At the start of the weekend, and quite by accident, I found myself aloft and looking directly into the glare of the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System. I can tell you that not only does it roast birds in mid-air, it certainly seems to be a hazard to aviation. First, a story today from AP, via my local newspaper. Photos follow.
Emerging desert solar plants scorch birds in midair-Chico Enterprise-Record

IVANPAH DRY LAKE (AP) >> Workers at a state-of-the-art solar plant in the Mojave Desert have a name for birds that fly through the plant’s concentrated sun rays — “streamers,” for the smoke plume that comes from birds that ignite in midair.
Federal wildlife investigators who visited the BrightSource Energy plant last year and watched as birds burned and fell, reporting an average of one “streamer” every two minutes, are urging California officials to halt the operator’s application to build a still-bigger version.
The investigators want the halt until the full extent of the deaths can be assessed. Estimates per year now range from a low of about a thousand by BrightSource to 28,000 by an expert for the Center for Biological Diversity environmental group.
The deaths are “alarming. It’s hard to say whether that’s the location or the technology,” said Garry George, renewable-energy director for the California chapter of the Audubon Society. “There needs to be some caution.”
The bird kills mark the latest instance in which the quest for clean energy sometimes has inadvertent environmental harm. Solar farms have been criticized for their impacts on desert tortoises, and wind farms have killed birds, including numerous raptors.
“We take this issue very seriously,” said Jeff Holland, a spokesman for NRG Solar of Carlsbad, the second of the three companies behind the plant. The third, Google, deferred comment to its partners.
The $2.2 billion plant, which launched in February, is at Ivanpah Dry Lake near the California-Nevada border. The operator says it is the world’s biggest plant to employ so-called power towers.
More than 300,000 mirrors, each the size of a garage door, reflect solar rays onto three boiler towers each looming up to 40 stories high. The water inside is heated to produce steam, which turns turbines that generate enough electricity for 140,000 homes.
Sun rays sent up by the field of mirrors are bright enough to dazzle pilots flying in and out of Las Vegas and Los Angeles.
Full story here: http://www.chicoer.com/breakingnews/ci_26357771/emerging-desert-solar-plants-scorch-birds-midair
===============================================================
I drove to the Heartland ICCC9 conference in Las Vegas, NV, (my “Big Oil” charter jet never showed up) taking the US395 route through Nevada on the way to the conference, but on the return trip, I took the Interstate 15 to SR58 route to Bakersfield, and that had me drive by the Ivanpah Solar Power plant. I had never seen the desert air glow before in broad daylight, so I stopped to take some photos.
Here is the view from Interstate-15 looking west at the southernmost tower:
And here are all three solar towers from the same vantage point:
Click the images for full size ones to see details.
I have to say it was an eerie sight seeing the air glow that electric blue color like you see on carbon-arc searchlights at night, but instead being visible during the day. The amount of power being concentrated in the air is quite impressive.
Dr. Roy Spencer also took photos and wrote about the Ivanpah Solar power system when he drove out of Las Vegas leaving the ICCC9 conference. He got closer than I did and beat me to the story, so I never published my photos, figuring there was little I could improve upon.
On Friday, in the early afternoon, coming back from a work related trip in Florida, I found myself having a short layover in Las Vegas, to connect to my flight to Sacramento. I’ve flown the Vegas to Sacramento route dozens of times, and so there is little I haven’t seen on the ground from that vantage point, so I didn’t even bother looking out the window. I was reading a book.
I was surprised all of the sudden when the cabin was briefly lit up by a flash, and I thought to myself that we must have passed some air traffic pretty darn close and gotten a sun glint off the aircraft, looking out the window, I discovered I was being dazzled from the ground, and then I knew what it was.
