those applauses should be used in the next climate-contrarian film, because they indicate where many warmists’ hearts are at.

troe
Reply to  Roger Knights
April 7, 2017 4:42 am

Chavez. Now that is a mouthful. Seems like only yesterday and $100 a barrel oil that he was the latest fetish leader of the Progressive movement. Genius of the Danube and all that. Now his beloved people suffer hunger in the dark while struggling to shake the disease he left behind. I felt sorry for the poor tumor that he infected.

No quarter ask none given.

CD in Wisconsin
April 6, 2017 4:23 pm

From the March for (Junk)Science website:
“We are building a broad, nonpartisan, and diverse coalition of organizations and individuals who stand up for science……”

Nonpartisan? Nonpartisan? Um….yea. Right. And I’m Smokey The Bear…..

drednicolson
Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
April 6, 2017 8:13 pm

Silly rabbit, partisanship is for the Right. ;|

co2islife
April 6, 2017 4:33 pm

Climate “Science” Gone Mad; The True Face of Envirofascism
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/climate-science-gone-mad-the-true-face-of-envirofascism/

Bill Nye Deemed “Too White”, “Too Male” To Lead Lefty Science March

Bruce Cobb
April 6, 2017 4:35 pm

It’s nothing but a virtue signaling fest.

TA
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
April 6, 2017 4:58 pm

It’s desperation.

Clyde Spencer
April 6, 2017 5:11 pm

I think that the organizers should have scheduled the march for April 1st! They are all a joke and fools to boot!

Auto
Reply to  Clyde Spencer
April 7, 2017 1:44 pm

Immediate flash-back to the ‘Ship of Fools’ caught in the Antarctic ice that wasn’t there (they believed), and had to be rescued.
2013-14 I am reminded.
Already over three years ago.

Auto

NW sage
April 6, 2017 5:13 pm

I’m still trying to get my head around the significance of the poster associating Bill Nye with the Disney logo. I can’t imagine ANYTHING more opposite than Disney and any kind of science. Disney is and has always been a feelings and emotions enterprise – and they are VERY good at it! Science is the search for truth without regard for emotions. It doesn’t matter whether or not you feel good about the Law of Gravity, it simply IS!

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 6, 2017 9:54 pm

I watched a couple of those shows and associated Bill with Goofy.
http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130310121327/youtubepoop/images/c/c0/Goofy_Yop.jpg

gnomish
Reply to  NW sage
April 6, 2017 5:34 pm

wut? disney is the mother of post modern science!
‘wishing makes it so’ didn’t come from aristotle, yo.

drednicolson
Reply to  NW sage
April 6, 2017 8:38 pm

Science is the search for fact, not truth. We can only believe that fact will equal truth. And we wouldn’t search for either if we weren’t emotionally motivated by a desire for meaning. 🙂

gnomish
Reply to  drednicolson
April 6, 2017 9:36 pm

mr spock says:
‘interesting…’
(vulcans can’t pronounce ellipses cuz they don’t have a word for the ‘teh ineffable’)

April 6, 2017 5:19 pm

This personal attack is totally unnecessary, be it Bill Nye or anyone else, it does sceptics no favours. This bile is one of the reasons I turned from an AGW believer into a sceptic. I can get this kind of personal attack tripe from any alarmist site I care to visit. I really didn’t expect it from contributors to WUWT.

We promote the science, yet now we smell a little success, after many years in the wilderness, the best we can do is mount a full frontal personal assault on a member of the alarmist brigade? It makes us no better than them.

Does this mean our professionals will now seek retribution at every opportunity and humiliate and degrade anyone who adopts the position of a warmist or alarmist. Once again, we stoop to their level.

I object to this futile, paranoid, revengeful and childish attack on Bill Nye, or anyone with a belief in AGW. They may not be right in their beliefs, but we may not be right in ours.

Stop it. It is disgusting and demeaning and we object to it, for very good reason, when it is levelled at us.

Willis, I am shocked, and ashamed of you.

Anthony, I am appalled you allowed this on your site.

billk
Reply to  HotScot
April 7, 2017 8:34 am

Dear HotScot: I suggest you do a little research into the “position of a warmist or alarmist” that this “any person” has “adopted”, and the WAY he has promoted it as Science God. THEN you can fly your virtue signals without promoting giggles.

MarkW
Reply to  HotScot
April 7, 2017 9:07 am

This qualifies as bile?????

It’s pretty mild compared to what Bill the nonsense guy has sent our way.

MarkW
Reply to  MarkW
April 7, 2017 9:42 am

Other than a couple of mild digs towards Nye for the notion that he could possibly represent science, most of the digs are at those who care more about a person’s color and gender than they do about a person’s character or qualifications. Such people have earned everything that is thrown at them.

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 9, 2017 1:49 am

Willis,

feeling a tad defensive are we? A detailed rebuttal of a “random anonymous internet popup”?

Using the authority of your position to discredit another? Virtue signalling?

Because Bill Nye is a nasty little piece of works, it doesn’t mean you have to be.

Michael 2
Reply to  HotScot
April 7, 2017 3:38 pm

HotScot wrote some things: “we stoop to their level.”

That we do. Or I do. I have no idea who I mean by “we” and even less knowledge of you you mean by “we”.

