Wind: An Important Forgotten or Ignored Weather Variable

Guest opinion; Dr. Tim Ball

“Every wind has its weather.” English philosopher Sir Francis Bacon (1561 –1621)

What happens if the global average wind speed changes by one kilometer per hour? A great deal, including the rate of evaporation from the surface, a major mechanism of energy transfers in the atmosphere. The wind is not part of the official discussion about climate change because it is not part of the greenhouse effect (GE) mechanism. It is the major reason why GE is a false analogy. Wind is a major variable so important in physical mechanisms of the atmosphere. It is also very important in people’s interaction with the atmosphere. But consider what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR5 Physical Science Basis Report says,

AR4 concluded that mid-latitude westerly winds have generally increased in both hemispheres. Because of shortcomings in the observations, SREX stated that confidence in surface wind trends is low. Further studies assessed here confirm this assessment. (My bold)

Lack of adequate temperature and pressure measurements mean the computer models cannot reproduce accurately these mechanisms.

Wind (advection) is created by temperature differences at the surface. This creates pressure differences relatively determined as High and Low. Nature tries to offset the imbalance by moving air from the High to the Low. The strength of the wind is determined by the difference in pressure and the distance between the centres of High and Low known as the Pressure Gradient Force (PGF).

Transport of heat is an extremely important function of the wind, which it does when warm air moves into a cold region. It also does it by the least known and understood, but most important, latent heat.

Evaporation is the process of molecules of water reaching escape velocity and breaking free from the surface of the water into the air. This can increase in three ways, increasing of water temperature, increasing in air temperature or, increasing wind speed. The most important of the three is an increase in wind speed.

The energy used to increase the escape velocity of a water molecule is not lost; rather it is within the molecule as latent heat. The molecule changes from liquid to gas in the escape. When condensation occurs the water as gas goes back to liquid and the latent heat is released to warm the atmosphere. This is why air temperature increases when rain or snow occurs.

Moisture is also put into the air through plants in a process called transpiration. This also varies with heat and wind speed. The volumes of moisture are prodigious The United States Geological Survey say,An acre of corn gives off about 3,000-4,000 gallons (11,400-15,100 liters) of water each day, and a large oak tree can transpire 40,000 gallons (151,000 liters) per year.” No wonder there is a considerable difference between cleared and forested slopes at the Coweta Experiment Station (Figure 1.)

clip_image002

Figure 1. Comparison of evaporation and run off from

cleared and forested slopes.

The sensationalist media focus on tornadoes and hurricanes, but strong winds constantly and consistently do far more damage. People who lived through the thirties dust bowl talk about the constant winds desiccating everything. Southern Canada saw similar pattern across the Prairies. Figure 2 shows a picture taken in Regina, Saskatchewan in April 1933. Despite this, there are few studies of the wind and its role in aggravating the situation. For example, soil erosion is a natural process, but exacerbated by increased winds.

clip_image004

Figure 2

Most people know about meteorology, but don’t realize it is a subset of climatology, that it only studies physics of the atmosphere. Aristotle wrote a book De Meteorologica that relates to atmospheric processes. He also studied climatology and produced a global climate classification system. The word climate comes from klima, the Greek word for inclination (The spell-checker suggested karma). They mean the angle of incidence, the angle at which the sun’s rays strike the surface. From this Aristotle identified three climate zones (Figure 3).

clip_image006

Figure 3

The Greeks also understood that each region had different wind patterns and seasonal movement of the zones meant changing winds that marked the change of seasons. The wind was so important that in the first century BC Andronicus built the Tower of the Winds in Athens. Each of the eight sides depicts male deities who characterize wind and weather from that direction. The only name familiar to people today is Boreas god of the north wind. We retain two important ideas. The first is that we define winds by the directions from which they come – a north wind comes from the north. For many, especially people whose livelihood like farmers are weather dependent, still use wind direction as a prognosticator of weather conditions. The idea persists because it is observable and a useful method of predicting local conditions. These empirical observations and forecasts were recorded by Theophrastus (371-287 BC), a student of Aristotle’s, in a book Meteorological Phenomena, more commonly known as the Book of Signs.

