Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Yet another poll has been published, which suggests that despite relentless media bombardment in the leadup to Paris, Americans are increasingly unconcerned about climate change.
According to Associated Press;
Q9. How worried, if at all, are you about global warming? [HALF SAMPLE ASKED OPTIONS IN REVERSE ORDER]
AP-NORC 10/15-18/2015 AP-NORC 7/17-19/2015 Extremely/very worried NET 23 26 Extremely worried 8 9 Very worried 14 17 Moderately worried 34 37 Not too/not at all worried NET 38 34 Not too worried 22 20 Not worried at all 17 15 Not sure 4 3 SKIP/REFUSED 1 –
Read more: http://surveys.ap.org/data/NORC/October_Omnibus_Topline_FINAL_EARLYRELEASE.pdf
Climate alarmists frequently invent bizarre conspiracy theories about why they are losing the climate debate, but in my opinion they simply aren’t facing up to the truth. If alarmists want to understand who has sown the most doubt about the urgency of the climate issue, they need only to look in the mirror.
Very few of today’s jetset climate elite behave as if they have the slightest inclination of ever practicing the austerity they preach. The growing list of failed predictions must surely play a part, but in my opinion, the rank hypocrisy of the world’s leading climate activists likely sets off the most alarm bells in people’s heads.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Those numbers obviously are not percentages so are they the actual number of people questioned. It is a very small sample if so.
I believe in Mann-made global warming.
Good one. It’s sad that most of the general population would not get that.
Are poll results like this even reported beyond this site if the results go against the policy bias steamroller and concerted media control feed?
Also, over-the-top propaganda is self-defeating. After an especially blatant diatribe by the LATimes this observer warned them — some of us really want to see an honest debate — but, of course, was ignored.
The Narcissist-in-Chief will see this poll and say, “Looks like it is time to give another prime-time speech on climate change.”
What sent the BS meter bleeping for me was asking myself the Question: If global warming is “the greatest threat to civilization mankind has ever faced,” then WHY was no one doing anything tangible about it? Got my answer in under 3 clicks–because there ISN’T anything that needs doing anything about. Smelling a LIE, that’s the day I cut my teeth as a skeptic and began a remarkable reading list. Think “Emperor’s New Clothes.”
Watts up with this? The name of the poll is: “AMERICAN ATTITUDES TOWARD THE POPE FOLLOWING HIS VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES.”
The only place that the word “Pope” appears in their survey results is in the headline, and at the top of every page. Nowhere is the “Pope” referenced in regards to any discussion, nor question?
Gary,
“Watts up with this? The name of the poll is: “AMERICAN ATTITUDES TOWARD THE POPE FOLLOWING HIS VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES.” ”
Well, it does reveal that the Pope’s much ballyhooed support has done squat for the CAGW cause, which says something about American’s attitude toward him it seems to me.
Kinda a dilemma…saw this on someone’s facebook post.
It read:
“I need new haters.
The old ones are starting to like me.”
Just an FYI: Have a look at the 2016 White House Budget for the US of A:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2016/assets/budget.pdf
Page 19 is where the issues of ‘Climate Change’ also “Carbon Pollution’ are covered, along with a section for expenditures for ‘Climate Resiliency’ (where I would think most $$$ should be spent)..
https://www.whitehouse.gov/ – This site is a very interesting read as well. Lett everyone know what the current administration has decided is important.
Just a post to provide a bit of insight,
MCR
Ever heard this one ?
“what you know, you haven’t had time to learn”
Sounds like a line from “These Boots are Made for Walking” by Nancy Sinatra.
/grin
It was ….. but what does anyone really “know”.
Anyway, I was just cruising the internet and came upon this video with that soundtrack.
I really like the low tech rear-view mirror.
u.k.(us) ,
Cool vid.
Re: the rear view mirrors. The Israelis demonstrated their worth in the six day war in ’67. They installed them in the F-4 Phantoms they bought from the U.S., which had none.
It’s helpful to know if there’s someone coming up from behind…
No point in even taking your fighter jets out of the hanger, when the F-15’s are up.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
Similar result in Australia, where the premier science body, and champions of global warming alarmism, the CSIRO, found that the majority of Australian’s are now sceptical of man-made global warming! https://climatism.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/csiro-most-australians-are-now-global-warming-sceptics/
Props to the ever increasing climate sceptical majority for maintaining their independence of thought, reason and sense. And for not being tempted into the comfort of groupthink and a fashionable climate cause, despite the relentless bombardment of fear, alarmism and lies propagated by the majority of ‘mainstream’ media.
The global warming scare is dying.
errrr???
so why then, today on ABC rn did they have some fool on stating recent survey shows 76% believe in warming and are worried a lot?
no I didnt get the supposed survey or who it was done by..will try n remember what show it was on n hunt up link for you all.
A CSIRO survey of more than 5000 people confirmed the majority of those surveyed fall into ‘sceptic’ category.
Warmist reporters, ABC, Fairfax et al tried to spin it, as they would.
See yesterday’s post for survey details:
https://climatism.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/csiro-most-australians-are-now-global-warming-sceptics/
A few more degrees of warming would open up huge tracts of land for farming in Canada and Central Asia, at perhaps the cost of some bleached coral and moving a few thousand South Sea islanders to higher ground. Why is this not a good thing?
CSIRO in Australia just released a poll. More people think a warmer climate is not a problem but the amazing figure is that 19% of greens agree, it is not a problem. Seems there might be some greens with integrity after all.
