Apparently with the new Obama administration version of NASA, failure IS an option.
One of the biggest space disasters ever, the Challenger disaster, was caused by FREEZING COLD WEATHER and idiotic management that ignored risks related to cold weather as warned by engineers.
I have a pretty hard time believing that about a degree of warming is going to cause all these woes. That and the fact that NASA has had a nearly 9 year hurricane free window in Florida to not worry about launches.
From EcoWatch:
NASA programs are being put in jeopardy by the impacts of climate change, including rising sea levels, high temperatures and humidity, wind, heat waves and extreme storms, which could impact such high-profile NASA sites as its Kennedy Space CenterNASA identifies a number of potential risks, including damaged infrastructure, power failures that threaten communications systems, delayed launches, employee health and safety concerns, contamination and even threats to endangered species. It says it could expect the loss of land essential to launch operations, experience extensive downtime when its systems are disrupted, and asks “Given the already degraded condition of much of NASA’s infrastructure portfolio, how will NASA find the money to conduct necessary adaptations, repair failing infrastructure, and maintain mission tempo?”…The report is one of two dozen released by the federal government Friday that address what steps various government agencies are taking to address climate change.
They need to remember what Dr. Richard Feynman said about NASA’s failure to embrace what is really important:
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled. – Feynmans closing words, Appendix F – Personal Observations on Reliability of Shuttle
I think he means Muslim outreach.
Get your funding requests in now or else!
Allan McDonald sounds like a damned good engineer! Salutes!
I pretty much spread have, but this puts the final nail in the coffin that is NASA….at least when it comes to this crap. Sure, weather had big impact on their operations but to pin all the potential. And known extremes that can affect them on this silly AGW notion is a joke. I am a meteorologist and our dept gas been forced to deal with this nonsense. I have no prob planning for all wx extreme possibilities, but by all accounts nothing is trending worse. The only thing they got is that rainfall may be slightly heavier the past 40yrz in the Midwest. BFD!!
Typos…phone…you all understand 😊
I suspect the “Power Failures” will be caused by Wind Turbines and Solar cells in the power grid — so the article is correct in that sense I guess.
As for endangered species — I suspect one of them is “Thoughtful Humans”.
“..even threats to endangered species.”
Good Lord. Don’t they know that that tips us off to the political science that is writing this stuff? No engineer go near this press release. This type of kitchen sink alarmism has clearly been turning even non technical people off. What has this got to do with NASA space operations, never mind that there aren’t many real space operations being initiated these days. The longevity of those damn Mars Rovers are probably getting to be a pain to the new world order NASA.
The Challenger disaster was caused by O-ring failure. They had a perfectly good O-ring originally but it had asbestos, and the supplier could not maintain his Workers Comp insurance unless asbestos was removed. It was removed and the Challenger blew up due to asbestos-free O-rings. Columbia disaster was caused by crappy weak foam resulting from Freon no longer allowed to be used as blowing agent due to “the ozone hole.” NASA management seems to be self-destructive, much better left to private industry. On that note, did the co-pilot of SpaceShipTwo actually intend suicide? Why is the pilot interview not being released? Why would anyone apply thrust reversers/descent brakes while accelerating UP?
Nature cannot be fooled. Too bad it’s full of fools. Ie POTUS.
Fire whoever directed that this bit idiocy be produced.
Dismaying. It seems from recent events that NASA ought to worry more about QC and QA. It doesn’t much matter what the weather does if one’s rocket bursts on launch. When the history of this period is writ, we shall wonder how so many were fooled by so few. On the other hand, it is just one more adventure in superstition. There have been so many.
Florida weather sucks. It always has, always will. Afternoon thunder showers every afternoon in the summer. Winter freezes killing orange crops. The most lightening strikes in the U.S. Then there are hurricaines. Don’t forget The Bermuda Triangle (*ahem*). What’s the problem with figuring out it is a good place to shoot off rockets due to its southern latitude?…but if you expect to have good weather for launches…forget it.
Besides having worked for NASA for a a brief time back in the 1980s….first hand I know they are so overburdened with red tape…what do you expect? How many years will we study why bugs or plants grow weird in outer space?
From “The Right Stuff” to “Chicken Little” in one easy step for personkind…
Yep, I said on a particular Safety Course at Oxford University that I could not understand why good engineers are hired (Challenger/Morton Thiocol) ) and then ignored. Not appreciated at all!
Rising sea levels! How does that impact a NASA launch? It must be something to do with their budget.
It’s good to know that there are a group of former NASA astronauts who are sceptical of CAGW. Some even landed on the Moon!
These geniuses built Cape Kennedy below sea level and now they are worried about a 7″ to 10″ rise in sea level in 100 years!!
It’s nice to see the idiots are now in charge of the asylum.
Actually, NASA has gone the route of most government agencies. Once congress starts messing with budgets, the good managers and engineers bail out and get a job elsewhere,
I believe it was called ‘The Entrepreneur’s Handbook’ (or something like that) that came out back in the ’70’s that stated: “First rate managers hire first rate people. Second rate managers hire third rate people.”
If sea level rose 20 feet (overnight, presumably) then the NASA facilities in Florida would be underwater. It could happen! I’m building a computer program right now that shows how much of Florida would be underwater if the sea level rose 20 feet.
Was the foul weather a sunny, warm day? Tornadoes? Hurricanes? Frost?
The only possible way to change the idiocracy at departments such as NASA and EPA is to change congress/administrations. I say “possible” since it is not 100% that the republicrats won’t continue down the road of stupidity even if they are in charge. Look how many of them supported the global warming scam! Vote today. Vote early and vote often, as they say in the democrat circles.
How the mighty have fallen. Reduced now to blaming “climate” for their failures, and using “climate” as an excuse for needing more money.
The real dangers to NASA are the placement of political cronies into administrative positions, and the ebb tide of funding from Congress.
Climate Changes (tick) TRUE
Climate Change is caused by AGW (tick) UNTRUE.
The once trustworthy (august?) CSIRO has all but ceased to publish papers and information of value, instead it is littered with appalling AGW nonsense..
Wikipedia trumps it these days, sad, sad, sad.
Help is at hand.
“Patriot Missile Long-Range Air-Defence System – Army …
http://www.army-technology.com/projec...
Patriot is a long-range, all-altitude, “ALL WEATHER” air defence system to counter … effectiveness against tactical ballistic and cruise missiles”
It’s not Rocket Science, it’s RACKET science…