Lago Enriquillo Redux

Guest Essay by Kip Hansen

le_expanding_smIn previous episodes:  In January of 2014, the NY Times published an article “Rising Tide Is a Mystery That Sinks Island Hopes” by  Randal C. Archibold, in which the waters of Lago Enriquillo, in the southwest corner of the Dominican Republic, were claimed to be rising and flooding farms and towns there due to climate change.   I responded with an essay here “NYT Pushes the Rising Tide of Climate Nonsense – This time in the Dominican Republic” and followed up 14 months later with “Lago Enriquillo Revisted”, which ended with this promise: “It will be interesting to see how the lake fares over the next couple of years. I’ll try to write an update next year.”

Lago Enriquillo is a hyper-saline lake in the southwest corner of the Dominican Republic (DR), on the island of Hispaniola, in the northern Caribbean.    Its surface is about 145 meters below sea level, covering part of the floor of a rift valley, in an arid region complete with cactus which to me looks like many parts of eastern Southern California or Arizona.  Several years ago, my wife and I were managing humanitarian projects in the Dominican Republic and spent a lot of time in “el Sur” – as the Dominicans call the southwest corner of the country.   We had recurring projects in the city of Barahona and reforestation and irrigation projects in one of the side valleys leading off of the Yaque Sur river valley.


A couple more images will help fill in the geography of the area:


The image above shows the “cuencas”, the watersheds, of the region.  The two that concern us are the large YaqueSur valley watershed through which  the Rio Yaque Sur winds its way down to the sea at Barahona and the Lago Enriquillo watershed in which all water there flows down into the lake, from which there is no outlet.

The general geography is this:


In this map it is hard to see that the two watershed are separate –  but I have penciled in a black line showing that the divide that runs more or less due north from the smaller lake near the bay. (This divide becomes important later.)  The small red rectangle in the upper right is the location of the Rio Las Cuevas valley, where several of our reforestation and irrigation projects took place.

In 2013/14, there was great concern locally that the lake was expanding, the water rising, and this increase in size was impinging on local settlements on its shores – flooding grazing areas, banana farms and little towns of cinder-block homes.  The flooded areas are shown on the map above in red.  The land and homes that were being flooded were those of some of the country’s poorest people, increasing the toll.  These people were there because, years earlier, when the lake decreased in size, the shoreline receded and made available land that wasn’t already owned by anyone.


Starting in the mid-1980s, the lake began to shrink, losing 100 km2 in surface area by the year 2003 – which means those 100 km2 were then dry land – available for the taking.  And take they did, occupying land for agriculture and over time building small villages of shacks and concrete-block homes along the shore of the lake.  This may seem odd to readers from countries where all the land has been owned by someone for hundreds of years but in the DR things are a bit looser and this type of squatting is rampant, even in cities.

So what do you suppose they did?  They were looking at this situation:


(Note:  This graph originally shows a point at 1965 that cannot be correct.  The civil record shows no sudden 10 meter increase in depth of this lake, which would have caused massive flooding of towns along the lake’s north shore.  No record exists of any such event, so I have penciled in (in blue) a guesstimate. Passing hurricanes dump water into the lake, but it continues to shrink.)

This wonderful lake, home to American salt-water crocodiles, is considered a national treasure and is designated a National Park.  It is disappearing, shrinking, the salt concentration is rising, threatening fish.  So, in 2003-2005, they dig canals from the Yaque Sur to the lake to add some fresh water.  They dig more canals from the dam on the Yaque near Padre Las Casas to bring irrigation water from the Yaque Sur watershed into the Lago Enriquillo watershed.

There are persistent rumors about a broken dike or levee — such as “But then canals from the Yaque del Sur were constructed to keep water levels steady and the salinity at such a rate that marine life could continue to survive. But the lake surface area never expanded at the rate it did after one of the Yaque del Sur dykes broke following the storms in 2003”.   There is no evidence for this theory, this rumor.  See a fuller report on this in my essay “Lago Enriquillo Revisted“.

But only ten years after the panic that the lake was shrinking and disappearing, the panic shifted to “Rising Tide Is a Mystery That Sinks Island Hopes”.   American engineering students from Cornell and CCNY had been sent down to do studies and write papers.  Luna and Poteau of Cornell supply this longer-term data:


The water is rising and flooding land, higher than historic levels.  My analysis to this point is given at the end of my previous essay: “Lago Enriquillo Revisted“.

