Guardian: Old People Voting Against Climate or Brexit is "Intergenerational Theft"

Anker Grossvater erzählt eine Geschichte 1884
Anker Grossvater erzählt eine Geschichte 1884. By Albert Anker – Albert Anker, Sandor Kuthy und andere, Orell Füssli Verlag, Zürich 1980, Public Domain,

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Oil industry consultant Dana Nuccitelli, writing for the Guardian, has launched yet another green attack on democracy, by suggesting that older people who voted for Brexit, or who vote against green policies, are committing “intergenerational theft”.

The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change

Youth will bear the brunt of the poor decisions being made by today’s older generations

In last week’s Brexit vote results, there was a tremendous divide between age groups. 73% of voters under the age of 25 voted to remain in the EU, while about 58% over the age of 45 voted to leave.

This generational gap is among the many parallels between Brexit and climate change. A 2014 poll found that 74% of Americans under the age of 30 support government policies to cut carbon pollution, as compared to just 58% of respondents over the age of 40, and 52% over the age of 65.

Inter-generational theft

The problem is of course that younger generations will have to live with the consequences of the decisions we make today for much longer than older generations. Older generations in developed countries prospered as a result of the burning of fossil fuels for seemingly cheap energy.

However, we’ve already reached the point where even contrarian economists agree, any further global warming we experience will be detrimental for the global economy. For poorer countries, we passed that point decades ago. A new paper examining climate costs and fossil fuel industry profits for the years 2008–2012 found:

“For all companies and all years, the economic cost to society of their CO2 emissions was greater than their after‐tax profit, with the single exception of Exxon Mobil in 2008”

It now falls to the US to do better than the UK. Risk management and the well-being of future generations must trump ideology and fear in the November elections. We simply can’t afford two of the world’s superpowers being dictated by populism and xenophobia at the expense of our youth’s future.

Read more:

Most old people I know would throw themselves into a fire if they thought it would somehow improve the lives of their grandkids. Claiming old people en-masse do not care about the young is utterly obscene.

When older people vote for Brexit, or vote against fanatics who think it is OK to advocate disenfranchising groups who oppose their views, just maybe it is because they have the life experience to see through the lies of would be tyrants.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 27, 2016 6:17 pm

Great idea!
Let’s only let people aged 15 to 30 vote. Since they have little compared to their elders, why not confiscate all their parents and grandparents wealth, as well as ignoring their wisdom accumulated over a lifetime?
Would Britain have gone to war against Germany in 1939 had Parliament been elected by teenagers and young adults?

Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 6:29 pm

I am reminded of the 1968 film “Wild In The Streets”, which is looking increasingly prophetic these days.

Reply to  MishaBurnett
June 27, 2016 6:40 pm

I cited Logan’s Run below.
The theme was a thing back then, when there were so many Boomers.

Steamboat McGoo
Reply to  MishaBurnett
June 27, 2016 8:01 pm

Ditto, Gabro, on the Logan’s Run reference. Where’s my palm flower?

Reply to  MishaBurnett
June 28, 2016 1:31 am

William Golding – ‘Lord of The Flies’ – the Green epitome of nirvana, updated by: Kevin Andrews, ‘The Greens’ Agenda, in Their Own Words’

Reply to  MishaBurnett
June 28, 2016 9:35 am

idiocracy turned out to be a prophesy and not a comedy after all…

Bryan A
Reply to  MishaBurnett
June 28, 2016 10:25 am

Then are the younger demographic who vote in favor of costly Green Initiatives actually committing Geriatricide by committing their elders to costly energy while being relegated to a meager fixed income leading to premature death?

Bryan A
Reply to  MishaBurnett
June 28, 2016 2:44 pm

First and foremost the probable reason for the generational deficit is most likely the proliferation of climate change material being taught in schools now that wasn’t being taught 30 years ago. Very few courses, whether they be English, Social Studies, History, Economics, Chemistry, even Math, hasn’t been adjusted to include some form of the CO2 = Climate Change narrative. Today’s graduates have heard the dogma concerning AGW every day and in almost every course so it is ingrained in them thus the 73% statistic.
It then goes on to describe the older demographic (ages 45 to 65+) as Inter-Generational Thieves for voting contrary to the younger demographic due to the perceived “Cost of Carbon”. But, given the true cost of energy produced by the Green Alternatives it is really robing from the Older Crowd on Fixed incomes that higher energy costs tends to create. And as to the often reported catch phrase (redistribution of Wealth) referring to take money from those (that Can afford it) and giving it to those (other countries) that can’t afford it. The question arrises
“Which generation is it that has the money that is being redistributed and to which generation is it being redistributed”?
Before Mr Nuccitelli accuses the older generation of robbing the futures of the younger generation, he should consider the younger generation also robbing the accumulated wealth of the older generation.
It seems to me to be the same thing either way. It’s just a question of Who is robbing Who.

Ray Boorman
Reply to  MishaBurnett
June 28, 2016 9:51 pm

Is that the one where progressively the compulsory age of your death is lowered, the movie ending at age 11? I thought about it the other day, & thought it might have been called “If”.

Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 6:40 pm

I wonder how much dystopian Dana Nuccitelli, would like the old movie Soylent Green? I suspect she would endorse and RELISH it.
Old people sent to the knacker factory to be turned into GREEN protein wafers, yummy!

Reply to  TG
June 27, 2016 7:09 pm

Dana is a boy, at least biologically at birth.

Reply to  TG
June 27, 2016 7:16 pm

My foible,
I wonder how much dystopian Dana Nuccitelli, would like the old movie Soylent Green? I suspect it would endorse and RELISH it.
Old people sent to the knacker factory to be turned into GREEN protein wafers, yummy!

M Seward
Reply to  TG
June 27, 2016 7:43 pm

Dana is of indeterminate species let alone gender, IMO. It is even indeterminate if it is a carbon based life form. Methinks its silicon based or even just hydrogen based. Helium would be far to balanced to be possible.

Hocus Locus
Reply to  TG
June 27, 2016 9:57 pm

This conversation with Governor Henry C. Santini…
… is brought to you by Soylent Red and Soylent Yellow…
… high-energy vegetable concentrates…
… and new, delicious Soylent Green…
… the miracle food of high-energy plankton gathered from the oceans of the world.
Because of its enormous popularity, Soylent Green is in short supply.
Remember, Tuesday is Soylent Green Day.
And now, Governor Santini.

This is the police.
This is the police. This is the police.
I am asking you to disperse.
The supply of Soylent Green has been exhausted.
You must evacuate the area.
The scoops are on their way.
The scoops are on their way!

~Here is the complete script of ‘Soylent Green’

Santa Baby
Reply to  TG
June 27, 2016 11:18 pm

It’s about getting enough people believing that Marxism will stop climate change?

Bryan A
Reply to  TG
June 28, 2016 10:20 am

M Seward
Not sure about Dana being Silicon Based (Horta) or Hydrogen Based
But more probably Carbon-Hydrogen Based (CH4)

Reply to  TG
June 29, 2016 8:51 am

Good old Soylent Green. An imaginative romp through a distopian future brought about by combining all the Greens most fevered predictions. The Population Bomb. Mass Extinctions. Peak Oil. Environmental Destruction. Resource Depletion. And of course Global Warming. Set 50 years in the future, it showed what horrors could await humanity if we failed in our stewardship of the Earth.
Of course, it came out in 73, so that 50 years placed it in 2022. Personally I doubt we’ll be forced to stoop to cannibalism in the next 6 years. But as any Green can tell you, just because their predictions failed doesn’t mean they weren’t right.

Science or Fiction
Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 10:30 pm

“Lord of the flies” comes to mind.

Steve (Paris)
Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 10:48 pm

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
― George Orwell, Animal Farm
Obviously one diminishes in equality as one ages…

Reply to  Steve (Paris)
June 28, 2016 6:07 am

Like declaring 95% of countries developing and get paid…..
Then voting to make it look democratic and equal

UK Sceptic
Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 11:00 pm

Nuccitelli is lying through his teeth. Again.
The breakdown of age demographics he’s quoting missed out one vital statistic. The stats for under 25 voting was thirty six percent. That 75% Nucci is blathering on about is nonsense. It comes from the same stable as the 97%. It means means the Yoof vote was so important to the Yoofs only approximately one in five bothered to get off their backsides to vote. And now a small minority of vociferous activists on social media are banging on about “intergenerational theft”. It’s all bollocks.
And would Nucci please explain why the older generation would vote Brexit to deliberatly wreck the lives and future of thei children and grandchildren? I have yet to hear a sensible reply to that one. The Guardian and the BBC are doing their utmost to be divisive, widening a gulf between families and using young people, too wrapped up in their own lives, who do not undersand what the EU really is – a fascist state with an unelected politburo intent on dictating whatever they damn well please.

Tim Hammond
Reply to  UK Sceptic
June 28, 2016 12:58 am

It’s a logical fallacy – begging the question.
People voted Leave because they thought it was good for their children and grandchildren.
The whole point of the argument is whether Leaving is good or bad – you can’t bypass that step to start pontificating about the poor children.

Stephen Richards
Reply to  UK Sceptic
June 28, 2016 1:10 am


Berényi Péter
Reply to  UK Sceptic
June 28, 2016 3:03 am

Yup. Under 25 years of age 27% of those eligible voted “remain”, above 65 it was 32%. That’s what 36% vs. 83% turnout does.
Hopefully, as they get older, youngsters are going to gain a bit of responsibility.
The British may consider introducing compulsory voting, as it was done in Australia almost a century ago. With that device they were able to keep turnout around 95% since then.

