The polar bear attack that was all over the news last summer is now an ebook.
![melt-down_terror-at-the-top-of-the-world_nov-12-2014-press-release-book-cover[1]](https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/melt-down_terror-at-the-top-of-the-world_nov-12-2014-press-release-book-cover1.jpg?quality=83)
Dr. Susan Crockford writes:
The Maine lawyer who was mauled by a bear while on a hiking trip to Labrador (and lived to tell the tale) has allowed his story to be co-opted by an activist journalist to promote fears of sea ice decline, polar bear extinction, and man-made global warming.
The press release issued yesterday by the news group that published the book and employs author Sabrina Shankman (InsideClimateNews), described it this way:
“A riveting new e-book about the battle between man, beast and Nature in a warming world. Called Meltdown: Terror at the Top of the World, the e-book tells the story of the hikers’ harrowing encounter with a polar bear; of the plight of the polar bear in general, facing starvation and extinction as the sea ice melts and its habitat disappears; and of the Arctic meltdown, the leading edge of man-made climate change.”
I have little doubt the man mauled by the bear was indeed terrified and that his companions were as well. However, that horror is exploited shamelessly in this book as a means to promote anxiety over the future survival of polar bears and instill panic over a prophesied Arctic “meltdown.”
Read the rest here: http://polarbearscience.com/2014/11/13/meltdown-terror-at-the-top-of-the-world-new-book-exploits-polar-bear-attack-to-sell-fear-of-sea-ice-decline/
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
How to put this ?
You see to a Polar Bear humans are and have always been nothing more than interestingly coloured meat snacks that [they’re] happy to hunt and follow for many miles. Ice or no ice , as top predator everything else is seen as potential dinner , humans just offer a different menu opition.
Hiker -the other white meat..
Bears are fast, but you only have to outrun your buddies.
You know, am I the only one, or does anyone else find this story to be yet another eco-cracker example of that bleeding-heart, lefty excuse-mongering that the hive-bozos always serve up when some “pigmentally-challenged” ice-bear chows down on yet another priveleged-white-dork, nature-boy flake? OR WHAT?!!!
I mean, like, do you ever see this sort of “oh-the-poor-bear-bubber-wubber-just-had-the-munchies!”, “that’s-just-his-bear-bubbah’s-foodie-culture!” solicitude for BLACK-bears or BROWN-bears when they grab a quick, free-range-Vegan, tree-humper snack? DO YOU?!!! Freakin’ “white-bear-privilege” at work, once again! Haven’t we had enough of that sort of offensive mentality , already?
@Paul
Yes, you don’t have to be the fastest gazelle on the savanna, just the second slowest.
I blame Walt Disney and Climate Change…or some such sih*t
Frankly children’s culture has lead to a situation where people no longer understand the animalness of animals.
A lamb could kill you bare headed, bovine horns do kill people, and polar bear is truely a nightmare.
Indeed. Big and small, wild creatures are fighting for their lives. They will generally leave you alone precisely because of this. But if they come after you, though, it will be with a ferocity truly alien to most urbanites.
Anyway, this ebook amounts to nothing. Were it not for its mention here, it would have been forgotten within hours of its manufacture by the propaganda machine. Heck, I would be surprised if the ebook itself contains anything other than mindless repetition of its jejune title.
““A riveting new e-book about the battle between man, beast and Nature in …”
I like how nature is spelled with an uppercase “N”.
They either believe it’s a battle between man, beast, and the publication “Nature”…or
They believe nature is a religion…or
Both?
They must be talking about Tommy Nature.
A real interesting guy.
I think I read that he lived in Canada somewhere.
About the publisher
So if its non-partisan why would anyone question their findings?
Thus, I see it must be true that
Except the Antarctic, of course. But perhaps an attack by marauding penguins can be the sequel;
Iced-Up.: Terror at the Bottom of the World.
M Courtney:
“…an attack by marauding penguins…”
LOL! Great imagery. They’ll be the cleanup crew picking through our bones after the Sharknadoes subside.
Great imagery indeed 🙂
My wife and I had the incredible experience of visiting penguin colonies. You could sit on the beach, and groups of King penguins would waddle on over to within a foot or two, and tilt their heads with that “WHAT in the world are YOU???” look.
We failed to note any “attacks”, though I’m certain that with the stress of CAGW bearing down on them, they’ll resort to that soon. (sarc)
This post by Susan reminded me of another kind of author I read about last year.
Do I detect the faintest of aromas of utter bs?
It is a LOT more than a faint aroma!
bs=bear sh*t, right?
The beauty of the Warmest religion is that it can be woven into any tale of woe, or indeed any tale, real or otherwise. Thus, even Santa, and by extension, Christmas is “threatened” by global warming.
