Paramount to Release a Sequel to Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth"

gw-al-gore-fire

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Paramount has announced that a sequel to Al Gore’s 2006 climate documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” will be aired at the Sundance Festival in January 2017.

Paramount Pictures will distribute a still-untitled An Inconvenient Truth sequel

Paramount Pictures announced today it will release a still untitled An Inconvenient Truth sequel theatrically. From Participant Media, and directed by Bonni Cohen and Jon Shenk, the An Inconvenient Truth sequel follows former Vice President Al Gore as he continues his decades-long fight to build a more sustainable future for our planet. The 2006 original won two Academy Awards.

“Now more than ever we must rededicate ourselves to solving the climate crisis,” says Gore. “But we have reason to be hopeful; the solutions to the crisis are at hand. I’m deeply honored and grateful that Paramount Pictures and Participant Media have once again taken on the task of bringing the critical story of the climate crisis to the world.”

Read more: http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/793849-an-inconvenient-truth-sequel

I’m personally looking forward to the sequel. I mean, there are important questions unanswered by the first “Inconvenient Truth”, questions like “Why did you sell your TV station to Al Jazeera – what happened to the $100 million you took from the Qatar Oil Sheiks?“. Or “Why did you buy that Montecito beach view villa in 2010, if you thought sea level rise was about to engulf coastal towns?”. How about “How much electricity did you burn during Earth Hour 2009, when you left the lights on at your huge Tennessee mansion?“.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
175 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
johan
December 11, 2016 2:40 am

Hey you all,
Can someone tell me if it’s true that Al Gore, after a trip to Latin America, has said that he regrets he did not study latin more diligently at school so he would have been able to talk to people on his trip.

Roger Knights
Reply to  johan
December 11, 2016 5:00 am

“Albert Gore Jr. won the Nobel peace prize was vice president for 8 years without scandal …”
Not quite. Here are a few interesting quotes from the book, The Stupidest Things Ever Said by Politicians:
On Illegal Fund-Raisers at Buddhist Temples, Al Gore on:
Explanation number 1: It wasn’t a fund-raiser, it was a “community outreach event.”
Explanation number 2: It wasn’t a fund-raiser, it was just “finance-related.”
Explanation number 3: It wasn’t a fund-raiser, it was a “donor-maintenance meeting.”
There’s also this amusing tidbit:
On Historical Knowledge, Vice-Presidential:
“Who are these guys?”
Al Gore, referring to the busts of Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, and Lafayette on a televised tour of Monticello. (p. 109)
And this:
“A zebra cannot change its spots.” (p. 54)
And this:
On Senator’s Sons, Typical Days of:
“[My father] taught me how to clean out hog waste with a shovel and a hose. He taught me how to clear land with an ax. He taught me how to plow a steep hillside with a team of mules. He taught me how to take up hay all day long in the hot sun and then, after a dinner break, go help the neighbors take up hay before the rain came and spoiled it on the ground.”
Vice President Al Gore on the virtues of farm life, not mentioning that, as a rich senator’s son, all this was presumably learned on summer vacation from Harvard. A real farmer’s son, Republican National chairman Jim Nicholson, replied, “Mr. Vice President, with all due respect, you’re shoveling a lot more of it right now than you ever did back then.” (p. 141)
And this:
On Timing is Everything:
“[Due to pollution, cars pose] a mortal threat to the security of every nation.”
Senator Al Gore in his 1992 book,
Earth in the Balance.
“Here in Motor City we recognize that cars have done more than fuel our commerce. Cars have freed the American spirit and given us the chance to chase our dreams.”
Vice President Al Gore — while gearing up for his 2000 presidential run — in a 1999 speech to the Economic club of Detroit. (p. 253)
Wade (06:46:18) :
Ah yes, Al Gore. Does anybody remember the fuel additive MTBE? It just so happens that this fuel additive was ground water poison. It can be cleaned up, but it ain’t cheap. Does anybody remember who was the one pushing MTBE? Answer: Al Gore and Carol Browner.
Here is what is known. A disciple (and yes I mean disciple) of Al Gore, Carol Browner, knew MTBE was groundwater poison but destroyed those documents. The data was suppressed that showed a dissenting viewpoint; sound familiar?