Alan the Brit
Reply to  UK Sceptic
June 28, 2016 4:29 am

Ah, don’t worry about the young people, they’re far too wrapped up in more important things in life like which pop-star is sleeping with which thesbian & vice-versa, or will the new latest mobile phone ring-tone work on their phone, or will they need a new one!

Lawrence George Ayres
Reply to  UK Sceptic
June 28, 2016 2:34 pm

Very astute comment. When those who elect not to vote through laziness or ignorance then complain the correct response is to ignore them.

Ray Boorman
Reply to  UK Sceptic
June 28, 2016 9:57 pm

The inter-generational theft is where the current ruling generations make decisions regarding climate change that result in huge amounts of money being borrowed, & repaid by future generations of taxpayers. Nuccitelli & his ilk don’t care about that – only the warm & fuzzy feelings they get from believing they are saving the planet from humanity! Such ignorance. Such arrogance.

Fred of Greenslopes
Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 11:42 pm

Great idea!
‘Let’s only let people aged 15 to 30 vote’
Better idea!
Let only people who pay taxes vote.

Reply to  Fred of Greenslopes
June 28, 2016 12:33 am

Or let votes be directly proportional to paid taxes? Not a very good idea though.

Reply to  Fred of Greenslopes
June 28, 2016 6:30 am

Actually, it is an excellent idea. He who pays the piper should call the tune.

Paul Mackey
Reply to  Gabro
June 28, 2016 2:03 am

This old person voted leave. When we voted to join, I was too young to get a vote, so seeing the diaster that generation got us into, I decided to vote to fix it.

James Bull
Reply to  Paul Mackey
June 28, 2016 5:07 am

Paul Mackey June 28, 2016 at 2:03 am
I’m with you on that I didn’t get to vote join or stay out but I was not going to let the chance to get out go by without having my say.
I voted out and am happy with the result if the result had been otherwise I wouldn’t have been happy but I wouldn’t be trying to make out the vote was wrong, fixed or those who voted for what I didn’t want were somehow under the undue influence of corrupting powers! AS the BBC and Grauniad are doing.
James Bull

UK Sceptic
Reply to  Paul Mackey
June 28, 2016 5:34 am

I missed out on voting the last time too. My parents both voted NO because they had lived in Germany and understood what the Common Market, as it was then, really meant; a huge hike in the cost of living.
Many people who voted to join the Single Market back in the 70s voted Leave because now they are 40 years older and wiser they know they were duped and acted to reverse it.
Unfortunately we are now witnessing the Establishment closing ranks to try and overturn or fudge the Brexit result. What do we have to do to get the message across? Foment a civil war?

Reply to  Paul Mackey
June 29, 2016 5:36 am

Aged 64(!) I voted not to join in the first place,and voted “leave” this time around.Have to say I am increasingly worried at the attitude of the press towards older people,and how it is,in many cases,affecting how we are viewed by the younger generation.

Reply to  Gabro
June 28, 2016 2:23 am

Dan Nut-Celli is a typical vile spoilt middle class white western lefty . They have no idea or concept of the struggle that humans had experienced to get where we are today which is a damn-site preferable that that of our ancestors. This shallowness is caused by pampered easy affluent lifestyles made only possible by the older generations . As for the concept that the youth are the best stewards to save the planet! Well if you want to see a world smothered in graffiti, wrecked by vandalism, strewn with rubbish, millions of abortions, porn being encouraged at increasingly younger ages, a globe of idiots laying in bed all day, the ability to lie and carry out herculean levels of hypocrisy , well I guess the youth are your best bet to save our planet

Reply to  lawrence13
June 29, 2016 7:06 pm

great rant. Has the virtue of being true!

ferd berple
Reply to  Gabro
June 28, 2016 6:56 am

When future generations look upon Brexit they will realize that it was the older generation that saved the UK.
One need look no further than the statements coming out of Germany and its lap dog France, to realize that the EU has no Magna Carta to limit the power of the King.
Twice in the past 100 years the UK saved Europe from Germany. Brexit is simply a continuation of this process. As Greece, Spain, Italy and such crumble under mountains of debt and unemployment, to feed the industrial might of Germany, they too will wish they had voted with their feet.

Reply to  Gabro
June 28, 2016 7:44 am

Dear Mr. Nuccitelli,
Tell me: Who created the Euro, what year, and why.
You can’t.
That’s why your comment is jejune, uneducated bordering on stupid, and devoid of any historicity or context.
Granted, the majority of the working people who voted for Brexit have no clue either. But their common sense prevailed. Luckily, the best thing that ever happened to Britons was that the (late) Wynne Godley convinced Margaret Thatcher in 1990-1992 not to adopt the Euro, whose advice she did not ignore.
How old were you in 1990, Mr. Nuccitelli? Twelve? Ten? Younger? Older?
While you were discovering the unleashed independence of your young gonads, those of us who did read history remember and understood it.

Reply to  MRW
June 28, 2016 7:48 am

Correction: “Wynne Godley convinced Margaret Thatcher in 1990-1992” should read “Wynne Godley convinced Margaret Thatcher in 1990.”

Reply to  MRW
June 28, 2016 7:55 am

Wynne Godley wrote his public objection to the Euro and the Maastricht Treaty in the London Review of Books on October 8, 1992.

Reply to  Gabro
June 28, 2016 12:05 pm

We need to set up a La-La land where they can live out their fantasies. (Of course, we could also send them to Venezuela.) The survivors, if they can muster sufficient evidence that they have achieved some degree of maturity, would be allowed back into a country run by adults.

george e. smith
Reply to  Gabro
June 29, 2016 4:36 pm

Well those old fogeys with their quaint ideas of freedom, may just have saved all of those wild eyed millenials from living under sharia law.

June 27, 2016 6:17 pm

The last two paragraphs here sum this nonsense up perfectly.

David L. Hagen
Reply to  John
July 2, 2016 9:53 am
Mark from the Midwest
June 27, 2016 6:18 pm

Same as it ever was, and the world goes on, get over it Dana.

John Robertson
June 27, 2016 6:20 pm

Dana needs to stop the projection.
When it comes the generational theft and ripping off children,Nutty Boy and his chosen comrades have shown their skills.

Reply to  John Robertson
June 27, 2016 6:53 pm

Here in the US, the government has $20 Trillion in debt which will be on the backs of the younger generation to pay off. But some of my children are so brainwashed with Left ideology, they don’t consider that debt is made of real dollars.
Someday they’ll wake up and find they were wrong.

Reply to  RockyRoad
June 27, 2016 6:56 pm

“Dollars? Where do DOLLARS come from, Mommy?” You can bet the answer won’t be “Hard Work!”

Reply to  RockyRoad
June 27, 2016 8:39 pm

Propose an Amendment (USA) that all things that are “generational” theft be banned, including government borrowing money. I would like to see how they would justify government debt, but without it, most all their cherished government programs would come to a halt.

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  RockyRoad
June 27, 2016 10:03 pm

Speaking of intergenerational theft, who stole democracy from the youth in the UK and handed it to unimpeachable EU commissars? Dana’s squealing is painful to hear because of the hypocrisy it contains. I guess Dana thinks the young are too stupid to have an opinion on the matter – if it disagrees with the EU regulators, but are all smart and responsible if they agree. Huh. That’s mature.
The fact that older people are harder to swindle is not too surprising. The same applied when I was young.
To the young, I say get your heads out of your phones and look around. Your entire future is being stolen from you by a multi-tentacled green blob intent on telling you which green leaf you can use to wipe your ass. They are not your friends. There is no free lunch. That charging station is actually paid for by someone. Having national dominion over national affairs is not an error, it is common sense.
The squealing is going to get a lot louder. Carefully and crafty plans are starting to unravel. You can be a world citizen without giving up your rights as one.

Reply to  RockyRoad
June 28, 2016 6:54 am

Government debt is true generational theft!

Bryan A
Reply to  RockyRoad
June 28, 2016 2:20 pm


Reply to  Bryan A
June 28, 2016 8:13 pm

You could have just used the mathematical expression of 10^100 ( a google) instead of 10^42 and a really big number is 10 ^google.

Ralph Short
Reply to  RockyRoad
June 28, 2016 2:20 pm

Excellent comment, I was thinking when I read this article how the marxist wannabe’s never mention how the current or older generation is robbing the younger generation’s future by endless increases in deficits and borrowing. Currently, we are on the same path as Greece but who will bail us out? The answer is nobody.

Reply to  RockyRoad
June 28, 2016 2:36 pm

Amen, amen, amen!!! I am in my thirties, and even in my late teens, I started to realize how bad the US debt situation. Now it is so much worse, yet even fewer people seem aware. Probably because all the old people who lived through the Depression are dying, and hardly anyone remembers how dangerous credit and money on “paper” can be.
The only question is, will the revolution occur before China calls in the IOUs?

Reply to  RockyRoad
June 28, 2016 8:03 pm

Strange the generational theft term was used when the Progressives are the biggest thieves supporting the 20 trillion and rising debt burden on our next generation.