Wind direction was easily determined, but speed was always much more difficult. Early attempts used a flat board on a spring with a pointer attached set against a scale. Wind pushed the board, and the pointer indicated the force. The major change came with the wind cup or anemometer in 1846, although some earlier instruments existed from about 1450 in the pre-scientific era. It provides an accurate measure, but recording the information for analysis was more difficult. Unlike most weather variables, continuous data is critical because wind speed is extremely variable but the effect is cumulative. Any average is inadequate, except for determining global wind patterns (Figure 4).

clip_image007

Figure 4

George Hadley (1685-1768), lawyer and amateur meteorologist made a major contribution to climatology through an interest in the Trade Winds. He used ships weather logs to produce a theory about a major portion of atmospheric circulation. The Hadley Cell was the only portion of atmospheric circulation we understood in concept for 250 years. Ironically, and sadly, its major role in global weather and climate is still inadequately covered in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) computer models.

There are also distinctive regional winds that often define a cultural region. For example, hot, dry winds blowing from desert regions such as the Santa Ana winds in California, the Sirocco or Harmattan winds from the Sahara, or the Mistral in southern France. They are harbingers of stressing conditions. In Alberta, the Chinook are warm winds blowing down off the Rockies. The name means “snow eater” which reflects higher temperatures but also stronger winds. That great environmental expert Leonardo DiCaprio was in Calgary for a chinook event and displayed his ignorance by saying it was evidence of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

Ironically, the Agricultural Revolution took people away from the weather into the confines of urban areas. When I lived in Winnipeg, I did a regular program each month on the weather. Every autumn it included warnings about travelling outside city limits. Every year people considered conditions reasonable but were suddenly caught in blowing and drifting snow. The worst was west of the city on the open Prairie. For better control, they installed gates so they could close the highway (Figure 5).

clip_image009

Figure 5

Most people are more removed from agriculture than ever. Those still involved recognize the impact. A book “Weather forecasting: The Country Way” by farmer/author Robin Page says in the preface,

Yet it is strange to record that as the weather forecasting service has grown in size and expense, so its predictions seem to have become more inaccurate.”

Some of the wind observations still used in the Northern Hemisphere middle latitudes include;

Easterly winds bring rain. Or; When you can see the backs of the leaves, it will rain.

 

A west wind is a favourable wind.

 

A veering wind will clear the sky; a backing wind says storms are nigh.

 

Veering means the wind direction is shifting clockwise, so a wind that changes from west to northwest to north is veering. This is associated with high pressure, which brings clear skies. If the wind is backing it is turning counterclockwise then there is a low pressure bringing clouds and probably precipitation. These comments explain Buys-Ballots law that says in the Northern Hemisphere

With your back to the wind, the low pressure is on your left.

 

Wind effects are real-time experiences for comfort and survival of plants and animals. Air temperatures are measured in still air, so they don’t express how plants or humans are impacted. A wind chill index tells us the rate at which a body is losing heat, which is useful for avoiding severe conditions. Wind also creates large scale regional precipitation effects. For example, west or northwest winds across the open water of the Great Lakes can bring lake-effect rain or snow to large areas of the Northeast.

A significant climate change was captured in a long-term weather record. Wind was the most consistent entry in the Daily Journals of the Hudson’s Bay Company. Officers were all trained as Mariners maintained the journals. They used a standard logging technique developed by Dr. James Jurin in 1722 and recorded the wind to 32 points of the compass. At no time in the record did they measure wind speed, rather, they used a subjective scale similar to that developed by Admiral Beaufort.

