King Obama strikes again – Obama Pursuing Climate Accord in Lieu of Treaty

king_obamaA reaction from Pat Michaels follows. From the NYT article: Obama Pursuing Climate Accord in Lieu of Treaty

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress.

In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summit meeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world’s largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution. But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.

To sidestep that requirement, President Obama’s climate negotiators are devising what they call a “politically binding” deal that would “name and shame” countries into cutting their emissions. The deal is likely to face strong objections from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from poor countries around the world, but negotiators say it may be the only realistic path.

“If you want a deal that includes all the major emitters, including the U.S., you cannot realistically pursue a legally binding treaty at this time,” said Paul Bledsoe, a top climate change official in the Clinton administration who works closely with the Obama White House on international climate change policy.

Lawmakers in both parties on Capitol Hill say there is no chance that the currently gridlocked Senate will ratify a climate change treaty in the near future, especially in a political environment where many Republican lawmakers remain skeptical of the established science of human-caused global warming.

Read full article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0

Former Virgina State Climatologist and Cato Institute Director of the Center for the Study of Science Dr. Pat Michaels reacts:

When it comes to climate change, President Obama surely thinks he is king, subject to absolutely no advice and consent from our elected representatives.

The President clearly believes that a 2007 Supreme Court decision on greenhouse gases empowers him to completely bypass the Senate, including signing on to what is clearly a new United Nations treaty effectively limiting our domestic greenhouse gas emissions, without the necessary two-thirds vote required by the Constitution. And, while the nations of the world will clearly ignore such a treaty, he will impose whatever regulations he sees fit without approval of Congress.  Sweeping regulation without legislative representation borders on tyranny, and it is doubtful that what he is proposing will ever stand a court challenge.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

166 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bruce Cobb
August 27, 2014 11:43 am

This should be very helpful to the Republicans in ’16. Thanks, Obama!

Robert Westfall
August 27, 2014 11:53 am

I love the Gomer Pyle enforcement mechanism. For shame, for shame, for shame.

timg56
August 27, 2014 12:01 pm

About a year and a half ago I wrote my 2 Senators (OR) asking why Lisa Jackson, as head of the EPA, was travelling to Paris to discuss international efforts on CO2 emission reductions. Having read the EPA’s charter, nothing in it justified such action on her part.
I received a response from just one, and it completely avoided my questions.

August 27, 2014 12:27 pm

Separation of Powers is dead
The Constitution is dead
The Rule of Law is dead
National Sovereignty is dead
Long Live obama the Destructor!
(not)

brock2118
August 27, 2014 1:57 pm

Why wouldn’t it withstand a court challenge?
The Czar should have a good chance to pack the Court by 2017…

TYoke
August 27, 2014 9:49 pm

Peter, you wrote: “There is nothing that binds the US in the President’s proposal.”
Do you think Obama would agree with that statement? He is the one who has asserted the unilateral power to write regulations.

fred
August 27, 2014 11:17 pm

The world leaders should devise a plan to increase carbon emissions in line with the fairy tale of endless economic growth. The truth is they don’t know what they are doing or why they are doing it. There’s no proof that more CO2 will have harmful effects and there’s no proof that they will reduce carbon emissions. The world leaders do not understand science or economics, so there is no chance of success.

August 29, 2014 11:42 pm

I have noted many comments in this thread that indicates a lot of people feel Obama will not be able to enforce any agreement that is made at the UN. The EPA currently has the authority to do practically anything it wants with respect to CO2/AGW regulation. Once the agreement between far left Progressive John Kerry and the UN, the Progressive run EPA under direction from Obama will be way more than happy to start enacting regulations to meet the UN agenda. With the Dems in control of the Senate, congress will be powerless to stop the EPA. Thus, the UN agenda will be enforced as law, even at gun-point if necessary.

Pooh, Dixie
August 31, 2014 10:43 am

A simple solution would be: Amend the Clean Air Act (CAA) to remove the reference to “Green House Gases”. Instead, list Greenhouse Gases except for CO2. By not excluding CO2, the CAA gave the EPA the legal authority to claim CO2 was a “pollutant” and therefore to regulate it.
Justice Stevens. “MASSACHUSETTS ET AL. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL.,” April 2, 2007. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1120.pdf