Reply to  John Robertson
June 27, 2016 8:47 pm

Projection indeed.
It was the older generations who built up wealth in developed countries and actually own property rather than a life-time of debt and a negative equity loan.
It is the younger generation who to give all that wealth to third world despots.
Key figures have admitted on several occasions that AGW is all about wealth redistribution. Whose wealth is it the younger generation wants to redistribute?
Inter-generational theft indeed.
The older generation who grew up with the old fashioned idea of being able to elect those in charge of running the country want to retain the means of sacking them if they don’t perform. The younger generation who seem generally disinterested in politics seem in favour letting that be taken away, thus depriving the rest of us of our democracy.
Inter-generational theft indeed.

Reply to  Greg
June 28, 2016 6:18 am

It is stunning how close the parallels are with these nut jobs and 1984. They steal and live off government tax dollars, pursue quixotic idealized policies with no grounding in fact, sentence generations to sub-standard living, deny basic freedoms and then when the peasants revolt — call it inter-generational theft.
Oceania must be proud of its native son.

george e. smith
Reply to  Greg
June 29, 2016 4:44 pm

Factorial (Google ). Now that IS a big number ! or Google^google .

June 27, 2016 6:21 pm

…I bet 97% of those kids under 25 also think that “Basket Weaving” is a great college course to further their careers !

Reply to  Marcus
June 27, 2016 6:56 pm

No, “Gender Studies,” preferably performed naked and underwater. . .

Reply to  Goldrider
June 27, 2016 11:23 pm

I’m 70 & I’d enroll for a 3 yr course of that (:-))

bill johnston
Reply to  Marcus
June 27, 2016 7:10 pm

Hey! A grade is a grade. They all go in the win column.

June 27, 2016 6:22 pm

so much BS–I remember a time when the wisdom that comes with age was respected. The younger folk vote in stupid ways because they have not yet experienced life in all of its many faces. As these “younger” generations grow up, they too will (hopefully) gain the wisdom that comes with experience.

Reply to  jvcstone
June 27, 2016 6:27 pm

Plus, the young people today are so much smarter than the old people because internet, computers and software.

Reply to  PiperPaul
June 27, 2016 9:46 pm

For those that don’t get it ….. internet, computers and software, that the old people invented.

Reply to  PiperPaul
June 28, 2016 1:19 am

Yes the young are so smart they can’t even bother to register to vote. In many societies the wise council of the elders is held in high esteem; also they have seen it all before and voted wrongly to stay in in 1975 – only to see the common market/EEC morph into an unaccountable political/fiscal union that is corrupt and undemocratic.

Reply to  PiperPaul
June 29, 2016 3:08 pm

Unfortunately for them, lived experience is not something you can Google or ask Siri about.

george e. smith
Reply to  PiperPaul
June 29, 2016 4:46 pm

Well we are born smart a*** know it alls, and we slowly forget all the stuff that didn’t work, until we know nothing; and then we die.

Reply to  jvcstone
June 27, 2016 10:13 pm

I remember an old saying. “When I was 15,my father was really dumb. I am now 21,and amazed how much my father learnt in 6 years”.

Stephen Richards
Reply to  Billy NZ
June 28, 2016 1:12 am


Reply to  Billy NZ
June 28, 2016 5:18 am

An old Mark Twain quote as I recall.

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  Billy NZ
June 28, 2016 6:14 am

Bill W has it right.
“When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years.”

Samuel C Cogar
Reply to  jvcstone
June 28, 2016 6:20 am

As these “younger” generations grow up, they too will (hopefully) gain the wisdom that comes with experience.

HA, are not all local, state and federal elected politicians …… as well as 98% of all public sector employees ….. classified as “grown ups”?
Gaining the wisdom that comes with experience …. is 100% dependent upon the environment that one “grows up” in (subjected to).
90+% of the “younger” generations are already doomed to be deficient of “wisdom and experiences” …. primarily because of their Public School Environment.

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
June 28, 2016 2:41 pm

Well, there are people who have converted oxygen to carbon dioxide for 18 or more years, and there are grownups/adults.
Sadly, the former tend to somehow amass a heck of a lot of power.

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
June 29, 2016 3:32 pm

Human history is a long perpetual cycle of Big Kids making Big Messes and the long-suffering adults who spend a century or three cleaning up after them.
Here’s to those nameless legions of responsible people. If not for them, history’s Big Kids would have probably killed us all by now.

June 27, 2016 6:23 pm

The only thing this proves beyond a doubt is that the voting age should be raised to 26 !

Reply to  Marcus
June 27, 2016 11:32 pm

How about…no tax payments, no vote?

Reply to  DonK31
June 28, 2016 1:50 am

That would put unemployed and elderly away. A republic needs ways to protect those who don’t have a job or who are not yet, any more, or just now capable of working. Voting right is one of those.
But I do think consevatism that comes with age is a good thing. To certain smount at least.

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  DonK31
June 28, 2016 6:19 am

What country do you live in where old people don’t pay taxes? I’d like to move there in about 5 years.
I like the “no pay, no play” idea. In the US, approximately 47% of wage earners pay no federal income tax, but they get to decide how to spend my money. When it tips over 50%, who’s going to stop them from pillaging those of us left to pay?

Reply to  DonK31
June 28, 2016 7:10 am

The problem we have in this country is that those who pay no taxes are continually voting for more free stuff.

Reply to  DonK31
June 28, 2016 7:16 am

Unless you are without a job for the entire period between elections, then you did pay taxes.

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  DonK31
June 28, 2016 12:22 pm

To your first point, that’s exactly what I was saying.
To your second point, please note that I said “federal income tax”. The FICA tax is nominally to support SSI payments although the surplus is entirely spent. When SSI outgo exceeds income, the shortfall will be made up out of general revenues, or more likely added to the general debt.

Reply to  DonK31
June 28, 2016 12:52 pm

SSI outgo started exceed income about 5 years ago.

June 27, 2016 6:24 pm

Just get rid of everyone over 30; they can’t be trusted anyway.

Tom Harley
Reply to  PiperPaul
June 27, 2016 9:06 pm

That’s because of the Left’s march through the institutions teaching propaganda, not science. Bill Ayers and his ilk being a major socialist pusher.

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  PiperPaul
June 27, 2016 10:05 pm

“Just get rid of everyone over 30; they can’t be trusted anyway.”
According to Sendero Luminoso, the age to exterminate is those >13.

george e. smith
Reply to  Crispin in Waterloo
June 29, 2016 4:50 pm

Before they get to breeding age, and create more know it alls.

Gentle Tramp
Reply to  PiperPaul
June 28, 2016 2:20 am

Good idea: Hansen, Al Gore and al lot of other old green crackpots had to stop their anti-human agenda… 😉

Steve R
June 27, 2016 6:24 pm

It never seems to occur to people that they might be wrong.

June 27, 2016 6:25 pm

To all you “youngens” out their.
I would like to remind you that the AVERAGE age of the un-elected EU commissioners,
in whom you seem to want to put all your decisions and regulatory power…..
is approximately 55 ! 🙂

Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
Reply to  AndyG55
June 27, 2016 9:28 pm

And they’d better stop listening to GreenGuru David Suzuki, as well; ‘cuz he’s waaaay past his best before date!

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
June 27, 2016 10:07 pm

But when will he at his worst?

Reply to  Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
June 27, 2016 10:38 pm

he’s there

Reply to  Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
June 28, 2016 1:52 am

Nasty! Nuccitelli is not too young either.

Reply to  Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
June 28, 2016 7:11 am

Unfortunately, he can always get worse.

Ross King
June 27, 2016 6:26 pm

Yet another recidivist, wanting to revert to the Eco-Purity of the Dark Ages,
Modern society is largely built on Energy. Mankind has moved from harnessing cropping & animal husbandry, to adopting the wonders offered by the exploitation of Energy, and moving into the (amazing!!) advancement we now have, and will continue to have, bar Luddites like this moron.

Reply to  Ross King
June 27, 2016 7:43 pm

@Ross King
You missed slavery as another form of energy,witch it was in times past

Reply to  Tom McEwen
July 3, 2016 11:37 am

Witch is not a pronoun but ‘which’ is and should be used in this context.

Reply to  Ross King
June 27, 2016 7:45 pm

@Ross King
You missed slavery as another form of energy,which it was in times past

Reply to  Tom McEwen
June 28, 2016 7:12 am

Socialism is already bringing slavery back.
One group of people is forced to work to support others.

June 27, 2016 6:27 pm

Considering that the “old people” voting to leave the EU are pretty much the same people who voted in favor of joining/staying in the EU over the last few decades, it’s more of a case of “what the hell were we thinking all of those years?”

Reply to  cirby
June 27, 2016 8:44 pm

The British people never voted to join the EU. They voted to stay in the Common Market, when there were assured that it was just a free trade zone and had no intention of becoming a European superstate that would take Britain’s sovereignty away. The government told them that even though they already knew that was exactly what the EU was meant to be.
It’s taken this long to get another vote to get the heck out.
So, the left have proven that they hate the right, the working class, and now the old farts. Pretty soon they’ll have run out of people to hate.

Reply to  MarkG
June 27, 2016 9:01 pm

Good knee-jerk rant against “the left” but if you’ve been following the story, the left wing leader of the Labour party is currently undergoing a leadership coup because “it’s his fault” that he did not “deliver” the votes of Labour supporter for the Remain camp. ( Like parties are there to tell their followers what to vote for rather than to represent them ).
“The Left” in Britain are just a split on this question as the right are. Without “the Left” there are not enough Euro-sceptics on the right for Britain to have decided to abandon the anti-democratic federal Europe.
Sorry to spoil a good rant.

