I figured that I should give people a heads-up, rather than just dump changes unannounced like wordpress.com did with their recent beep boop editor bomb.
Two changes – comment filtering and format. Two notes: editing for guest authors and a personal note about the future of WUWT.
1. Comment filtering has become stricter
This change is already in place this week and has been necessitated by the rising amount of spam comments not just at WUWT, but all blogs seem to be getting. Steve McIntyre laments his trouble with recent spam increases here.
WUWT gets about 3 times the amount of spam that Climate Audit does, most of it commercial link-back spam disguised as a comment. I too have seen the increase, and clearing out the spam filter has become quite a chore on some days. As a result, I’ve turned on this setting in my wordpress.com dashboard:
Strict: silently discard the worst and most pervasive spam.
What this means is that occasionally, some legitimate comments that meet this criteria might get thrown out with the bathwater. Some comments that are on the fence may also go to the spam holding que for review.
So, if you make a comment and it immediately disappears, it may go straight to either of these places. But, that doesn’t mean it is lost forever, it may be in the holding queue. Give it some time to see if it is retrieved by a moderator. For overnight, typically 11PM-6AM PDT, some comments may take awhile before they are rescued.
For a few people who have no manners and have been warned and finally banned (for example, Doug Cotton and his variety of shapeshifting sock puppets, and NASA GISS scientist Jan Perlwitz who made a death threat) those comments will straight to the bit bucket. Words with the usual variety of cuss words, profanity, and banned topics, etc. will also go straight to the bit bucket.
If your comment doesn’t fit any of these categories, and you don’t see it rescued within a few hours, it may have been a victim of the new stricter spam policy. I wish this wasn’t the case, but the enormity of the spam increase requires it. There just isn’t enough time in the day as it is and we shouldn’t be wasting it wading through dreck comments to decide which require permanent deletion and which don’t. Due to WUWT being a high traffic blog and in the top 10 of wordpress.com blogs worldwide on a daily basis, it is a prime target for spammers.
Also, some comments may be held for moderation, as we’ve recently added some words to that filter. Some people who have been known to post wildly off-topic, long rants, hateful, or otherwise inappropriate comments will get the inspection of a moderator. Also, first time commenters will be held in moderation, and after the first comment is approved, you are whitelisted.
The vast majority of regular commenters are also whitelisted, but occasionally somebody may trigger moderation. One of the surest ways for your comment to be held is to put a whole bunch of links in it, which mimic commercial spam. Right now we have it set to 4 links as the maximum. If you have a comment that requires more than that, try to break it up into two comments, or just accept that your comment will be held for moderation.
Also, moderator, please step up in removing off topic comments, we have a handful of people who think that “anything goes” when it comes to posting these sorts of comments on threads. Likewise, feel free to snip and warn purveyors of abusive comments.
The WUWT comment policy page is here.
2. New format
One of the biggest problems that WUWT (and many blogs like it) is that given the linear scrolling format, stories often get shuttled to the bottom of the stack pretty quickly, especially on busy news days. This means that some topics die a premature discussion death.
WUWT readers may have noted that I’ve been trying some experiments to keep stories of interest at the top, trying for awhile a “top stories” sticky post for a few weeks. While it helped, the amount of work to keep up with it was large, and some people didn’t like it. Of course in any change, there will be those that don’t like it.
The last major format change I made to the WUWT format was in early 2010, a couple of months after Climategate broke. I found the old Freshy theme we were using then was too narrow, and restrictive (it didn’t support mobile devices well) so I opted for the new (at the time) 2010 theme, which has served us well for over 4 and half years. But, it too is now showing signs of age, especially with so many topics and so much traffic.
After months of trying out new ideas offline, I believe I’ve found a new theme that will solve the problems mentioned above, while still retaining much of the look and feel of WUWT along with being able to keep all posts in a linear scrolling format as we have before.
The new theme is called “Expound” and you can read about it here. WordPress describes it as:
Expound offers a fresh, clean magazine-styled look for any type of blog. With a responsive design that looks great on any device, its support of post formats and featured posts will help your content shine.
Here is what it will look like. I still have not included the header image. This is a scaled version to show what the scrolled areas below the main headlines look like. It will be full width on any browser, and will properly adapt to tablets and phones as well.
The five most recent stories are at the top, you can see other stories directly below by scrolling down.
The only thing that will significantly change is the front page of WUWT and some sidebar elements will be removed that are no longer relevant. Posts themselves will pretty much look the same and commenting will work as before.
One big improvement to this theme is that it will allow bigger images, 720 pixels wide, up from the previous width of 640. We’ll be able to do HD! This is important for graphs with a lot of details and some videos in HD.
Here is a full-on view of the main page before scrolling:
The change will start on Monday morning, August 25th.
The good news is that if it doesn’t work for some reason, it can be changed back.