pameladragon
Reply to  Roger Knights
December 11, 2016 7:05 am

There’s also this amusing tidbit:
On Historical Knowledge, Vice-Presidential:
“Who are these guys?”
Al Gore, referring to the busts of Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, and Lafayette on a televised tour of Monticello. (p. 109)
That was during the Clinton Grand Triumphant bus ride through Virginia to D.C. The docent at Monticello has already done her little talk about the contents of the room (which includes a description of the busts and who sculpted them) when Algore asked that question, the look on her face was priceless. It was at that precise moment I realized that we had yet another idiot-elect VP. Of course he went on to prove this over and over during the next 8+ years. His climate nonsense was just another indication of his lack of knowledge.
PMK

Tucker
December 11, 2016 3:23 am

I’m personally looking forward to the sequel. I mean, there are important questions unanswered by the first “Inconvenient Truth”, questions like “Why did you sell your TV station to Al Jazeera – what happened to the $100 million you took from the Qatar Oil Sheiks?“. Or “Why did you buy that Montecito beach view villa in 2010, if you thought sea level rise was about to engulf coastal towns?”. How about “How much electricity did you burn during Earth Hour 2009, when you left the lights on at your huge Tennessee mansion?“
Inconvenient truths indeed!!!

know better
December 11, 2016 3:26 am

It would be rather nice if some sceptic film production company could be found to produce a film showing where the Inconvenient Truth propaganda film and its warnings therein have turned out to be so far from the truth, and to dig deep into the financial benefits that Gore has gained from attaching his businesses to the global warming falsehoods. that he has promoted. Much of the material for such a film would be readily available from this site. I for one would be happy to make a substantial donation towards the production of such a film.

2hotel9
Reply to  know better
December 11, 2016 4:32 am

Here you go, enjoy, and share. “Climate Hustle” is still readily available on DVD from C-Fact priced, I think, $19.99

Dean
December 11, 2016 3:32 am

An Inconvenient Data Set??

Roger Knights
December 11, 2016 4:41 am

Here’s part of Scott Adams’ blog post from yesterday, at http://blog.dilbert.com/post/154250104221/watching-trump-create-money-from-nothing

On Climate Change
Trump is also well on the way to changing the public’s thinking on climate change. Trump met with Al Gore, and he’s meeting with climate activist and actor Leonardo DiCaprio on the topic. Trump is looking for common ground and education on the topic, I assume, but he is almost certainly also looking for the persuasion buttons. And this is a hard one.
The simple, visual persuasion favors the climate alarmists. They can point to rising seas, super hurricanes, and droughts. We can imagine all of that stuff and it scares us. Fear plus a visual element make for the strongest persuasion.
On the other side of the debate there is no visual persuasion available. Normal weather is just normal. And since you can’t “prove a negative,” there is no way to prove human activity and C02 production will NOT be the tipping factor that ends civilization.
If you think many people believe in climate science predictions because of the science and the facts, you don’t know anything about human beings. We just observed an election in which facts and policies barely mattered at all. What matters is how we feel. Climate change is the same situation. All of the natural elements of persuasion are on one side. We can visualize bad weather and it scares us. The other side has nothing, persuasion-wise.
I’m not a scientist, so I can’t evaluate the claims of climate science. But I’m knowledgeable in persuasion, and I can tell you with a degree of certainty that the number of citizens that believe in climate science predictions of doom would be the same whether the science was valid or not, because the persuasion advantage points in that direction. If something is scary and you can visualize it, you treat it like it is real. Even if it isn’t.
Some say that the risk of climate change is unpredictable, and that’s reason enough to get serious about it. Maybe climate change will do nothing but help crops in some places. But maybe it will destroy civilization. Shouldn’t we take seriously any risk with that much downside?
Answer: No.
Because lots of risks have a worst-case scenario. And they all look terrible if you think about them long enough. It isn’t rational to make all of your major decisions based on the worst-case scenario for every situation.
My best guess from the perspective of a non-scientist observer is that human activity does change the atmosphere, but the climate prediction models are unlikely to be accurate because complicated models rarely are. Once you get more than three variables, and you have humans deciding which data to use and when to smooth it, you end up with nonsense. Climate science has more than a few variables. So I expect the models are nonsense, which is a separate issue from the underlying truth which could be anything. I don’t have any insight on the underlying truth of climate science. All I see is persuasion of various types.

