Thank you, America!

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley 

head for the brexit

For my final broadcast to the nation on the eve of Britain’s Independence Day, the BBC asked me to imagine myself as one of the courtiers to whom Her Majesty had recently asked the question, “In one minute, give three reasons for your opinion on whether my United Kingdom should remain in or leave the European Union.”

My three reasons for departure, in strict order of precedence, were Democracy, Democracy, and Democracy. For the so-called “European Parliament” is no Parliament. It is a mere duma. It lacks even the power to bring forward a bill, and the 28 faceless, unelected, omnipotent Kommissars – the official German name for the shadowy Commissioners who exercise the supreme lawmaking power that was once vested in our elected Parliament – have the power, under the Treaty of Maastricht, to meet behind closed doors to override in secret any decision of that “Parliament” at will, and even to issue “Commission Regulations” that bypass it altogether.

Worse, the treaty that established the European Stability Pact gives its governing body of absolute bankers the power, at will and without consultation, to demand any sum of money, however large, from any member state, and every member of that governing body, personally as well as collectively, is held entirely immune not only from any civil suit but also from any criminal prosecution.

That is dictatorship in the formal sense. Good riddance to it.

I concluded my one-minute broadcast with these words: “Your Majesty, with my humble duty, I was born in a democracy; I do not live in one; but I am determined to die in one.”

And now I shall die in one. In the words of William Pitt the Younger after the defeat of Napoleon, “England has saved herself by her exertions, and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.”

Indeed, No-way and Nixerland having already voted down the EU, Brexit may well be swiftly followed by Frexit, Grexit, Departugal, Italeave, Czechout, Oustria, Finish, Slovakuum, Latviaticum and Byebyegium.  At this rate, soon the only country still participating in the European tyranny-by-clerk will be Remainia.

The people have spoken. And the democratic spirit that inspired just over half the people of Britain to vote for national independence has its roots in the passionate devotion of the Founding Fathers of the United States to democracy. Our former colony showed us the way. Today, then, an even more heartfelt than usual “God bless America!”

All who have studied the Madison papers will grasp the greatness of the Founding Fathers’ vision. They were determined that no law and no tax should be inflicted upon any citizen except by the will of elected representatives of the people in Congress assembled.

They regarded this democratic principle as of such central importance that they wrote it down as Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States: “All legislative power herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” Period. No ifs. No buts. No exceptions.

Except one. The Constitution establishes that foreign treaties ratified by a two-thirds majority of the Senate shall have the same force of law throughout the United States as enactments of Congress.

It is, therefore possible for any U.S. Government that can muster that Senate majority to ratify any treaty and thereby to thwart the central principle of Congressional democracy: that no Congress may bind its successors.

The Republicans, who are not always as lively in their understanding of the threat to democracy posed by supranational and global institutions such as the EU, the UN and its bloated climate bureaucracy, are too often snared or charmed by determined “Democrats” who fully understand and thirst to exercise the power to inflict perma-Socialism on their nation by bilateral, multilateral or global treaties.

It is astonishing how many of the GOP are willing to be cajoled and schmoozed into supporting monstrosities such as the Transatlatic Trade and Investment Partnership, which on its face sounds like a free-marketeer’s dream but is in its small print a series of outright Socialist measures which, once the Senate has ratified them, cannot be repealed. Its climate provisions, for instance, are highly dangerous.

It is no accident, therefore, that the bankers, the corporate profiteers, the Greens and the National Socialist Workers’ Party of Scotland – the corporatists and the communists together – made common totalitarian cause and heavily promoted the campaign to keep Britain in the EU, that paradise of vested interests and their poisonous lobbyists.

It is likewise no accident that precisely these same national and global vested interests heavily promote the campaign to subject Britain and the world to various unnecessary and damaging measures whose ostensible purpose is to control the climate but whose real ambition is to curb capitalism, fetter freedom, punish prosperity,. limit liberty and deny democracy.

The necessity to protect the flagile flower of democracy from the scythe of Socialism is now surely self-evident. Here are two modest proposals to ensure that the will of the people prevails over the power of the politicians, the Press, and the profiteers.

First, every new treaty, and as many pre-existing treaties as possible, should be made subject to repeal by a national referendum – and not just by a referendum called by the governing party because it thinks it can win it but by the people via the initiative procedure. Britain would have left the EU long before now if we, the people, and not those who govern us, had had the right to put referendum questions on the ballot.

Secondly, the governing bodies of all new supranational or global bodies exercising real sovereign power or spending taxpayers’ money from the states parties to the treaty that establishes them should be elected at frequent intervals by the peoples of those states parties.

Otherwise every international treaty, being a transfer of power from elected to unelected hands, diminishes democracy. Britain’s membership of the European Union effectively took away our democracy altogether, so that three new laws in five (according to the researchers of the House of Commons Library) or five in six (according to the German Government in a submission some years ago to the German Constitutional Court) are inflicted upon us solely because the unelected Kommissars require it.

Till now, our obligation has been to obey, on pain of unlimited fines.

The vote by the people of Britain to break free from this stifling, sclerotic tyranny has sent a shock-wave through every major international governing entity. It was no accident that the the International Monetary Fund, the Organization for Economic Corruption and Devastation, and various world “leaders” including Mr Obama, broke with democratic convention by openly promoting a “Remain” vote in a flagrant attempt to interfere in Britain’s decision.

Mr Obama’s intervention was decisive. The moment he demanded that Britain should remain within the EU, the polls began to swing against it. It was only when, in his maladroit fashion, he had sought to interfere in Britain’s decision that so many undecided voters woke up to the danger that the maneuverings and posturings of the international governing class represent to democracy.

What will Britain’s decision mean for the climate debate? Of course, it will break us free from the EU, whose governing elite had seized upon the climate issue as a purported ex-post-facto justification for the now-hated bloc’s continued existence.

