Earth Hour supporters propose ‘Carbon Law’

From the UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE and “that ain’t gonna fly” department comes this wishful thinking for Earth Hour.

A ‘carbon law’ offers pathway to halve emissions every decade, say researchers

On the eve of this year’s Earth hour (25 March), researchers propose a solution in the journal Science (24 March) for the global economy to rapidly reduce carbon emissions. The authors argue a carbon roadmap, driven by a simple rule of thumb or “carbon law” of halving emissions every decade, could catalyse disruptive innovation.

Such a “carbon law”, based on Moore’s Law in the computer industry, applies to cities, nations and industrial sectors.

The authors say fossil-fuel emissions should peak by 2020 at the latest and fall to around zero by 2050 to meet the UN’s Paris Agreement’s climate goal of limiting the global temperature rise to “well below 2°C” from preindustrial times.

A “carbon law” approach, say the international team of scientists, ensures that the greatest efforts to reduce emissions happens sooner not later and reduces the risk of blowing the remaining global carbon budget to stay below 2°C.

The researchers say halving emissions every decade should be complemented by equally ambitious, exponential roll-out of renewables. For example, doubling renewables in the energy sector every 5-7 years, ramping up technologies to remove carbon from the atmosphere, and rapidly reducing emissions from agriculture and deforestation.

“We are already at the start of this trajectory. In the last decade, the share of renewables in the energy sector has doubled every 5.5 years. If doubling continues at this pace fossil fuels will exit the energy sector well before 2050,” says lead author Johan Rockström director of the Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University.

The authors pinpoint the end of coal in 2030-2035 and oil between 2040-2045 according to their “carbon law”. They propose that to remain on this trajectory all sectors of the economy need decadal carbon roadmaps that follow this rule of thumb, modeled on Moore’s Law.

Moore’s Law states that computer processors double in power about every two years. While it is neither a natural nor legal law, this simple rule of thumb or heuristic has been described as a “golden rule” which has held for 50 years and still drives disruptive innovation.

The paper notes that a “carbon law” offers a flexible way to think about reducing carbon emissions. It can be applied across borders and economic sectors, as well as both regional and global scales.

Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, says, “Our civilization needs to reach a socio-economic tipping point soon, and this roadmap shows just how this can happen. In particular, we identify concrete steps towards full decarbonization by 2050. Businesses who try to avoid those steps and keep on tiptoeing will miss the next industrial revolution and thereby their best opportunity for a profitable future.”

Co-author Nebojsa Nakicenovic, deputy director general of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and member of the Earth League, said “Humanity must embark on a decisive transformation towards complete decarbonization. The ‘Carbon law’ is a powerful strategy and roadmap for ramping down emissions to zero so as to stay within the global carbon budget for stabilizing climate to less than 2°C above preindustrial levels.”

Joeri Rogelj, also at IIASA, said, “The carbon law outlines a global path towards achieving climate and sustainability goals in broad yet quantitative terms. It sketches a general vision of rapid emission reductions in conjunction with the development of sustainable carbon dioxide removal options. It clearly communicates that no single solution will do the job, and that this deep uncertainty thus implies starting today pursuing multiple options simultaneously.”

Malte Meinshausen, director of the Climate & Energy College at the University of Melbourne, said “Regions that make way for future-proof renewable energy and storage investments will turn a zero-emissions future into an economic opportunity. While for years, we’ve seen the ramp-down of incumbent fossil technologies only as burden, the other side of the coin is now finally visible: lower costs, more jobs and cleaner air.”

Following a “carbon law”, which is based on published energy scenarios, would give the world a 75% chance of keeping Earth below 2°C above pre-industrial temperatures, the target agreed by nations in Paris in 2015.

###

Notes:

The paper “A roadmap for rapid decarbonization” appears in Science as a peer reviewed “policy forum article” on 24 March 2017.

The Paris Agreement sets out a goal to attempt to keep global temperatures “well below 2°C” above pre-industrial temperatures. http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php

The global average temperature is currently about 1.1°C above pre-industrial temperatures.https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/wmo-confirms-2016-hottest-year-record-about-11%C2%B0c-above-pre-industrial-era

What are the key carbon roadmap milestones to 2050?

Each decade has key milestones to reach:

2020: 40 Gigatonnes of CO2

2030: 20 GtCO2

2040: 10 GtCO2

2050: 5 GtCO2

Carbon dioxide emissions from land use fall from 4 GtCO2/yr to 2 Gt CO2, to 1 to 0,5 by 2050. New carbon sequestration technologies ramp up to remove CO2 from the atmosphere from 0 to 0,5. 2,5 to 5Gt CO2 by 2050.