Reply to  MarkG
June 27, 2016 9:07 pm

Yeah, because Labour and the Guardian are right-wing. I forgot.

Reply to  MarkG
June 28, 2016 1:28 am

> Pretty soon they’ll have run out of people to hate
Naah, there’s still all the young farts to go.

ferd berple
Reply to  MarkG
June 28, 2016 6:43 am

The Labour party in the UK is out of step with the working people it claims to represent. It was the Midlands of England, the industrial heart of the nation that carried the vote against the EU. It is the disconnect between the politicians and their constituents that is at the heart of the problems facing Labour.

Reply to  MarkG
June 28, 2016 2:27 pm

Jeremy Corbyn has campaigned against the EU many times in the past, his campaign was half hearted, and the Labour heartlands voted comprehensively and decisively out. Its safe to say when Coal mining areas such as County Durham, Sunderland, The Rhondda and Merthyr Tydfyl are voting out , and Bolsover (MP Dennis Skinner) has a 40% margin. Then its not a right wing result

Reply to  MarkG
June 28, 2016 4:20 pm

Bolsover (MP Dennis Skinner) has a 40% margin.”
Dennis Skinner aka ‘the Beast of Bolsover’ is one of the few honest MPs we have.

June 27, 2016 6:27 pm

Nuccitelli apparently likes relying on imaginary “costs” of CO2. Like what real costs, as in real people paying out real money, Dana, not estimated costs no one ever actually paid.

CD in Wisconsin
June 27, 2016 6:28 pm

So much for the concept of wisdom coming with age.
Nuccitelli apparently would have us believe the those under 25 know what is best for us rather than those who have been around the block (so to speak) many more times in life and know when to be suspicious of what politicians and the MSM are telling us.

Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
June 28, 2016 2:49 pm

Nuccitelli clearly has not spent any time on a college campus in the last few years. Who is dumb enough to want to risk those crazy special snowflakes grabbing power?

Curious George
June 27, 2016 6:28 pm

Dana provides an excellent advice to both Americans and Britons. He probably lives in both countries and drinks in pubs all day long, getting acquainted with a public opinion. I wonder when does he pen down his wisdoms.

Reply to  Curious George
June 28, 2016 12:19 am

When he is 3 parts cut. I’m not sure if that translates across the oceans too well. 3 sheets to the wind.

June 27, 2016 6:30 pm
June 27, 2016 6:32 pm

Dana and his ilk are birds of a feather with jihadis screaming “Death to the Infidels!”

Paul Westhaver
June 27, 2016 6:36 pm

for Brexit in headline would be helpful.

Double Income No Kids Remember that term from the 80s?
The idea was that there was a group within society that felt no social obligation to contribute to the population, and thereby suffer the burdens and joys of raising children. The couple, by their own choice, once raised by selfless parents, had no kids and lived like college kids for the rest of their lives. It was put to me then that D.I.N.K.s should not have a right to vote nor should they be able to collect social security payments. The rationale was that if you don’t contribute to society, you should not reap the rewards.
Now we have a reverse situation wherein the baby boomers have spent the futures of their grandchildren so that they can have various forms of security like health care or a second home in the sunny south. The grandchildren will be taking up the tab in their 40s and 50s.
The rationale now is that the baby-boomers have screwed up the environment and won’t be around long enough to suffer the consequences of their life-long actions. The kids are aware of where the hurt is coming from…. vaguely.
I offer this counter argument:
The young (under 25) and those without children should not be able to vote.
The young are too ignorant and dependent of the social gov-funded fabric to make an informed decisions. People who willfully have no children have no stake in the future. So why should they have any control over national finance?
So I propose the only people who should be able to vote are those who ultimately will be responsible for carrying the burden of the popular will. Hmmm who does that leave at the voting booths?
Democracy is a messy thing.

Reply to  Paul Westhaver
June 27, 2016 6:58 pm

I must be a SCAR–“Single Crusty Aging Republican!” 😉

Reply to  Goldrider
June 27, 2016 7:58 pm

Nahhh.. Not if you have to practice this, Goldrider.
If you don’t have to practice that, then you’re just normal.

Reply to  Paul Westhaver
June 28, 2016 7:14 am

You don’t have to bear children in order to contribute to society.
Anyone who works an honest job contributes.

Reply to  MarkW
June 28, 2016 10:13 am

We have plenty of deadbeats who have more kids in order to get more $$$s from the gov. Doesn’t mean they’re contributing to society.

Reply to  MarkW
June 28, 2016 2:57 pm

The major flaw in the argument: the assumption that people who have kids a) care about them and b) are more concerned with the future than non-parents. It is good that childless people care about children and the future, it is sad that many parents do not.
I think there is some merit to the idea, perhaps with a few alterations. Sometimes I think people should have to prove they are sensible enough to vote. A single question might be enough: do you think the government can spend your money more wisely than you?

Reply to  MarkW
June 28, 2016 3:10 pm

The problem is that for way to many of those voting, the government isn’t spending their money. It’s spending someone else’s money.

chris moffatt
Reply to  Paul Westhaver
June 29, 2016 10:53 am

Where do you get the utterly erroneous idea that those without children do not contribute to society. My wife and I can’t have children & it’s too late now anyway but we worked all our lives since college. She’s a nurse in an ICU – tell her she doesnt contribute. She’s made more of a contribution in her life than you ever will in yours. If you have a credit card or a debit card I’ll bet you use software to process your transactions that was created by my teams and me. No contribution? Then how about paying more taxes than you because of no child credits, no child deductions and years of the marriage penalty? How about local taxes that support your kid’s education and health services? How about more in state taxes that also support your kid’s education and general public health services. No contribution anywhere there? You Prick!

June 27, 2016 6:38 pm

“… maybe it is because they have the life experience to see through the lies of would be tyrants”
That’s almost exactly what I was thinking as I was reading Nuccitelli’s words. I can’t remember how many times I’ve heard this or that was the next thing I should fear, from the threat of nuclear war to SARS to the bird flu. I saw an interview with one of the young people suing the federal government (with James Hansen’s help) over climate change and I had to laugh at both his passion and naivete.

Reply to  BillJ
June 27, 2016 7:00 pm

No lie–right now they’re trying to foment hysteria about spraying for Zika mosquitoes–in CONNECTICUT!

Reply to  Goldrider
June 28, 2016 4:41 pm

Is the hysteria for or against spraying? One never knows these days. 😛

June 27, 2016 6:38 pm

Dana is relatively young with a small memory frame-of-reference. “Old” people recall experiencing or hearing about weird and extravagant weather which, today, sends younger people into paroxysms of fear and high anxiety. Climate is mainly a function of latitude, ocean currents and land mass variations. “Managing” that would be an exercise in expensive experimental magic. But people keep pretending because it seems to them to be the “responsible” thing to do. It’s just a new version of sacrificing goats, virgins, burnt offerings, etc. which seemed rational back in days of yore. A few generations from now, now will be “days of yore”.

Reply to  C.K.Moore
June 28, 2016 12:25 am

Dana is a Peter Pan-er. For him “old” is always someone 25-30 years older than he.

Timothy Neilson
June 27, 2016 6:40 pm

The voting turnout in the Brexit referendum among 18-24 year olds was 36%. In fact, a greater proportion of 65 and overs voted to “remain” than the proportion of 18-24 year olds who voted “remain”, it’s just that the vast bulk of the rest of the over 65’s voted leave while the vast bulk of the rest of the 18-24’s didn’t vote at all.
I’m not criticising the 18-24’s who didn’t vote. Maybe they thought that they simply didn’t have enough reliable information to make an informed vote amidst all the unverifiable hyberbole.
But Nuccitelli is clearly being dishonest or stupid in implying that the Brexit vote demonstrates overwhelming support for “remain” among the young.

Reply to  Timothy Neilson
June 27, 2016 11:43 pm

“Maybe they thought that they simply didn’t have enough reliable information to make an informed vote amidst all the unverifiable hyberbole.”
NONE of us had enough reliable information to make an informed vote amidst all the unverifiable hyperbole.
Both sides used the well practiced CAGW method – each lie is more intimidating than the last one

Ross King
June 27, 2016 6:43 pm

‘Guardian ‘ readers are typified by the Ivory-Tower , self-proclaimed “inner leckual”, Elite: “Only Our Way is Best”.
And so went the French Revolution .
Delighted to see another Revolution propagated (bloodlessly?) by today;s proletariat.

June 27, 2016 6:45 pm

To MARCUS @ 6:21pm . . .
It is “Underwater Basket Weaving” if you puhleese for goodness’ sake. I graduated Summa Cum Bono U2 in ’63. And I think it highly discriminatory to focus just on above water Basket Weaving.
Dana NutJob – what a great and perfectly apposite name.

June 27, 2016 9:12 pm

Nuttercelli actually. I think the celli part means a twisted bit of pasta.

June 27, 2016 6:50 pm

I’m wondering….just how many children does Dana have? Is he indeed a parent….in what we used to call a nuclear family ? Or is procreation not sufficiently “green” for this miserably ignorant individual?
I’m too old to contact Dana in about 25 years, but someone younger out there….please make a note to do just that, and attach (or perhaps telepathically transmit) this goofy opinion piece. If able, I’d pay to see his reaction to his youthful idiocy.
The question I still have is why on earth would The Guardian print such nonsense?
Oh never mind. It’s just The Guardian. The increasingly irrelevant Guardian.