We are left with our own British governing class, which has until now been no less determined than the EU to damage our economic and environmental interests by shutting down vital coal-fired power stations and carpeting our once green and pleasant land with windmills.

Now that the EU and its devoted poodle Mr Cameron have been consigned to the trashcan of history, it is near-certain that any new British Cabinet will take a more alert and less acquiescent stance than the present lot on the climate question.

It may even occur to the new Cabinet to check whether the rate of global warming is anything like what the profiteers of doom had predicted; to count the number of downstream businesses – such as cinder-blocks made from fly-ash out of coal-fired power stations – that have been destroyed by the EU’s war on coal; and even to wonder whether the forest of windmills that infest our once beautiful landscape are now extracting between them so much kinetic energy from passing storms that they are slowing them down, causing far more flash flooding than slightly warmer weather would (if and when it happened).

In the past, there was no point in our politicians asking any such questions, for our policies on all matters to do with our own environment were set for us by the unelected Kommissars of Brussels, whether we liked it or not.

Now that our politicians are going to have to learn to think for themselves again, rather than acting as an otiose, automated rubber stamp for directives from Them in Brussels, perhaps the Mother of Parliaments will begin to calculate the enormous economic advantage that Britain will gain by abandoning all of the climate-related directives that have driven our coal corporations, our steelworks and our aluminum works overseas, and have killed tens of thousands by making home heating altogether unaffordable.

We, the people, are the masters now. Our politicians will have to reacquire the habit of listening not to Them but to us. Here, and in the rest of Europe, and eventually throughout the world, let freedom ring!

Thank you, America, and God save the Queen!

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

509 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CodeTech
June 24, 2016 4:50 pm

Brilliant! Thanks, Lord Monckton!
There is a very simple rule of thumb to be observed in all things political: if 0bama is for it, the correct position is to be against it. If, of course, you value personal freedoms and actual democracy.
I’ve been seeing and reading some horrendous examples of “personal freedoms and democracy” all day. A huge swatch of millennials feel that nobody older than them should be allowed to vote, because they all voted “the wrong way”. The indoctrination of the young has always been a very successful tool for fascists and dictatorships.

AlexB
Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 5:15 pm

Indeed.
There are 16–18 year olds who say that it’s their future and they didn’t get to vote, and the old people who aren’t going to be around that long screwed them over. I’m 30, I don’t think I’m shuffling off this mortal coil any time soon (although who knows what tomorrow will bring). I’m pretty sure it’s my future too. It also happens to be my present, the same as all those older folk who voted the wrong way. The kids haven’t experienced the real world yet, they don’t see how the EU affects those it doesn’t directly benefit.
I’ve been thinking about it a lot lately, and I’ve come to the conclusion that I’m glad I couldn’t vote at that age. The stuff my head was full of back then makes present-day me cringe.

Reply to  AlexB
June 24, 2016 7:37 pm

When I was 16 my R&B band played at a rally for LBJ’s announcement for his War On Poverty.
We see how that’s worked out, eh?
“The stuff my head was full of back then makes present-day me cringe”
Oh, that’s so true.

Reply to  AlexB
June 25, 2016 5:56 am

For anyone wanting to learn more about the arguments for the UK leaving the EU should watch Martin Durkin’s (Producer of The Great Global Warming Swindle) excellent film:
Brexit:The Movie

Russ Wood
Reply to  AlexB
June 25, 2016 9:29 am

But it has often been said that if you are not a Liberal by age 21, you have no soul. If you are not a conservative by age 40, you have no sense.

Reply to  AlexB
June 25, 2016 2:27 pm

I’ve been thinking about this a lot too. As a 50 year-old who has lived and paid tax in Germany for over 10 years and having worked on the continent for 15, I have a lot of experience of the EU and Europe. I have also paid an awful, awful lot of corporation tax in to both the German and UK exchequer, in fact 5 times more than Facebook did to the UK government in 2014. Furthermore I’m white middle aged and highly skilled and belong to that generation that created that thing call the internet among many, many other things. So my suggestion would be to higher the voting age to something like , say 40 and weight the vote according to how much tax you have paid in to the system. Furthermore anyone voting on such an important issue as membership of the EU , should be forced to do some kind of pre-test , to verify they understand what is at stake. I’m sorry to say my experience of most of the so called educated under 40s who are not white and male is that they are shockingly ignorant.

Reply to  AlexB
June 25, 2016 3:50 pm

@Poptech: Thanks for the link to Brexit: the movie. I hadn’t seen that before, glad I didn’t miss it.

RossP
Reply to  AlexB
June 25, 2016 5:37 pm

The problem with many young people is those that were eligible to vote did not go to the polling booth. Figures I saw were 1 in 4 18-24 years olds voted but 4 in 5 over 60 year olds voted. The young can moan all they like, but if they don’t exercise the privilege to vote they have not right to criticise anyone. ( NB. This is an issue world wide –not just the UK)

Gabro
Reply to  AlexB
June 25, 2016 5:41 pm

Nothing wrong with the young not voting. If they’re not informed, working and raising families, they shouldn’t vote.
Lowering the voting age to 18 was a mistake. It should be raised from 21 to 35, when the brain reaches full maturity. How did the Founding Fathers know that?

MarkW
Reply to  AlexB
June 27, 2016 6:53 am

Gabro, the founding fathers were keen observers of their fellow men.

JohnKnight
Reply to  AlexB
June 27, 2016 3:27 pm

And themselves it seems to me . .

Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 5:43 pm

Lord Monckton, you really nailed it!
And Codetech, you did too. I’ve been saying for at least the last 6 years that 0bama really is running the most transparent administration in US history. All one must do is reverse everything he says and voila, you have the truth. Perhaps the simplest code ever.
It felt good this morning to learn that the British people had the slight enough majority to slip a monkey wrench into such un-democratic madness as the EU was actually always meant to be.
One can only hope that we can do something to check our own slide into such madness. I suppose we will see something in this regard in November.

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  William McClenney
June 25, 2016 3:33 am

I suppose we will see something in this regard in November.
I hope so.
But, yea or nay, we get to decide.
God Bless America! says this atheist. (It’s a tough job, but somebody has to do it.) I particularly note, with great positive feeling, that melord credits the example of America — stand beside her and guide her with a light through the night from above.

george e. smith
Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 5:58 pm

Welcome back to the outdoors Lord M of B. We learned a lot from our Mother, and we (we as in I am) happy to have you back on the playing field of free peoples and ideas.
G

CraigAustin
Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 6:01 pm

I think you are saying that Obama is now “Yoko Ono” wrong. Not just wrong but exactly wrong, 2+2=-4 type of wrong.

Jeff Mitchell
Reply to  CraigAustin
June 25, 2016 8:28 pm

Yes! I’ve always liked the joke that 2 + 2 = 5 for large values of 2. This makes it possible for 2 + 2 = 6 for even larger values of 2. And 2 + 2 = -4 if you remember the correct signs and parenthesis. (-2)(+2) = -4. They just don’t have their math structure down very well.

Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 6:17 pm

Barry Soetoro may want the UK at the “back of the queue”
however “The Donald” disagrees. Hear him say so at the
opening of his newly renovated Golf & Country Club in
Scotland. Already he has invested almost $200 million
on the place, and yet the SNP “Government” despise him.
short excerpt from Trump’s one hour speech in Scotland.

Reply to  The Editor
June 25, 2016 2:36 pm

The presidential Trump on display here. No one who voted leave for one minute believed the crap Obama came out with. This referendum has revealed a lot about who our true allies in this world our. Good luck Mr. Trump in your bid for the presidency and f*** Obama.

chev4575
Reply to  The Editor
June 25, 2016 5:42 pm

QUOTE : America does not need gun control. It needs Muslim control.We
can either ban guns, box cutters, shoes,cars,underwear, pressure cookers,
underground volcanoes,DemocRATS and bodily fluids… or we can put a stop to the
terror tidal flow of Muslim migrants into America.
End of Quote…
Trump for President, Hillary for Prison – 2016

Hugh
Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 7:15 pm

That’s a great rule of thumb, CodeTech. Mine is a variation: “If Obama and Pope Francis are for it, it’s infallibly wrong”.

Reed Coray
Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 9:06 pm

Absolutely agree. Only I would extend the rule-of-thumb to say: if the democrat party is for “it,” the correct position is to be against “it.” I’m not a republican, but I staunchly an anti-democrat.

Sleepalot
Reply to  Reed Coray
June 25, 2016 2:33 am

Your anti Democrat, not anti democrat. That capital “D” makes a huge difference.

David A
Reply to  Reed Coray
June 25, 2016 3:51 am

Yet, and perhaps the only thing missing in C.Ms. excellent post is that a constitutional republic is designed to protect individuals against ALL tyranny, including democratic. (Two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch, for example)

Joe Crawford
Reply to  Reed Coray
June 25, 2016 9:35 am

David A, you are absolutely right. It has always amazed me how many people don’t understand the difference between our republic and a pure democracy. But, I that’s what happens when the people teaching history don’t understand it themselves (I’d rather leave it at that than assume evil intent).

MarkW
Reply to  Reed Coray
June 27, 2016 6:56 am

I’ve lost track of the number of people who insist that any form of tyranny can be justified, so long as the majority wants it.

TG
Reply to  CodeTech
June 24, 2016 10:58 pm

if 0bama is for it, the correct position is to be against it.
I have found this to be the case 99.99999999% of the time. Obamaman is a real top down dictocrat, With his hammer, pen and phone he’s always looking for a way to nail the people and the economy.

David L. Hagen
Reply to  CodeTech
June 25, 2016 5:42 am

Well said Christopher Lord Monckton
However, vitally more important than a “democracy” is upholding a Republic.
See The Founding Fathers Rejected Democracy

Minority rights are protected from the majority in a Republic. A lynch mob is Democracy. Everyone voted but the man being lynched. A Republic rescues this man gives him a fair trial with a bona fide judge and witnesses for his defense. In a Republic there is an emphasis on individual differences rather than absolute equality. Such individual differences are seen as a strength in a Republic rather than as a flaw under Democracy, which equates sameness as equality.

All States in the USA mutually required that their constitutions be “republican in form” because all classic democracies had descended into mob rule.
See further on why the Founding Fathers chose a Republic not a Democracy to prevent Mob Rule

george e. smith
Reply to  David L. Hagen
June 25, 2016 6:07 am

Article IV, section 4 of the US Constitution says that the ….. United States ….. shall guarantee to each State, a Republican from of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion …..
But yes our 57 Sovereign Republics do operate along generally democratic lines.
Too bad that ….. The United States …. is delinquent on that invasion prevention.
Note that Article IV , section 4 , is something the government is told they MUST do, not something they are told they MAY do, as in Article I section 8.
The UK will now also be able to put some efforts into their own invasion by peoples who start from the premise of rejecting the established laws of their country, and demands to substitute their own seventh century rules.
G

William Bradford Grubel
Reply to  CodeTech
June 25, 2016 7:21 pm

Don’t mock Obama. He’s the most successful gun salesman this country has ever seen.

Marcus
June 24, 2016 4:51 pm

“The necessity to protect the flagile flower of democracy”
Lord Monckton, was that meant to be ” fragile” ??

george e. smith
Reply to  Marcus
June 24, 2016 5:59 pm

NO !