How to get there:

  • 2020: remove fossil fuel subsidies. Put a price on carbon starting at $50 per ton rising to $400 per ton by 2050. Large-scale energy efficiency measures and large scale trials of carbon sequestration begin at 100-500MtCO2/yr.
  • 2030: coal exits energy mix, in this decade construction becomes fully carbon neutral or stores carbon, several cities reach carbon neutral status. Carbon sequestration of 1-2 GtCO2 begins.
  • 2040: oil exits energy mix early in this decade. Europe starts the decade with close to zero emissions. Other continents finish the decade close to zero.
  • 2050 global economy carbon neutral.
Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
255 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bruce Cobb
March 24, 2017 8:14 am

Looks like they are using Moore’s Law correctly; they want to double-down on stupid every 5 -7 years.

eyesonu
March 24, 2017 8:32 am

I’m holding out for Earth Hour this coming Saturday between 8:30 and 9:30 pm. Will turn on the auto-dishwasher with the drying mode on. Wash clothes in hot water and utilize clothes dryer. Long hot shower and cooking dinner. I’ll shut down heating system early in the day and turn it back on at 8:30 to bring back up to normal temp. May even vacuum floors if time allows. Oh … and play the stereo full blast with some heavy rock!

Dale S
March 24, 2017 9:36 am

In a way, the “Carbon law” folks are right — if you want to meet the goals of Paris, you really do need to make massive, painful changes along the lines they realize. The actual non-binding Paris commitments are nowhere near enough to get emissions where they “need to be”.

The part they don’t seem to get is that the cure is vastly worse than the disease. Exiting coal and oil world-wide by 2050 would create *massive economic harm*, while the 1.1C increase from an arbitrary level earlier in the industrial era (plus a substantial rise in CO2 concentrations) has caused no documented net harm at all. [I too am bugged by the “above pre-industrial temperatures”. We don’t *have* global pre-industrial temperatures, and from proxies and variation in our earliest industrial temperatures we certainly know the temperature was not fixed!] What realistic damages are they expecting from exceeding 1.5C that could possibly economically justify the policy steps they call for?

This is rather like advocating applying a tourniquet in hopes of preventing future bruises.

Barbara Skolaut
March 24, 2017 9:53 am

“this year’s Earth hour (25 March)”

Thanks for the reminder! I’ll be sure to turn on all the lights tomorrow. (Would raise the [oil] heat, but tomorrow’s supposed to be in the 70’s [F].) Probably wash clothes a day early too. And I’ve got a project that requires me to use the oven for several hours – been putting it off, but tomorrow sounds just about perfect> 😀

Bruce Cobb
March 24, 2017 11:16 am

Maybe we’re looking at “Earth Hour” all wrong. If you shut everything off for an hour, when you turn things back on, you perhaps realize even more how fortunate we are to have energy available in such abundance, to make our lives comfortable, and do things we want to do. But then you also realize that this is exactly what the climate cultists want to stop, by making energy cost far more, and be less available. But it needs a new name, like “Energy Hour”. Earth Hour is stupid.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
March 24, 2017 7:27 pm

Earth Hour is certainly stupid because the generators are still spinning and still burning coal/gas for when the fools turn on their TV’s and lights again.

It’s stupidity beyond stupid, very common in Australia.

Reply to  Patrick MJD
March 25, 2017 2:36 pm

Unless it’s “green and sustainable”, the goal is to have an energy grid that can support peak demand.
“Earth Hour” (voluntarily reducing your personal use of electricity for an hour) is just a useless, “feel good” action to get you to feel good about supporting those politicians/ideologies who’s goal would be to expand “Earth Hour” into a 24/7, mandatory, reality.

Patrick MJD
March 25, 2017 3:02 am

Not seen anything in the media about Earth Hour in Aus, which IIRC, originated here.

March 25, 2017 2:11 pm

Those in favor of a “carbon law” may be Horta’s in disguise.
https://youtu.be/IpZ9_i3DEbU

Warren Latham
March 26, 2017 9:01 pm

I had to read this twice:- “Our civilization needs to reach a socio-economic tipping point soon, and this roadmap shows just how this can happen. In particular, we identify concrete steps towards full decarbonization by 2050. Businesses who try to avoid those steps and keep on tiptoeing will miss the next industrial revolution and thereby their best opportunity for a profitable future.” (the quote from Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research).

A more illiterate, ill-educated, meaningless and contrived piece of drivel would be hard to find.

Well spotted Anthony.

Russell Johnson
March 29, 2017 6:15 pm

Simple response: no way