One of the weaknesses of the right was failing to grasp the Power of the Left, which, as Saul Alinsky kindly explains, resides principally with ridicule. One of the weaknesses of the Left is not recognizing that ridicule does not affect libertarians in particular. So both sides tend to be ineffective on the other AND that is also a reason why it is not a continuum from left to right. The left in particular enforces “left-ness” upon its subscribers.

“but we may not be right in ours.”

Yet you seem to express considerable rightness in your opinion, a worthy opinion to be sure but effective only upon those for whom it is effective.

To FAIL to ridicule and humiliate the left is seen as a weakness by the left on the assumption that you would if you could and dared to do so. They taunt each other frequently; entire television shows exist to taunt and ridicule their own kind. Oh, they ridicule libertarians and the right wing, but how many of that kind watch Saturday Night Live? They are sending signals of (1) acceptable beahvior and (2) establishing hierarchy and (3) de-stressing the pack by designating the “omega” for everyone to ridicule.

Obama did this a few years ago at the White House correspondents dinner, designated Donald Trump for ridicule. How did that turn out?

Consider any kind of pecking order or hierarchy. How is it established? The “pecking order” is so named because this establishment is physical. As you go up the evolutionary ladder, words and behaviors start to take the place of physical hierarchy establishment, but if words don’t work, it’s back to physical.

The solution therefore seems to be to “ridicule with style” and W.E. handles that part well. Ridicule sends a signal to the left, and style sends a signal to the right.

Sheri
Reply to  HotScot
April 7, 2017 5:58 pm

HotScot: Welcome to the reality of “science”. Neither side is capable of being nice. Learn to love it or learn to love being pummeled by both sides for your idealism and rational thoughts.

Reply to  Sheri
April 9, 2017 1:52 am

Sheri,

I have suffered an awful lot worse than this in the past because of my desire to remain impartial. Thanks though.

April 6, 2017 5:33 pm

Is it just me, or is this sentence incomplete: “Prepare for impassioned speeches from all the extremely scientific co-“?
CO’s.
Co-ed dorm captains.
Co-d pink conspirators.
Co-Agenda 21ers.
Co- what did you mean (I tried to quote the exact words that you wrote)?
– JPP

DaleC
April 6, 2017 5:36 pm

Julius Sumner Miller – a real science guy. Never missed an episode of “Why Is It So?”. A nice example:

https://youtu.be/z3BSkMj1wLc

On XX vs XY, I once saw this cute cartoon captioned “The Goddess Creates Men”. The drawing showed the goddess up in heaven sorting a tray of XX pairs for the next batch of women. She picks up one and accidentally breaks off the lower right leg of the X, thereby making an XY pair. “Oops”.

Gloateus
Reply to  DaleC
April 6, 2017 5:42 pm

Which is essentially the case.

In mammals with the XY system, males are effectively genetically defective women. We are missing alleles to match up with most of the big X chromosome. Hence, much higher rate of sex-linked genetic disorders in men.

And it’s why male pattern baldness is inherited from your mother’s dad.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Gloateus
April 6, 2017 7:28 pm

Or evolution has made males to demonstrate greater diversity so that the species can adapt more quickly. Evolution has been at work for 4 billion years I tend not to think it uses poor tools.

Michael 2
Reply to  Gloateus
April 7, 2017 11:09 am

Gloateus suggests “males are effectively genetically defective women.”

Well that’s one way of looking at it (I don’t look at it that way).

“We are missing alleles”

I seem not to be missing alleles. Perhaps I misplaced one in my desk drawer and just don’t remember having done so.

Alan Ranger
April 6, 2017 5:42 pm

“97% of all true moral noble and upstanding humanoids ”

You forgot to include all the Nobel humanoids, who once had something to do with the IPCC … or something or other.

Alan Ranger
Reply to  Alan Ranger
April 6, 2017 10:54 pm

Nor larrikins mistaken for laureates.

Dav09
April 6, 2017 5:49 pm

Cue Monsieur Bonaparte: Never interrupt . . .

Neil Jordan
April 6, 2017 6:08 pm

Per Willis’ link, march for/against science will be held on Earth Day, 22 April. I had heard that the date was picked by environmental activists because it was Lenin’s birthday. There is much on the Internet. I found this post interesting:
https://cei.org/blog/earth-day-lenins-birthday-coincidence
Quote:
So on the 45th anniversary of the first Earth Day, we sadly see the continuing belief in command-and-control economic systems. Government ownership of the land, water, and natural resources continues to grow with each passing year. The mass of governmental regulatory agencies, bureaucrats, and the sheer staggering number of new environmental regulations passed every year take us further away from any solution.

Roger Knights
Reply to  Neil Jordan
April 6, 2017 9:41 pm

A year or two ago I heard, on NPR, an interview of the daughter of a legendary adman who had just died. He had handled the publicity for the first Earth Day. She said that he suggested April 22 based on his own birthday, or that of one of his relatives or friends. She sounded convincing to me; she didn’t seem aware of the Lenin’s-birthday claim.

MarkW
Reply to  Roger Knights
April 7, 2017 6:44 am

Could be true, could be cover up.
No way to tell which.

TA
April 6, 2017 6:24 pm

OT:

Well, it looks like Trump has laid down a marker for the dictators of the world. The U.S. just struck targets in Syria with cruise missiles.

I bet ole Kim Jung Un of North Korea is paying attention. Russia and China, too. And all the totalitarians of the world. What do you think.