I promised an update and here it is:

From the Dominican press:




For those of you who cannot read Spanish (although over 18% of New Yorkers can):




The pages are (machine-) translated by Google, with obvious errors and misunderstandings, but luckily, I can read Spanish.  The lake levels have receded by 50 meters and the retreat began in 2013.  Farmers are beginning to recover their lands that only a couple of years ago were underwater.

The receding waters are attributed to drought in the southwest DR over the last few years.

As for the recent history, we finally see this admission: “By 2013 this salinity had dropped significantly as a result of the large amount of fresh water coming from the rainfall that has accompanied the storms and hurricanes, as well as the contributions of Yaque del Sur [from] 2004 to 2012.”  Which tends to confirm my suspicion that the rising lake was the result of human error (*on top of natural variation).

Last year I concluded: “In the case of Lago Enriquillo, in spite of the relationship between lake levels and incoming water, none of the major studies actually attempted to measure, or even estimate, in any way, the water being imported into Cuenca [watershed]  Enriquillo from the Yaque Sur – even though they were attempting to understand where the extra water was coming from. This strikes me as an obvious oversight – or political correctness, not wishing to blame a government agency [INDRHI] for causing the problem.”

My best guess at this time?  Remember, all water entering the Lago Enriquillo watershed stays there until evaporation removes it, there is no other outlet. So, basically,   INDRHI [Instituto Nacional de Recursos Hidráulicos – National Institute of Hydraulic Resources] had piped water to the lake (via canals) and into its watershed (as irrigation water) from the Yaque Sur and left the tap running  for eight years – under one or more of the following circumstances:   as upkeep and maintenance are not strong points of Dominican governmental agencies,  the mechanism to control the flow of water into the lake was broken and never repaired properly  or was ineffective from the start or possibly there was no “tap” ever installed to be shut off  – at least until the lake level became an  issue (around 2012).

This is not an accusation – things are not easy for government agencies in the DR – they seldom have adequate funding for even their most basic tasks and depend on foreign aid to accomplish all major projects (see note below).    I suspect that the government not only built new homes for the displaced, better homes on better land,  but quietly repaired the system that was allowing a run-away flow of water from the Yaque Sur into the lake.  And, with the tap shut off, water is receding again.

Check back next year for another update – as time marches on and the Earth’s natural systems interact with human attempts to modify our environment.

# # # # #

Note:  For example,   INDRHI  had an existing  program to supply isolated villages with clean drinking water by drilling wells.  They had the well-drilling trucks and an expert grew to operate it, but no hand-pumps to install, no pipe, and no cement and no money to buy any.  The NGO my wife and I managed arranged to have 500 pumps manufactured in India and shipped to the DR complete with well pipe and end-user repair kits.  We purchased local cement.  After three years, we financed an independent review by the UN’s WHO/PAHO (World Health Organization, Pan-American Health Organization)  to recommend improvements to the process and program.     In all, safe clean drinking water was supplied to 500 villages around the country over four years.

# # # # #

Author’s Comment Policy:

Hope you don’t mind my following this interesting little story.   It is an example of how the press and certain elements of society turn unexplained occurrences into stories that push their favorite politically correct hobbyhorses and  advocacy positions.

Many of these situations, like the demise of amphibian species and honey bee hive collapse, take patience to let the science really find out what is going on.   We must resist our urges to have a quick answer – the quick answers are almost always wrong.

In today’s world, “It’s Global Warming” or “Climate Change done it” are the quickie, and nearly always wrong, answers most commonly thrown at us by the CAGW fanatics, MSM and blindered Academia. (well, that and “The Russians, the Russians, …”)

In 2005, one of my children, a [with her]  newborn babe in arms,  approached me and asked if I was worried about the future in light of the ongoing alarm about Global Warming. [correction h/t John M. Ware and Lance Wallace — one can never have too many editors – kh]  I told that child, “Let’s give it five or ten years and see how it turns out.”  Now we’ve had ten years of a pause in warming, or ten years of just a little warming [opinions vary], no disasters, and the hype is beginning to fade.  My advice today would be, “Let’s give it another ten years and see.”  I am patient when it comes to science issues.

Please keep the comments to topic (Lago Enriquillo) and if you are addressing me in your comment, begin with my first name “Kip….” so as to catch my eye.

