In the past week both the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) scaled back forecasts for a big El Niño warming event in 2014.
![anomnight.8.7.2014[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/anomnight-8-7-20141.gif?w=640&resize=640%2C348)
Source: http://iri.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/figure4.gif
Meanwhile, NOAA has announced that the probability of an El Nino Pacific Ocean warming event taking place this year has dropped significantly, saying:
“The chance of El Nino has decreased to about 65% during the Northern Hemisphere fall and early winter,”
Last week BoM changed its El Niño status from “El Niño Alert” to “El Niño Watch”, saying:
“While the chance of an El Niño in 2014 has clearly eased, warmer-than-average waters persist in parts of the tropical Pacific, and the (slight) majority of climate models suggest El Niño remains likely for spring. Hence the establishment of El Niño before year’s end cannot be ruled out. If an El Niño were to occur, it is increasingly unlikely to be a strong event.
This means the chance of El Nino developing in 2014 is approximately 50%, which remains significant at double the normal likelihood of an event,”
Earlier this year, sea surface temperature appeared on the rise, and there was hope in the warmist community that this would help 2014 become a record warm year. For example, the paid Center for American Progress mouthpiece Joe Romm squawked:
Is A Super El Niño Coming That Will Shatter Extreme Weather And Global Temperature Records?
He cited this model forecast:
Uh, no. That hopes seems faded now.
Niño 3.4 Region Sea Surface Temperature Index – July 2006 to Present
Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) – Click the pic to view at source
El Niño related SST’s from earlier this year have now returned to near normal, and NOAA says: “the lack of a coherent atmospheric El Nino pattern, and a return to near-average SSTs in the central Pacific, indicate ENSO-neutral”.
Niño 3.4 Region Sea Surface Temperature Anomaly – 2000 to Present
NOAA – National Climate Data Center – Click the pic to view at source
Here is the NOAA ENSO discussion published today:
===============================================================
EL NINO/SOUTHERN OSCILLATION (ENSO) DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION
issued by CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER/NCEP/NWS and the International Research Institute for Climate and Society
7 August 2014
ENSO Alert System Status: El Nino Watch
Synopsis: The chance of El Nino has decreased to about 65% during the Northern Hemisphere fall and early winter.
During July 2014, above-average sea surface temperatures (SST) continued in the far eastern equatorial Pacific, but near average SSTs prevailed in the central and east-central equatorial Pacific (Fig. 1). Most of the Nino indices decreased toward the end of the month with values of +0.3°C in Nino-4, -0.1°C in Nino-3.4, +0.2°C in Nino-3, and +0.6°C in Nino-1+2 (Fig. 2). Subsurface heat content anomalies (averaged between 180º-100ºW) continued to decrease and are slightly below average (Fig. 3). The above-average subsurface temperatures that were observed near the surface during June (down to 100m depth) are now limited to a thin layer in the top 50m, underlain by mainly below-average temperatures (Fig. 4). The low-level winds over the tropical Pacific remained near average during July, but westerly wind anomalies appeared in the central and eastern part of the basin toward the end of the month. Upper-level winds remained generally near average and convection was enhanced mainly just north of the equator in the western Pacific (Fig. 5). The lack of a coherent atmospheric El Nino pattern, and a return to near-average SSTs in the central Pacific, indicate ENSO-neutral.
Over the last month, model forecasts have slightly delayed the El Nino onset, with most models now indicating the onset during July-September, with the event continuing into early 2015 (Fig. 6). A strong El Nino is not favored in any of the ensemble averages, and slightly more models call for a weak event rather than a moderate event. At this time, the consensus of forecasters expects El Nino to emerge during August-October and to peak at weak strength during the late fall and early winter (3-month values of the Nino-3.4 index between 0.5°C and 0.9°C). The chance of El Nino has decreased to about 65% during the Northern Hemisphere fall and early winter (click CPC/IRI consensus forecast for the chance of each outcome).