Gabro
Reply to  Marcus
June 24, 2016 8:47 pm

The frequently flagellated fragile flower of democracy.

Robin Hewitt
Reply to  Marcus
June 25, 2016 6:55 am

Hopefully not Flagyl

Gabro
June 24, 2016 4:51 pm

You’re welcome!
Little Jimmy Madison

Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 4:54 pm

Hip, hip — hooray!!!
We, the People, of the United States of America (if I may be so bold as to speak for us all) … 🙂 … accept your gracious thanks with pleasure! Oh, hooray, hooray, HOORAY for the United Kingdom!
SO HAPPY FOR YOU!
#(:))
**************
And Barack Hussein will now take a bow:

(youtube)
And, now, Barry Soetoro proposes a toast, “To the Queen” —
with “God Save the Queen”
as background music for his little speech:

(youtube)

Marcus
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 5:03 pm

“Long live the Queen” !!

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 5:12 pm

Barack Hussein Obama was not bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia, but to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, the highest office in Islam. Overcome with religious fervor, he lost control and bowed deeply. Then he had to bow repeatedly to other foreign, non-Muslim officials in an attempt to cover his gaffe.

Alan McIntire
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 25, 2016 6:30 am

After leaving office, President Fillmore visited Europe. He had an offer to meet the pope, but turned it down because he thought protocol required one to kiss the pope’s ring, and believed that such an action would demean the office of President of the United States. He later accepted the meeting when he found out that there was no such “kissing the ring” requirement.
President Fillmore had a lot more respect for the office of president than the current occupant. I think historians are wrong in ranking President Fillmore so low as a president.

Gabro
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 25, 2016 12:17 pm

I guess that Fillmore gets lumped in with his pre-war successors, the Democrats Pierce and Buchanan, who usually (rightly, IMO) rank at the bottom for hastening and not heading off the Late Unpleasantness.
Many historians conclude that the Compromise of 1850 delayed the LU rather than contributing to it. But if so, the delay came at the cost of adding a new slave state in the territories and of passing the Fugitive Slave Act, which helped give rise to the Republicans and to destroy Fillmore’s Whigs.
Had the North and South gone to war in 1851 instead of 1861, the latter would have had greater relative strength in population and resources then as opposed to ten years later, so its secession might have succeeded. More Southern militias had participated in the Mexican-American War, so that section would have had more military experience. England and France too might have been more inclined to support the South earlier.
Fillmore’s also an article of fun and opprobrium for later running on the anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic American Party (Know Nothings) ticket, although he apparently never joined before being nominated as its candidate for president.
[Egyptian cotton was not yet available to the English mills in 1850 in large amounts either …. .mod]

Gabro
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 25, 2016 12:42 pm

Mod,
Good point.
So by sacrificing runaway slaves for ten years, Fillmore may have helped keep the Union together.
New Mexico was never going to have a lot of slaves, anyway.

MarkW
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 27, 2016 6:59 am

I remember one comparison between Clinton and Reagan when it came to the office of the Presidency.
It was said that Reagan wouldn’t even take off his suit coat while in the Oval office, out of respect for the men who had occupied it before him.
Clinton on the other hand …

Will Nelson
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 5:15 pm

What does he do during his briefings? Maybe his trusted advisors need to quit playing video games all day.

TA
Reply to  Will Nelson
June 24, 2016 6:45 pm

Obama doesn’t listen to briefings. He already knows everything.

Reply to  Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 5:22 pm

“Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 at 4:54 pm
Hip, hip — hooray!!!
We, the People, of the United States of America (if I may be so bold as to speak for us all) … “

On this issue Janice, I’m more than happy to allow you to speak for me, too.
Which makes your use of the word “we” totally acceptable.

Janice Moore
Reply to  JohnWho
June 24, 2016 5:40 pm

Thank you, JohnWho, for telling me that. Good to know.

asybot
Reply to  JohnWho
June 24, 2016 8:42 pm

Janice you were speaking for not only the USA but : Canada, Australia New Zealand and the list goes on so thanks for speaking on our behalf! ( you took the words out of many mouths! how is your 4 legged friend?)

Janice Moore
Reply to  JohnWho
June 24, 2016 10:08 pm

Hi, Sybot (a),
Yes, yes, indeed — all liberty-loving (and honoring) peoples are represented by the comments in this thread. Good point!
Thank you for asking, Riley would like you to know that, while he will be 11 in August, he is STILL HERE. “I’m still here,” he said, with a little growl. Heh. The two German Shepherds are fine. Riley is not well, but, he’ll be with me at least another 2 or 3 months (or more!), I think.
Life is hard — but, God is good. All will be well…
I hope all is well up there in this busy growing season time of year.
Take care (sorry so terse, here, but, well, you understand…),
Janice

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  JohnWho
June 25, 2016 3:47 am

You’re welcome, from Us the People.
(Hang in there, Janice.)