UPDATES
UPDATE: As you can see by now, the new format is live. Like with any new format, there may be some hiccups or some things that aren’t quite right. I’ve spent the evening doing some font tuning, and I hope the body font for posts is OK now for most people. If not, you can magnify/shrink in your browser using CTRL and + keys simultaneously as well as CTRL and – keys. CTRL and 0 (zero) puts you back at default magnification.
There are a couple of missing elements, such as comment count, and “leave a comment” on main page entries, along with some other small tweaks that will be put back in over the coming days with the CSS editor. BTW, if anyone is a WordPress CSS specialist, and can help me with such tasks, please leave a note in comments – thanks, Anthony
UPDATE2: Some things that I expected to retain got broken, such as the mobile theme, which I believe is fixed now. Some other things that we are used to got broken or removed because the default theme setting didn’t support them.
The good news is that most everything can be fixed with CSS tweaks over the next few days, though I have a bit of a learning curve on these items. Anybody out there a wordpress CSS specialist?
Some things already fixed are:
- Mobile theme
- Header font and body of story font sizes
- Making body font more readable by making it sans serif
- Put back “latest posts” on sidebar since some users still need it
- Background image restored
Things I’m working on:
- Putting back real time stamps
- Putting back comment counts
- Getting comment body fonts and comment name headers sized properly
- Less white space
- About a half dozen other small tweaks
Your patience is appreciated while these things are dealt with. – Anthony
Note: editing for guest authors.
For guest authors who can post on WUWT, to get an image to appear in the top five, you’ll have to select it as a “featured image” (on the lower right sidebar) during editing, otherwise it will appear as text only. Putting a short summary in the first sentence or two is more important now, since that is what readers will see at the top of the main page.
Also, to get around invoking the horrid beep boop editor that wordpress.com refuses to dump, here is a workaround. In the dashboard, simply click on the “Posts” item but NOT on the drop down menu where it says “Add New”:
To edit a post, click on “all posts”, select the post needed to edit, and edit from there.
Personal note:
After this change settles in, I will make the decision as to whether to stick with wordpress.com any longer. They assure me they are trying to polish this beep boop editor turd fix the beep boop editor, but I’m not sure they are going to be successful. They’ve pretty well ignored users concerns in this thread, and then decided to close it.
Closing threads where users are sounding off angrily sounds like the tactics some newspapers and magazines we know that simply choose to ignore overwhelming reader input when it comes to the many climate science faux pas that grace their pages.
Bad move, WordPress. I’m not sure your free hosting is worth the hassle anymore. Many other users feel the same with this “jumped the shark” moment with the “beep boop” editor debacle. Being able to control one’s own destiny has its advantages, and I’m beginning to feel abused by wordpress.com.
BTW, the video ads that appear at the bottoms of posts give the highest payback to WUWT, should you be inclined to watch them.




Looks pretty good to me. I like change for the better 🙂
tonyb
August 25, 2014 at 11:42 pm
> Please can you tell me how we access the ‘archives by month’ feature now?
See the right-sdie nav button for “Ric Werme’s Guide to WUWT?” Click it or just visit http://home.comcast.net/~ewerme/wuwt/index.html and use my monthly Tables of Content.
Currently the comment counts that I try to update (i.e. articles from the last fortnight) are broken. Either AW will get them restored to the daily summaries or I’ll read individual articles and fish them out of those.
Expect the daily updates to fail a few times before the new format settles down.
The new theme looks great. It’s a lot easier to read over, and the post content is a lot more clearly separated. But why do you use wordpress.com instead of a self-hosted solution?
Anthony,
If you choose to reconsider the idea of running your own server (and I understand your reasons for not considering that in the past), I would be happy to help out in the research and/or implementation of that.
Anthony,
As I most often access WUWT with my iPhone, I really appreciate your efforts on the tweaking you’ve done since your initiation of your new webpage to make it readable on the iPhone. Initially, before your tweaks, the new webpage was almost un-useable.
Accessing WUWT on my notebook PC I did not have major concerns about your new webpage.
Appreciate your wonderful venue.
John
From tonyb on August 25, 2014 at 11:42 pm:
WordPress automatically makes listings for the relevant URL directories, newest stories first. So you can always type it in by hand. For example:
Days:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/08/24/
All 8/24/2014 postings
Months:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/08/
All the August 2014 postings
This also works for years.
Note you will need JavaScript on for WUWT to get all the listings with the nigh-perpetual “load next page of older stuff as user scrolls down” method.
If you don’t like JavaScript on for WUWT, or just don’t have it with certain browsers, you can still access the listings with “page-slash-number” syntax, currently displaying 7 stories for page.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/page/3/
Third page of results for June 2014.
db,
Not even close. The context was discussing the possibility of people going after alarmist scientists with pitchfolks, tar & feathers. If someone comes after me in that manner they are likely to be unpleasantly surprised.
Besides, if Perlwitz is as good a shot as he is a commentor, he’s unlikely to hit anyone, short of his using a howitizer.