Figure 6 shows plots of the percentage frequency of south winds at York Factory located on the southwest shore of Hudson Bay (Figure 5).

clip_image011

Figure 5

The plot compares percentage of wind directions for two decades over 100 years apart. In the early decade from 1721 to 1731, which is well within the Little Ice Age (LIA), south winds blow less than 7 percent of the time. In the decade from 1841 to 1851, which is outside of the LIA, south winds occur over 12 percent of the time with a peak in 1842 of 27 percent.

clip_image013

Figure 6: Percentage of south winds at York Factory

Source; Ball (1986), Climate Change, Vol. 8 pp. 121-134.

This indicates York Factory was within the zone of the polar easterlies (Figure 4) during the Little Ice Age. Then, as conditions warmed naturally, the Polar Front moved north, and York was in the zone of the Westerlies. The same change did not occur at Churchill approximately 190 km further north (Figure 5).

There are so many variables ignored, underreported or simply not understood in climate science and especially in the computer models that purport to simulate global climate. This destroys any pretense we know or understand weather and climate. James Lovelock, the originator of the Gaia hypothesis, said,

“It’s almost naive, scientifically speaking, to think that we can give relatively accurate predictions for future climate. There are so many unknowns that it’s wrong to do it.”

The degree to which the IPCC and their supporters have fooled the world is amazing. As Jean-Francois Revel said:

“How is it possible for a theory, which is false in its component parts, to be true as a whole.”

With ‘official’ climate science many parts of the whole are simply omitted. Revel explained the mentality of the AGW supporters when he wrote,

“A human group transforms itself into a crowd when it suddenly responds to a suggestion rather than to reasoning, to an image rather than to an idea, to an affirmation rather than to proof, to the repetition of a phrase rather than to arguments, to prestige rather than to competence.”

His book, “The Flight from Truth: The Reign of Deceit in the Age of Information” tells it all.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
143 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Murphy
September 11, 2016 12:44 pm

As a proud deplorable may I add:
1 – the kinetic energy in wind is trivial in comparison to the overall energy budget for the atmosphere. However, some of it reflects the fact that the atmosphere is only loosely coupled to the earth itself -i.e. not all of the energy is due gravity acting to balance highs and lows against solar or other heating. Very hard to work out even in theory and so far utterly impractical to measure, but real none the less.
2 – one issue I keep wondering about involves the loss of atmospheric kinetic energy to windmills. Fourteenthe decimal place stuff; but a real and unnatural transformation none the less.

Reply to  Paul Murphy
September 11, 2016 12:56 pm

“one issue I keep wondering about involves the loss of atmospheric kinetic energy to windmills.”
Or solar heating turned into electricity by photovoltaic cells.

Catcracking
Reply to  Paul Murphy
September 12, 2016 12:43 pm

Paul,
As another deplorable, I would like to compare the energy removed from wind and from solar systems preventing return to space compared to the impact of incremental CO 2 caused by fossil fuels.
Do you have any numbers?

September 11, 2016 1:27 pm

You forgot to mention:
Because of higher wind speeds, SUVs will burn more gasoline, and of course EVERYONE knows SUVs burning gasoline are the main cause of climate change.
A climate change article on wind?
What could wind have to do with global warming?
Next thing I imagine you’ll be writing about the sun, cosmic rays and clouds!
EVERYONE knows global warming is caused by humans — there is a 105% consensus on this!
Expert scientists, such as Mr. Obama, Mr. DiCraprio, and the Pope himself, say so.
Everyone knows humans cause climate change:
(A) Who puts thermometers next to runways?
HUMANS
(B) Who wild guesses data for about half the grids every month?
HUMANS
(C) Who “adjusts” historical raw data to better match the confuser models?
HUMANS
In my opinion, and I have 18 years of edumacation, the “adjustments” to the raw temperature data are the main cause of global warming … and the rest is just random temperature variations, from century to century — and that small amount of warming is only noticed because so many HUMANS are overweight !
A huge number of overweight HUMANS were feeling warm, and all those baby boomers going through menopause were feeling warm, so a lot of people in the world were ready to believe in the global warming boogeyman.
If most people had been skinny, like models, and cold all the time, like my wife, global cooling would have been the boogeyman.
I believe this comment, which is not satire … makes as much sense as so many people living in a wonderful climate in 2016, that has barely changed in 150 years, and believing we are actually living in an ongoing climate catastrophe that will end with runaway global warming?
Thanks for yet another interesting article Dr. Ball