I’m thinking all of them are going to be taking Trump a little more seriously now.

TA
Reply to  TA
April 6, 2017 6:26 pm

Fox News is reporting that Trump did NOT call Putin and warn him before the attack.

TA
Reply to  TA
April 6, 2017 6:30 pm

War with the Mad Mullahs of Iran, of which Syria is a surrogate, is inevitable, so we might as well get started on it now because the longer we wait, the stronger our enemies will get.

Michael darby
Reply to  TA
April 6, 2017 6:51 pm

War is never inevitable.

Roger Knights
Reply to  TA
April 6, 2017 9:44 pm

War is never inevitable.

Appeasement is an alternative. Or surrender.

MarkW
Reply to  TA
April 7, 2017 6:45 am

Good move, why give Putin a chance to warn Assad?

MarkW
Reply to  TA
April 7, 2017 6:45 am

It takes two to make peace, and only one to make war.

MarkW
Reply to  TA
April 7, 2017 8:11 am

Putin and Assad reminds me of an old LBJ quote:
“He may be an SOB, but he’s our SOB.”

Gloateus
Reply to  TA
April 6, 2017 6:53 pm

If, as reported, the attack involved 50 cruise missiles, Trump is still way behind Clinton’s attempt to distract from Monica Lewinsky. That involved 63-88 Tomahawks:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Infinite_Reach#Background

Still, it’s a more than token gesture.

Missiles have the advantage of not needing to warn the Russians ahead of time. Of course that didn’t stop Clinton from warning Pakistan, so that they could warn bin Laden to evacuate his training camps.

R.S. Brown
Reply to  Gloateus
April 6, 2017 9:13 pm

Actually, they use 59 Tomahawks to whack that airfield.

Gloateus
Reply to  TA
April 6, 2017 6:56 pm

At about $1.6 million a pop, buy Raytheon stock.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Gloateus
April 6, 2017 10:02 pm

Don’t they have a “use by” date?
Resupply is likely already factored into the stock price.

MarkW
Reply to  Gloateus
April 7, 2017 8:13 am

Wouldn’t the solid rocket motor and the explosive be the only parts with use by dates?
The electronics and structure should have a pretty long life expectancy.

Auto
Reply to  Gloateus
April 7, 2017 2:14 pm

59 x 1,600,000 dollars.
Less than $100,000,000.
Is that even chump change?

Auto

J Mac
Reply to  TA
April 6, 2017 11:13 pm

President Trump authorized a coordinated cruise missile attack on the Syrian airbase that supported the aircraft that launched the WMD gas attack on Syrian civilians. Then he had dinner with the Chinese President at Mar-a-Lago.

Tonight Syria, Russia, China, Iran, ISIS, and North Korea are all frantically re-evaluating their intelligence estimates of the new President of the United States of America. And well they should….

“Message received? How copy? Over…”

Reply to  J Mac
April 7, 2017 4:31 am

Steve Bannon’s removal from National Security Council?

troe
Reply to  J Mac
April 7, 2017 4:49 am

We extend the open hand of friendship to all people of goodwill. Others will be dealt with appropriately. Whatever the cost to us in lives and treasure you are mistaken in believing that we will not act forcefully when required. That weak fellow is gone. The new one has an itchy finger, a huge gun, and trouble sleeping. Enjoy.

April 6, 2017 6:35 pm

I think I saw all of the Science Fiction Theaters in the 1950s:
Science Fiction Theater 26 Target Hurricane:

I used to relay these TV episodes to my friend via phone in high school who had no TV…
He is now a Dr of physics and computer science who believes in CAGW…

Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
April 6, 2017 6:44 pm

The little guy “Bobbie” is actually A. Watts before he became a meteorologist…

Gloateus
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
April 6, 2017 6:57 pm

No good deed goes unpunished.

Maybe if he had had TV he might have turned out better.

Mumbles McGuirck
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
April 7, 2017 10:23 am

I love how the Scouts find shelter in the *caves* west of Miami. LMAO

nn
April 6, 2017 6:36 pm

The “best and brightest” are protesting the “color of his skin”. The outcome of resurrecting institutional racism, sexism, etc. and normalizing prejudice, unlike the incompletely, and, in fact, insufficiently characterized, and unwieldy Earth system, was not only forecast, but was wholly predictable.

April 6, 2017 7:05 pm

Old’un , you must a bit older then me, First I wanted to be a jet pilot and shortly after it became the “rage” I wanted to be an astronaut, my how times change! ( But a an Engine Driver is cool as hell! 🙂 ).

TomRude
April 6, 2017 7:07 pm

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/ancient-arctic-ice-core-damaged-melting-university-alberta-1.4058756

A coveted collection of ancient ice cores recently acquired by the University of Alberta has been partially destroyed in an “unprecedented” double malfunction of a $4-million freezer.

Nearly 13 per cent of the samples in the Canadian Ice Core Archive melted when temperatures inside a storage freezer soared to 40 C after the refrigeration chillers shut down, university maintenance officials said Thursday.

After the chillers shut down, the system monitoring the freezer temperatures failed due to “a database corruption,” the U of A said in a news release.

U of Alberta? They’ll blame it on the Russians… with the blessing of Freeland.

Sheri
Reply to  TomRude
April 7, 2017 6:00 pm

Over-reliance on computers and modern appliances never works out well.