# # # # #

55 thoughts on “Lago Enriquillo Redux

  1. Kip, Nice article! Pls come to the Salton Sea in the Southern Calif. We could use help saving it from the stumbling, fumbling politicians and bureaucrats who are doing nothing material to prevent it from drying

    • eric ==> I grew up in Southern California, in the fifties and sixties, and our family made the obligatory pilgrimage to the Salton Sea several times, when there were still resorts along its shores. Even then, in the dead of summer, it stank.
      Many here will subsequently claim that the Salton Sea is the result of human error — an accidental sea — but this is only partially true. If I were Snopes I would give that idea a red and green dot. See the Wiki for the whole story.
      What you need is more rain over the entire southwest….that would provide enough water to the Colorado to refill the lake. barring that, pouring scarce precious fresh water out on the desert floor just to watch it evaporate in the desert sun may not be the best idea. But….opinions vary.

  2. Kip,
    Sometimes nature has her way. Sometimes man steps in and changes natures course. Sometimes it takes a perceptive eye to attribute anthropogenic impacts appropriately.
    Thank you for this analysis.

    • Lance ==> Adult child with newborn babe in arms…sometimes my language is a little lacking when you can’t see my arms and hands make the “rocking a baby in my arms” gesture.

    • All you need do is add “her” before “arms.” I, too, was amazed at the perspicacity shown by a newborn.

    • hunter ==> It is a labor of passion. Not the Climate Wars, but the long and steady slog against the tide of lazy journalism.

  3. Kip:
    Good reportage.
    All the more reason for an academic institution(s?) to be established by Trump, Chartered with ***Non-AGW*** Climate Sciences, funded 50/50 with AGW-dedicated Research. In short, divide funding for Climate Warming Research equally between Anthropogenic-only Studies and ‘Everything But’. Organized and supervised by Dr. Judith Curry.
    This wd provide employment for those Scientists not wholly convinced as to anthropogenicity (65%?) to follow their careers, un-ostracized and beyond peer- , institutional- and political pressure, in an enlightened environment. Let the academics compete for future funding and research-accolades on a level-playing-field.
    If you think this is a good idea, please get on to Mr. Trump! Let’s get *all* the relevant facts out into the open: ‘Angels’ Advocacy’ to counter the Devil’s. Also, to rebut the Charlatans; purveyors of over-hyped, over-expensive and unnecessary technology funded at the public-trough; sinecure-retainers; and Snake-Oil Salesmen?!!!

  4. Just over the border in Haiti is lake Etang Saumatre, which is also exhibiting a parrellel rise in water level as lake Enriquillo, although that lake level is not as high. There is an, as yet, undetermined quantity of subterranean ingress of water from the Haitian lake that gets to the Dominican Republic lake.
    Added to this subterranean water ingress into lake Enriquillo is water from the topographically distant watershed (“cuenca”) of Yaque del Sur, which is highland fed. Which seems to indicate the changing Dominican Republic lake level is, in large part, driven by an altered rainfall pattern.
    There are many micro-climates on Hispaniola island & there have been decade long dry conditions in a micro-climate that have significantly depleted aquifers, which years later can be fully restored or even exhibit more abundant water than a selected past date in time. Lake Enriquillo even had a coral reef fringe 6,000 years ago.
    The settlers (“colon”) on unclaimed land where the lake had receeded are certainly living with sad consequences of moving into flood zones. However, even the established towns (Duverge pop. 13,500, Villa Jaragua, La Descubierta pop. 7,000 & smaller hamlets) have been seriously impacted, as has a major road linking Haiti between Neiba & Jimani.

    • gringojay ==> No need to guess about those parts of the equation…previous studies, featured in the essay “Lago Enriquillo Revisted” touch on all these points, and up to 2010/11 have data on rainfall, the levels of the two lakes (which rise and fall in unison, not Suamatre emptying into Enriquillo). The Yaque Sur watershed does not feed the LE watershed except by canals. One of the studies mentioned in my earlier essay did ground-penetrating radar to see the subterranean water flows. These and other theories have been looked at in some detail, though there are no smoking guns — other than the canals, which they ignore as far as water flow quantity goes.
      It is highly unlikely that the huge uptick 2003-2011, was caused by increased rainfall alone which does not show up in the precipitation record.
      I am willing to give it another few years and see what shakes out. If my wife and I visit the DR during that time, I’ll ask the director of INDHRI directly if they shut the tap off after 8 years.

