Friday Funny – Best Grauniad typo ever

Grauniad smallPeople send me stuff. The name “Grauniad” as defined by Urban Dictionary says:

The Grauniad is a nickname for the UK national newspaper, the Guardian, because of a now ill-founded reputation for typos. The name was given to it by the satirical magazine Private Eye. The Guardian newspaper earned its reputation for lots of misprints in the days of hot-metal printing when it was published in Manchester (it was originally called the Manchester Guardian), and the editions that appeared in London were very early editions brought down by train, before all the errors had been spotted.

And so it goes today. Lost in Lima, will they ever find it?

find-global-warmingYes, if you find it somewhere in the midst of “the pause”, please point it out.

h/t to Howard Goodall and also the scientist-as-troll known as “and then there’s physics”, writing:

Hey, is that a simple Gruniad typo I see, or one of the most revealing Freudian slip of all time 😉

 

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

140 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 12, 2014 5:43 am

“…to find climate change by the end of next year.”
OMG!
Climate change is lost!
Wherever can it be?
Al Gore – “I put it somewhere, but can’t remember where.”
Pachauri – “We must act now anyway, because it will be really bad when we find it.”
Pelosi – “We need to vote to prevent it, then we can look for it.”

Reply to  JohnWho
December 12, 2014 7:07 am

We have less than a year to find Climate change. If we fail to do so, our children will never have the opportunity to see climate change.

Reply to  Paul in Sweden
December 12, 2014 7:55 am

So this is how Karma works, eh?

Mike from the cold side of the Sierra
Reply to  JohnWho
December 12, 2014 7:34 am

Al Gore – Perhaps you should check the lock box.

Doogie
Reply to  Mike from the cold side of the Sierra
December 12, 2014 3:10 pm

Maybe Tipper got it in the big breakup.

ConTrari
Reply to  JohnWho
December 13, 2014 5:11 pm

First one must invent, then prevent. But what kind of typo is this, what would have been the correct text? “Fund” climate change perhaps, not find? Though it seems a bit blasphemeous.

Reply to  ConTrari
December 14, 2014 5:31 am

But then you are suggesting the absurd, namely that climate change needs funding or it will not happen. Hmmm… but cutting the funding would be a good place to start.

Knutsfordian
Reply to  JohnWho
December 13, 2014 5:18 pm

Schnozzle – “Let’s celebrate I’m feeling great I’m the guy who found the lost change.

zorro
Reply to  JohnWho
December 13, 2014 7:13 pm

Oceans ate it.

December 12, 2014 5:51 am

I think some wag in editorial did this.

Jimbo
Reply to  Gary Pearse
December 12, 2014 7:11 am

What makes people think it’s a typo? 😉

Paul Westhaver
Reply to  Jimbo
December 12, 2014 7:47 am

I agree. It isn’t a typo. Climate change isn’t a collective noun phrase indicating a series of variations in planetary climate, rather it is an anthropomorphism, a God to be worshiped. It has a name, a birth date, a personality, a body and spirit. So the attribution that it can be lost is extant from the mindset of the writer.
So weird…

Jimbo
Reply to  Jimbo
December 12, 2014 9:34 am

Here is a sports headline from the Guardian in January of this year. You Americans will have to look for yourselves what the word ‘wanking’ means.
http://www.thescore.ie/guardian-typo-ranking-commentators-1252337-Jan2014/
http://c2.thejournal.ie/media/2014/01/wanking.png

Bryan A
Reply to  Jimbo
December 13, 2014 1:52 pm

What makes people think it’s a typo? 😉
Obviously supposed to be Fund but so far there has been no FUN and since they are getting close to FIN

TRM
Reply to  Gary Pearse
December 12, 2014 8:49 am

Freudian slip or honest moment? You could be correct. I mean even the type setters and proof readers must know by now that global warming stopped 13-18 years ago (depending on which data set you look at).
I would be just such a person were I stuck putting this drivel out day after freaking day. I’d lose it or get mischievous.