Reply to  TomBR
June 27, 2016 7:01 pm

Nuclear families are so last century–hadn’t you heard, we’re all “non-binary” now?

Science or Fiction
Reply to  TomBR
June 27, 2016 11:34 pm

I miss watchdog journalism.

Richard M
June 27, 2016 6:54 pm

Age bias is another form of “racism”. Dana shows his true colors.

June 27, 2016 6:58 pm

Nuccitelli apparently is only giving voice to a widely held notion after the vote.
“Inter-generational theft” seems to me more like “inter-generational squander”. The current generation of under-25 seems not to know of their inheritance of freedom, and seems not interested in finding out.
I look at the college campus and see speech codes and movements to ban “hate speech”. Even such a mainstream speaker as Condoleeza Rice got disinvited as a speaker. Apparently some points of view are not to be tolerated. In some segments of society, freedom of speech has been obliterated. Other freedoms are not far behind. The vote to remain in the EU by the under-25 crowd is very much the same. It seems that if allowed, they will squander their freedoms for reasons even they cannot articulate.

Reply to  TonyL
June 28, 2016 2:08 am

I think no government money should go to any university with “no platform”, “safe space” or “trigger warnings” policies.

Reply to  Roy
June 28, 2016 4:47 pm

A college group hosting a controversial speaker handed out pacifiers to protesters that said something to the effect of “I survived the *speaker* tour”. Many of the protesters were unamused.
I thought it was the cleverest thing I had heard of happening at a campus “protest” in the last few years.

June 27, 2016 6:59 pm

I suggest Dana and his followers look at this:

Steve Oregon
Reply to  RossP
June 27, 2016 8:11 pm

Outstanding…………And anti-Brexit snob in the US should watch that and try and cling to their arrogance.

Stephen Richards
Reply to  Steve Oregon
June 28, 2016 1:30 am


Reply to  Steve Oregon
June 28, 2016 6:32 am

Facts seem to not appear in modern democratic debating. Long ago a statement of a free people of a State, mirrors this Leave vs. Remain issue. That statement in part “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State” . Is this to be free from tyranny?

george e. smith
Reply to  Steve Oregon
June 29, 2016 5:02 pm

Actually FredericE, what you tried to cite, actually says: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
They actually could have offered as a reason, something like the following:
“The sun rising in the east, being necessary for a warm day at the beach in a free state; the right …..etc.
has EXACTLY the same meaning according to the normal rules of English grammar. Whatever a militia is, is totally irrelevant.

Reply to  RossP
June 27, 2016 8:21 pm

The quote at the end of the film from DH Lawrence is worth bringing out:
“Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools. And their grandchildren are once more slaves.”
Ain’t that the case?

Philip Mulholland
Reply to  RossP
June 28, 2016 2:22 am

From the last slide:-
“Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools. And their grandchildren are once more slaves.”
― D.H. Lawrence
Or to use an old saying from my Lancastrian heritage:-
“Clogs to clogs in three generations”

Reply to  Philip Mulholland
June 28, 2016 7:21 am

On a similar note, there’s an old saying in the US “Shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in 3 generations”.
Shirtsleeves being a working class garment.
That is, the first generation generates great wealth, the children squander it, and the grandkids are back to working for other people again.

June 27, 2016 7:01 pm

Hello, with age comes not so much a case of being more intelligent, but the result of accumulated wisdom as to what has occurred in their hopefully long life.
Now in my 90th year I can truly say, “Being there, done that” and can spot a fraud coming a long way off.
We have always had what the US West called a “Snake oil salesman” . Budding politicians who mostly would have never made it in the Real World, so they take the politicial way to power and money.
And they can always find a problem that we, the average citizen never realised that we had, and then of course we are told by them that their way is the only way to “Save ourselves from far worst things to come”
Climate change is just the latest one to come along, and sadly its taken off, why ?
Because it suits our present crop of politicians, who want to remain in their well off jobs.

June 27, 2016 7:02 pm

It’s called critical thinking The youngsters do not have it

June 27, 2016 7:05 pm

As with so many Warmist accusations, this is the precise opposite of the truth. The Warmists are the ones who want to steal economic growth and infrastructure resiliency from future generations, in the name of the false religion of catastrophic anthropogenic warming.

June 27, 2016 7:09 pm

He fails to point out that the vast majority of nonvoters were young. We have no idea how they think. We are not Obama who upon losing the midterm ascertained as his lesson that the nonvoters were in favor of his policies.

June 27, 2016 7:17 pm

Anyone less than 40 has never lived without the chains of Brussels and so is unqualified to have an opinion. They should not have been allowed to vote.
Then again, all those old folks generate no wealth, they are only a drag on the economy.
I suppose they should all be euthanized for the good of the under 30s.
Do these ****ers understand what they are saying?
Actually, I think they do.

June 27, 2016 7:19 pm

Typical Nuccitelli. Certainly not “73% of voters under the age of 25”. It might be 73% of people under the age of 25 who bothered to vote.
Sky Data 25 June:
18-24: 36%
25-34: 58%
35-44: 72%
45-54: 75%
55-64: 81%
65+: 83%
Projection, not collection. The poll wasn’t designed to measure age turnout, so this is a guess, but others have come up with similar figures. The young didn’t bother turning out.

Reply to  Martin Clark
June 27, 2016 8:57 pm

Spot on, Martin, I was about to point that out. As Mark Twain said “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Dana Nutcase deals in the latter, as do his partners in intergenerational theft – the climate hoaxers.

Nigel S
Reply to  brians356
June 28, 2016 12:53 am

Not sure how many Sky Data surveyed. Lord Ashcroft surveyed over 12 thousand people who had just voted before the result was announced (and got the 52/48 split correct). His figures indicate that only 32% of 18-24 year olds voted, that 3.6 million did not vote (total electorate 46.5 million, votes cast 33.6 million) and that 76% of 18-24 year olds either voted Leave or didn’t care enough to vote. Not quite the story Dana Nuccitelli would have you believe. How young people in UK can view the catastrope that EU has brought to other young people in southern Europe with collapsed economies and huge unemployment and then vote for more of the same whilst accusing us oldies of selfishness escapes me. Most people I know having had 40 year’s experience of what morphed into EU voted to give their granchildren a chance of something better and a say in that.

Reply to  Martin Clark
June 28, 2016 12:55 am

You are right and as I pointed out on the thread below –75% of the 36% who voted is only 27% of those eligible to vote in that age group. Nuccitelli is just using the usual alarmists twisting of figures tactic.

June 27, 2016 7:20 pm

“The problem is of course that younger generations will have to live with the consequences of the decisions we make today for much longer than older generations.”
As a consequence of decisions made by the older generations, the younger generations are alive today.

David Schofield
Reply to  Rob
June 28, 2016 10:51 am

As it as always been.

June 27, 2016 7:26 pm

Youth is wasted the youth…..

Clyde Spencer
June 27, 2016 7:33 pm

The generational voting gap may also reflect a problem with the schools teaching logic and critical thinking.

June 27, 2016 7:33 pm

No sense in pointing out that there would be no European Union to withdraw from without the efforts of the greedy old farts during WW2. History is so, like, yesterday.

Reply to  betapug
June 27, 2016 8:51 pm

If not for the old farts the ballots would have been in German.

Reply to  betapug
June 27, 2016 9:01 pm

There was once some minor activity called “The Battle Of Britain”. You ought to read what the old fart Britons did in it.

Reply to  brians356
June 28, 2016 1:35 am

They had help from some like mined refugees from a devastated europe, who knew all too well what failure would bring.
I salute every one of them that stood and fought what must have seemed an unstoppable juggernaut.

Pat Frank
June 27, 2016 7:40 pm

Nuccitelli’s argument is a classic example of the unethical debater who doesn’t have a case. In its absence, he descends to ridicule, discredit by derision, and character assassination.
Nuccitelli’s argument about generational differences also rests on the basic falsehood of cultural determinism — that one cannot think beyond one’s contemporaneous culture.
This is the foundational mistake of Marxist/Leninist thinking — that there is no human independent mindfulness and therefore cultural propaganda controls all thought and development.
This idea that humans are clay upon which propaganda would work its magic was the basis for the attempted ‘new socialist man.’ It failed abysmally.
This is also the central idea of post-modern culture studies.
There may have been a time when cultural determinism could be validly debated, but today the idea is beyond stupid.

June 27, 2016 7:46 pm

They make the assumption that the young people who did not vote would have followed their socialist teens in voting for remain. There is no way of knowing since they chose to abstain.
Having abstained the question becomes why?
Apathy would be number 1 reason.
2nd reason might be, they trusted the older generations including their parents had enough experience to make a choice.
All this intergenerational nonsense does not stand up to scrutiny. DO these accusers have a crystal ball that can foretell the exact nature of the world 20,30, 40, 50 and 60 years out? NO.
In others words, this marxist confected outrage designed to cause trouble because they were beaten.
The vote has to be ratified by parliament, but it would be a foolish parliament that defied the people’s vote.

Reply to  Jack
June 28, 2016 2:07 am

> … it would be a foolish parliament that defied the people’s vote
I’ve seen that statement before and asked this question before:
What exactly do you think would happen if indeed the UK Parliament decided not to honour the plebiscite results ?
So far, no sensible answers.