April 6, 2017 7:20 pm

A lot of O2 is going to wasted on April 22 and a lot of CO2 is going to be added to the atmosphere. But heck it is cherry time in DC so just maybe they’ll have a decent crop. Oh right those trees, just like the politicians don’t produce anything except for “flowery” looks..

Menicholas
April 6, 2017 7:40 pm

When I used to tell all my schoolmates I wanted to be an engineer when I grew up, they all decided they wanted to drive trains for a living too.

April 6, 2017 9:09 pm

Have the mods gone on vacation? I found this thread filled with disgusting name-calling that ought have been tossed.

John F. Hultquist
Reply to  Don Perry
April 6, 2017 10:05 pm

And still you read this far. Interesting.

Reply to  Don Perry
April 6, 2017 10:22 pm

Don Perry @ 9:09

Yes, I quite agree. It detracts from the issue, is childish and boring. Also gives us useless stuff to have to sort through. Most importantly it lowers the tone of WUWT to the level of the rest of the pack which is a great shame after Anthony has spent so much time making it great (again?).

Reply to  Alastair Brickell
April 9, 2017 2:12 am

@Alastair Brickell

It seems I’m not alone in holding this opinion.

Am I, Willis?

Michael 2
Reply to  HotScot
April 11, 2017 9:11 pm

HotScot asked “It seems I’m not alone in holding this opinion.”

So it would seem. 7 billion humans on Earth; someone has the same opinion!

Reply to  Alastair Brickell
April 13, 2017 6:27 am

2

Gosh, you’re so clever. Unfortunately there isn’t 7 billion humans subscribing to this blog, or did you miss that bit?

Michael 2
Reply to  HotScot
April 13, 2017 9:16 am

HotScot wrote: “Gosh, you’re so clever.”

True enough. As it happens I am a clever Scot. If there’s truth to the stereotype of Scottish engineer, well, I would be an affirming example.

“Unfortunately there isn’t 7 billion humans subscribing to this blog”

Nearly certain to be true, but I have not asserted that it is so. The selection pool is 7 billion persons. From this selection pool we draw two sets. One set is persons who think as you think, and the other set is those who read this blog. It is somewhat likely that persons who think like you will also behave like you, meaning that a disproportionate number out of that 7 billion people pool is probably here with you; or put another way, the chance or probability of encountering such a person is at least slightly better than 1/[7e9].

“or did you miss that bit?”

Somewhere on Earth is someone that thinks like you, he or she may be reading this blog AND I missed the part where previous to your observation someone has pointed out that not all 7 billion people read this blog.

Reply to  Alastair Brickell
April 13, 2017 9:53 am

2

Your statement was specific, with no qualification: “7 billion humans on Earth; someone has the same opinion!”.

“It is somewhat likely that persons who think like you will also behave like you”.

And your evidence for this sweeping statement is?

“meaning that a disproportionate number out of that 7 billion people pool is probably here with you”.

Shouldn’t that be ‘proportionate’ number? A disproportionate number would suggest one significantly higher, or lower, than a number proportionate to the pool, the sets, the number of subscribers to this blog, the number of people with access to a suitable computing device, and those of that subset with internet access. Amongst other variables like, most of the worlds population don’t give a monkeys about GW, man made or otherwise, at least those with a computing device and internet access who could be bothered to vote on an online, United Nations poll.

In other words, you made a smart ar*ed comment and now your wriggling.

Haud yer wheesht.

Michael 2
Reply to  HotScot
April 13, 2017 11:03 am

HotScot wrote: “Michael 2: Your statement was specific, with no qualification: 7 billion humans on Earth; someone has the same opinion!”

Well, okay, I exaggerated. It is remotely possible that your exact opinion is not found even among 7 billion humans. In my experience people and their thinking tends to cluster around specific “attractors” which I believe are evolutionary in nature and thus not amenable to change or even inspection.

Several such attractors exist and are somewhat rival. One is a need for security in a herd or hive and its political manifestation is socialism in varying forms. It is rival with an explorer instinct to find new pasture. A third attractor is a need to protect the herd. This kind isn’t interested in being a herd or hive member, but obtains some benefit in the vicinity of the herd and protects the herd from predators. It is those predators that are a fourth kind of attractor.

In the movie, “American Sniper”, we explore three kinds: Sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. A fourth kind, the loner, isn’t relevant to war, neither making it or preventing it and thus outside the scope of the movie.

“And your evidence for this sweeping statement is?”/i>

I do not offer evidence. I declare my beliefs. You declare yours. Nothing here is evidence; it is all words.

“In other words, you made a smart ar*ed comment and now your wriggling.”

Yes. It creates opportunity to lay out ideas for further exploration. In the hive and herd thing, I seem to lean toward protective of the herd but also exploration, find new forage for the herd; but I don’t like being *in* the herd or told what to do by those who appoint themselves shepherds.

Reply to  Alastair Brickell
April 13, 2017 9:58 am

Apologies

and now you’re wriggling

Type in haste, repent at leisure ~sigh~

Reply to  Alastair Brickell
April 14, 2017 6:32 am

2

Once again I refer to your original statement, “7 billion humans on Earth; someone has the same opinion!”

It is uncompromising, and again unqualified by any expression that it is your belief. Indeed it appears a rash, ill considered, statement of fact.