So… good news!
Global warming will cause polar bear attacks to decrease, since there will be fewer of the beasties around. I feel much safer now.
The CAGW Profits Of Doom have to look on the bright side once in a while.
Labrador is at the top of the world? I guess it’s in the upper 1/2.
Next thing we know someone will claim that the PB was paid by Big Oil to hunt the poor defenceless member of the Sierra Club. Maybe someone from MSM could go to interview it.
Training polar bears to eat our greens sounds like a GREAT idea, where do I send a donation 🙂
Wow, another book corrupted by global warming fanatics. Yawn…..
…Oh. Unless your from Australia. Then maybe it’s in the bottom 1/2
John, I provided a map to show them how far the “top” actually is – about 2,070 miles from where the attack occurred.
Susan Crockford, PolarBearScience
So we now have so many polar bears that they are extending their range looking for food? Wow. Now there is a successful conservation story!
“Climate doesn’t kill polar bears. Guns do!”
Well, with my jaded view of humanity, I lost interest as soon as I found out a lawyer was involved. Also, I suspect that the title subliminally links terrorism into the whole thing so it’s a perfect fit for today’s TV educated generation of Lemmings. I can already see a similarity to some rich dude vacationing in Iraq being chased and attacked by ISIS.
Agreed. Just look at the images of ISIS members we’re bombarded with, and see how closely they resemble penguins 🙂
“I lost interest as soon as I found out a lawyer was involved”
Are you suggesting that this was a case of an enraged client?
well we did have three american hikers travelling in Iraq who “accidentally” crossed into Iran a few years back. Who, except CIA agents, goes for a hiking vacation in an active war zone?
Well, it is up on Amazon, US and UK at least, so I invite everyone to do as I have done and write a comment in the review section outlining why the book is a waste of money. Won’t stop true believers from buying it, but it might warn off the uninformed!
Good idea. Consider it done.
Edward Martin I wrote, that in Arkansas it gets slippery.
You look at the blog, Dr. Roy Spencer?
Let’s see:
1. guy trespasses on bear’s territory.
2. bear mauls guy.
3. guy thinks CO2 melts ice that bear depends on.
4. guy wants to limit CO2 to help the bear so more trespassing people can get mauled.
Is this the kind of person you want to take advice from?
Nonononono!
The REASON the bear mauled the guy is because it’s so threatened by global warming.
If we can stop the warming, the polar bears would be at ease, and we could have tea with them.
Thank you Dr. Crockford for thoroughly deconstructing this propaganda dreck on your blog. Just shows how low warmunists will stoop, and how shrill they are becoming as their ‘settled science’ unravels.
I laugh at an electric wire to protect from polar bears. They wear the best insulation available in nature. Seeing black bears demolish a honey bee nest, they probably think the stings add piquancy to the honey flavor. I wonder if any of the bear experts were like the bear consultant in hollywood who went up to Alaska with his girlfriend to sing and read poetry up close to the grizzlies. He and his girlfriend got eaten and park rangers then had to kill two very innocent bears. They apparently don’t like English poetry.
Oops, link
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/997103/posts
Huh… sounds like his penchant for risky behavior caught up with him.
Sounds like he may have done some hallucinogens and watched “Brother Bear” one too many times. I do feel sorry for his GF, though.
No, I think the poetry is fine. They don’t like singing. I understand they expressly don’t like Mariah Carey. Then again, who does?
I am appalled that any person could allow themself to be made a laughing stock for a few pieces of silver. To me, that is exactly what this “lawyer” did – by permitting his real life misadventure to be turned into a fairy tale of woe.
You haven’t met many lawyers. They generally don’t work for only “a few” pieces of silver.
If lawyers were concerned about being “laughing stocks”, the number of law suits being filed would be close to nil.
Zac Unger wrote “Never Look a Polar Bear in the Eyes.” It’s a fun read and debunks the whole endangered polar bear nonsense. He also captures the whole hypocritical “Let’s make as much money as we can out of these fears” typical of the whole AGW/CCC movement.
Climate change causes polar bear attacks, why not they blame everything else on climate change.
There are numerous documented polar bear attacks in the 1960s and 70s when they say there was a whole lot more ice. What prompted those?
Stupidity. Same as now.
+1
+10
“What prompted those”
Maybe too much ice from global dimming?
Or that hikers are an easy catch…
Global cooling caused them. 😉
If the polar bear population continues to expand as it has for the past 40 years, there will be a lot more attacks like this because it is inevitable that competition for food drives the edge further out into human habitations.
The best response is Shoot Back! A polar bear will kill you in a trice.