Why should governments accept the deep green notion that warming is dangerous, when many other possibilities exist?
All the evidence seems to suggest that warming is benefitting the planet without trillions spent on horrendous wind turbines etc.
It is a gigantic rort. A single wind turbine in Australia is subsidised to the amount of $700,000. Multiply that out and you will see why they are so desperate for the scam to continue. All that money should be going into alternative schemes like thorium reactors and investigating sources from space.
The super dense opposition leader in Australia supports wind turbines but says any variation of nuclear power is too expensive. I think we have found a new black hole between his ears.
Wow. 57% worried about climate change compared to 51% a few months ago? That’s pretty impressive.
traffy, you’re amusing if nothing else. I like watching the alarmist contingent desperately grab onto whatever they can. A drowning man and a stick comes to mind…
(Pathological liars come to mind ; )
No, it’s 56% versus 63% a few (3) months ago. I’ll be happier when more are unconcerned than are worried. Even so, given the amount of mainstream pressure to make people worried, it’s not a bad position. But, if this issue alone determined the next POTUS, it would be Mrs. Clinton.
Rich.
OT…but this is interesting. Look at this AP article about Governor Brown getting state workers to assess any oil or gas prospects on his 2700 acre family ranch. This could be an interesting post…..http://bigstory.ap.org/article/7780d1a9b1fd436284a40a1f6d6bd969/ap-exclusive-brown-had-state-workers-research-oil-ranch
In making the survey, the results depends up on the how the question is framed. In this the question is clear “global warming”. It is not so in many surveys. See for example:
Pro-global warming groups argue that “Overwhelming scientific consensus says human activity is primarily responsible for global climate change”. The 2010 Anderegg study found that 97-98% of climate researchers publishing most actively in their field agree that human activity is primarily responsible for “global climate change”. The study also found that the expertise of researchers unconvinced of “human-caused climate change” is “substantially below” that of researchers who agree that human activity is primarily responsible for climate change.
The 2013 Cook review of 11,944 peer-reviewed studies on climate change founded that only 78 studies (0.7%) explicitly rejected the position that humans are responsible for “global warming”. A separate review of 13,950 peer-reviewed studies on climate change found only 24 that rejected “human-caused global warming”.
A survey by German Scientists Bray and Von Storch found that 83.5% of climate scientists believe human activity is causing “most of recent global climate change”. A separate survey in 2011 also found that 84% of earth, space, atmospheric, oceann and hydrological scientists surveyed said that “human-induced global warming” is occurring.
More than one thousand scientists disagree that human activity is primarily responsible for “global climate change”. In 2010 Climate Depot released a report featuring more than 1,000 scientists, several of them former UN IPCC scientists, who disagreed that humans are primarily responsible for “global climate change”. The Cook review of 11,944 peer-reviewed studies found 66.4% of the studies had no stated position on “anthropogenic global warming”, and while 32.6% of the studies implied or stated that “humans are contributing to climate change”, only 65 papers (0.5%) explicitly stated “that humans are the primary cause of recent global warming.” A 2012 Purdue University survey found that 47% of climatologists challenge the idea that humans are primarily responsible for climate change and instead believe that climate change is caused by an equal combination of humans and the environment (37%), mostly by the environment (5%), or that there’s not enough information to say (5%). In 2014 a group of 15 scientists dismissed the US National Climate Assessment as a “masterpiece of marketing,” that was “grossly flawed,” and called the NCA’s assertion of human-caused climate change “NOT true.”
:
In the above presentation, there are several terms were used to imply human activity is responsible to: with several adjectives to global warming and climate change. They are:
• Global climate change
• Human-caused climate change
• Most recent global climate change
• Humans are contributing to climate change
• Global warming
• Human-induced global warming
• Humans are the primary cause of recent global warming
• Anthropogenic global warming
This clearly shows that there is an ambiguity on the terminology: global warming and climate change. This is also true with IPCC where they started using “global climate change” instead of global warming. IPCC is shy of using the word global warming.
Climate is function of several met parameters. When specific met parameter is used, they invariably use that parameter like global warming referring to only temperature. We can not use climate change for global warming.
In many cases climate change is used as de-facto global warming, an erroneous concept. IPCC or UN has never clarified this aspect even to date.
The other terminology is: human activity. There are several areas under this, namely, anthropogenic greenhouse gases influencing temperature through greenhouse effect, anthropogenic non-greenhouse effect [they are not really comes under human activity], non-greenhouse effect related cause through the destruction of nature, known as ecological changes by changing the land & water use and the land & water cover.
Ecological changes influence all meteorological parameters at local and or region level. They are not global in nature. They influence systematic variations at local and or regional level. Anthropogenic greenhouse gases influence temperature at global level through greenhouse effect. However, it is flawed argument as greenhouse effect is also a local and or regional factor. The global average of this is termed as “global warming”.
While making survey, the organizers must ask clearly “which human activity” and “is it climate change or global warming”? Otherwise the answers may become highly ambiguous and with little meaning.
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
NOAA, the IPCC, the News media … have been screaming “Wolf” so often for so long about so much that more and more people just roll their eyes and tune them out.
Either someone is incapable of basic mathematics, or there is some intentional number fiddling going on there.
AP-NORC 10/15-18/2015
Extremely/very worried NET 23? 8+14=22
Not too/not at all worried NET 38? 22+17= 39
AP-NORC 7/17-19/2015
Not too/not at all worried NET 34? 20+15=35
Hmmm.