“In my experience” is nothing more than anecdotal evidence.

Reference to a Hollywood dramatisation of real events to justify anything is ludicrous. Much like citing Braveheart as a representation of Scottish culture and factual events.

So, from a simple, silly statement you made, you have bragged about your intellect, maintain your experience is suitable evidence to support a fantastical departure into the subject of herds and hives, cite Hollywood as a source of philosophical inspiration, dismiss a sweeping statement as a declaration of your beliefs and, finally, when you admit (barely) you are wriggling, you justify it by contending you are merely exploring ideas.

Wow, flights of fancy or what?

Michael 2
Reply to  HotScot
April 14, 2017 11:48 am

HotScot writes “Once again I refer to your original statement, ‘7 billion humans on Earth; someone has the same opinion!’ It is uncompromising, and again unqualified by any expression that it is your belief. Indeed it appears a rash, ill considered, statement of fact.”

Good heavens, you seem obsessed! I suppose the only thing to do is find that other person that shares your opinion. Alastair Brickell April 6, 2017 at 10:22 pm “Yes, I quite agree. It detracts from the issue, is childish and boring.”

“‘In my experience’ is nothing more than anecdotal evidence.”

Yes.

“Reference to a Hollywood dramatisation of real events to justify anything is ludicrous. Much like citing Braveheart as a representation of Scottish culture and factual events.”

You mistake that I need to justify anything as if you were some kind of judge.

What is important is shared experience to advance a conversation. Chris Kyle’s father chose the metaphor of sheep, wolves and sheepdogs to explain the circumstances under which entering a school playground fight on behalf of someone else would be justified by him. Justification is not a property of a thing, it is the result of a mental process by someone that presumes himself to be a judge (that be you for you, and me for me).

“So, from a simple, silly statement you made, you have bragged about your intellect”

Bragging was apparently a fine art in Scandinavia (Beowulf comes to mind).

“maintain your experience is suitable evidence to support a fantastical departure into the subject of herds and hives”

I admire your quick grasp of the obvious. Carl Jung, Sigmund Freud, so far as I know each used his own experiences to develop his understanding of psychology just as I do likewise for my own understanding.

“cite Hollywood as a source of philosophical inspiration”

I have many sources of inspiration and even more sources of expressions.

“dismiss a sweeping statement as a declaration of your beliefs”

That happens occasionally.

“and, finally, when you admit you are wriggling, you justify it by contending you are merely exploring ideas.”

I justify nothing. Occasionally I will explain my behavior. My style of argumentation is intended to be at least slightly unpredictable to get people “off script” and onto a meaningful discussion. It can take quite a long time to exhaust these scripts.

Reply to  Alastair Brickell
April 18, 2017 12:59 am

2

Keep digging.

Michael 2
Reply to  HotScot
April 18, 2017 9:00 am

HotScot orders: “Michael 2, Keep digging.”

Once again you assume to tell others what to do; it’s probably in your DNA. But today is your lucky day, it is indeed my nature to keep digging until I have uncovered truth or decide there’s no truth to be had.

Reply to  Michael 2
April 19, 2017 5:16 am

Michael 2

Well done, you made it.

J Mac
Reply to  Don Perry
April 6, 2017 11:26 pm

Do you need a ‘safe place’? In the part of the world that accepts the right to free speech proscribed by the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the open, uncensored discussion of concepts and ideas may not always appeal to your delicate sensibilities… or your desires for selective censorship.

RAH
Reply to  J Mac
April 7, 2017 3:00 am

A “safe place” is merely the place that intolerant people wish to go when they can’t destroy, or at least silence those that they disagree with. It is in fact an expression of close minded intolerance.

MarkW
Reply to  J Mac
April 7, 2017 6:49 am

The 1st ammd is a restriction on government, not private individuals or companies.

eyesonu
Reply to  Don Perry
April 7, 2017 7:34 pm

DP,

Even Willis’ cat is not happy. Safe space is relative to one’s perception of need. The cat is inside and out of the rain but it is not happy. Probably would be less happy outside.

Would you have read through soo many posts if you had the opportunity to scroll through an equal of blank pages? Would that make you a ‘happy cat’? You may not really like a safe space after all you put yourself through.

Reply to  Don Perry
April 9, 2017 2:10 am

@Don Perry

Agreed.

April 6, 2017 9:57 pm

JoNova had a story about this March and “Intersectional Feminism” yesterday. It get loonier all the time. Should be fun to watch.

Johann Wundersamer
April 6, 2017 10:15 pm

A. Philip Randolph and Bayard Rustin began planning the [ Great March on Washington ] in December 1961.[ … ] They received help from Amalgamated Clothing Workers unionist Stanley Aronowitz, who

gathered support from radical organizers who could be trusted not to report their plans to the Kennedy administration.
____________________________

What good is a March with “announcement that the March for Science, [ will be scheduled for April 22, ] “

Johann Wundersamer
April 6, 2017 10:23 pm

whatnot.

Organized. Greens. Marching.

April 6, 2017 11:58 pm

Bill Nye “The Science Guy” is a yet another TV moron… He is neither a scientist nor a philosopher and his attempts to do science and philosophy fail miserably. He’s just an entertainer and a very poor one at that.
Bill Nye is ‘The Socialist Guy’.