“Never Look a Polar Bear in the Eyes.”
Now that’s a piece of advice I intend to take to heart
I did not hear of this story. Having quickly checked, it appears that the group was of that faux-spiritual, Sierra Club sort that eschews weaponry when going into the wild. I truly do not wish to make light of anyone’s suffering, but c’mon! They’re called “Wild” animals for a reason. I understand the bear attacked at night and one could not have seen the attack coming, and the use of flares to drive the bear off was prudent as one does not wish to hit the victim. Once the bear let go and was a sufficient distance away, it should have been dispatched at once.
I have a friend in Alaska, who gave me his permission to share this exchange:
After hearing about the seven students hiking a “survival course” in Alaska getting mauled by a bear:
ME:
Just curious, do you take along a firearm or two when you go camping? I saw a story about a group of kids hiking somewhere in Alaska, and three of them were mauled badly by a Grizzly. They had no clue about hiking in bear country, all they had was spray, and they didn’t even know how to use it. I couldn’t believe anyone hiking in Grizzly country wouldn’t be carrying some kind of weapon. All we had where I was from were cinnamon bears (and occasional reports of pumas,) but we were still packin’ when we went camping …
Enjoy your camping.
Xxxx,
We do indeed . . I personally carry a 12 gauge pump loaded with buck and slugs. Lots of guys carry pistols. We bought our old motor home, a 1984, about eight years ago, because my wife became too fearful of camping in a tent. Within a, say, 20-mile radius from where I sit typing, in the 16 years we’ve been back, there have been two guys killed by a brownie and at least a score of maulings.
Have you seen this tongue-in-cheek advice?
**************************
Anchorage, Alaska: Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game
BEAR WARNING:
In light of the increasing frequency of human-grizzly bear contacts, the Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game is advising hikers, hunters, and fishermen to take extra precautions and keep alert for bears while in the field. We advise that outdoorsmen wear noisy bells on their clothing so as not to startle bears that aren’t expecting them. We also advise outdoorsmen to carry pepper spray with them in case of an encounter with a bear. Further, it is a good idea to watch for fresh signs of bear activity when afield. Outdoorsmen should recognize the difference between black bear and grizzly bear scat. Black bear scat is smaller and contains berries and vegetable matter. Grizzly bear scat contains bells and smells like pepper.
****************************
As Mike Rowe of “Dirty Jobs” once said about “Safety First” in a TED talk: “You want to get home alive? That’s on you.” (The story is at 13:10 into the talk for anyone who wants to google it.)
I lived in Alaska while in the service. I was stationed there for almost 4yrs. Upon arrival, we had to go through the mandatory indoctrination training.
As part of that training, some State Troopers and reps from Fish and Game spent a morning presenting to all of us noobees.
Rule #1 was never leave a paved road without a weapon, period. The recommended weapon was a 12ga pump, loaded with buckshot. They explained that bears can do the 100yd dash in about 3.5secs, and if you think you’re a good enough shot with a pistol, go ahead and carry that…but always save the last round 🙂
With buckshot, it’s point and shoot in the general direction, and keep going until the shotgun is empty. You won’t kill the bear, but you’ll stand a good chance of at least blinding them, thereby surviving.
And yes, during the time I was there, there were many stories of being mauled.
They really can’t run ~60MPH, but it’s a good scare tactic.
I find it ironic that the Sierra Club with its rabid stance on protecting these polar bears from CAGW, actively promotes and participates for its members, activities that put humans and polar bears in direct contact, increasing the chance of human/bear confrontation usually resulting in the death of the bear. No one with an ounce of brain, ventures anywhere in that park without an armed Inuit guide. The guide is not there to actually guide you, but to stand watch for polar bears and prevent or discourage any attack. The fact that these Sierra Club members refused the Inuit guides, demonstrates that they had an ill informed image of polar bears being majestic cute and cuddly creatures, when in fact they are large meat eating carnivores, that in this remote place, with limited human presence, represented a real and present danger to anyone venturing into the park.
And it’s worse than that – not only did they know the electric fence wasn’t working properly (none of them had ever used one before) but they had been confronted by the same bear that attacked the lawyer, THE AFTERNOON BEFORE.
The big male just moved off a short distance after being hazed by flares but stayed there watching. They all went to bed knowing the fence was crap and that a big male bear was laying in wait, and did nothing proactive. They did not call for advice, the did not even post a night watch. They just waited for the attack to happen.
And then collaborated with allowing the story to be exploited for an activist end.
This news story has the best details of the attack, which I’ve included in my post: http://www.pressherald.com/2013/09/02/bear-attack-victim-thought-dude-youre-going-to-die_2013-09-02/
Susan Crockford, PolarBearScience