December 12, 2014 5:54 am

C’mon guys & gals – that’s no typo, that’s reality.

MarkW
December 12, 2014 5:54 am

It’s more lost than we thought.

cnxtim
December 12, 2014 5:58 am

The most surprising thing about this rag is that they actually use words, and presumably, people who follow it can actually read..The world is indeed amazing

December 12, 2014 6:06 am

No it is not a typo, it is necessity, something has to be done before the Arctic ice vanishes.
the Guardian, Monday 17 September 2012
Arctic expert predicts final collapse of sea ice within four years
“This collapse, I predicted would occur in 2015-16 at which time the summer Arctic (August to September) would become ice-free. The final collapse towards that state is now happening and will probably be complete by those dates”.

George Lawson
Reply to  vukcevic
December 12, 2014 12:01 pm

I wonder how many academics have been so wrong in their prognostications on the future effects of so-called Global Warming and the catastrophe that is going to have on this wonderful world of ours. Just because they have a title they always seem to be listened to by such shallow thinking of rags like The Guardian. You would have thought that the editorial staff at these papers would have learned their lesson by now.

Alba
Reply to  vukcevic
December 12, 2014 7:17 am

Remember that countdown on this page? I can’t remember what it was about but the time obviously expired without the event happening. How about a new countdown for this eccentric prediction?

Jimbo
Reply to  vukcevic
December 12, 2014 9:26 am

It was Peter Wadhams. He has now changed his prediction to 2020, and thought no one would notice. A devious character indeed.

Links for quotes from Professor Peter Wadhams
[Cambridge University]
—————-
Daily Telegraph – 8 November 2011
Arctic sea ice ‘to melt by 2015’
Prof Wadhams said: “His [model] is the most extreme but he is also the best modeller around.
“It is really showing the fall-off in ice volume is so fast that it is going to bring us to zero very quickly. 2015 is a very serious prediction and I think I am pretty much persuaded that that’s when it will happen.”
——-
BBC News – 27 August 2012
Professor Peter Wadhams, from Cambridge University, told BBC News: “A number of scientists who have actually been working with sea ice measurement had predicted some years ago that the retreat would accelerate and that the summer Arctic would become ice-free by 2015 or 2016.
I was one of those scientists – and of course bore my share of ridicule for daring to make such an alarmist prediction.”
——-
Guardian – 17 September 2012
Arctic expert predicts final collapse of sea ice within four years
“This collapse, I predicted would occur in 2015-16 at which time the summer Arctic (August to September) would become ice-free. The final collapse towards that state is now happening and will probably be complete by those dates”.
——-
Financial Times Magazine – 2 August 2013
“It could even be this year or next year but not later than 2015 there won’t be any ice in the Arctic in the summer,” he said, pulling out a battered laptop to show a diagram explaining his calculations, which he calls “the Arctic death spiral”.
——-
The Scotsman – 12 September 2013
Arctic sea ice will vanish within three years, says expert
“The entire ice cover is now on the point of collapse.
“The extra open water already created by the retreating ice allows bigger waves to be generated by storms, which are sweeping away the surviving ice. It is truly the case that it will be all gone by 2015. The consequences are enormous and represent a huge boost to global warming.”
——-
Arctic News – June 27, 2012
My own view of what will happen is: 1. Summer sea ice disappears, except perhaps for small multiyear remnant north of Greenland and Ellesmere Island, by 2015-16. 2. By 2020 the ice free season lasts at least a month and by 2030 has extended to 3 months…..
——-
TheRealNews – 29 May 2014
Transcript [Youtube]
[Q] WORONCZUK: And, Peter, what’s your take? Do you think that we’ve already passed the point of no return in terms of controlling polar ice cap melting?
[A] WADHAMS: Yes, I think we have. A few years ago, I predicted that the summer sea ice–that’s the September minimum–would go to zero by about 2015. And at that stage, it was only really one model that agreed with me. My prediction was based on observations from satellites and from measurements from submarines of ice thickness, which I’ve been doing from British subs, and Americans have been doing the same from American subs. And the trend was so clear and so definite that it would go to zero by 2015 that I felt it was safe to make that prediction, and I still think it is, because next year, although this year we don’t expect things to retreat much further than last, next year will be an El Niño year, which is a warmer year, and I think it will go to zero.

jayhd
Reply to  Jimbo
December 12, 2014 9:44 am

Damn, I was so looking forward to kayaking to the North Pole next summer.

