Seven Earth Day predictions that failed spectacularly

Never Trust The Doom-Mongers: Earth Day Predictions That Were All Wrong

EarthDay_Envorinmental_Scares

The Daily Caller, 22 April 2016

Andrew Follett

Environmentalists truly believed and predicted that the planet was doomed during the first Earth Day in 1970, unless drastic actions were taken to save it. Humanity never quite got around to that drastic action, but environmentalists still recall the first Earth Day fondly and hold many of the predictions in high regard.

So this Earth Day, The Daily Caller News Foundation takes a look at predictions made by environmentalists around the original Earth Day in 1970 to see how they’ve held up.

Have any of these dire predictions come true? No, but that hasn’t stopped environmentalists from worrying. From predicting the end of civilization to classic worries about peak oil, here are seven green predictions that were just flat out wrong.

1: “Civilization Will End Within 15 or 30 Years.”

Harvard biologist Dr. George Wald warned shortly before the first Earth Day in 1970 that civilization would soon end “unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” Three years before his projection, Wald was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine.

Wald was a vocal opponent of the Vietnam War and the nuclear arms race. He even flew to Moscow at one point to advise the leader of the Soviet Union on environmental policy.

Despite his assistance to a communist government, civilization still exists. The percentage of Americans who are concerned about environmental threats has fallen as civilization failed to end by environmental catastrophe.

2: “100-200 Million People Per Year Will Be Starving to Death During the Next Ten Years.”

Stanford professor Dr. Paul Ehrlich declared in April 1970 that mass starvation was imminent. His dire predictions failed to materialize as the number of people living in poverty has significantly declined and the amount of food per person has steadily increased, despite population growth. The world’s Gross Domestic Product per person has immeasurably increased despite increases in population.

Ehrlich is largely responsible for this view, having co-published “The Population Bomb” with The Sierra Club in 1968. The book made a number of claims including that millions of humans would starve to death in the 1970s and 1980s, mass famines would sweep England leading to the country’s demise, and that ecological destruction would devastate the planet causing the collapse of civilization.

3: “Population Will Inevitably and Completely Outstrip Whatever Small Increases in Food Supplies We Make.”

Paul Ehrlich also made the above claim in 1970, shortly before an agricultural revolution that caused the world’s food supply to rapidly increase.

Ehrlich has consistently failed to revise his predictions when confronted with the fact that they did not occur, stating in 2009 that “perhaps the most serious flaw in The Bomb was that it was much too optimistic about the future.”

4: “Demographers Agree Almost Unanimously … Thirty Years From Now, the Entire World … Will Be in Famine.”

Environmentalists in 1970 truly believed in a scientific consensus predicting global famine due to population growth in the developing world, especially in India.

“Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions,” Peter Gunter, a professor at North Texas State University, said in a 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.”By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”

India, where the famines were supposed to begin, recently became one of the world’s largest exporters of agricultural products and food supply per person in the country has drastically increased in recent years. In fact, the number of people in every country listed by Gunter has risen dramatically since 1970.

5: “In A Decade, Urban Dwellers Will Have to Wear Gas Masks to Survive Air Pollution.”

Life magazine stated in January 1970 that scientist had “solid experimental and theoretical evidence” to believe that “in a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution … by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching Earth by one half.”

Despite the prediction, air quality has been improving worldwide according to the World Health Organization. Air pollution has also sharply declined in industrialized countries. Carbon dioxide (CO2), the gas environmentalists are worried about today, is odorless, invisible and harmless to humans in normal amounts.

6: “Childbearing [Will Be] A Punishable Crime Against Society, Unless the Parents Hold a Government License.”

David Brower, the first executive director of The Sierra Club made the above claim and went on to say that “[a]ll potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” Brower was also essential in founding Friends of the Earth and the League Of Conservation Voters and much of the modern environmental movement.

Brower believed that most environmental problems were ultimately attributable to new technology that allowed humans to pass natural limits on population size. He famously stated before his death in 2000 that “all technology should be assumed guilty until proven innocent” and repeatedly advocated for mandatory birth control.

Today, the only major government to ever get close to his vision has been China, which ended its one-child policy last October.

7: “By the Year 2000 … There Won’t Be Any More Crude Oil.”

On Earth Day in 1970 ecologist Kenneth Watt famously predicted that the world would run out of oil saying, “You’ll drive up to the pump and say, ‘Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, ‘I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’”

Numerous academics like Watt predicted that American oil production peaked in 1970 and would gradually decline, likely causing a global economic meltdown. However, the successful application of massive hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, caused American oil production to come roaring back and there is currently too much oil on the market.

American oil and natural gas reserves are at their highest levels since 1972 and American oil production in 2014 was 80 percent higher than in 2008 thanks to fracking.