I got up to get my cell phone/camera out of my laptop bag in the overhead, and was griping to myself, “c’mon, c’mon, BOOT dammit!” waiting for Android to load. By the time I was able to get the camera app running the glare had passed, and all I got was a couple of photos like this one:
I gotta tell you, for a moment, it felt like we were in full glare. And I think that if I had my camera ready at that instant when the angles all conspired to illuminate our aircraft, all I would have gotten was a screen of white, much like this one taken by Sandia Labs during a study:
![ivanpah-glare-7-17-14-thumb-600x395-77670[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/ivanpah-glare-7-17-14-thumb-600x395-776701.png?resize=507%2C334&quality=75)
Interestingly, the Sandia National Laboratory is developing a 3D mapping tool to help predict glare from this thing, as seen below:
They purposely flew into the glare and report:
The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) consists of three 459-ft-tall power towers and over 170,000 reflective heliostats with a rated capacity of 390 MW. The California Energy Commission (CEC) has received numerous pilot and air traffic controller glare-impact reports. The situation is serious because pilots report that they cannot “scan the sky in that direction to look for other aircraft.” According to an air traffic controller, “Daily, during the late-morning and early-afternoon hours, we get complaints from pilots of aircraft flying from the northeast to the southwest about the brightness of this solar farm.”
Some Ivanpah heliostats are moved to standby mode in which they reflect light to the side of the tower to reduce sunlight being pointed at the tower’s receivers. Aerial and ground-based surveys of the glare were conducted in April, 2014, to identify the cause and to quantify the irradiance and potential ocular impacts of the glare.
Sandia’s report concluded the glare from those standby heliostats could cause “significant ocular impact” at a distance of six miles. Ivanpah operators BrightSource and NRG are investigating new strategies and algorithms for heliostat standby positions to reduce the irradiance and number of heliostats that can reflect light to an aerial observer, and pilots have been warned of the issue.
Source: http://energy.sandia.gov/?p=19782
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



![3D-glare-tool-1[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/3d-glare-tool-11.jpg?resize=640%2C368&quality=83)
![Ivanpah-glare-photo[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/ivanpah-glare-photo1.jpg?resize=640%2C342&quality=83)
At least the bats are safe from this, for obvious reasons.
The imagination goes wild. This technology obviously has a future in constructing open-air greenhouses and Florida citrus frost preventers, all at the modest cost of needing 10X as much land to concentrate the sunlight from. And so peculiarly effective at night, too.
OK, pre-cooked birds fall from the sky. At least the scavengers won’t get ptomaine poisoning…..
I see from the FAA NOTAM that this thing covers 3500 acres. How many diesel (or coal, or nuclear) plants could you fit into that space? And how many households would be supplied with power – 24 hours a day?
Maybe if these mirrors were killing fish they would face more environmental opposition?
Birds fly. They have options?
Mike McMillan says:
I’ve been through the glare field of a smaller prototype of those things back in the 90’s, and they really are a hazard to flight. They light up the cockpit like an arc light, and you can’t look in that direction until you get past the mirrors.
Sounds rather more dangerous than handheld laser pointers. Which are hadly capable to dazzling BOTH pilots at once.
I have spent a lot of time hiking through the desert. I might see a couple birds in an entire day. It’s astonishing that this thing could fry this many birds, especially considering the location, which is quite barren, even for a desert. If I walked across similar terrain, I’d expect to see zero birds. It has be attracting them, and in large numbers. My suspicion is that from a distance it looks like a lake, and birds come looking for a drink of water and a meal.
I have to wonder about critters that are attracted to the site expecting water, but don’t get fried. Life in the desert is tenuous, and unnecessary expenditure of energy can easily result in death. How many birds, coyotes, rodents, etc, make the journey to this site expecting it to be a lake, and then wander off and [die] as a result of their fruitless trek?
In the end, the critters will survive. Even at 30 birds an hour, it is a tiny fraction of the overall death toll. What kills me is the blatant hypocrisy and the horrific waste of money. 2 billion dollars to provide power to 140,000 homes? In what universe does that make any sense at all?
“Ric Werme says:
August 19, 2014 at 6:22 am
This could be California’s answer to the Burning Man Festival.
They could make their Burning Bird Festival a celebration of solar powered everything, including solar fried chicken.”
Actually what they should do, if possible, is aim the output of the collectors at the nearest windfarms. Then they could have the “Burning Fan” festival……(sorry)….
“pat says:
August 18, 2014 at 11:32 pm
***windows kill “somewhere between 100 million and 1 billion birds each year in North America” – how accurate is that? ”
Gosh, I knew Vista and Win8 were bad, but not THAT bad….