Zeke
April 7, 2017 12:11 am

“It gets better. The protest is not just because Bill Nye lacks melanin. He’s also guilty of being short of another even more important requirement.

Bill Nye lacks that scientific necessity, the vital XX chromosome.” ~W E

It is helpful to realize that gender equality now has absolutely nothing to do with individual freedom and equality in the law. It is now a numbers game. The entire goal of feminism is attaining the correct percentages of women in all fields.

ref below

Zeke
Reply to  Zeke
April 7, 2017 12:16 am

“Thus, feminists measure gender equality, in the words of a popular women’s studies textbook, by “the degree to which men and woman have similar kinds or degrees of power, status, autonomy, and authority.”[22]

Practically speaking, this standard has led most contemporary feminists to gauge equality in terms of outcome uniformity rather than equal legal opportunity. If women are not half of all college athletes, half of all engineers, half of all surgeons, half of all CEOs, and half of all political leaders, for example, the assumption is that women do not have the opportunity or freedom to pursue these goals equally.”
~Christian Villegas

http://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-modern-feminist-rejection-constitutional-government

It occurs to me that everyone already knows this. (: Thanks for waiting while I catch up.

Klem
Reply to  Zeke
April 8, 2017 4:51 am

Rubbish. About 70% of teachers are female, I see little effort to make it 50%.

About 90% of nurses are female, I have seen little effort to fire almost half of them and replace them with men.

About 90% of workers in the retail sector are female, no one complains about it, I see little effort to fire half of them and replace them with men.

There are 25 people employed at my wife’s place of work, all are female. I never hear them making plans to dump half of their staff and replace them with men.

Gunga Din
Reply to  Klem
April 8, 2017 6:46 am

Klem,
All they need to do is get the excess to ignore certain observable facts and “identify” as the other gender.
(Not sure how to handle those who “identify” as non-gender. Maybe shoot for 33.333…% of each?)

Zeke
Reply to  Klem
April 8, 2017 11:09 am

Klem says, “Rubbish. About 70% of teachers are female, I see little effort to make it 50%.”

I do not see the 50% standard of female participation in a field as a maximum limit, only a minimum. The reason this is wrong is because it is a capricious and arbitrary means of qualification, and it requires large government to fulfill this arbitrary quota.

Not only that, experience shows that it will result in forcing all women into the work place. Very advantageous for government in expanding tax base, in expanding government systems of patronage in who gets hired, and the end of the home maker in society.

Remember, the Baby Boomers hated June Cleaver. Mo and four wives, yes — That is all very multi culti. But they hated June Cleaver and wanted to erase her existence. No one has ever seen her since. So the toxic form of feminism is in combination with the Cannabis Generation’s pet philosophies — it is not just a form of government action to expand its own power.

Klem says, “There are 25 people employed at my wife’s place of work, all are female. I never hear them making plans to dump half of their staff and replace them with men.”

And the female participation in the prison population is only 7%. Something must be done. I believe that is an argument put forward by the ACLU.

Gunga Din
Reply to  Klem
April 8, 2017 11:37 am

Not only that, experience shows that it will result in forcing all women into the work place. Very advantageous for government in expanding tax base, in expanding government systems of patronage in who gets hired, and the end of the home maker in society.

I saw a story a couple of weeks ago about a feminist saying it should be illegal for a woman to be a stay at mom.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/24/should-it-be-illegal-to-be-stay-at-home-mom-why-feminists-are-so-frustrated.html

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 9, 2017 2:27 am

Not getting the message yet Willis?

As a whole, the article is a snide little attack, no need to dissect it.

Justifying your reasons for writing it as “He started it” is childish.

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 9, 2017 5:26 pm

Willis,

as are you.

Admad
April 7, 2017 12:33 am

What’s the odds of a Gore-effect blizzard on the day of the march? Gotta love Nye

Jan Lindström
April 7, 2017 1:02 am

Somebody have seen the future…comment image

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
April 7, 2017 1:35 am

You are all being disgracefully non-PC and will be put down on the list for re-education. I’ll have to crawl across the floor to find a pen to write down your names – when I stop laughing!

Krudd Gillard of the Commondebt of Australia
April 7, 2017 2:16 am

Great title to the article. “The March Against Science.” Exactly what they are about.

MarkW
Reply to  Krudd Gillard of the Commondebt of Australia
April 7, 2017 6:54 am

I thought they were holding it in April?

April 7, 2017 2:57 am

Must be frustrating Bill. After all your efforts for years this is how you are repaid.

Oh well Bill. Your case proves beyond doubt the inherently uncompromising nature of the cAWG crowd.

Look at the bright side, the cAWG crowd excludes a very diverse, dare I say heterogeneous, group of people. a.k.a. The majority. Despite of everything, you’ll fit right in.

Ceetee
April 7, 2017 3:40 am

“So in the wonderful American non-tradition of everyone getting a Participation Trophy,..” thats not just an American non tradition I’ll have you know. We all non do that.

fretslider
April 7, 2017 4:00 am

I’m sorry, but this outfit is clearly transphobic.

There are real women out there with x y chromosomes. Ask any loony 3rd wave feminist

RAH
April 7, 2017 4:07 am

I love it. Someone should head line “Bill Nye gets kicked to the back of the climate change bus.”