      • Cornell Master of Engineering (2011) thesis by Luna & Poteau full free text pdf link = conclusion is basically that “… high precipitation events during last few years exceeding soil capacity …” for local absorption is responsible for lake level changes. Authors go on to point out that from 2003 to 2011 the Haitian lake rose 5 meters & from 2003 to 2010 the Dominican lake rose 6.5 meters. Their Fig. 3 tracks both lakes for few decades if anyone cares to look into the pattern; the irrigation water contribution would only be relevant on the Dominican side.

      • gringojay ==> I thought I had linked that paper in the previous essay, but don’t see it there. One of the charts above is from Luna&Poteau. These two students did a good job but their results are one opinion amongst many, as shown in the comparative chart of in Lago Enriquillo Revisited showing seven studies all published in 2011 with their varying conclusions. None of the reports include or even consider the input of fresh water from Rio Yaque Sur beginning in 2003…..none….no measurements, no calculations, no mention really. Luna and Poteau don’t even mention gthre canals, though it was an official government project to add freshwater to the lake beginning in 2003 to “save the lake”. By 2011, they had been adding freshwater to the lake intentionally for eight years….with no measurement or control.
        The lake has a long history of rising and falling with the weather — that part is the natural variation.
        The unnatural part is running water in from the Yaque Sur for eight years — both just straight into the lake to raise its level and as irrigation water added to the watershed.
        Read some of the other reports for other views.

  5. Kip,
    Thanks for an interesting tale of government ‘good intentions’, the unanticipated results thereof, and the political attempts to use the rising lake levels as false evidence of ‘rising tides’.
    And a big ‘Thank You!’ for your in-the-field charitable work!

    • J Mac ==> Yes — they also wanted to bring prosperity to the very poor area through irrigation — like California’s Imperial Valley. The whole Yaque Sur valley is a booming agricultural region now, as a result, including bringing that same water from higher up in the Yaque Valley from the dam at Padre Las Casas down and over the little hump into the Lago Enriquiillo watershed. That irrigation water ends up either in the bananas, evaporated back into the air, or in the lake.

  6. Even the NYT agrees climate changes . Humans , despite some over inflated sense of importance are not going to control the climate . We do the adaption thing best and isn’t that as it should be . If the seas rise there are winners and losers . It’s not all about us .
    Humans have a better chance of working on human to human problems than wasting $$ Trillions on something that has a 4 billion year track record of doing what it wants .

  7. Lovely story. Thanks.
    Sanity prevails.
    The last bit: I presume you were installing India Mk II pumps. If you are interested in accessing epoxy/glass-filament-wound pump cylinders for those (no metal at all in them) to deal with corrosive ground water, contact me via the Mods.

    • Crispin ==> We used a custom-built pump based on the India Mark II — extremely basic and simple, repairable by anyone with the basic skills of a bicycle mechanic. You can email me at my first name at the domain i4 decimal net.

  8. The NYT also covered the drying of the charmingly named Lake Poopo due to climate change. A tiny bit of googling revels the real factors.
    New York Times 23 Jan 2016 had an article entitled- A Lake in Bolivia Evaporates, and With It a Way of Life
    This article was updated and on 8 July 2016 the New York Times published another article- “Climate Change Claims a Lake, and a Way of Life”
    This story was also published in the Guardian- Bolivia’s second-largest lake dries up and may be gone forever, lost to climate change – Friday 22 January 2016 13.10 AEDT
    The Guardian has many comments attached to the article which picked up that the lake had dried up many times before and that a lot of water had been diverted for mining and agriculture.
    There is a scientific study on the lake-
    which confirms this and notes that there is a dam upstream which restricts water supply to the wet season. The collapse of the Tiwanaku civilization (c. AD 1100) has been attributed to an extended dry period (Binford et al., 1997).

    • littleoil == Thanks for the great example of the type of thing I am trying to illustrate — the use of the press forever trying to blame negative occurrences on a favored boogeyman. It may well be that drought dries up the lake — but without the interference of dams diverting the available water to preferential water customers, the lake would probably remain viable.