Janice Moore
Reply to  JohnWho
June 25, 2016 8:02 am

Thank you, Evan, for your kind encouragement.

george e. smith
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 6:13 pm

Only last April, Emperor Obama the first, decreed that upon exit, the UK could go to the back of the bus; excuse me, I meant to say queue. Now he is saying that nothing will change WRT the US UK relationship.
This is the same Obama, who opened his White House Oval Office residency, by excommunicating the bust of Winston Churchill; a gift to the US, of the British People.
He also added his emphasis to that sentiment, by arranging to have an official photograph of himself sitting in the Oval Office chair, with his boots up on the desk of oaken timbers from a British Revolutionary war battleship; also a gift of the British people.
And of course we all know that presenting the soles of ones boots , is the standard form of Islamic insult to one’s opponents.
Lo and behold within seconds, Lady Hillary issued her opinion of Brexit, in words that almost exactly matched and mimicked The Emperor Obama speech.
Hey Hillary, at this point what the hell does it matter (to you) what the freedom desiring British people want; what difference does it make ??
G

TA
Reply to  george e. smith
June 24, 2016 6:58 pm

Hillary is trying to keep her name on the front page.
Trump’s great speech and news conference in Scotland this morning sucked all the political air out of Hillary’s world, so she is trying to claw her way back into the public eye by sounding off on Brixet. Naturally, she says just the wrong thing.
Hillary has a lot of titles. But she has no accomplishments to speak of, and has made numerous really bad decisions on her watch that have led to the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people, and the disruption of Europe by Middle Eastern refugees fleeing from the wars Hillary and Obama’s stupidity caused.
You could say that Hillary is partially responsible for Britain exiting the EU: The British are tired of playing cleanup to Hillary’s Middle East mistakes.
Trump is going to tear her record apart during the general election, and there is nothing she can do to stop it, because it is all true, and on the record.

Janice Moore
Reply to  george e. smith
June 24, 2016 7:08 pm

Well said, George! (great memory for all the facts about that poseur in the White House)

MarkG
Reply to  george e. smith
June 24, 2016 7:33 pm

“Now he is saying that nothing will change WRT the US UK relationship.”
Perfectly true. Obama hated Britain before the vote, and he still hates Britain after the vote. Nothing changed.

george e. smith
Reply to  george e. smith
June 24, 2016 7:56 pm

Well Obama had a venomous hatred for the British and Churchill in particular, because of Churchill’s action in quelling the Mau-mau uprisings in British Colonial Africa, where the (Kikuyu ?) tribesmen (some of them) went on a murderous rampage hacking farmers, black and white to death, and burning their farms.
His paternal grandfather was involved in that in some way, according to a report I have heard from a guy who researched it. Don’t recall the name of O’s grandpa, but there is a dingo in there somewhere, if my memory hasn’t gone all sour.
G

george e. smith
Reply to  george e. smith
June 24, 2016 7:59 pm

Might have got that ancestral name a bit pear shaped.
g

Leonard Lane
Reply to  george e. smith
June 24, 2016 11:47 pm

george, Hillary has to bow and scrape and fawn over Obama. He is the one who will have the final say whether she is indicted and tried as a criminal.

David A
Reply to  george e. smith
June 25, 2016 3:58 am

LL, do you not think those two are engaged in “MAD” due to their extensive corruption. If the FBI finds the brass to indict, how long before there is a pardon, or does one have to be convicted to pardon?

AlexB
Reply to  george e. smith
June 25, 2016 12:59 pm

I don’t know about elsewhere in the UK, but where I am the back of the bus is the place the kids make a bee line for anyway.

Reply to  george e. smith
June 26, 2016 7:08 pm

george e. smith June 24, 2016 at 6:13 pm
This is the same Obama, who opened his White House Oval Office residency, by excommunicating the bust of Winston Churchill; a gift to the US, of the British People.

Sorry George, but this didn’t happen, it’s outside the door of the president’s office, the Treaty Room.!

Gabro
Reply to  george e. smith
June 26, 2016 7:14 pm

Sorry, Phil. Wrong again!
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself regurgitating lies by the Administration and its MSM lackeys?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/9436526/White-House-admits-it-did-return-Winston-Churchill-bust-to-Britain.html
Needed UK media to set straight the lies of Obama’s American cheer leaders and echo chamber sycophants.

Reply to  george e. smith
June 27, 2016 8:56 am

Gabro June 26, 2016 at 7:14 pm
Sorry, Phil. Wrong again!
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself regurgitating lies by the Administration and its MSM lackeys?

Apparently you don’t understand english and didn’t read the article you linked to!
The post by George that I responded to said:
This is the same Obama, who opened his White House Oval Office residency, by excommunicating the bust of Winston Churchill; a gift to the US, of the British People.
The bust of Churchill which was a gift to the US in 1965 is still in the White House exactly where I said it is, outside the Treaty Room.
There was another bust of Churchill which was loaned to President Bush (do you understand the distinction between loan and gift Gabro?) by Tony Blair. As the ambassador, Sir Peter Westmacott, said, it was a loan for the duration of the Bush presidency and was returned to the Embassy at the end of that presidency.

Gabro
Reply to  george e. smith
June 27, 2016 9:29 am

Phil,
The depths of your superficiality cannot be plumbed.
The post-9/11 loan was indefinite. Had Obama wanted to keep it for the rest of his term, the UK embassy would have been happy to let him.
http://www.allenbwest.com/michele/is-this-the-real-reason-obama-returned-that-churchill-bust
Dig deep or taste not of the Internet.

Reply to  george e. smith
June 27, 2016 8:39 pm

There is one more bust of Churchill that remains in the White House – this one is displayed outside The Treaty Room, but there’s little chance Obama will be hanging out there, considering he has little interest in actually discussing treaties with Congress.
Gabro, you really should start reading someone who actually knows what he’s talking about. President Obama uses the Treaty room as his primary working office.
http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/floor2/treaty-room/treaty-room-2009-sw.jpg

benofhouston
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 24, 2016 10:06 pm

Now, this is ridiculous. The president can show respect and politeness. Gestures and wishes are one thing. It is the meaningful actions that concern me.

Jeff Mitchell
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 25, 2016 8:44 pm

On this subject, you can speak for me too. Monckton hits it out of the park 🙂

June 24, 2016 4:55 pm

What a pity Christopher Mockton is not in the running for Prime Minister, as Cameron just resigned. Is he inelgible, given his place in the House of Lords? I don’t know enough British law to know.

Steve Fraser
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 25, 2016 5:31 am

While a peer, he is not in the House of Lords.