Roger Knights
Reply to  Roger Knights
December 11, 2016 4:52 am

CodeTech says: August 10, 2014 at 10:38 pm
But it’s not about the science.
Millions of people actually BELIEVE that Bill Nye and/or Al Gore demonstrated “global warming” on live TV. That is what counts. Anyone else is funded by the Koch brothers and eats kittens.

2hotel9
Reply to  Roger Knights
December 11, 2016 6:58 am

Kittens give Morbo gas!

Nigel S
Reply to  Roger Knights
December 11, 2016 5:21 am

Very, very good! My son and daughter-in-law, both, like me, engineers, sent me Dilbert’s ‘Salary Theorem’.
Knowledge is Power, Time is Money
As every engineer knows;
Power = Work/Time
hence
Knowledge = Work/Money
and
Money = Work/Knowledge
As Knowledge approches zero, Money approaches infinity regardless of the amount of Work
Conclusion: The less you know, the more you make.

Bruce Cobb
December 11, 2016 4:55 am

How about: “Code Red For The Blue Marble”, or “We’re Going To Need A Bigger Scissors Jack”.

John Robertson
December 11, 2016 5:03 am

New title?
Inconvenient Reality?
Busted ! Years of lying by another greedy parasite.?
The so misnamed “An Inconvenient Truth” was comedy,propaganda so thick and heavy handed that it will rank with “Reefer madness” in the halls of misfired messages.
A sequel?
Al Gore is gonna try telling the truth?
After the first pack of lies failed to persuade, after enriching himself selling doom and self hatred to the gullible, what is next?
After all the damage to taxpayer this monster lie has caused, Gore would be better off with “shut up”.
However with classic Progressive/Democrat style I expect a movie with the premise that reality is wrong and only the official Narrative is acceptable.
Funny how most of these “Planet Savers” fit the typical image. Do-Gooder, a cover for a power hungry loon.

Scott
December 11, 2016 5:43 am

Since the first one spectaculatly failed its mission to make us believe in global warming, and everyone knows sequels always stink, they will have to crank up the sales pressure this time, maybe give a tax break for attending the showing, also expect to stand and recite the national anthem and global anthem (not written yet) beforehand to foster a greater sense of national pride and global togetherness, if you dare not rise you will be hauled out a there and dealt with.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/30/world/asia/india-cinemas-national-anthem.html

john
December 11, 2016 6:52 am

There once was a man named Al,
Who thought everyone was his pal,
It could’ve been confusion,
or maybe a delusion,
but his best friend’s a computer named HAL.

Marty
December 11, 2016 8:06 am

DJ Trump’s newest film ” The Incoming Truth”.

Joe
December 11, 2016 9:14 am

I am waiting for the Park City weather forecast for mid-Jan.

pameladragon
Reply to  Joe
December 11, 2016 9:24 am

Well, it is primarily a ski resort, so the locals are most likely out doing their snow dances in hopes of appeasing the local Gods and receiving many meters of fluffy frozen water. Kind of curious why Redford would select this location for Sundance unless they are convinced that it will be warm and sunny thanks to CAGW….
PMK

December 11, 2016 9:18 am

The photo accompanying this post clearly misrepresents the subject, since the flaming cloud actually blows from the opposite orifice.
Now the photo would work great for a certain group of authors (whom we are forbidden to mention here), if we added dragon ears, dragon wings, and, of course, a pointed dragon tail.

Resourceguy
December 11, 2016 9:22 am

Where are the monster hurricanes from the first movie poster?