Furthermore, the U.S. now controls the world’s largest untapped oil reserve, the Green River Formation in Colorado. This formation alone contains up to 3 trillion barrels of untapped oil shale, half of which may be recoverable. That’s five and a half times the proven reserves of Saudi Arabia. This single geologic formation could contain more oil than the rest of the world’s proven reserves combined.

Via Benny Peiser. (H/T, Ronald Bailey at Reason and Mark Perry at the American Enterprise Institute).

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.5 2 votes
Article Rating
354 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
yoyoma
April 22, 2016 1:23 pm

Well, they’ve improved their “science”. They are now stretching their predictions out to the year 2100, when everyone alive now will be dead.

Paul
April 22, 2016 1:27 pm

If you live in Beijing then #5 is may seem true.
I grew up in southern california during the 70s. The pain in my lungs after swimming or running was terrible. It is so much more beautiful now, I sometimes consider moving back!

Retired Kit P
Reply to  Paul
April 22, 2016 1:48 pm

Paul how stupid are you. If you exercise too hard you will have pain even with good air quality.

MarkW
Reply to  Retired Kit P
April 22, 2016 2:13 pm

I grew up in LA during the 70’s, and there were days where the ozone levels got high enough to cause breathing problems in those exercising hard, or who already had breathing problems.
The fixes to that problem were fairly minor and could have been had at a tenth the cost of the regulations that were actually passed.
The biggest problem was that they went after hydro-carbon emissions first, leaving NOx to later. Unfortunately it was later discovered that nature was the largest contributor to hydrocarbons in the air, making the first round of pollution control devices virtually useless.

BFL
Reply to  Retired Kit P
April 22, 2016 2:38 pm

Yeah, I remember flying into LA in that time period, the stench and reddish smog coming down thru 5K was eye watering. But, gee, never knew it was almost all natures fault; thanks for informing….

Marcus
Reply to  Retired Kit P
April 23, 2016 12:44 am

,,,BFL…….” the stench and reddish smog coming down thru 5K was eye watering.” ? In a plane ? Were you seated outside on the wing or something ? D’oh !

April 22, 2016 1:30 pm

From the founder of the Weather Channel, “The Paris climate agreement is all about empowering the U.N. and has nothing to do with the climate.”
I knew something was up with this whole Global Warming nonsense when all the dissenting scientists were instantly silenced and ignored by the media. The public was not allowed to hear their views. Then we hear of emails where their so-called scientist were caught red handed admitting to manipulating the data. Even NASA is in on the hoax and they got embarrassed by an ordinary individual several years ago who showed them that their official weather data and findings were wrong.

3¢worth
April 22, 2016 1:39 pm

Is nobody celebrating the birthday of Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov? He would have been 146 years old today. I guess it’s just coincidence that his birthday falls on the same day as earth day? Ulyanov once said, “If the workers and peasants don’t wish to accept socialism, our reply will be: Why waste words when we can apply force?” Ulyanov’s birthday falls just just two days after the birthday of that other monster who might have been known to history (or maybe not) as Adolf Schicklgruber (127 years old today). They are two of a handful of people (?) who did much to reduce the world’s population. When eco-fascists say that the world’s population must be reduced, be worried, be very worried! I’m going to celebrate earth day as I did earth hour by turning all the lights on in my house. Use the energy available to you before they take it away. In other news: Norway and The Netherlands announced they are going to ban sales of new automobiles that use gasoline or deisel engines by 2026.

April 22, 2016 1:48 pm

“Seven Earth Day predictions that failed spectacularly”
That’s because they were issued by professing ‘scientists’.

michael hart
April 22, 2016 1:58 pm

Seventh Earth Day Predictionists, sounds suspiciously like a new -media religion.

RWturner
April 22, 2016 2:03 pm

I think this sums up the mentality of doompocalypse predictions from the 70s.

Saul from Montreal
April 22, 2016 2:09 pm

OMG, it’s trolls all the way down….

MarkW
Reply to  Saul from Montreal
April 22, 2016 2:14 pm

Fascinating how they always show up right after school lets out.

Bentnwasted
April 22, 2016 2:19 pm

7.2 Billion people are the only problem. Ideal sustainable Earth population is about 4 Billion. Only the top 10% can say that “life” is getting better! THE CULLING IS COMING!

Reply to  Bentnwasted
April 22, 2016 3:02 pm

Bentnwasted Do us a favor and place yourself at the head of the line.

Reply to  Matt Bergin
April 22, 2016 4:47 pm

If not first..be the next in line.

Reply to  Bentnwasted
April 22, 2016 4:48 pm

“Ideal sustainable Earth population is about 4 Billion.”
Who says? Where? Why? What were they studying exactly and more importantly HOW did they achieve that number?

