Study reverses climate science position that the 'Southern Ocean carbon dioxide sink was weakening'

From the AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION and the department of “cold water increases CO2 solubility” comes this bit of good news, which reverses previous climate science assertions.

Southern_Ocean

Southern Ocean removing carbon dioxide from atmosphere more efficiently

Scientists compile densest carbon data set in Antarctic waters

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Since 2002, the Southern Ocean has been removing more of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, according to two new studies.

These studies make use of millions of ship-based observations and a variety of data analysis techniques to conclude that that the Southern Ocean has increasingly taken up more carbon dioxide during the last 13 years. That follows a decade from the early 1990s to 2000s, where evidence suggested the Southern Ocean carbon dioxide sink was weakening. The new studies appear today in the American Geophysical Union journal Geophysical Research Letters and the AAAS journal Science.

The global oceans are an important sink for human-released carbon dioxide, absorbing nearly a quarter of the total carbon dioxide emissions every year. Of all ocean regions, the Southern Ocean below the 35th parallel south plays a particularly vital role. “Although it comprises only 26 percent of the total ocean area, the Southern Ocean has absorbed nearly 40 percent of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide taken up by the global oceans up to the present,” says David Munro, a scientist at the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR) at the University of Colorado Boulder, and an author on the GRL paper.

The GRL paper focuses on one region of the Southern Ocean extending from the tip of South America to the tip of the Antarctic Peninsula. “The Drake Passage is the windiest, roughest part of the Southern Ocean,” says Colm Sweeney, lead investigator on the Drake Passage study, co-author on both the GRL and Science papers, and a CIRES scientist working in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado. “The critical element to this study is that we were able to sustain measurements in this harsh environment as long as we have–both in the summer and the winter, in every year over the last 13 years. This data set of ocean carbon measurements is the densest ongoing time series in the Southern Ocean.”

The team was able to take these long-term measurements by piggybacking instruments on the Antarctic Research Supply Vessel Laurence M. Gould. The National Science Foundation-supported Gould, which makes nearly 20 crossings of the Drake Passage each year, transporting people and supplies to and from Antarctic research stations. For over 13 years, it’s taken chemical measurements of the atmosphere and surface ocean along the way.

By analyzing more than one million surface ocean observations, the researchers could tease out subtle differences between the carbon dioxide trends in the surface ocean and the atmosphere that suggest a strengthening of the carbon sink. This change is most pronounced in the southern half of the Drake Passage during winter. Although the researchers aren’t sure of the exact mechanism driving these changes, “it’s likely that winter mixing with deep waters that have not had contact with the atmosphere for several hundred years plays an important role,” says Munro.

The Science paper, led by Peter Landschützer at the ETH Zurich, takes a more expansive view of the Southern Ocean. This study uses two innovative methods to analyze a dataset of surface water carbon dioxide spanning almost three decades and covering all of the waters below the 35th parallel south. These data–including Sweeney and Munro’s data from the Drake Passage–also show that the surface water carbon dioxide is increasing slower than atmospheric carbon dioxide, a sign that the Southern Ocean as a whole is more efficiently removing carbon from the atmosphere. These results contrast with previous findings that showed that the Southern Ocean carbon dioxide sink was stagnant or weakening from the early 1990s to the early 2000s.

In addition to the Drake Passage measurements, the Science paper uses datasets that represent a significant international collaboration, including carbon dioxide sampling from NOAA’s Ship of Opportunity Program. This program, led by Rik Wanninkhof of NOAA’s Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML) who is also a co-author of the Science paper, is the world’s largest coordinated carbon dioxide sampling operation. Despite all these efforts, the Southern Ocean remains undersampled. “Given the importance of the Southern Ocean to the global oceans’ role in absorbing atmospheric carbon dioxide, these studies suggest that we must continue to expand our measurements in this part of the world despite the challenging environment,” says Sweeney.

###

This study was funded primarily by the NSF and NOAA’s Climate Program Office.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
96 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SAMURAI
September 11, 2015 6:53 am

BTW, it looks like the Arctic ice Extent may have hit its low yesterday and is likely to start increasing from here.
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/satellite/index.uk.php
(If you toggle backwards and forwards between 9/10 and 9/11, on the above link, you can see the sea ice starting to grow in all areas.)
Seems a bit earlier than usual.
Atmospheric Arctic temps are now around -7C, which is plenty cold enough to start forming ice around the ice pack edges and along the Arctic shoreline.