Reply to  Richard Greene
September 11, 2016 1:39 pm

“Because of higher wind speeds, SUVs will burn more gasoline”
Mine gets about 1 MPG less when driving into a head wind, but also gets 1 MPG more when driving with a tail wind. Cross winds are another story …

Reply to  co2isnotevil
September 11, 2016 1:54 pm

Let’s not confuse my post with actual facts.
I have a climate blog with serious posts:
http://www.elOnionBloggle.Blogspot.com
September 11 was even more depressing for me than usual, because today my wife insisted on us watching a replay of the actual MSNBC broadcast on September 11, 2001 … I went graduate school in the shadows of the twin towers, and the first time I took my wife to NYC we ate at Windows on the World restaurant on the top floor of one of the towers.
Yet here we are 15 years later, and I’m not sure if the attack on the towers, or the US response to it, was worse!
Sending so many Americans to Muslim countries, where our soldiers became targets like ducks in a shooting gallery, and even more Americans were killed by Muslims — did that make sense?

Another Ian
September 11, 2016 2:30 pm

FWIW A couple of observations on wind that come from the perspective of a driver of a not overpowered truck.
One of my regular runs starts in open grassland and then goes through open woodland (around 30 – 40% canopy cover).
If I head out with a stock crate on the truck (i.e. not very aerodynamic) into a good head wind I will gain up to 20 km/hr when I get to the timber. Obviously the wind hasn’t stopped, but it is now a layer over the trees and its effect is diluted below the tree line.
And in a good hot summer day the engine temperatures will be higher in the timber, even though there is some shade there.
Also I wonder at some bare patches in the timbered country that don’t seem to be related to stock activity and whether there might be something like boundary layer vortices in action.

H. D. Hoese
September 11, 2016 5:25 pm

Seems like there are similar scale boundary conditions in the oceans which have no trees to identify them. Don’t see much study.

September 12, 2016 7:46 am

Plant life significantly alters ground airflow patterns, and some evidence suggests plants may utilize wind-induced motion to generate energy. When considering wind, then, we should also consider alterations to airflow with plant life interactions in mind; “Another Ian” touches on this above. The potential implications of extensive wind power on weather are important, but the implications for agriculture, as we potentially rob plants of an energy resource, may be at least as significant.

September 12, 2016 9:41 am

I dealt with this very topic here:
http://www.newclimatemodel.com/weather-is-the-key-after-all/
June 2008

September 12, 2016 9:20 pm

Fine post as usual from Tim Ball who knows more about the atmosphere than you could discover if you upended a hundred PhDs. The direction of the wind coupled with its origin is the prime determinant of surface temperature. Changes in the global circulation are systematic, natural and under external control. There is apparent chaos until the mechanism is revealed. At https://reality348.wordpress.com/ I look at the impact of cosmic rays as part driver of the well recognised annular modes of climate change, generally recognised as the dominant mode of natural climate change and provide a proof that there is no greenhouse effect.

September 18, 2016 9:04 pm

Fortunately we have the seminal work of DrJoseph O Fletcher who asked himself:”What is NATURAL climate change? Read http://www.seafriends.org.nz/issues/global/climate7.htm
He concluded: the wind vector (=wind speed).
Read also my chapter on the capricious role of water, ice and vapour:
http://www.seafriends.org.nz/issues/global/climate2.htm
It also explains how the laundry dries in frost.
All relatively easy to understand.