  9. Kip,
    “My advice today would be, “Let’s give it another ten years and see.” I am patient when it comes to science issues.”
    Which is fine when there are no compelling influences like another few £/$ Billion (trillion?) to be extracted from the public by way of taxation for renewables, which, in any competent business model would have been abandoned years ago.
    My belief is the alarmist community have been given enough rope to hang themselves with. A pause of almost 19 years now (or heading that way rapidly) whilst Co2 has continued to rise, meanwhile, there are no convincing, in-field, empirical studies demonstrating Co2 causes global temperature rise.
    Forty years of research, millions of scientific man hours, and billions of £/$’s poured into that one simple concept, and no one has produced anything like conclusive evidence. There should be hundreds, if not thousands of convincing papers on the subject by now, but there are none.
    Without wanting to seem critical of your admirable hard work, who will be in government in the US in 10 years time? Who will have the belief to take the liberal lefty greens on, and actually say “enough is enough”? How much more money will be wasted, how much more human suffering before the greens are convinced they were wrong?
    I sincerely hope Trump will put the brakes on because there sure isn’t another politician on the planet with the wherewithal to do it, with the possible exception of Putin, for all his faults.
    Our income in the UK is taxed now at what is probably approaching 50% because of stealth taxes. Our contribution to madcap (failing) renewables is going to be £300Bn by 2030, £19Bn a year(?) whilst our National Health Service is running at a loss of £2.5Bn a year and has been announced as a humanitarian crisis by the Red Cross who have been called into help. Imagine that, the 6th or 7th wealthiest country in the world has to have it’s health service bailed out by the Red Cross!
    It is utter madness to encourage the liberal greens, who will happily spend everyone else’s money on a problem mankind cannot possibly solve, to find more and more bizarre reasons to string the whole issue out.
    And whilst I’m not great Trump fan (the better of two evils I think is the best description) if he stops this madness, and gets America back to work, the rest of the world will be a better place and he will go down in history with an admirable legacy.
    And whilst you might like to give the greens in America ten years (and I’m assuming you are American) that equates to 20 years in Europe. I’ll probably be dead by then but my kids and grandkids will have to endure the financial fallout from 20 years of excessive taxation for no benefit other than to the green machine liberal elite. Even my kids tell me they don’t care about climate change. As our parents did, we dealt with the destructive mess of the 20th Century by adapting, not crystal ball gazing.
    Stop the whole train wreck right now. It has gone on for ten years too long as it is.

    • HotScot ==> I write here and elsewhere to try and fight the tide of poor journalism that misrepresents science and health issues to the general public. Sometimes those journalists are correctly reporting what the University Press release says…but they fail to do their journalist’s job — ask the hard questions, present a fair and even-handed report, seek out contrary views and try to give them the right amount of weight. The values journalists should be following are given in the Journalists’ Code of Ethics.

      • littleoil ==> The NY Times Environmental desk has always been wildly biased pro-CAGW — they hire only advocates to write for them and publish only advocacy pieces….their e=seems to be no editor to rein them in. Andy Revkin, years ago, used to provide a foil for their over-enthusiasm, but then he discovered the money and fame associated with joining the Cause….John Tierney still occasionally fights back but has wisely (professionally wise) chosen to spread himself out rather than concentrate on the Climate Wars.

  10. nature presents us with 2 types of problems
    problems that can not be fixed
    and problems that fix themselves

    • 1random1rando ==> Yes, terrific tool, one can see the lake being filled up to overflowing and in the last two or three years begin retreating.
      The “lake” near Padre :Las Casas is behind a major INDHRI dam.
      In this image, you can see the greenway created by the canal that brings water from the Yaque Sur to the lake circled in red. I believe they have stoppered the end at the lake, so the water can recede.

  11. Kip – Did you detect any hydrothermal activity during drilling? Are there any natural hot springs in the region?

    • Michael ==> Not a hot spot of hot spots….there is reportedly at least one hot spring in the DR, but couldn’t find any info on it.
      Several of the water wells we installed were in near-shore areas, where the people drank brackish water from the slough between their homes and the sea. Careful location and deep drilling provided clean fresh water to those locations.

  12. Kip. I am a geologist who too has spent several years in water exploration and provision in developing countries. I recognised the geomorphology of the region you are addressing. The long term fate of the 2 lakes you describe is most probably death. They are part-way through the process that eventually results in salt lakes.
    Rather than wait for you to answer the questions above I did my own research. Gypsum and salt are mined in the Neyba valley. Recently (in geological scale) this valley was a seaway. Not all rift valleys subside. Some uplift. Furthermore, within the last 100 ka global sea level was as least as high as what we see today and probably higher. I would still put my money on uplift. Portions of these lakes are below sea level. Uplift has formed a marine barrier.
    I have seen a similar scenario on a much larger scale at Afar in the East African Rift Valley. There, the process was more advanced. Most lakes had dried up. These are below sea level too.
    If the pumps you bought in were Afridev I suggest you go back and do a survey on how many are still operating. They are flawed. “Village maintenance” is fine in theory. It seldom works.
    Michael C