Reply to  cassandra
June 28, 2016 6:27 am

What exactly do you think would happen if indeed the UK Parliament decided not to honour the plebiscite results ?
So far, no sensible answers.

Reply to  Jack
June 28, 2016 7:25 am

More likely, they just didn’t care enough. Which implies that they are fine with either outcome.

June 27, 2016 7:55 pm

Is there anything that points out that climate is really the issue and communism is the bottom line when the people who want to stay in the EU start using youth as their rallying cry? All is pretty much a fabrication without any bases. The only thing the greens are lacking at this point are armed soldiers. But First, they have to be able to silence the skeptics. It isn’t for a lack of trying. Which if the greens are trying to do that in more than one country, isn’t that close to racketeering?
I think the writing was on the wall in England, money flowing out, rules and regulations flowing in. I don’t doubt that financial interest in the EU will try to punish England.

June 27, 2016 7:56 pm

Dana N and his ilk lost. He seeks a reason why. His published reason does not to have any merit.
Why even give him further unreasoned voice here?

Reply to  ristvan
June 27, 2016 8:49 pm

Because the more people see the ‘Greens’ red in tooth and claw, the less they’ll fall for the ‘Green’ BS.
I honestly think Twitter may have saved the world by allowing the left to shout their obnoxious thoughts to all and sundry without a compliant media to ensure they’re filtered for sanity first.

G. Karst
June 27, 2016 8:03 pm

“However, we’ve already reached the point where even contrarian economists agree, any further global warming we experience will be detrimental for the global economy.”
Which “contrarian economists” would he be blathering about… some may wonder? GK

Reply to  G. Karst
June 28, 2016 7:26 am

The IPCC declared long ago that warming up to 2C from the pre-industrial was good. We are less than half way through that. Is Nuttichello disagreeing with holy script?

Reply to  G. Karst
June 28, 2016 5:02 pm

You know, that remark makes sense if “contrarian economists” is referring to economists who support his ludicrous ideology. I suspect he and other retainers took a leaf from Gruber’s book: depend on the stupidity of the voter. Fortunately, the Brits actually got a direct vote about this particular issue.
All I got was increased premiums and decreased care. Thanks, scumbag senators.

Reply to  AllyKat
June 28, 2016 5:04 pm

Whoops! Should be “remainers”. Autocorrect is not always smarter than I am.

June 27, 2016 8:07 pm

The human brain does not reach full maturity until age 35. How did the Framers of the US Constitution know this now well established fact, when requiring the president to be of this age?
A society of humans all under 30 couldn’t function. Even Neanderthals had elders in their 40s and 50s.

Mark T
Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 9:09 pm

Ut oh. 35? Damn. Um, can I get a do over? I wasn’t paying attention and let it slip by.

June 27, 2016 8:09 pm

Richard Fernandez had this to say:
“Essentially people much older than you gave you what you now take for granted. They won World War 2, fueled the great boom, walked through the valley of the shadow of nuclear death — and had you.
You didn’t make the present, nor as you now complain, are you making the future. No children, no national defense, no love of God or country.
“But that’s just it. You’ve brainwashed yourselves into thinking someone else: the old, the older, the government, the dead would always do things for you.
“If you learn anything from Brexit, learn that nobody got anywhere expecting someone to do things for him.”
Sounds right to me!

Reply to  BLOC
June 28, 2016 4:59 am

They have also allowed World War 2 – by appeasing Hitler, allowed Cold War – by being blind to the danger of communism until around 1946, made a giant debt, burned most easily extractable fuel, lost the Western superiority in technology to Asia, in case of UK – lost an entire empire that their predecessors had built – how spectacular! They allowed huge islamic immigration, and allowed the spread of this ideology in homeland. Essentially invented eco-nuttism. Now they are trying to mess up European integration.

June 27, 2016 8:12 pm

Related issue: have a look at Luboš Motl’s site –
” France, Germany demand the establishment of the Fourth Reich
Remaining 25 member states should be turned into protectorates ”
At first glance I thought this was satirical …

Reply to  Martin Clark
June 27, 2016 8:50 pm

To be fair, the Germans will be responsible for funding the EU now the UK is going. If they’re paying for it, they should at least end up owning it.

Reply to  MarkG
June 27, 2016 9:23 pm

If the Germans are smart, they won’t want it. Now, let’s see how smart they are.

Gentle Tramp
Reply to  MarkG
June 28, 2016 2:03 am

Sorry Rocky – but the Germans are definitely not very smart today. You have only to look on their “Energiewende”…
The reason for that sorrowful state of German public thinking is too much lopsided green propaganda in their MSM. And history shows the Germans have a sad tendency of following all kinds of insane propaganda rather uncritically…

Reply to  MarkG
June 28, 2016 5:13 pm

Ugh. I used to think Merkel had some sense but her actions of the last few years do not support that hypothesis.
All the free thinking Germans immigrated to Pennsylvania. Trust me, none of my Pennsylvania Dutch relatives let anyone tell them what to do, and are likely to do the opposite just to tick off the person.

Rick Bowen
June 27, 2016 8:12 pm

All of the comments here summarize all of my reasons for never as much as clicking a link to this vile leftist tabloid, never mind take anything it writes as something even remotely associated to anything truthful.

June 27, 2016 8:22 pm

The numerous comments here just summarize all of my reasons for never as much as clicking a link to this vile leftist tabloid, never mind take anything it writes as something even remotely associated to anything truthful.

June 27, 2016 8:28 pm

So those who have contributed decades of taxes and work are thieves as opposed to those who have contributed nothing? The opposite is happening. What is wrong with you, Guardian? Don’t you understand democracy?

Reply to  Dana Lee Quinney
June 27, 2016 9:49 pm

The Guardian understands what democracy is alright, that’s why they despise it and vehemently oppose it. That vile left-wing tabloid would be the most undemocratic publication in the free world. They advocate TYRANNY not democracy and only support speech that upholds their wicked party line.

Kaiser Derden
June 27, 2016 9:16 pm

It was the “older” generations that made the original decision to join the EU … they have now realized their mistake … the young folks should STFU and get a job …

Alan Robertson
June 27, 2016 10:11 pm

If the staff at the Guardian weren’t embarrassed by publishing that incoherent screed (excerpted above,) why was I embarrassed reading it?

Reply to  Alan Robertson
June 28, 2016 1:41 am

Because you have a better grasp of reality and critical thinking would be my guess.

June 27, 2016 10:44 pm

The twitterati failed to vote and lost the referendum, historians will have a field day.

June 27, 2016 10:46 pm

What no trigger warning :/

June 27, 2016 10:51 pm

Racism – climate change, Brexit -climate change.
At least she is on the back of the bus where she belongs…oops sorry

Patrick MJD
June 27, 2016 10:53 pm

The brain of a female typically matures at about 18. The brain of a male at about 24. So the 18-24 demographic really aren’t up to making rational decisions.

Reply to  Patrick MJD
June 27, 2016 11:08 pm

Youth have little intelligence and experience and no wisdom, which would explain why these adults have successfully corralled them into being used to support global Communism.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  LarryFine
June 28, 2016 2:41 am

I have met some brilliant and smart people aged between 18-24 when I was, myself, aged between 18-24. I am not sure intelligence makes a difference IMO and in my experience. I once, in the 80’s, trained a university student on his “work experience” part of his study. He had 8 or 9 London Board “O” level A and B grade certificates. A few “A” level A and B grade certificates, and I think even an “S” level pass certificate too. Some of these were in electronics, and yet, he did not know what an AVO was or what AVO means!!!

June 27, 2016 11:05 pm

Communists spread the same lies in the 60s. Remember the inane saying, “Don’t trust anyone over 30!”
By the way, the guy who coined that phrase turned 30 in 1970 and is now approaching 80. Do you think he went quietly into the night back in the year that Apollo 13 was nearly lost?

June 27, 2016 11:05 pm

“However, we’ve already reached the point where even contrarian economists agree, any further global warming we experience will be detrimental for the global economy.”
What the??? Evidence please.
Dana, please share your wisdom – what is the perfect global temperature? If any further temperature rise is detrimental, was the world a better place economically 50 years ago, 100 years ago, when the temperature was about 1 degree cooler?
Seems to me that we cope very successfully with significant daily temperature variations and even more significant seasonal temperature variations, yet another a degree rise in global average temperature will be catastrophic? Evidence please. Else label your blog as unsubstantiated opinions.

Michael Carter
June 27, 2016 11:27 pm

Isn’t it interesting that the greens are snuggled up in bed with the bankers, free-traders and multinationals? These sought of people will sell their souls for power
What fascinates me is the anger being spewed by the losers. They thought it was slam dunk. Politicians, financiers and economists who proclaim to know better than the common people were mostly all wrong footed. Experts?
The anger now will be nothing compared to what would happen should they decide on a re-referendum. Britain would be the laughing stock of the world

Ex-expat Colin
June 27, 2016 11:27 pm

On the vote day here in the UK West Midlands my wife mentioned that quite a few people were walking by and to the nearby polling station. That was about 07:30. Never saw that behaviour with local and general elections in the past. Usually lethargic 20% – ish attendance
I thought Remain would win due to the heavyweight VI’s appearing in the media and in rapid succession that week (Branson for instance). Think these strident walkers were the OUT brigade and they were between age 30 and 40. The walking stick brigade were much later after Pimms.
I voted for the Common Market having lived in Germany/Holland in the 60s and 70s. Pleasant places then. Don’t think I would recognise it now…don’t want to really. Hopefully it all unravels shortly!