Steve T
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 25, 2016 7:35 am

Tom, the Prime Minister is a position decided by the group who control the majority in Parliament. In this case the Conservative Party. It’s more of a process than a matter of law
The qualification for the post at this time is to belong to the party, make the short list selected by the elected MP’s of that Party and then be able to gain the majority of votes at the party’s annual conference this autumn.
They should obviously choose someone who supported the leave vote.
SteveT

Drcrinum
June 24, 2016 4:55 pm

THANK YOU, Christopher Monckton of Brenchley.

Admin
June 24, 2016 4:58 pm

Its a wonderful day for democracy and freedom Lord Monckton!

Marcus
June 24, 2016 5:00 pm

..Outstanding sir !
p.s. congratulations on a well deserved victory !

Les Hunter
June 24, 2016 5:00 pm

Wow! Well explained!

Bloke down the pub
June 24, 2016 5:00 pm

A friend of mine asked what possible benefit could come from a vote for Brexit. I replied democracy, to which he said that it was over-rated. I knew at that point that I had to be more careful in future who I called a friend.

birdynumnum
June 24, 2016 5:01 pm

With Scotlands attitude to all this I would suggest a close eye is kept on William Wallace’s grave for any signs of rotation. “Freedom!”
Remains to be seen.

Texcis
Reply to  birdynumnum
June 24, 2016 6:19 pm

+1305

Reply to  Texcis
June 24, 2016 7:40 pm

+1314 (exactly) [ well, except for the calendar change ]

stan stendera
Reply to  Texcis
June 24, 2016 10:15 pm

Very astute reply.

expat
Reply to  birdynumnum
June 24, 2016 6:20 pm

Love Scotland and it’s people, but sometimes I think all the industrious ones either emigrated or got shot up in the wars cause the people there now sure like “free stuff” paid for by others.

Ric Haldane
Reply to  expat
June 24, 2016 7:49 pm

The Scots have turned to socialism in a big way. They may leave GB and join the EU whose days are surely numbered.

Owen in GA
Reply to  expat
June 24, 2016 8:06 pm

Ric,
But Scotland is an economic basket case and thus would not qualify for EU membership. They could leave the union jack only to wander in the hinterlands without a sugar daddy to maintain their welfare state.
What ever would they do then?

asybot
Reply to  expat
June 24, 2016 8:47 pm

I wonder if the Scots leave how much blue paint there is left? (Looks like that is what their government is going to wear )

Gabro
Reply to  expat
June 24, 2016 8:49 pm

If they let in Greece, they’ll let in any socialist spongers. At least Scotland still has a few years of oil left. Not olive oil, but petroleum.

Steve T
Reply to  expat
June 25, 2016 7:28 am

Ric Haldane
June 24, 2016 at 7:49 pm
The Scots have turned to socialism in a big way. They may leave GB and join the EU whose days are surely numbered.
**************************************************************************************************************
Good luck to Scotland joining the EU. I’m sure that Spain and one or two others among the EU members will use their veto to stop them joining to discourage independence from the likes of Catalonia and regions elsewhere with similar ideas.
SteveT

jdgalt
Reply to  expat
June 25, 2016 9:50 pm

@Owen: I predict that the next referendum proposal will be for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland to secede from Britain together. That way the Scots don’t have to apply to join the EU — they will have never left, and as a bonus, the Scots won’t get to vote on the question. Instead, the rest of the kingdom will be the ones to vote on it.
If this is their intention it explains why PM Cameron did not send the EU an Article 50 Notice before resigning. The clock on negotiating the separation doesn’t even start to run until that notice is given.
Of course, Cameron may just intend to cheat the voters by never giving the notice. So Vote UKIP in the upcoming general election!

rw
Reply to  expat
June 28, 2016 11:45 am

They’e all over here.

Gabro
Reply to  birdynumnum
June 24, 2016 8:51 pm

Scotland wouldn’t even exist except for the untimely death of King Edward I. Had he lived, his son, Queen Edward II, wouldn’t have lost the Battle of Bannockburn. Without that lucky win, Robert the Bruce wouldn’t have been King of Scots and Scotland today would be even less separate from England than is Wales.

Louis
Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 11:13 pm

“his son, Queen Edward II”
Is that a type-o? Or did Edward II self-identify as a queen?

george e. smith
Reply to  Gabro
June 25, 2016 6:13 am

I guess he used the Ladies Loo under the new principle of all 57 genders are equal.
g

Reply to  Gabro
June 27, 2016 9:15 am

Well Edward II may well have had a homosexual relationship with Piers Gaveston, Marlowe’s play makes very explicit reference to this.

June 24, 2016 5:02 pm

Well said Lord Monckton –and will be posted in my Facebook account!

Doug S
June 24, 2016 5:07 pm

Bravo Christopher Monckton!
Indeed, God save the Queen and God give us all strength to build upon the freedom our forefathers won for us through their sacrifice.

Will Nelson
June 24, 2016 5:11 pm

I’m sure Packagerm will never happen though.

jorgekafkazar
June 24, 2016 5:15 pm

God save the Queen, indeed.

Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 24, 2016 7:50 pm

Yes, indeed!

June 24, 2016 5:15 pm

Lord Monckton wrote, “Mr Obama’s intervention was decisive. “

I immediately realized that at the time he did that back in April. Many other did as well. That man’s ego cannot listen to his better advisors to keep his socialist, nanny-stater yap shut. He cannot accept that it was his words that helped convince the good people of Britain that their future should be in their own hands, not in an unaccountable socialist bureaucracy.

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
June 24, 2016 5:17 pm

Advisors? He has advisors?