September 11, 2015 7:52 am

Table 6.1 | Global anthropogenic CO2 budget, accumulated since the Industrial Revolution (onset in 1750) and averaged over the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, as well as the last 10 years until 2011. By convention, a negative ocean or land to atmosphere CO2 flux is equivalent to a gain of carbon by these reservoirs.
The table does not include natural exchanges (e.g., rivers, weathering) between reservoirs. !!!!!!
The uncertainty range of 90% confidence interval presented here differs from how uncertainties were reported in AR4 (68%).
IPCC AR5 Table 6.1………… all PgC
…………………………….minus….mean…..plus……..Uncertainty +/- (aka WAGs)
Anthro output……………….470…….555……..640……….15.3%
Fossil Fuel………..…………345……..375……..405………..8.0%
Net land use………….……..100……..180……..260………..44.4% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ocean atmos flux……………-185…….-155…….-125………..19.4%
Residual land sink……….…-250…….-160………-70………56.3% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anthro Residual ……….….230………240……..250…………..4.2%
Percent Retained……………48.9%…..43.2%….39.1%
Maximum Range…………….10……….240……..470…………95.8%
Min to max……………….….4%…..mean……196%
Square root sum of squares, +/- ………..76%
So man’s contribution could be almost anything because the natural sources/sinks are just a WAG!

Paul Milenkovic
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
September 12, 2015 4:54 am

Do the uncertainties really add?
If the fossil fuel term is known to within 8% and the atmospheric increase in CO2 (say, over 20th century) to within 4 percent, doesn’t that constrain the net variability of the remaining sources and sinks to about that much change?
By remaining source and sink I mean such thing as “net land use” minus “residual land sink.” The hodge podge of flows could be quite uncertain, but their combined effect needs to balance with the more certain fossil fuel term?

johann wundersamer
September 11, 2015 11:40 am

Bryan A on September 10, 2015 at 2:25 pm
I didn’t know Stephen Hawking made a music video.
Bryan A on September 10, 2015 at 2:26 pm
(I’ll probably burn for that one)
____
Brian A,
burning a Steven Hawking Video on CD
____
‘ain’no hanging matter, ain’no capital crime.
citation Jagger/Richards, stray cat blues
/ and second: no need to burn anyway; YouTube won’t forget a Steven Hawking Music Video /
Hans

September 11, 2015 9:54 pm

“The global oceans are an important sink for human-released carbon dioxide, absorbing nearly a quarter of the total carbon dioxide emissions every year.”
Second time this week for this. The best modern Carbon cycles allow a bit over 1 GtC net absorption by the oceans from the atmosphere. A quarter of human emissions would be 2.5 GtC. A quarter of soil emissions would be 15 GtC. Let’s hope they meant total human emissions.
No arm waving allowed. Bring data, even if you’re God.

Paul Milenkovic
Reply to  gymnosperm
September 12, 2015 4:39 am

1 GtC net carbon into the oceans?
I thought that the oxygen balance allowed more than that.
The Keeling observatory on Mauna Loa is not only tracking atmospheric CO2 but also O2 changes. If you assay all the fossil combustion, you come up with what the CO2 and O2 levels would be. To get to where CO2 and also O2 actually is, you need a net sink of CO2 and a net source of O2. Update by the biosphere emits O2 whereas uptake in the total inorganic carbon (TIC) dissolved in the ocean does not. Furthermore, the O2 output of photosynthesis in relation to CO2 uptake is along a different slope than the emission of CO2 and the removal of O2 by burning fossil fuel — fossil fuel is much less heavily oxygenated than plant matter.
So is there more recent data/reasoning to contradict this mass-balance between organic and inorganic carbon update that gives a rough 50-25-25 split of emitted CO2 between atmosphere, ocean, and biosphere?

Reply to  Paul Milenkovic
September 12, 2015 9:41 am

The best modern Carbon cycle in my opinion is the following from the IPCC.comment image
It shows a net flux ocean/atmosphere of 1.6 GtC. This is less than 1/8 current human production. Assessing O2/CO2 mass balance gets very tricky. Plankton are big players cycling O2/CO2 “aqueously”. This cycling translates to the atmosphere only through Henry’s partial pressures. Also, certainly on land in soils and likely in the oceans as well a lot of CO2 is produced anaerobically.

September 13, 2015 8:29 pm

“The best modern Carbon cycle in my opinion is the following from the IPCC.”
This is a carbon cycle, not CO2. And C * 3.677 = CO2. Why not just say so?
And just consider the +/- error bands. i.e -30 +/- 45 !, +155 +/- 30 !! Especially in table 6.1. +/- 50% for residual land sink.
PgC – was a metric dart board consulted?
How will the sudden appearance of 2.6 trillion trees affect this graphic?