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Ex-expat Colin
June 28, 2016 2:27 am

No you didn’t, well not before the UK was already inserted into the common market (CM). Ted Heath (Conservative) committed the UK to the CM before Jan 1st 1973, effective Jan 1st 1973. Labour at that time were bleating on about “we will hold a referendum about entering the CM”, an obvious vote grab as there was significant voter displeasure at what Heath did. A referendum was held in 1974, or more likely 1975 IIRC. That is when the people of the UK actually got the option to voice their opinion. I would say you voted to stay in the CM if you voted at all for the CM in 1974/1975. But by then the damage was already done.
Heath was booted out in favour of Labour and after the winter of discontent in 1979, Thatcher won in a landslide win! She was the last to endorse the UN drive to “tackle climate change” which lead to the UEA CRU and the IPCC.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Ex-expat Colin
June 28, 2016 2:31 am

And I am sure you recall the hot summer of 1976!

Alan Kendall
June 27, 2016 11:30 pm

Just wondering what the age demographics of WUWT commentators is, and whether this explains the absence of any counter-arguments here.

Bob in Castlemaine
June 27, 2016 11:31 pm

No mention by Dana of the criminal waste of public resources on “climate change” sourcery and the inevitable impoverishment of western democracies like the UK.
Without doubt no regime has more to answer for in this regard than the EU dictatorship.

June 27, 2016 11:34 pm

If they want to inherit our money they can suck it up.

Stephen Lindsey
June 27, 2016 11:37 pm

The whole premise is bollocks, 73% of 18-24 year olds did not vote remain. Yes 75% of those that voted chose remain but only 36% voted.

June 27, 2016 11:58 pm

They had a vote and over half of the 18 to 35 year olds couldn’t be bothered to use it. We old farts used ours. Theft? Huh!

June 28, 2016 12:07 am

I suppose this lot read bits and pieces of Lord Stern’s Review, the cost-benefit study of energy austerity that ignred most of the benefits of global warming and enhanced CO2.
They were probably looking for sound-bites and punchy headlines.
Because they missed the voodoo economics related to intergenerational equity.
Professor Stern tells us we must make sacrifices today to preserve the health and well-being of future generations. But look more closely, and you will see that this virtuous purpose would make future generations richer than we are today and richer thn our children and grandchildren.
But the whole Stern Review is vitiated by the choice of a discount rate so low as to place almost no time value on the present.
The Stern Review is all “pie in the sky, bye and bye”.
Richard Lindzen once remarked that ordinary people have common sense but academics have no sense at all.
Based of almost 50 years experience of cost-benefit analysis in the public sector, I think Dr Lindzen was too optimistic in limiting this judgment to academics

David Cage
Reply to  Frederick Colbourne
June 28, 2016 5:15 am

What do you mean the academics have no sense. They know they are on EU grants that may or may not be forthcoming after exit.

June 28, 2016 12:24 am

So voting to leave the EU is “intergenerational theft,” but charging billions to the credit cards of our children and grand children to subsidize unreliable green energy and fund the UNFCCC ‘s Green Climate Fund is not? Does Dana Nuccitelli really believe future generations will thank us for wasting such huge sums of money and leaving them the bill?

June 28, 2016 12:27 am

I’m tongue tied. I really don’t know what to say or write. The author openly suggests killing everyone to make the world a better place. There’s just no arguing with that; fewer people, fewer mouths to feed.
Difficulty being they’ll be fewer to work.
This was the inevitable conclusion of the Great Green Grave; live fast, die young, make a beautiful corpse. It was the goal of my generation.

Reply to  Bartleby
June 28, 2016 12:36 am

I’m sorry, that was in bad taste.

Reply to  Bartleby
June 28, 2016 9:41 am

Frustration often comes out that way.

Martin A
June 28, 2016 12:30 am

Dana has got it all arsey-versey. What a surprise.
I have been better off than my parents, thanks to their efforts and the efforts of their contemporaries, including their paying for my education.
My children are better off than I was at their age, I am delighted to say. As a result of the efforts of my generation.
And so it goes on from generation to generation.

Dodgy geezer
June 28, 2016 12:36 am

About 80% of the older generation voted. But only about 35% of the younger generation did.
If you want a voice, vote…

Henry Galt
June 28, 2016 12:54 am

When it’s being pitched as “carbon pollution” how do you expect the young, miseducated textgen to vote Dana?

June 28, 2016 1:12 am

Intergenerational theft is Governments borrowing money today which will have to be paid back by children who are just beginning primary education – and their children too.

June 28, 2016 1:15 am

The consensus in neuroscience is that your Prefrontal Cortex isn’t fully developed until you are about 25.
An underdeveloped Prefrontal Cortex results in the following:

Decision making: We often struggle to make good decisions when we are teenagers, but as we enter our 20s, our decision making improves. This is due to the fact that our prefrontal cortex helps us think logically and make more calculated assessments of situations. Our brain weighs the risks and tells us whether a certain behavior or choice is a good idea vs. a bad one.
Logical thinking: Justifying behaviors based off of emotions rather than logic is common among teens. When the prefrontal cortex fully develops, logical thinking simultaneously improves. This means you will be better at rationalizing and making smarter choices. It also means that your ability to write and solve math problems will improve.
Risk management: The ability to assess risky situations and determine whether they will result in long-term benefit is a byproduct of your prefrontal cortex. Those who are poor at assessing risk may have underdeveloped prefrontal regions. The ability to turn down immediate gratification for long-term rewards is a result of this region.

The under 25s are more likely to succumb to peer pressure and to act emotionally rather than logically.

Reply to  TerryS
June 28, 2016 1:47 am

Total unmitigated bollox. Hundreds of generations of homo sapiens lived short, brutal lives curtailed by acute infection, infant maternal mortaility and acute injury ever before they reached 25 yoa, but long enough to advance and procreate. Evolution certainly doesn’t leave us short of a full deck until we’ve surpassed 25 yoa – “fully developed” doesn’t necessarily mean fully competent. Try telling that to Lancaster and Spitfire pilots of WW2, together with some of the youngest commanders in Fighter Command, all of them well under 25 yoa who in the modern, infantile parlance of the politically correct were able to “multi-task” brilliantly against nearly insurmountable odds, and who responded sublimely to the threat of Nazi totalitarianism. God help the Green totalitarian globalists when they loose their propaganda war, which they surely will. They’ll be intellectually slaughtered in their hundreds of thousands by motivated, focused young people who’ve suddenly decided to grow-up rather than put-up with the mind-dumbing, impoverishing and incarcerating drivel .

Reply to  Manfred
June 28, 2016 11:53 am

Also notice people like Bil Gates – doing some outstanding business at young age, and basically giving up at late thirties…

Robin Hewitt
June 28, 2016 1:31 am

Among the Brexit first casualties, the hugley expensive, proposed Hinkley Point C nuclear power station in Somerset. A Franco-Chinese funded project guaranteed sales of electricity at hugely inflated prices.

Robert from oz
June 28, 2016 2:00 am

Bob in Castlemaine has it , the inter generational theft that Dana refers to is every single cent that’s been wasted trying to mitigate a gas that’s vital for the life of every creature on earth .
Put that sort of money into medical research and new technology we would be in flying cars and cancer free .

Mark - Helsinki
June 28, 2016 2:23 am

All of this smells like another referendum will be held. Or at least they are trying really hard to scare everyone post Leave win in preparation for another vote.
Ireland voted no to Nice and Lisbon and were made vote again

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Mark - Helsinki
June 28, 2016 2:50 am

So true! Ireland was a very depressing place to live, and trying to work. I know I was there! But then the EU stepped in and demanded Ireland change their tax laws, effectively making Ireland a tax haven, attracting many international companies to setup their HQ’s in Dublin. I believe Google is still there. So from the mid-80’s billions and billions of Euros entered Ireland and so lead a boom. International companies migrated to Dublin, even forcing the country to build it’s first motorway. Then the claims that the multinational companies were not paying their way…y’know the 1%’ers.
This action lead to a boom in property prices in Dublin, not much else anywhere else, and then came the collapse. Not many happy people in Ireland, esp, after having to vote “right” on Nice and Lisbon.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Mark - Helsinki
June 28, 2016 2:54 am

In the case of the UK, Cameron resigned. That did not happen in Ireland with their PM. So, a 3 month or so delay while a new leader of the Conservative party is found and thus, by default, becomes PM of the UK. Brexit will happen, for good or bad.

Mark - Helsinki
June 28, 2016 2:25 am

What’s interesting is liberal fervor for Globalism. Soros and Rockefeller all the way.

Barry Sheridan
June 28, 2016 2:26 am

The world the young inherit is the outcome of effort put in by previous generations. To suggest that this toil is to be rewarded by denying those that did the work any say in what happens to it is beyond idiotic. Do any of these people think about what they are saying.