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  Jimbo
December 12, 2014 2:09 pm

“[Q] WORONCZUK: And, Peter, what’s your take? Do you think that we’ve already passed the point of no return in terms of controlling polar ice cap melting?”
Whereas before, we were fully in control of those pesky ice caps. Oh, things were so much better run back in the days of my youth. The government controlled everything. People forget how good we had it.
Gone are the days when the climate was at our mercy. Now we are at the mercy of the climate! The next thing you know they will be putting high fructose corn syrup and MSG into the food supply.
I wish we hadn’t passed that point of no return.
/sarc

December 12, 2014 6:07 am

William Connolley – “It is not lost, it is right here on this Wikipedia page I just edited.”
Dr. Mann – “If you take a hockey stick thusly and hit it against a tree like this, you’ll find the resultant tree rings show that climate change is, uh, wait, disregard that last 50 plus years, the climate doesn’t change that way. Now, look right here where the plotted data takes a sharp turn, uh, where was I? Now I’m lost.”
SkS website – “We have it right here. We always do. Why, we change what people say about climate all the time. Oh, wait, you said “climate change”. Never mind.”

Reed Coray
Reply to  JohnWho
December 12, 2014 11:16 am

Nancy Pelosi — “We’ll have to find it to know what it is.”

December 12, 2014 6:08 am

The talks – scheduled to end at noon local time on Friday after 10 full days – are intended to provide a clear blueprint for a global agreement to find climate change by the end of next year.

And it’s a travesty that we can’t find it!

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  UnfrozenCavemanMD
December 12, 2014 7:27 pm

I think they meant to say “fund”. Climate Change is broke, and needs some new sharpies to make a new sign.

Harry Passfield
December 12, 2014 6:10 am

Personally, I always thought “andthentheresphysics” was a tyro.

GeeJam
December 12, 2014 6:10 am

“Damn. I’m stuffed without it. I left it next to the car keys. It was there this morning. . . . . Honey, have you seen the climate change anywhere?”
Cue: Josh

AndyG55
Reply to  GeeJam
December 12, 2014 11:30 am

“Honey, have you seen the climate change anywhere?””
Honey.. I shrunk the climate change. !

Harry Passfield
December 12, 2014 6:11 am

😉

jon
December 12, 2014 6:14 am

“Yes, if you find it somewhere in the midst of “the pause”, please point it out.”
epa is in the middle of “thE PAuse”

December 12, 2014 6:16 am

Do they have a typo every few days ?
Here is one more from the article published on 10th December 2014:
“An El Niño is officially declared if the temperature of the western tropical Pacific rises 0.5C above the long-term average.”
link:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/dec/10/first-el-nino-in-five-years-declared-by-japans-weather-bureau

December 12, 2014 6:16 am

They haven’t looked very far, it is all in the (adjusted) data.

Bloke down the pub
December 12, 2014 6:19 am

I’ve spotted another typo.
As crucial UN climate summit in Peru enters final hours, negotiators have made little progress on draft text.
There, sorted.

kenw
Reply to  Bloke down the pub
December 12, 2014 6:23 am

+

pablo an ex pat
December 12, 2014 6:22 am

A quote from the late great Kenneth Wolstenholme in July 1966 on soccer but relevant to this
“Some people are on the pitch….they think it’s all over……. It is now !”

Apologies to our German friends but you had the reverse happen in South Africa in 2010.

Tim
December 12, 2014 6:27 am

They seek it here, they seek it there
Those warmists seek it everywhere
Is it in heaven or is it in hell?
That dammed elusive warming.

rogerknights
Reply to  Tim
December 12, 2014 5:26 pm

Is it in heaven or is it in hell?
That dammed elusive warming-tell.