    • Michael ==> Ah, you are familiar with Afrodev pumps — luckily, we were aware of the problems with those and avoided them, rather having custom pumps made for us based on a modified design. Luckily the DR is a fairly small country and one can get anyplace in the country, and back, overnight. Each pump not only had a local repair person assigned (the most mechanical person in the village, usually an auto mechanic or motor bike mechanic, sometimes a bicycle mechanic) but has a plaque with the direct telephone number of the phone on the desk of the National engineer responsible for the pump program, who would dispatch repair personnel (in the usual Dominican time frame).
      In these situations, a lot depends on the local people and their willingness to take local/personal responsibility for their water system. Those that do that manage to keep things working.

      • Kip – well done. I hope you used the upgraded plunger and seal. Many Indian manufaturers just keep sending out the early flawed version. They don’t care

      • Michael ==> We had some in-depth technical discussions with them over the problems in Afridev versions, and ordered an better design — and after the first 200 pumps, an additional upgrade was made for the remaining 300. At the 3 year mark, they had held up pretty well.
        Maintenance is not a real strong point in some places…even with daily use items like motorbikes — it is a learned behavior.

    • Michael ==> Yes, the two lakes were sea at one time .. In one of the previous essays, I ventured that the lakes were in a channel between the larger island and islands formed by the hills to their south. This has been confirmed by geological studies. Perfectly willing to accept your opinion on an uplift or a simple sea level drop. The low land barrier to the sea to the southeast of LE is only 35 feet or so above sea level == breach that and it is a channel (or a long narrow bay) again.

  13. Epilogue:
    Thanks to all of you reading here and to those who have left comments, asked questions, and supplied additional data and links. Also appreciated are the ever-present editors who help me keep my English language chops tuned up — there are not enough people who pay attention to words today — they argue about words, but not their proper usage.
    I do promise to follow up again in another year. If the lake fails to continue to recede, assuming normal rainfall this season, I’ll be looking for a better explanation.
    If you missed the comment with the Google Earth time lapse link, here it is, don’t miss it: Use the search to navigate to the Dominican Republic, and scoot over and zoom in on Lago Enriquillo. Very nice illustration of the points of this series. [h/t reader 1random1rando ]

  14. as determined by myself, we were warming globally at a rate of about 0.012K /annum when looked at it over the past 30-40 years
    however, the last 15 years we have started some cooling, from the top latitudes downward.
    naturally this means less clouds and rain at the higher latitudes and more clouds and rain around the equator.
    hence we have already seen major rain /flooding in the Philippines, Indonesia, Brazil and now apparently also in the DR
    this is also apparent from the records of the flooding of the Nile [south to north] and another big river in South America flowing north to south
    hence, you can expect more rain the DR for the years to come…..

    • henryp ==> Alas, I am not a hydrologist nor a meteorologist….just a lowly essayist and science popularizer.
      I’d love to see an analysis of precipitation for the SW DR over the long term. Not sure it will be cyclic, as the majority of precipitation there comes from passing tropical storms and hurricanes in the season thereof. this is part of their problem, rain, when it comes, dumps on them and washes the gulleys and riverbeds clean — with the hills and mountains deforested (for the most part) and now gone to scrub and cactus and brush water rolls right off the soil and down the steep hillsides.

  15. Are there no long term rainfall data going back to 1927 from Haiti, e.g. Port-au-Prince?
    if you can get it, I would also be interested in doing that analysis
    here you can the oldest data I could find, going back to the beginning of the last century. You can see the pendulum relationship that I am claiming exists? At least you can see that the actual measured 1100 at that time does not fit the curve at all?
    At least give it a try [if you can find the data)

    • Henryp ==> I will make an attempt at finding long-term annual rainfall records for Barahona, DR. That is the critical location. Rainfall there is as close to rainfall in the Lago Enriquillo watershed as any point likely to be recorded. The rainfall patterns produced by tropical storms, which supply the bulk of all rain in each annual period, can be very dependent on exact location, especially for the extra five or ten inches in a particular storm.
      I’ll take a look when I get a moment.
      Email me at my first name at the domain i4 decimal net so we can take the project offline.

Comments are closed.