December 11, 2016 9:55 am

What is the IPCC’s projection for sharknadoes ? “Impossible occurrences”, you say ? … You’d think. But we have CO2 now as a pollutant, and so I dismiss nothing as a possibility.
Oh, you mean CO2 pollution was just a fantasy for movies all along ? Whew !, … you had me going there for a while.

December 11, 2016 9:57 am

An Inconvenient Truth II: Because the First Load of Crap Didn’t Work.

john
December 11, 2016 10:19 am

Rick Perry may be the DOE pick according to Zero Hedge moments ago.
I am not a fan at all…This is going to be a very big mistake. Just ask Australia about all those recent statewide wind generated blackouts, ERCOT issues and all those former Enron cats still running amok out there that received billions in stimulus funds, got rich and crashed all those green companies costing us dearly (and in the future with double to triple electric rates and and grid problems). This is crap in no uncertain terms.
http://e360.yale.edu/feature/how_conservative_texas_took_the_lead_in_us_
Furthermore…
http://www.masterresource.org/pickens-t-boone/governor-rick-perry-r-tx-

December 11, 2016 1:11 pm

Paramount to Release a Sequel to Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth”

Is it going to be called, “Wrong Again”?
Oddly enough, it was the hype about the original and The Weather Channel” that helped convince me CAGW was a sham, “political science’.
Back then the TWC’s “Weather on the 8’s” included the record highs and lows for the day. I noticed that records for my little spot on the globe didn’t seem to be reflecting what CAGW, as Al promoted, should be happening.
In 2007 I went to the NWS’s listed records of the highs and lows and found that most of the record highs were before 1950 and most of the record lows were after 1950. (This was years before I found WUWT.)
I went back about 5 years later and found that there were many new record highs and lows. Not new ones set, but old ones changed. (ie a new record high for the day “set” more recently was lower than the old record high for the day in the 2007 list.)
TWC stopped putting up the record highs and lows for the day a few years ago. (I wonder why?)
But I would like to thank them, the back then “them”, for helping to confirm my suspicions that Al was full of hot air.

knr
December 11, 2016 2:12 pm

I am surprised given St Gores last 24 borathon totally bummed out , you think that their not be any millage in this . Still the bad news is he will once again hes gets a ego boast and will make a ton of cash, both of which hardly need adding to . The good news is hat the people who will lose cash are the dam fools who want to go and watch it .

Javert Chip
December 11, 2016 2:35 pm

Are they going to fake the “heating CO2 in a bottle” experiment again? I really liked that.

Dr. Strangelove
December 11, 2016 6:55 pm

Regarding the nine errors in Gore’s film ruled by the High Court of Justice of England, Error 4 alone is enough to debunk CAGW. As Einstein said about the “100 authors against Einstein,” if I were wrong one would be enough. One error is enough, nine errors are more than enough to dismiss Gore’s film as science fiction. A sequel to Gore’s science fiction? I would rather watch the sequel to Star Wars

Tom Halla
Reply to  Dr. Strangelove
December 11, 2016 7:05 pm

To make a geeky distinction–“science fiction’ tries to get the science right, or at least does not depend on deliberately violating it. “Fantasy” uses something as an essential plot element that is impossible. Gore did a fantasy.

J.H.
December 11, 2016 8:22 pm

They had that all ready for Hillary’s win at the election…. But things didn’t go as planned. 😉

Johann Wundersamer
December 12, 2016 1:05 am

The start of Al Gores
undeclared civil war.

tadchem
December 12, 2016 4:29 am

The Farmer’s Almanac forecasts colder than normal temperatures for the northern High Plains region in January 2017. My wife, as a high school student in Casper WY, recalls a guest lecturer once addressed her whole school on the subject of global warming on the coldest day of the year. She says in the people of Wyoming they WANT global warming.

Lone Gunman
December 12, 2016 7:20 am

Wonder if they are going to rate this one as a “Situation Comedy” like the last one?

Joel Snider
December 12, 2016 3:40 pm

Maybe Adam Sandler can sing the theme song: My suggestion is this little diddy from the ‘Wedding Singer’..