Derek Wood
April 7, 2017 4:25 am

“Prepare for impassioned speeches from a bunch of extremely scientific spokesdudes and spokesmodels on how Trump hates water and air, and how spending $ Trillions with a T to cool the earth by 0.1°C in fifty years is a scientifically brilliant plan supported by 97% of all true moral noble and upstanding humanoids everywhere. Amen.

Oh, and if you disagree, think of the grandchildren, because compassion, and besides you’re just a hater and a scientific troglodyte, because 97%.

I put the over/under of someone passing out white lab coats along the march route at 100%.

March for science? … I don’t think so.

A rainy day here, more rain on the way. The forest is happy. The cat is not happy.

Me, I’m overjoyed, and I can only wish the same for you.”

This is genuinely funny, I laughed a lot!

mikewaite
April 7, 2017 4:35 am

I failed to notice any mention of the inclusion of Native Americans , the people who “ran” North America
very successfully for more than 10 000 years , coping with considerable changes in climate during that time – amazingly without the help of Europeans.
The latter of course were preoccupied during that time in inventing novel ways of killing each other.

garymount
Reply to  mikewaite
April 7, 2017 5:37 am

And after all those 10 000 years, not one of them invented the wheel.

mikewaite
Reply to  garymount
April 7, 2017 11:43 am

A valid point and the answer, addressed mainly to Inca wheellessness , may be here :

https://www.quora.com/Why-were-the-indigenous-peoples-of-the-Americas-not-able-to-invent-the-wheel

-“The fact is that most civilizations in the Old World didn’t invent the wheel either–instead, they borrowed it from some other culture. The wheel appears to have been first used in Sumer in the Middle East around 3500 BC, whence it spread across Europe, Asia, and North Africa. It didn’t arrive in Britain until 500 BC. This orderly diffusion pattern makes it conceivable that all the wheels in use today are directly descended from the invention of a single gifted individual–an individual, however, who was such a dope that he failed to sign his name on the patent application, thus assuring his (or her) eternal anonymity. We might therefore attribute Inca wheellessness to the absence of a pre-Columbian Thomas Edison.
But there are other factors involved. The principle of rotary motion, is pretty obvious, and was well known throughout the New World as well as the Old. The Incas, for instance, are thought to have used wooden rollers to haul the giant stones they used to build their cities. Unfortunately, the New World suffered from a conspicuous scarcity of draft animals. The only beast of burden known in the Americas was the llama, a delicate critter restricted to certain parts of the Andes, which was used solely as a pack animal. Without draft animals you cannot do extensive hauling with sledges, and without sledges it will never occur to you that the wheel would be a handy thing to have.”-

And they did not even have llamas in North America .

MarkW
Reply to  garymount
April 7, 2017 12:58 pm

The did have buffalo.

Gloateus
Reply to  garymount
April 8, 2017 11:24 am

Mesoamerican Indians did know of wheels, but they put them on toys, rather than carts. However, the lack of draft animal argument is not IMO convincing, since they used humans as beasts of burden, and a man-hauled cart can carry more weight than his back or head.

http://www.mexicolore.co.uk/images-1/122_00_2.jpg

Plains Indians used dogs to pull a travois made of wooden poles.

The potter’s wheel however was apparently unknown in the New World.

A more telling consideration is the lack of metallurgy in the Pre-Columbian New World. Maybe bronze also was invented by only one genius in the Near East, but it’s possible that the discovery also occurred independently elsewhere in the Old World.

Both Aztecs and Incas were just starting to make bronze prestige artifacts when Europeans arrived, c. AD 1500. That’s some 4800 years after the Old World.

The Mayans had systems of writing and symbolic arithmetic, but they were lost. The Inca had a record keeping system based upon strings, called quipu in Quechua.

Reply to  garymount
April 13, 2017 10:18 am

“This orderly diffusion pattern makes it conceivable that all the wheels in use today are directly descended from the invention of a single gifted individual–an individual, however, who was such a dope that he failed to sign his name on the patent application”

That’s assuming it wasn’t a committee, designing a camel.

Michael 2
Reply to  mikewaite
April 8, 2017 8:27 am

mikewaite wrote “I failed to notice any mention of the inclusion of Native Americans”

Most of the marchers and its leader, and me, and probably you, are native Americans.

“the people who ran North America very successfully for more than 10 000 years”

They had effective population controls called “war” and desertification. Where are the Pueblo indians or the Fremont?

“The latter of course were preoccupied during that time in inventing novel ways of killing each other.”

Whereas the Americans were satisfied with traditional ways of killing each other until they adopted the European ways of killing each other, which on close inspection turns out to be Chinese after all (gunpowder).

Zeke
Reply to  Michael 2
April 8, 2017 12:07 pm

garymount April 7, 2017 at 5:37 am
And after all those 10 000 years, not one of them invented the wheel.

If a wheel or writing is found in North America, academics and scholars have a word for it. “Fraud.” So you see it is a self-fulfilling theory you have there.

michael hart
April 7, 2017 4:48 am

I keep wondering which of Charles Dickens’ characters Bill Nye most resembles. I like the comparison with Seth Pecksniff: “Some people likened him to a direction-post, which is always telling the way to a place, and never goes there.”

April 7, 2017 4:48 am

I know I am going to catch a bunch of flak for this, but…..

