I could be wrong, but this this has all the indications to me of being a cover story for a spy satellite. The artist rendering (below) they provide with the press release shows the satellite imaging a ground based communications facility, rather than probing the atmosphere.That looks like an accidental slip in the PR. Lest you think I’m paranoid, there is precedence for this, NASA reports another Chinese program that looks like the USLANDSAT program, appears to have military capabilities:
The ZiYuan program appears to cover different civil and military earth observation – as well as remote sensing – programs. The ZiYuan-1 program is focused on Earth resources and appears to have two distinct military and civil branches
Given that China’s government doesn’t seem all that concerned about their rapidly rising CO2 emissions, and China is currently burning four billion tons of coal per year compared to the U.S. use of one billion, one wonders why they’d bother to monitor it. Seems like a perfect ruse, especially since China has recently begun what appears to be a cold war style build up of military programs, including building islands at sea solely for military purposes.

From the INSTITUTE OF ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
A cloud-screening scheme for for the Chinese Carbon Dioxide Observation Satellite (TanSat)
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the major greenhouse gases, and causes great concern due to the rapid increase in its atmospheric concentrations. China launched its first minisatellite dedicated to the carbon dioxide detection and monitoring at 15:22 UTC on December 22, 2016. The Chinese Carbon Dioxide Observation Satellite (TANSAT) was designed to focus on the global observation of CO2. For retrieving carbon dioxide from TANSAT observations, cloud detection is an essential preprocessing step.
The TANSAT project is one of the National High-tech Research and Development Programs funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. During the pre-launch study of TANSAT, a cloud-screening scheme for the Cloud and Aerosol Polarization Imager (CAPI) was proposed by a team at the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University. They noticed that previous cloud-screening algorithms were basically designed to provide comprehensive utilization for sensors that contain multiple channels over a wide spectral range. However, for TANSAT/CAPI, the channels available for cloud screening cover only five spectral bands, which is why such sensors need a more effective method to regroup results from few threshold tests.
Their work relies upon the radiance data from the Visible and Infrared Radiometer (VIRR) onboard the Chinese FengYun-3A Polar-orbiting Meteorological Satellite (FY-3A), which uses four wavebands similar to that of CAPI and can serve as a proxy for its measurements. The cloud-screening scheme for TANSAT/CAPI, based on previous cloud-screening algorithms, defines a method to regroup individual threshold tests on a pixel-by-pixel basis according to the derived clear confidence level (CCL).
The scheme has been applied to a number of the FY3A/VIRR scenes over four target areas (desert, snow, ocean, forest) in China for all seasons. Comparisons against the cloud-screening product from MODIS suggest that the proposed scheme inherits the advantages of schemes described in previous publications and shows improved cloud-screening results. This scheme is proven to be more efficient for sensors with few channels or frequencies available for cloud screening.
###
The paper: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00376-016-6033-y
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Even if it was for CO2 who is going to believe the data – From China, the one nation that has the most to gain by PROMOTING CO2 Thermogeddon. The whole AGW scam weakens the west why would China not want more of that?
Okay, did anyone else notice the use of “Peking” in the release? They’ve enforced the Pinyin spelling since the 1980s…
China does not enforce American information sources but it is an interesting lapse in political correctness.
They do enforce the Pinyin spellings of various things, though.
But Nick and QQBoss are correct, apparently – interesting that there are a few “lapses” in the tyranny’s insistence on conformity.
No, it really is Peking University.
Because both Peking University and Tsinghua University were established and famous long before the national acceptance of Hanyu Pinyin, they both were allowed to keep their Wade-Giles romanization (I are a professor [not of English] in Beijing currently).
“China’s emboldened military is racing towards head-on confrontation with the U.S. ”
BS! The US is the dominant world military power. When China try to throw its non-existent weight around by committing ‘acts of war’, the US discretely sends another nuclear carrier for an unplanned exercise.
It is big ocean. The world depends on the US Navy to keep the sea lanes open. Every country with a blue water navy exercises with the US navy, including China.
When I was working in China, China committed an ‘act of war’ against a US surveillance plane. At about the same time, the Chinese news is full of stories about China joining exercises near Hawaii.
Yet the USN is concerned about the vulnerability of its CVNs. Although not enough to stop building supercarriers:
https://warisboring.com/the-u-s-navys-big-mistake-building-tons-of-supercarriers-571c8dad2f29#.kyqw4w348
The capital ships of the 21st century might prove to be super-boomer subs, ie underwater aircraft carriers (SSBGCVNs), capable of firing torpedoes, launching ballistic and cruise missiles and long-range, recoverable, reusable drones, plus delivering SEALs. Thus, they could engage in shore bombardment, fight fleet actions and deploy special forces and Marines, just like ships of the line, battleships and carriers of yore.
Trident SLBM tube-launched reusable drone design:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_Cormorant
So, instead of “Away all boats!”, it would be “Away all SDVs!”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEAL_Delivery_Vehicle
Drones is really the wrong word. Typically, drones are stupid and fly straight lines or simple, pre-planned routes. UAV is a better term. But, sadly, drone has stuck.
“Retired Kit P December 27, 2016 at 3:04 pm”
For now. All empires fall…
The United States is not an empire. The prosperity that China enjoys is based on trade not military conquest.
You are free to believe what you want.
The Chinese government is a communist government. It will always lie, big time, as and when it is in the best interests of China. You can see that with its militarised islands. The CO2 satellite is merely a spy satellite.
Naked prejudice…and ignorance. Impervious. You should pour it on canvas and make it into raincoats.
I suppose they work according to a 23-hour clock, as well? Sometimes tyrants say true things. The burden of proof is rather on you to show that it is (or even could be) a “spy satellite.”
One should remember that there is an international agreement allowing overflight of satellites which incorporate “National Technical Means”, ie if you can figure out how to map the other guy’s perineum the dude can’t do anything about it under international “law”. It would be anything but prudent to launch a multi-hundred million dollar satellite without covering all the bases.
Tan Weixing Satellite
———–
China’s Tan Weixing (Carbon Satellite or TanSat) was launched on Dec 21. It carries a high resolution grating spectrometer to measure CO2 and O2 distribution and a wide field of view cloud/aerosol imager. The 620 kg satellite will map global CO2 sources and sinks with a precision of 1
percent.
Three smaller payloads from the Shanghai microsatellite center were also carried; they are about 50 kg each. Spark-01 and Spark-02 have hyperspectral imagers; the third, referred to as Chao fenbianlu duo
guangpu chengxiang weixing (Ultra-resolution multispectral imaging satellite) has a 1.4m resolution imager.
http://www.planet4589.org/space/jsr/jsr.html
shouldn’t that thread talk about
http://www.practicalenvironmentalist.com/an-unwelcome-chinese-import-transcontinental-air-pollution/
samples
https://www.google.at/search?q=China+air+pollution+taklamakan&oq=China+air+pollution+taklamakan&aqs=chrome..69i57.42659j0j4&client=ms-android-samsung&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
For additional background on Tansat: https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/t/tansat
and
http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/china-national-space-administration/long-march-2d-launches-china-tansat-carbon-monitoring-satellite/