Seriously, though, I wonder where these watermelons get their data. They’ve made exaggeration of extrapolations into an art form…. (trying vainly to suppress thoughts of liberal arts majors [emphasis on liberal] flunking math)….
I agree that bird kills by these and the bird-choppers are bad, but what REALLY scares me is the potential for pilots and/or passengers to be blinded by these arrays….then some beaurocrat(s) somewhere will be taksed with balancing “energy production” with death counts…then again, the melons don’t care about humans anyway….sigh…
********* Typical NOTAM issued for the area ******
Data Current as of: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:43:00 UTC
KZLA LOS ANGELES (ARTCC)PALMDALE, CA.
FDC 4/1273 – CA..AIRSPACE IVANPAH DRY LAKE, CA. SOLAR POWERPLANT
GLARE THE LAS VEGAS / LAS / VORTAC 193 RADIAL RADIAL 36 NAUTICAL
MILES TO THE LAS VEGAS / LAS / VORTAC 189 RADIAL RADIAL 34 NAUTICAL
MILES. THIS PLANT COVERS APPROXIMATELY 3,500 ACRES WEST OF INTERSTATE
HIGHWAY 15 NEAR THE CALIFORNIA-NEVADA STATE LINE WITH ROUGHLY
175,000 MIRRORS SURROUNDING EACH OF THREE COLLECTION TOWERS. THESE
TOWERS EMPLOYE A NEW TECHNOLOGY THAT HAS NOT BEEN UTILIZED AT THIS
LEVEL BEFORE, CREATING A SOLAR GLARE EFFECT IN THE AIRCRAFT.
LOS ANGELES AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER (ARTCC) AND LAS VEGAS
TERMINAL RADAR APPROACH CONTROL (TRACON) BEGAN RECEIVING NUMEROUS
PILOT REPORTS OF GLARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE POWERPLANT SINCE THE
FACILITY BEGAN PRODUCTION.
TO APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENT THESE CONDITIONS, PILOTS AND OTHER AIR CREW
MEMBERS ARE URGED TO UTILIZE NASA’S AVIATION SAFETY REPORTING SYSTEM
(ASRS) AND PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC REPORT SUBMISSION (ERS) VIA THE WEB
AT http://ASRS.ARC.NASA.GOV/REPORT/ELECTRONIC/HTML
SOLAR POWERPLANT GLARE MAY BE INJURIOUS TO PILOTS’/PASSENGERS’
END PART 1 OF 2. 20 JUN 19:45 2014 UNTIL 31 DEC 06:00 2014 ESTIMATED. CREATED:
20 JUN 19:43 2014
https://pilotweb.nas.faa.gov/PilotWeb/radiusSearchAction.do?formatType=ICAO&geoIcaoLocId=MMTJ&geoIcaoRadius=5&openItems=&actionType=radiusSearch
Archimedes would be proud.
If the sunlight can not be better focused on the heat elements it would seem a great deal of energy is being wasted. Ideally couldn’t each mirror be “fitted” to shine exclusively at the intended object?
@Tom J says:
August 18, 2014 at 9:05 pm
You raise a great question: How much waste heat is pumped into the atmosphere per kilowatt produced vs. a nuke plant, or a gas fired or coal fired plant?
What is the carbon footprint of the mirror system, with its glass (high energy cost) motors, wiring, control devices, etc.)? Since the system is obviously offline or severely impaired at night, cloudy days and dusty/misty etc. days, what is actual power output vs. the rated capacity? Is it like wind, in <20% range? And what is the land footprint of this per kilowatt produced?
I wonder if you could sue for retinal damage if you happened to be looking out the window when the glare struck.
Hey! GlareNado?
I drove by the Ivanpah site this weekend. It can be blinding to drivers, too.
This site represents your tax dollars at work. But wait, Google pays for it, right? Wrong! Google gets tax write-offs for this, regardless of it’s actual utility. Why is Google, an internet company, dabbling in alternate energy projects? Because we have Byzantine tax laws that give incentives for the “correct” behavior. Tax credits means Google gets to write off an equivalent amount of income as if it never happened.
@Mike McMillan – I’ll take my Condor extra crispy, and from the wind farm down the road, I’ll pick up a couple helpings of birdslaw to go with it!