Now it rhymes.

Resourceguy
December 12, 2014 6:29 am

Little progress is code for “We’ll Gruber it in the late night hours and pronounce it good, no matter how out of touch it may be.”

Taz1999
December 12, 2014 6:31 am

With apologies to xkcd.com Higgs-boson. We thought you had already found climate change. Yeah, but we lost it. It was very small

December 12, 2014 6:33 am

‘Seek, and…’

Jimbo
Reply to  junkkmale
December 12, 2014 9:45 am

…ye shall find.’ I have found ‘Climate Change!’

Camperdown Chronicle 1903
THE ENGLISH CLIMATE. IS IT CHANGING?
“In the face of the facts it seems hardly worth while to answer the question, Is the climate changing? Every one knows that we hardly ever have a real old-fashioned, snow-clad Christmas in these times that fires are often welcome on Midsummer Day, and that September— after the cricket season—often turns out to be the best month of the year…”
____________________
The Brisbane Courier 1903
IS THE CLIMATE CHANGING?
“…..that the mean summer temperature at the Melbourne Observatory for the three years from 1859 to 1862 was 75.8, while for the last three years, from 1899 to 1902, the mean summer tempera-ture was 76.5—a difference of less than a degree….”
____________________
Examiner (Launceston, Tas.) 1906
IS THE EARTH GETTING WARMER?
That the earth is growing temporarilly warmer is shown by the mountain gla-ciers….The latest report includes 90 glaciers in the Swiss Alps, in Norway, Greenland, the Caucasus, the Pamir, the North West United States, Western Canada. and Africa, and practically all are grow-ing smaller. In the Savoy Alps and the Pyrenees small glaciers have quite dis- appeared.
____________________
Cairns Post 1923
TEMPERATE ARCTIC
“The discovery by American seal fishers that of late there has been a remarkable increase in the mean tem-perature of the Arctic, and that in some parts of the Polar basin no ice has been seen less than 9 degrees from the North Pole, agrees with the ex- perience of many Arctic explorers in recent years…”
____________________
The Sydney Morning Herald 1926
CHANGING CLIMATE. AMERICAN EXPERIENCE. RECORDED FACTS
“Although the temperature year by year fluctuates widely from the average, there is an underlying upward trend in the northern United States and Canada like a slowly rising tide, while in the south of the United States the trend is the other way. Thus the con-trast between the weather of the north and south is diminishing, and the climate ot the country as a whole is ameliorating…”
____________________
The Register News-Pictorial 1930
WARMER WORLD Weather Physicist Looks Ahead
The world is growing warmer. Dr. J. W. Humphreys, physicist of the Weather Bureau,…..”There is evidence, however, that the world as a whole is very slowly growing warmer,” he said. “The evidence is that glaciers in all parts of the world have been on the average slowly retreating since the culmina- tion of the Ice Age, and they are still slowly retreating….”
____________________
The Courier-Mail 1934
WORLD’S CHANGING CLIMATE Unsafe To Generalise
“The fact that during last year 81 of 100 Swiss glaciers decreased in size did not in any way indicate that the earth was becoming warmer and drier, said professor H. C. Richards, Pro- fessor of Geology at the Queensland University, yesterday, commenting on a message from Geneva concerning a world-wide drought. Even if the ob-servations of Swiss glaciers were con-tinued over a period of 50 years, he said, the data obtained could not warrant any general statement that the world as a whole was becoming drier or warmer…”
____________________
Camperdown Chronicle 1937
THE WARM ARCTIC!
“We are usually inclined to regard the Arctic as a region where it is always cold. Actually, this is an erroneous belief. In the summer quite a large part of the continental Arctic has temperatures of 80 degrees F. in the shade
____________________
The Courier-Mail 1939
WORLD CLIMATE CHANGING Scientists Puzzled
“Scientists’ investigations show that the world’s climate is changing. But whether it is becoming wetter, warmer, drier, or colder they can’t say with certainty. Dr. F. W. Whitehouse, University geologist, said this yesterday in an ad- dress to the Constitutional Club…”
____________________
Western Mail 1941
Impending Climatic Change.
“The report was made by Halbert P. Gillette, of Chicago, to the association’s geology section….”Three of the long climatic cycles.” he reports, “have produced a downward trend in rainfall in many regions, cul-minating in a series of droughts begin-ning about 1920. This series of cycles probably will continue until about 1990. In many regions these droughts bid fair to be more severe than any long series in the last 20 centuries. It will therefore prove futile to continue the present policy of relief in the dustbowl regions. Wholesale migrations from these regions seems advisable.”…”
____________________
The Canberra Times 1951
WEATHER REALLY IS CHANGING
Sunspot activity indicates that the world will have generally cooler summers and colder win-ters during the next 15 years, according to a forecast based on the study of sunspot cycles go- ing back to 1790. Dr. H. C. Willett, meteorolo-gist at the Massachusetts Insti-tue of Technology, said to-day that official records of sunspot activity linked their activity with weather conditions in all parts of the world….”