Reply to  Jenn Runion
April 22, 2016 7:11 pm

JR,No. Way way too low. I calculated two scenarios in Gaia’s Limits. Food, about 9.2-9.3 billion. Maybe 9.5 billion. Chicken/beef makes a big difference.
For liquid transport fuels, about 7.3-7.3 billion. The ebook has all the calculation details. You are free to differ, just provide the alternative facts and arithmetic. No models, just simple arithmetic on well established trends.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Jenn Runion
April 22, 2016 11:04 pm

Ideal earth population is me, Amanda Seifred, Charlize Theron, Cindy from high school and further considerations.

iamthor
April 22, 2016 2:19 pm

Apparently my boys must sacrifice the lives they are accustomed to for the good of the planet. Orders courtesy of the New World Order Catholic Religion via the Earth Day justice speech part of the morning announcements. School sucks has a whole new meaning for them. Wow! These extremists are becoming very bold. I think a good old fashioned smokey bonfire will cheer the boys up.

jameswlee2014
April 22, 2016 2:21 pm

“4: “Demographers Agree Almost Unanimously … Thirty Years From Now, the Entire World … Will Be in Famine.”
Obese!! We meant obese!! That ‘famine’ deal was a typo!! We meant the entire world will be obese!!!

Crispin in Waterloo but really in Beijing
Reply to  jameswlee2014
April 23, 2016 9:21 am

Funny how people have this habit of producing enough food to go round, decade after decade. Maybe we should place farmers in charge of a Lot More Things instead of the useless eaters that seek to direct and control society.

Dave F
April 22, 2016 2:22 pm

Seems like we have made some necessary improvements with polution abatement, green energy, etc. Seems like we still have things that make sense to do…. what to do with styrofoam…must be a better altenative…. solar power and wind power are getting less expesnive… mileage on cars is increasing… battery life is getting longer…so the end did not come when they predicted… but I think we have done some good things that only makes us better stewards of the earth, less junk in landfills, less gunk in the air….chicken little will always see the sky falling…. not yet I guess…

Reply to  Dave F
April 22, 2016 3:13 pm

What pray tell is wrong with putting junk in land fills? All of the things that make up the junk came out of the ground. It only makes sense to put it back where we got it when we are done with it. Green energy is a long way from “Green”. Solar and wind are worse than useless a complete and total waste of time and an awful lot of our tax money. If you want to see what happens to wind power after a few years take a look at South point Hawaii and the wind turbines installed in the Clinton era. There are pictures and video on the net.They finally removed the rusted junk just last year As for Styrofoam if you leave it out in the sun the ultraviolet rays will destroy the foam in a short period of time.

Resourceguy
April 22, 2016 2:22 pm

Speaking of Paul Ehrlich predictions, it has been awfully quiet at the WH science office lately.

April 22, 2016 2:25 pm

In March of 2011, Anthony Watts appeared to stake his entire stance on the reliability of surface temperature data on a single upcoming study: the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study (BEST), an independent temperature record to be constructed using over 39,000 unique stations. On March 6th, Watts said on his blog:
… I’m prepared to accept whatever result they produce, even if it proves my premise wrong. I’m taking this bold step because the method has promise. So let’s not pay attention to the little yippers who want to tear it down before they even see the results.
However, when BEST’s results confirmed the reliability of preexisting surface temperature records, Watts backpedaled.[7] Apparently, he was only willing to stake his claims on an independent study if it came to the conclusion he wanted.
[that might be your simplistic interpretation, but BEST blundered their use of Watt’s data, his most recent results speak for themselves and contradict BEST. See: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12/17/press-release-agu15-the-quality-of-temperature-station-siting-matters-for-temperature-trends/ -mod]

Crispin in Waterloo but really in Beijing
Reply to  Trent
April 23, 2016 9:44 am

Trent
You repeat an old saw about the BEST project. I, like many, followed the whole story as it unfolded so you won’t get much traction with the ‘Anthony backpedaled’ line. I ‘backpedaled’ too when I saw what went on with that whole ‘Muller: skeptic turned believer by the evidence’ crap. Another show at the Berkeley Carnival.
We have also learned since that pristine rural temperature measurements in the continental US show general cooling since about 1940. Was anyone surprised? I wasn’t. The temperature of Waterloo Ontario hasn’t budged in 100 years. It seems global warming isn’t.
If you want to debate the worth of temperature data sets this is probably the best place for it. We host several world class experts on the subject.
Oh…that means that trite dismissal and innuendo won’t carry much truck. Thought it best to forewarn you.