Gabro
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 24, 2016 5:25 pm

There is but one.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-white-house-aid-valerie-jarrett-obama/
In effect, the first female president.
Unless you count the second Mrs. Wilson, Edith Bolling Galt, who was the only person who could understand Woodrow after his stroke. Or claimed she could. So effectively ran the executive branch.
She was a “Red Bolling”, ie descended from Matoaka “Pocahontas” Powhatan. Most Bollings are “White”, but there are also a few “Blue Bollings”.

Texcis
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 24, 2016 6:19 pm

LOL!

Analitik
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
June 24, 2016 6:42 pm

Gore, Hansen, Mann, Jaczko, DiCaprio, …

Owen in GA
Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
June 24, 2016 8:10 pm

Oh I don’t know about Obama being decisive (if so it would be the first truly decisive thing in his term), I think that Junker’s comment about the British government being delusional to think there would be any further negotiations on the EUs structure was the death peg.

Philip
Reply to  Owen in GA
June 25, 2016 8:39 am

Agree. Doing it on the day before the vote seemed calculated. Britain was pretty much against him taking that position, I think he wanted an exit, and this was his way of helping that to happen.
He seems like a thoroughly unlikable and vindictive person.

AlexB
Reply to  Owen in GA
June 25, 2016 3:29 pm

Not sure how many people actually caught that, with how close to the vote he said it. Between that and the EU position that Cameron’s reform agreement wasn’t binding, one would hope more people would have swung to the Leave camp.

June 24, 2016 5:16 pm

typo ‘flagile’

george e. smith
Reply to  bobbyvalentine466921
June 24, 2016 8:02 pm

Notso !
G

SMC
June 24, 2016 5:17 pm

Congratulations to the UK.
I’ve been reading and watching some of the news reports and reading some of the blogs from the more ‘liberal’ side of the fence and, well, it’s interesting. Without fail, they all blame the poor, benighted, uneducated working class people for the failure of the Remain vote. They all feel it is the fault of nefarious, bigoted, unprincipled politicians leading the masses astray. Their condescending rhetoric is blind and sickening IMO.
While the UK and many of the rest of us celebrate this victory for freedom and democracy, we must remain cautious and on guard. The socialists have just suffered a major defeat and will not easily come to terms with this reality. They will oppose, perhaps violently, any opposition to their way of thinking. They will justify their opposition, perhaps violent, by some form of ‘The ends justify the means.’ They are currently in denial and I doubt they will ever reach acceptance. The road forward will be rocky and full of pitfalls, it always is and always will be. But, the issues that brought the UK to vote exit are still out there. There is still a powerful block of people that will do whatever it takes to see their dreams of power and domination come true. Unless they are defeated swiftly, relatively speaking, and in a decisive manner, then there will be more ‘battles’ and each will be more vicious than the last. Let’s do what we can to ensure these ‘battles’ remain in the realms of rhetoric and the ballot box.

Reply to  SMC
June 24, 2016 7:58 pm

That’s because the little people are too stupid to do the right thing…So we get nudged.
Actually, we also get lied to big time because we’re stupid.
Just ask anybody in Obama’s administration.
EPA, IRS, VA, Energy, Education, Justice, ask anybody.

rw
Reply to  SMC
June 28, 2016 11:52 am

I agree with your assessment 100 percent. They’re already looking for ways to overturn the vote. These people have the tenacity of a Terminator robot. I hope enough people in the UK realize that.

June 24, 2016 5:22 pm

And thank YOU, Christopher, for Shakespeare, Isaac Newton, the Beatles, and other good things from Britain.
I’m glad to see you mention TTIP, the evil cousin of TTP. Obama and his mostly Republican allies* are looking to shove democracy-killing TTP down our throats during the lame duck session. Perhaps you could arrange for Cameron to visit the US during the lame duck. We can at least hope for similar results.
* most TPA votes were by Republicans. TPA greased the skids for TPP.

Reply to  metamars
June 24, 2016 5:43 pm

I actually did wrote my Congresswoman (AZ-CD2, McSally) last year warning her of the dangers for her support and that of Republican Party in siding with Obama to give him TPA. They voted for it anyway. It still eludes her thimble brain that she won the closest Congressional district election contest EVER (by just 160 votes) because enough people wanted to see Obama opposed at his every step. She went to DC and snuggled up and canoodled with the GOP establishment.
Then Trump came along and showed the GOP establishment fools how disconnected they are from their base.

Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
June 24, 2016 5:43 pm

write. duh

Reply to  Joel O’Bryan
June 24, 2016 6:55 pm

You can join the Anti-TPP Git Sally Posse, preferably making wrangler and/or voteslinger pledges. Even if you’re a Republican, who can’t bring yourself to vote against somebody from the R tribe, you can still take and keep wrangler pledges. http://www.votersrevenge.org/follow/119/0 . The public is woefully ignorant of TPP – I’ve done my own (admittedly modest and statistically insignificant) polling. (See my facebook page “TPP Ignorance”, where I’ve documented some of this ignorance. http://tinyurl.com/j8rkuud Although I haven’t posted any recent ‘polling’ of mine, the results have been very similar).
Please do your own polling of neighbors. When you find out just how few of them know anything significant about TPP, you will hopefully be galvanized to change that. Obama actually classified the TPP docs (though Congress critter could read it, under draconian conditions) until after the TPA vote. The mainstream media blacked out the TPP, until TPA was in play, the only exception being Ed Schulz of MSNBC. (Who is no longer there. Hmmm. He is on RT.com).
PERHAPS CHRISTOPHER MONCKTON WILL USE HIS FATHOMLESS WIT TO HELP SET THE REPUBLICANS STRAIGHT ON TPP. CHRISTOPHER?