This discussion is a consolidated effort of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NOAA’s National Weather Service, and their funded institutions. Oceanic and atmospheric conditions are updated weekly on the Climate Prediction Center web site (El Nino/La Niña Current Conditions and Expert Discussions). Forecasts are also updated monthly in the Forecast Forum of CPC’s Climate Diagnostics Bulletin. Additional perspectives and analysis are also available in an ENSO blog. The next ENSO Diagnostics Discussion is scheduled for 4 September 2014. To receive an e-mail notification when the monthly ENSO Diagnostic Discussions are released, please send an e-mail message to: ncep.list.enso-update@noaa.gov.
Climate Prediction Center
National Centers for Environmental Prediction
NOAA/National Weather Service
College Park, MD 20740
End of diagnostic discussions
![figure4[1]](https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/figure41.gif?resize=643%2C546)
![CFS21-638x564[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/cfs21-638x5641.jpg?resize=638%2C564&quality=83)


And there goes the last great hope for obviously actionable levels of global warming for the next year or so. Even hardcore (C)AGW-pushers are going silent.
Speaking of which, and this sounds like a game, Where’s Hansen?
He retired in 2013 to become a full-time activist, mentioned how government employees can’t testify against the government which implied he was going to, and now…?
Was he on a certain GreenWar ship protesting Russian oil and gas exploration in the Arctic? Been awhile since I heard anything about those fools either.
As I recall from living most of the first 60 years of my life in Northern California, there was a 7 (SEVEN) YEAR drought in Northern Calif in the 1990s. Everybodies lawn went brown and we discovered ways to reduce flow in older toilets, etc. This current drought is a bit young by comparison.
I was hoping for an El Nino winter in Northern California Sierra mountains to help reduce the current drought, but I am happy to see the egg on the alarmist faces even if they don’t recognize it yet.
August 7, 2014 at 1:44 pm | Latitude says:
—
August 7, 2014 at 1:57 pm | Steven Mosher says:
===
Can’t help myself … Mosher gets climate and weather confused, weather is not climate !
Steven Mosher says:
August 7, 2014 at 1:57 pm
“and people pay attention to this, why?
######################
when the weatherman tells me there is a 50% chance of rain, I bring an umbrella.”
Hmmm… How many of the rest of you actually cart an umbrella around every time the precip forecast hits 50%? Exactly.
I’ve seen from Steven Mosher the occasional nearly-readable effort at something approaching coherent argument. Eventually I’ll probably see another.
But if GISS is an outlier with a record high this year, it”l look suspicious.
@Jake J at 3:37 pm
To Rasey, could you explain why, if reservoirs upstream from Lake Powell are “overfull,”
I said they are “near full” and the Powell site said upstream dams were at 78%.of capacity.
Part of your answer is sheer size.
The capacity of Lake Power is 26.2 million ac-ft.
It is six times bigger than the next biggest upstream dam. It is about three times bigger than all the dams upstream, and some of that water is owned by Denver and the Eastern Slope.
The next bigger dams upstream are
GREEN RIVER
Flaming Gorge: 152 MW, 3.79 million ac-ft
GUNNISON RIVER:
Blue Mesa Reservoir (84 MW) 0.940 million ac. ft
Morrow Point Reservoir (hydroelec, 173 MW) (0.114 million ac-ft).
Crystal Reservoir (hydroelec 31.7 MW) 0.025 million acft.
SAN JUAN RIVER
Lake Navaho 32 MW, 1.706 million ac-ft.
McPhee Reservoir Less than 0.01 million ac ft.
UPPER COLORADO River and Blue River:
Lake Granby 0.54 million ac-ft, (much of it diverted to Eastern slope through Adams tunnel.)
Green Mountain Reservoir: 0.12 million ac-ft
Lake Dillon, 0.25 million ac-ft (but most of that is owned by Denver Water Board and tunneled under the continental divide to Denver)
Wolford Mountain, 0.066 million ac-ft.
Williams Fork,
Roaring fork river has 0.052 million ac-ft diverted across the divide to the Twin Lakes reservoir at the head of the Arkansas river.
Ruedi Reservoir (Fryingpan – Roaring Fork) 0.106 million ac-ft.
So, the short answer
Lousy weather forecasters aren’t they. Mum nature is not going to be manipulated, she’ll do what she wants. Why don’t they accept that they can’t change the weather by predictions based on lousy models from the ‘holier than thou’ junket.
Steven Mosher says:
August 7, 2014 at 1:57 pm
so I guess youre preparing for the next ice age?