Iain Cook
Reply to  Jimbo
December 12, 2014 1:15 pm

Jimbo, this list is completely brilliant and should be slipped into every copy of the latest IPCC edition under “plus ca change….”). On a related topic (“Model it and it will come” fails), did you know that deaths from malaria are declining? Remember how we were supposed to be swamped with a tidal wave of Anopheles epidemics due to soaring temperatures? Well, malaria globally has decreased over the last decade, NOT increased (World Malaria Report 2014). However, the beautiful irony doesn’t stop there. Africans have ignored the murderous Green edicts and implemented the widespread use of insecticide-soaked netting for sleeping, which is credited with a large part of the gains in survival.
http://lifescientist.com.au/content/health-medical/news/malaria-on-the-decline-968143162?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=als_1412_2&utm_content=als_1412_2+CID_9bd06581d4c9d8e8add6012dda857616&utm_source=Campaign%20Monitor&utm_term=more

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  Jimbo
December 12, 2014 2:20 pm

Interesting that there were a great many American climate refugees in the dust bowl days. I wonder why they are not called that now.

Reply to  Jimbo
December 12, 2014 3:00 pm

The more things change the more they stay the same. 😎

Reply to  Jimbo
December 13, 2014 4:37 pm

Jimbo, may I please act like a real Climate Scientist and use YOUR efforts to find these Southern Hemisphere news blurbs to compose a Letter to the Editor? We don’t get Australian news in Rockford, Illinois.

rogerknights
Reply to  junkkmale
December 12, 2014 5:29 pm

Freak and ye shall fund.

somersetsteve
December 12, 2014 6:34 am

It’s hiding in the deep Oceans..

Kurt in Switzerland
December 12, 2014 6:45 am

That just made my day.
As good a laugh about the two Irish nuns at the traffic light.
Kurt in Switzerland

Baa Humbug
December 12, 2014 6:52 am

That paragraph is inane even with the typo corrected.
To FUND climate change?

Reply to  Baa Humbug
December 12, 2014 9:18 am

Maybe, to FEND climate change.
But they are probably talking about their own pay checks, yes.

ConTrari
Reply to  MCourtney
December 13, 2014 5:18 pm

To FEND OFF climate change might have made sense…

Woz
Reply to  Baa Humbug
December 13, 2014 1:05 am

To FANNED climate change?

Bruce Cobb
December 12, 2014 6:54 am

I believe if they input the numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42 they may find it again.

Kurt in Switzerland
December 12, 2014 6:54 am

Shucks, they corrected the error.
Now reading “fight” instead of “find” — either the editors of the Gnauriad have no sense of humor or they read WUWT.
Meanwhile, the whole Lima thing is turning into a pledge-a-thon gone awry.
The U.S. Congress just decided not to support Barack’s $3B pledge.
The Greenpeace photo op in Nazca was definitely an omen.
Kurt in Switzerland

1 2 3 4