Nye does not “lack”. He has one that others lack. He has an X, and he has a Y. His co-marchers lack the Y. They are Y deficient (in more ways than one).

hunter
April 7, 2017 4:50 am

It is appropriate that a faux scientist leads political activists in a march about the politics of extremists seeking to impose their extremism in the name of science. It is even more appropriate that it is Bill Nye, the leading faux scientist in America, is to be leading this march.

Wharfplank
April 7, 2017 5:26 am

Go the DVD section of any taxpayer funded public library, children’s section. Nye has feet, not inches of shelf space.

Richard
April 7, 2017 5:38 am

March for the Religion of Science

Skepticism not welcome.

Ed Zuiderwijk
April 7, 2017 6:42 am

A march as mad as March hares.

Timo Soren
April 7, 2017 7:03 am

I hope Vermin Supreme attends.comment image

Max Hugoson
Reply to  Timo Soren
April 8, 2017 5:00 pm

He’s grown a FOOT since I last saw him.

JBom
April 7, 2017 7:10 am

MFS should have gotten a ‘Jerry Lewis’ stand-in and parade kids in wheelchairs like the Cerebral Palsy and March of Dimes telethons did in the ’60s and the other guy in the ’50s.

OMG!

Bill Nye the Gay Guy IS the ‘Jerry Lewis’ stand-in and Al Gore, Jim Hansen, John Holdren and Michael E. Mann are the kids in wheelchairs!

Now their plan is clear to me. I can see their new slogan on the placards, “give us money”! Beautiful!

AllanJ
April 7, 2017 7:28 am

“Some animals are more equal than others.”

We are way past 1984.

You really can’t make this stuff up. Might as well enjoy it.

MarkW
Reply to  AllanJ
April 7, 2017 12:59 pm

The quote is from “Animal Farm”, not “1984”.

observa
April 7, 2017 7:32 am

Only lefties could struggle like this for their rights not to have to struggle so booting them onto the dole will really see them in their element.

Joe Crawford
April 7, 2017 7:54 am

I know Roger was lampooning them when he said: “The smartest people on the planet…” But, I have no doubt that most of them (i.e., academics) are sure they fit that category.

Resourceguy
April 7, 2017 8:12 am

Let the March of the Narcissists begin. Everyone line up in front, since none want to be second or third in line.

Mumbles McGuirck
April 7, 2017 10:31 am

I still say someone should attend the March with video camera in hand. Ask the participants their occupation and see how many are really scientists. Then give everyone a fun little Climate Quiz, asking them how fast sea levels are rising or what percentage of CO2 added to the atmosphere each year is due to human activity. I am willing to wager less than 50% will be scientists (if that) and none will answer the questions correctly.

Mark - Helsinki
April 7, 2017 11:01 am

The march has been taken over by the left. There was a bit of a fuss about this last week. It’s certainly not about Science.

DC Cowboy
Editor
Reply to  Mark - Helsinki
April 7, 2017 11:59 am

They’ve renamed it to “March for Science, Justice, and Jobs” — – seriously

Resourceguy
Reply to  DC Cowboy
April 7, 2017 1:05 pm

So this could strive for the Million Man (person) March and also invite Black Lives Matter too.

Editor
April 7, 2017 12:04 pm

w. ==> Are you sure about Nye’s chromosomal makeup? or his ancestry? How would we know?

April 7, 2017 12:08 pm

If you asked this crowd of scientists “What is blackbody radiation?” they’d likely say ‘some neutron bomb that targets only African Americans.’

Resourceguy
April 7, 2017 1:11 pm

I would suggest March of the Penguins, but that might include unpleasant low temps and smells.

April 7, 2017 1:16 pm

Willis, are you saying that Mr. Nye is an albino? If you’re not, as someone who has looked at skin sections, I have a bit of a story to tell. You see, white people don’t lack melanin relative to their darker shaded cousins. Aside from melanin type differences, you see, the skin shade is dependent on depth of penetration, not total amount of melanin in the skin.

clipe
April 7, 2017 4:57 pm

In the sadly common Blue-On-Blue violence of identity politics,

co2islife
April 7, 2017 7:39 pm

Climate “Science” Pillars of Sand; Eroding the Foundation of the Hoax
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/04/08/climate-science-pillars-of-sand-eroding-the-foundation-of-the-hoax/

crackers345
April 7, 2017 9:47 pm

of all the ways to criticize these marches, this attempt to dismiss it outright based on nothing at all is about the weakest i’ve read. that’s too bad, because a good critique is needed, i think

eyesonu
Reply to  crackers345
April 7, 2017 10:10 pm

We will await your good critique.

Joe Bastardi
April 8, 2017 6:03 am

Awesome as usual, and in some circles, always

Gloateus
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
April 8, 2017 11:41 am

The Aztec Empire was unusual in being based upon cannibalism rather than permanent conquest of territory. It needed to keep its enemy states independent in order to capture their warriors for sacrifice in their temples. That’s why Cortez found so many willing allies, like the Tlaxcalans.

South America tribes conquered by the Incas were also glad to side with the Spanish against their overlords.

The Caribs, from whom we get both the Caribbean Sea and the word “cannibal”, were similarly eating their way up the Antilles, consuming more peaceable local island tribes, when Columbus and company arrived.

There was more or less constant warfare among Indian confederations of the Atlantic Seaboard of the US at the time of contact, as well. In the north, Indians killed Eskimos wherever they found them. They even killed the women instead of enslaving them, but took their dogs.

Zeke