Craig W
June 28, 2016 2:26 am

If he lived in GB or the EU he would be sued for slander.
Speak freely America! 😉

June 28, 2016 3:23 am
Harry Passfield
June 28, 2016 3:26 am

My daughter and her partner are slightly older than I was when, as a naive youngster, I voted in the ’75 referendum, and voted to Remain in the EEC. That’s because I believed the likes of Heath and his lies about the Common Market not being a risk to our sovereignty.
Well, I learned from that mistake (as a lot of fishermen did too) and over the years have got to understand the EU and it’s despotic rulers; its undemocratic ways; and its expansionist designs for the future. Most of all, I feared for the fact that the Commission and the Council of Ministers could not be sacked by the electorate: They controlled our very lives and corrupted everything they touched. I voted to Leave. Not so much Brexit, as Fixit.
But my daughter and her partner voted to remain. when I asked why they said that it would probably be good for their businesses – but couldn’t explain how. They knew nothing of the democratic deficit and had no idea hoe the EU worked nor who was in charge.
I’m glad Leave won because if Remain had squeaked it there would never be another chance of a referendum in 40 years’ time that would allow today’s young to correct their mistake.
The full proof of the fact that Leave is the answer will be shown by the number of other countries who will follow suit over the coming years. Europe the Continent will survive and democracy will win.

Reply to  Harry Passfield
June 28, 2016 4:42 am

Well said Harry. I also voted to stay in the ‘Common Market’ in 1975 and spent the last 40 years regretting it. As a young person, I knew everything, as we all think we do at that age. As you get older your gain wisdom and clear black and white issues fade into shades of grey.

Tom in Florida
June 28, 2016 4:04 am

” Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed”
Words from the American Declaration of Independence. Unfortunately, those under 40 have no experience of living without the EU so were in no position to judge the difference.

June 28, 2016 4:09 am

If this shows anything at all, it is that with age comes wisdom.

Reply to  DaveS
June 28, 2016 9:45 am

Only if you let it.
Dana is no spring chicken and wisdom has not found him yet.

Reality Observer
June 28, 2016 4:15 am

How cute. Just which age cohort is demanding free college, free health care (including sex changes), free cell phones, free food, free housing?
Intergenerational theft, indeed – they plan to have the next generation (as yet unborn, most of them) pay for all of their free stuff.
Wups, wait a minute, there’s a slight flaw here! The “free stuff brigade” is also overwhelmingly opposed to children being born; “overpopulation” you know. Hmmm. I think they’re going to find themselves in a bit of a pickle in not too long…

June 28, 2016 4:21 am

Nigel Farage tells European Parliament “You’re not laughing now”

Reply to  MikeB
June 28, 2016 5:05 am

Darn .. he let loose at them, didn’t he.
You could almost feel their guilty consciences burning.
Great to watch and listen to !!

Reply to  AndyG55
June 28, 2016 5:31 am

Wow, where do you find politicians like this, please send him to Canada.

Reply to  AndyG55
June 28, 2016 6:13 am

Another fine performance from Nigel as he tells them a few home truths (& gets a good amount of support from other MEPs at the end).
I still think UK would be better in (& the system was changed) than out, where we have no influence.
40 yrs ago we shafted the commonwealth in favor of our ‘new best EU friends’, now we have to go cap in hand & re-negotiate; we wont get good deals & I don’t blame them.…people have long memory’s.
What I do fear is a return to tribalism, (verbal & physical post brexit racist attacks have already started), as a few nasty thugs think they now have a mandate; similar to 1930s Germany, we should remember what happened next !!

Scottish Sceptic
Reply to  MikeB
June 28, 2016 5:53 am

Almost all of them sit there knowing they are just puppets on the Eurocrats string and they hate it when one of them tells the truth.

June 28, 2016 4:39 am

Wisdom comes with age, not youth. Those who can remember the UK before the EU (pre-1973) wanted it back. Nuccitelli is too young to understand.

Reply to  tadchem
June 28, 2016 4:57 am

Those with age have the ability to look back and recognize mistakes and try to fix them. A trait sorely lacking in those who have no time to look back on.

Bruce Cobb
June 28, 2016 4:52 am

With Dana “Nutty” Nuccitelli, it is hard to know where to begin, as he employs logical fallacy after logical fallacy and blithely spews myths and outright falsehoods as if they were accepted truths. His use of intergenerational differences is classic Alinskyism. He opines that the climate issue is about “risk management” vs ideology, a clear case of both psychological projection and circular reasoning.
The target of his political screed is of course “the youth” with whom he hopes to whip up emotion, since emotion is all he, and his fellow Climatists really have.

June 28, 2016 4:56 am

Thanks, Eric, for reading one of Dana’s missives so I don;t have too.
His writing (leaving aside what he writes) is awful – dense in both senses of the word.
You’ve saved me 15 minutes of my life – thanks again 🙂

David Cage
June 28, 2016 5:08 am

So as usual the Guardian has got it wrong. Yes man pensioners did vote for exit but it still would not have won but for as one young man put it So many of our generation voting on facebook but not going out in the rain to put in an actual vote.
Even this is misguided as the real reason was that most of the lower income groups turned out in force for exit as they have already seen significant dumping of unemployed EU entrants in their areas. this is already making depressed areas that have houses that sold previously for around £100,000 compared to five times that in London now virtually unsaleable at any price. They fear, and rightly, the effect leading to to same as part of Liverpool where the council sold homes for £1 to any non druggie. ( Of course the did not admit that straight.) Many of these voters still have 90% left to repay on the mortgages on these houses. These people know that remain in is not a vote for the same but for even more of EU legislation to degrade their lives for the benefit of the few.
Of course this sort of person is not a Guardian reader who is typically a university lecturer on an EU grant.
what surprises me is that so few of these university lecturers seem to be able to do basic arithmetic to see the Guardian is talking through its metaphorical anal orifice.

chris moffatt
June 28, 2016 5:26 am

“Youth will bear the brunt of the poor decisions being made by today’s older generations”. Newsflash Dana; youth always bear the brunt of the decisions made by the older generation (as in 1914, 1939, 1963, 2001, 2003 etc etc) that’s how life works.
Regarding the vote to leave; If the EU of 2016 had been the EU of the seventies no brits would have voted to join in the first place. They are leaving now largely because of the betrayal of EU principles and the abandonment of democracy by the unelected despots of the European Commission, which is the only group in EU government which can propose and formulate law. It may be old fashioned,but quite understandable, to think that one’s own parliament of one’s own country should be making the laws for that country.
It’s not a stretch to imagine that if there were obvious advantages to staying in the EU the British would be smart enough to see them and vote accordingly. One gets the impression that the disappointed whingers of the “remain” party are so because they see themselves losing some undeserved advantage which they will no longer have.
One also can’t help but think that so many UK establishment figures are so upset by the vote simply because they have now lost access to all those wonderful sinecures in Brussels to which they feel entitled by their years (few as they may actually have been) of “service” to the nation

Harry Passfield
Reply to  chris moffatt
June 28, 2016 5:42 am

Chris: Totally agree. well said. Particularly the first para.
Learning comes from making mistakes; wisdom comes from learning. Nutti thinks he’s never made a mistake, therefore he has no wisdom.

Darkinbad the Brighdayler
June 28, 2016 5:33 am

Its too early to say with any certainty whether “In” or “Out” was the correct choice. However it is difficult to see how the EU can survive the economic and political tensions inherent in its current aims and chosen directions.
To the youth of the UK I say: Look at the levels of youth unemployment across Europe because that is the reality that the EU is delivering to your age cohort.

Scottish Sceptic
Reply to  Darkinbad the Brighdayler
June 28, 2016 5:50 am

Out was the correct choice – I didn’t meet anyone voting remain who was voting for the EU that actually existed.

June 28, 2016 6:06 am

“… Dana Nuccitelli, writing for the Guardian, has launched yet another green attack on democracy, by suggesting that older people who voted for Brexit, or who vote against green policies, are committing “intergenerational theft”.”
No, he is demonstrating that older people are generally harder to fool and less gullible than younger people.

June 28, 2016 6:12 am

As an American I had no idea the extent of control the EU had over people. Thanks to all who commented. My only questions are why wasn’t the vote higher to leave, and why wasn’t it done sooner.
So what the Guardian is saying is that they know better what’s best for the children than the dumb old adults? Who appointed the Guardian as Lord of the Relm? Who died and left them in charge?

Paul Coppin
June 28, 2016 6:13 am

Rather than think of it as “intergenerational theft”, Dana should look at it as parents taking something away from a child before they hurt themselves with it…

Paul Coppin
June 28, 2016 6:17 am

Of course, Dana, an American who lives and works in the US and only writes for the Graniaud, knows what’s best for the youth of Britain or anywhere else. And based on what he does write, regularly, it’s not clear if Dana knows what’s good for Dana, let alone somebody standing several thousand miles away.

michael hart
June 28, 2016 6:34 am

Now if Dana could just get the youth on social media to complain that it was not the right result last night when Iceland beat England 2-1……

Sweet Old Bob
June 28, 2016 7:38 am

Drillbit could use a Drill Dr. ………
He’s not too sharp …..
On purpose ?

June 28, 2016 7:41 am

I’m spending my kid’s inheretance, so what?

June 28, 2016 8:09 am

Sorry Dana, we can’t help it all the young voters were out saving the whales, hugging the trees or mounting sit ins on some vital issue and had no time to go and vote. They all clearly had more important things to do because their turnout was the lowest of all age groups.
The reality is the young didn’t turn up to vote because they obviously didn’t care. One could argue they were no more likely to vote for your crazy green politics, than they were to give two fingers up to the establishment and vote for a Brexit.
Political lesson in this is those who actually get off their backsides and vote determine outcomes.