Retired Kit P
April 22, 2016 2:28 pm

The three greatest environmental presidents were republicans. They changed how we thought about the environment.
The first was Teddy Roosevelt. We in North America were hell bent in following Europe’s lead in cutting down every tree. After Roosevelt we managed our forests and set aside some truly beautiful places.
Nixon put in place the EPA with the charge of protecting the environment with regulatIons. It has worked very well. Too bad some have made things worse by using the EPA for their political agenda.
George Bush brought successful policies started in Texas to the national level as POTUS. Unlike Clinton who backed doored industry by using the courts, Bush worked with congress to update the laws so that legislation would catch up with technology and be consistent state to state. For example, old coal plants built before the clean air act had to install pollution control equipment.
I would never have predicted that we would have been so successful at cleaning the environment. When I was little, we went swimming in Lake Erie. In high school, it was too polluted. My children could again swim in Lake Erie.

BFL
Reply to  Retired Kit P
April 22, 2016 2:53 pm

Concur, up until the “Super Fund Siting” which was designed for supporting lawyers and is so far behind and expensive that many will never be cleaned up. Then the EPA slowly became an entity unto itself with stricter and more extensive rules to support bureaucratic enlargement to the point of who really knows what is and isn’t really dangerous anymore. Now that they have become political with CO2 regulation, they have become a laughing stock for those with any intelligence which, unfortunately, tends to create animosity toward all of their rules, even those that make sense.

Marcus
April 22, 2016 2:31 pm

How hard will they try ??
/04/21/senator-john-barrasso-climate-change-boondoggle-hits-wall.html?intcmp=ob_article_sidebar_video&intcmp=obnetwork

April 22, 2016 2:37 pm

[snip – name calling – policy violation -mod]

Janice Moore
April 22, 2016 2:41 pm

A re-run of a clever 2011 WUWT “Earth Day” thread comment:
oakgeo:

Anytime I see these linear projections, I remember “The Simpsons” franchise episode wherein Disco Stu is selling… well, disco to potential franchisees. He has a memorable chart that projects disco’s popularity forward from a few years data in the late seventies. The data cutoff is around 1979, but the projections continue up and up and up. Why these people cannot see that the earth has been self-regulating through positive and negative feedbacks since the atmosphere oxygenated 2.3-2.4 billion years ago is beyond me. But they sure seem to love their Disco Stu linear trends.

(https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/04/22/failed-mirth-earth-day-predictions/#comment-646608 )
“The Simpsons” — Disco Stu (see chart to persuade potential franchisees)
{WARNING: Be ready to hit the “Stop” button — it just loops on and on, lololol}

(youtube)

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Janice Moore
April 22, 2016 11:18 pm

Hah! Excellent! Reminds me of 1999 and 2000 when projections for the Internet economy were greater than that for the entire worldwide economyI Made a small fortune via cynicism on that baloney.

Scott
April 22, 2016 2:49 pm

Yes and you’ve forgotten global cooling and acid rain.
The sky is falling, the sky…

Texas
April 22, 2016 2:49 pm

I remember and believed all the “experts” back when I was young in the 1970’s. I moved to Texas, and figured if we had an ice age, at least we would be the last to freeze. Texas worked out great anyway, but no thanks to the chicken littles.

April 22, 2016 2:55 pm

Even my weather man gets it right more often than these turkeys.

April 22, 2016 2:56 pm

Worth repeating:
From the founder of the Weather Channel, “The Paris climate agreement is all about empowering the U.N. and has nothing to do with the climate.”
‘Nough said.

n.n
April 22, 2016 3:03 pm

Predictions. Prophecies. Same difference.

April 22, 2016 3:12 pm

Some of these predictions have come true… In communist China for example: One child laws — people wearing gas masks….In North Korea…Starvation…Perhaps the problem is not environmental but rather, political. When government has too much power these things do happen….Funny, most of the predictions are made by those who prefer central government control of the economy and personal freedoms…These so called experts are wrong about predicting the future and wrong about the best form of government to prevent these catastrophes. When will we learn that we cannot rely solely on academics to determine policy. They are so often wrong it is astounding.

April 22, 2016 3:23 pm

Well, number 5 turned out correct for London. Since Tony Blair’s Dash for Diesel to save the planet from global warming, you can’t walk 50 yards down a London street without getting the most nauseating lungful of diesel fumes. Real, dense clouds of the stuff, and from cars, not just lorries. If you hold your breath when you detect it, you’re holding it in. If you expel your breath and run for it to escape the cloud, you’re in big trouble if you don’t clear it by the time you’re gasping. I’ve been known to dive almost headlong into a shop to escape it when that happens. It’s known that these large doses cause premature death in the long run. So yes, we now should be wearing masks to survive pollution in London and live longer. And Tony Blair should pay for them.