Gabro
Reply to  metamars
June 24, 2016 6:14 pm

What, no fish and chips?
No bangers with fried tomato? No Cornish pastie? Or haggis?
No rotten NHS teeth?

george e. smith
Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 8:04 pm

Gots to be wrapped in yesterday’s newspaper to qualify as fish and chips.
g

Owen in GA
Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 8:16 pm

George,
So what do we do when the papers all go online? I loved me some fish and chips when I lived in England. Of course the EU was trying to run the chippies out of business with their fish limits on cod when I was there. Chicken Tikka Missala actually passed fish and chips as the most popular dish in England while I was there.

Gabro
Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 8:37 pm

That’s right!
Let us never forget that we have the Mother Country to thank for Chicken Tikka Missala.
And Shakespeare, of course, dead white male chauvinist that he may be. But not a racist. Remember the Merchant of Venice, Othello the Moor and of course the Dark Lady of the sonnets, Lucy Negro or Emilia Lanier.

Gabro
Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 8:39 pm

George,
Can no longer wrap fish and chips in newspaper, since newsprint consists of that evil poison, carbon!

asybot
Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 8:52 pm

george e. smith,8:04 pm, gots to be wrapped in yesterday’s newspaper to qualify as fish and chips. Does the Guardian qualify or is it banned?

Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 9:02 pm

In the interest of brevity, there were many, many omissions. Chief among them, methinks, is tea and strumpets, with the Queen!

Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 9:36 pm

“….tea and strumpets…”
So that’s why Brexit won.

Reply to  Gabro
June 24, 2016 11:57 pm

What once was, is no more…
“In a recent World Health Organisation report of the dental status of children, British youths had fewer decayed, missing or filled teeth than those in France, Spain and Sweden. The United States, on the other hand, did quite a bit worse. At the age of 12, children in the United Kingdom have on average better teeth than their American counterparts.”

clipe
June 24, 2016 5:34 pm

“Now that the EU and its devoted poodle Mr Cameron have been consigned to the trashcan dustbin of history”
As Donna Laframboise would have it.

Jeff Mitchell
Reply to  clipe
June 25, 2016 9:40 pm

I like “ash heap of history” personally.

afonzarelli
June 24, 2016 5:34 pm

One has to wonder how much of this vote was purely due to the backlash against the EU climate change policies. Given time, liberalism is perfectly capable of destroying itself. Here in the states, we’re just a wisker away from having a republican president, congress and (importantly) supreme court. All this in the face of strong demographic head winds. Just let liberals be liberals and that will be the end of liberalism…

F. Ross
June 24, 2016 5:43 pm

Excellent — and entertaining at the same time!

“England has saved herself by her exertions, and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.”

To which I can only say Hear, hear.

Indeed, No-way and Nixerland having already voted down the EU, Brexit may well be swiftly followed by Frexit, Grexit, Departugal, Italeave, Czechout, Oustria, Finish, Slovakuum, Latviaticum and Byebyegium. At this rate, soon the only country still participating in the European tyranny-by-clerk will be Remainia.

Deserves at least thirteen smily faces : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – ) : – )
Tea… milord?

Texcis
Reply to  F. Ross
June 24, 2016 6:20 pm

+1776

Reply to  Texcis
June 24, 2016 8:02 pm

In th UK it’s +2016

Reply to  Texcis
June 24, 2016 8:03 pm

Oops, I forgot.
Welcome back to the free world.

June 24, 2016 5:44 pm

Next step: the United Kingdom of England and Wales…

Reply to  kalya22
June 25, 2016 12:00 am

Yep, it’s coming. Just us and Wales, and we’re very happy with that (since a female Welsh voice is the sexiest voice in the world!). People are already trying to think up a new flag.

Stephen Richards
Reply to  bazzer1959
June 25, 2016 1:17 am

UK will have so much spare money they won’t know what to do with it. Billions from EU, Billion from Barnet formula ~£10000/scot. Let the Venezuelan inspired scot nat party have their country.
Lord Monckton best wishes and thanks for all your efforts

george e. smith
Reply to  bazzer1959
June 25, 2016 6:26 am

Well all those Welshmen can sing. Them and their damn ” Dear Land of my (our ?) Fathers “.
That’s the only reason they won that game, when Wales beat the undefeated 1905 All blacks. Completely snookered our magic Haka, that was supposed to put the fear of god into them.
Anyway, our little Maori village still has a name that is longer than Llanfair ……………..
I’ll look it up.
G

Reply to  bazzer1959
June 26, 2016 8:30 pm

george e. smith June 25, 2016 at 6:26 am
Well all those Welshmen can sing. Them and their damn ” Dear Land of my (our ?) Fathers “.

It’s ‘Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau’, and it translates as ‘my’. I sang it for the first time about 60 years ago in my school choir at the Eisteddfod.
That’s the only reason they won that game, when Wales beat the undefeated 1905 All blacks. Completely snookered our magic Haka, that was supposed to put the fear of god into them.
It’s always good when the All Blacks come up against the Tongans, get the haka and the sipi tau!

Editor
June 24, 2016 5:48 pm

My dear Christopher, my thanks to you and all those who labored so mightily to bring this to pass. Well done, good sir, very well done indeed.
w.

Buckley
June 24, 2016 5:49 pm

It seems that Lord Monckton has a keener grasp of the U.S. Constitution than ‘Constitutional Law Professor’ Obama.
Go Brits!

Ogcone
Reply to  Buckley
June 25, 2016 2:57 pm

Except with respect to one issue; he has the Constitution right (treaties ratified by 2/3 vote of Senate alone), but trade agreements are not self-implementing, and they must be enacted by both houses of Congress. See http://conginst.org/2011/12/12/trade-or-treaty-why-does-the-house-approve-free-trade-agreements/ for an explanation.

stan stendera
Reply to  Buckley
June 25, 2016 4:24 pm

Lord Monckton has a keener grasp of EVERYTHING than Obama.

1 2 3 6