“The plant operators’ initial predictions that they would use natural gas about 1 hr per day. Their actual use has grown to 5 hrs per day.”
They should go to 20 hours per day. Then they’d have a gas-fired boiler plant disguised as a solar plant. That would fix the problem with idle assets, and solar being intermittent.
When Ivanpah was proposed, BrightSource claimed the plant’s natural gas-powered auxiliary boilers would only need to run an average of an hour per day. Now they’re saying they made a slight miscalculation. They really need to run on gas an average of five hours a day (burning enough gas to supply about 35,000 typical California households).
Even with $1.6 billion in federal loan guarantees, Ivanpah would not have been financially feasible if purchase of its ‘renewable’ power output wasn’t mandated by the State of California. Now it turns out the “world’s most efficient solar plant” is actually a gas/solar plant, selling power from natural gas at the same inflated price as from solar energy.
Jerry Brown, duly elected Governor of California by faux-greenie ignoramuses who believe “climate change” is a bigger threat to birds than 1000° F boiler towers, is now at odds with environmental groups who are fighting the construction of an even larger BrightSource concentrating solar plant in the middle of a bird migration route.
I believe that, somehow, some of those subsidized profits are benefiting Jerry Brown’s political machine.
Further evidence of BrightSource’s disingenuousness is their offer to pay $1.8 million in compensation for the anticipated bird deaths at their proposed Palen plant, money to be used to spay and neuter cats.
The reasoning behind cat population reduction is the claim that cats kill billions of birds per year. But there are two problems with that claim.
The Smithsonian study cited for that claim was done by green-energy-supporting bird conservationists. Their inflated numbers –which are used to excuse raptor kills by wind turbines, conveniently ignoring the fact that raptors kill both cats and other birds–come from a computer model that extrapolates numbers reported in other studies . The study–blabbed to the world by an unquestioning media–has been roundly criticized by other scientists as being sheer fabrication.
In any case, the bird species commonly killed by cats are by no means endangered (quite the opposite, in fact). There is no relationship between cat predation and the chopping and broiling done in the name of enriching crony corporations.
Eustace Cranch says:
August 19, 2014 at 7:01 am
“At least the bats are safe from this, for obvious reasons.”
Nope. The full report that started all the recent newspaper articles (link below) documents “significant bat and insect mortality”, however the cause of the bat mortality is not clear.
http://www.kcet.org/news/rewire/Avian-mortality%20Report%20FINALclean.pdf
The report notes that the bright light attracts insects and these insects attract birds and bats. The “streamers” are not all birds being ignited, but also include the combustion of swarms of insects and debris.
I just watched the Ivanpah construction video and they are using flat distorted mirrors, which I have to believe is diffusing a lot of the incoming sunlight and causing the glare
Maybe if they used high quality circular parabolic mirrors they could tighten up the focus and reduce the glare, of course that would likely add a billion to the cost.
My plant had to do an autosopy on a pigeon that ran into our unit (the poor thing had broken his neck). How are these people operating with hundreds of bird kills a day? That sort of take level would get a refinery shut down in hours.
So, anybody else played Fallout: New Vegas and recognized this as HELIOS One?
Post today based on several helpful comments and links above:
World’s largest solar energy plant wants to increase its greenhouse gas emissions to 94,749 tons per year
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/08/worlds-largest-solar-energy-plant-wants.html
Plant wants to increase its natural gas use to 525 MMSCF per “power block” X 3 units = 1575 MMSCF natural gas per year.
http://www.kcet.org/news/rewire/TN201928_20140326T164429_Ivanpah_Petition_to_Amend_No_4.pdf
Enough to supply 35K households of the 100K total the plant is said by some to supply
But – firing boilers with natural gas as they do at Ivanpah is known to produce much more particulate and greenhouse emissions than a much more efficient and cleaner-burning modern gas turbine generator.
Any engineers here who are able to estimate the pollution and GHG footprint of Ivanpah vs. a modern gas turbine plant?
It would be the ultimate of ironies if this “solar” plant ends up being similar or more polluting than a conventional gas turbine plant.
Don’t Worry,
The Administration will issue a permit for killing various birds as they did for Wind Turbine applications elsewhere.
The end justifies the means.
.http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2014/07/11/bird-conservancy-files-suit-against-wind-turbines