@tonyb
I’ve restored the Archives section to the sidebar. It is at the very bottom.
Anthony,
Once you get done with all the tweaking to make “Expound” a stylish modern yet fully functional and versatile theme, package it up, tie it together with a big pink bow, then offer up the “Expounded” theme for sale to WordPress. You clearly deserve some compensation for your effort.
Anthony and/or Mods,
Under the new format, if I click on one of the Blog Roll links e.g. William Briggs or Climate Audit to visit a linked site, when I use my browser’s back button (Safari 5.1.10) to return to your site I am taken to wattsupwiththat.com/page/4 which displays older content instead of wattsupwiththat.com home. I’ve tried clearing my cache and restarting Safari, but the problem persists.
P.S. I like the new format. It takes some getting used to but it is very clean and very easy to navigate. I use your blog roll as my bookmark page for most of the sites listed.
Cheers
@Steve E
And the blog is doing exactly what it is supposed to do.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/page/4/ is actually your jumping off point from WUWT at that link position. Scroll down further and look at your address bar. You’ll see it jump to http://wattsupwiththat.com/page/5/ etc.
This has to do with the new “infinite scroll” feature, which I had to implement in order to be able to fill the body of the blog to complement all the stuff on the sidebar. With posts shrinking size on the main page to capsule form, they didn’t fill the page in fixed number of stories to show format…and I had this long sidebar with nothing in the main body.
Great job, Anthony!
Is there a way to always display the author’s name on the front page? I always want to know who the author is as I scan the front page to decide what to read.
Thanks for all your hard work. Much appreciated.
Hi Anthony! I see that some of the white space has gone. Great! I’m kinda with Pamela on the fonts, though. I find that in reading a post I tend now to do a ‘CTL -‘ to drop a size in font, and then a ‘CTL 0’ to read the comments. That works for me, so I can’t say it should work for others…. That said, the new version is evolving into a swan. 😉
I take it back! Just done a refresh. Apologies
Anthony,
The Archive listing takes up too much vertical space and will keep growing. I suggest turning on the widget’s option to make it display as dropdown instead.
REPLY: Good suggestion – done – Anthony
Our Host
Didn’t read all the comments – he – 0745 In The City tomorrow. It’s 1005 here now…..
It looks fine on the outside for me.
Appreciate your efforts on this, recently & over the years I have been coming here.
Thank you – from the bottom of my heart.
Auto
Anthony, thanks for your reply. I should have been more specific. The infinite scroll only works in one direction. If I jump to another site from the blog roll and then come back via the back button on my browser, I can indeed continue an “infinite scroll” down, but I can’t scroll back up past the page I return to. Instead, I have to hit the home button to view new material. I have your site open for most of the day and as mentioned use your blog roll more or less like a bookmark page jumping back and forth between sites. Now when I bounce back I’m not coming back to the newest material.
It’s a small thing, but it would be nice for the scroll to work up as well as down.
Cheers
I like both the new and the old format. Would it be possible to have a menu option to display the page in the old format? Only consider it if it happens to be easy; your effort is better spent elsewhere. Thanks.
I like the tightness in the comment spacing. I wasn’t sure about the light-blue-green background, but the blockquote and code blocks show up differently so they now stand out.
Post Titles have been nicely reduce in size, too.
The menu is crisp with high contrast san-serif font. But ‘WUWT Stuff” isn’t there.
A lot of improvements inside of 60 hours.
Stephen Rasey says:
Thanks for noticing. Some things we won’t be able to fix while hosted on wordpress.com but we will do the best we can with what we can.
Stephen Rasey
August 26, 2014 at 3:33 pm
> But ‘WUWT Stuff” isn’t there.
Yes it is – the page may not have displayed the topmost data. Scroll up! (And that may have been fixed too.)
Yes, I have noticed them as well. The change of background on the comments is a very welcome addition to these tired old eyes! Many thanks.
Anthony, is there a way for someone to opt out of the colored backgrounds on each post?…….it’s incredibly distracting and messing with my eyes
REPLY: No, there is not. – Anthony
I can see!!! I can see!!!! Bless you!!!!!!
Latitude August 26, 2014 at 5:43 pm
Well, that’s really, really a pitty. I absolutely hate it. I don’t think I will get used to it. Maybe I will use the quote tag in order to, at least, see my own comments in black over white…
Most browsers let you do some adjustments on YOUR end. Perhaps if the final design Anthony settles on is still difficult for you to read, you can apply some custom styling?
article.comment div.comment-content blockquote { background-color: white; }
see http://www.lostsaloon.com/technology/using-a-custom-stylesheet-in-a-web-browser/
I’ve made another small tweak, switching the comment background from a light blue to a soft gray. We’ll see how that does.
Can we have hot pink? lol
REPLY: No you cannot. If you can run a better website, by all means go do it. – Anthony