Given the ambiguity of the current situation (near neutral conditions) it will be interesting to see how well the models fair over the next 3 months. Half the BOM models predict an El Nino, and the NOAA model mean is strongly predicting El Nino.
All of the nada is coming from the southern hemisphere right now and a lot of warm water has been monsooned up the California coast. Mosher, what? You want me to write code for that? Just look at it.
Northern hemisphere Pacific Hadley circulation is weak and a succession of Aleutian lows has been cycling through. This is supposed to happen in the NH winter, but in the last few winters the Hadley circulation has been strong.
You write the code. I’ll watch and learn. The wind will do the talking, and no amount of Windtalker code writing will make the least bit of difference.
I’d like to know if there is any published scientific evidence linking their modelling results, particularly considering Australian Bureau of Met and NOAA’s high probability prediction of an El Nino later this year, to actual El Nino results. Where do they get such high levels of confidence from? Can anyone shed light on this please.
“Earlier this year, sea surface temperature appeared on the rise, and there was hope in the warmist community that this would help 2014 become a record warm year.”
I just can’t believe that the same people who consider global warming to be such a crisis that those who doubt it’s significance must be muzzled and marginalized as “deniers” would actually wish for more warming rather than welcome any reprieve we get from the inevitable roasting. These are people with huge hearts and love for all mankind, and I’m quite sure all of them are saying, “Thank God/Nature there has been at least a slowing of the rate of temperature increase as this gives us more time to improve our models and institute the necessary policies to save mankind.”
To think otherwise would be to think that these public-spirited citizens of the world would rather be right than see a delay of what is certain to be a worldwide disaster marked by widespread suffering and death.
I’m shocked — shocked I tell you — that you would ever suggest such a thing.
The only way this could be true is if these people don’t really believe in the terrible consequences they are predicting. But what possible motives could they have to dissemble like that?
Steven Mosher says:
August 7, 2014 at 3:19 pm
“The climate models are using “best guesses” as to what should be in a climate model while they leave out items they aren’t able to reproduce or don’t understand fully.
Yeah, that’s exactly the same. Good analogy Mosher.”
These would be weather models.
generally you want to look at people who have something at stake and watch if they take the advise of a model. For example, some farmers in Australia and Indonesia change planting strategies according to these types of forecasts.
I farm in Melbourne, Australia.
Last thing i do is look at computer models.
I can tell whats coming months out.
The 2009 El nino we had floods here at the end of November.
Which i predicted we would be torn a new one 6 weeks earlier.
And it only lasted 30 months, with nearly 5 years of rain squashed into 2.5 years.
Models are garbage, only 7 days are any value. The BOM had 80% chance of a warm winter,
how lucky i ignored them.
It was already on cards
ENSOetc
Steven Mosher
You can be such a pillock at times. Engage your brain before typing.
You and your incompetent colleagues claim to be able to forecast/project the climate and yet can’t predict an El Niño/a 3 months out. So is el niño a climate parameter or a weather parameter in your models.?
Stephen Wilde says:
August 7, 2014 at 2:48 pm
Increased global cloudiness skews ENSO in favour of La Nina events relative to El Nino events for a cooling world and decreased global cloudiness does the opposite.
Global cloudiness is affected by the level of solar activity altering jet stream tracks between zonal and meridional patterns.
The gradient of tropopause height between equator and poles is affected by variations in atmospheric chemistry above the tropopause. Those changes in gradient affect the ability of the jets to adopt a more or less meridional pattern.
100%.
http://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/eit_304/1024/latest.jpg
Here in Central Queensland (NE Australia) the south east trades have become strong and persistent with a strong subtropical ridge. Neutral this year, La Nina next year?
Nice to have this one, El Nino risk, out of the way.
Now if we can move on to a record Antarctic Sea Ice extent this September and another recovery in Arctic sea ice things will be moving well.
Perhaps the new Obama/Gore effect combined is working out !.
anthonyvioli says:
August 8, 2014 at 12:54 am
I farm in Melbourne, Australia.
==============================================================
What do you grow…….bitumen??????????
Like Koala bears need to crap to feed their young, anything that comes out of the BoM should be treated as waste.
And today we get this little gem. http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/actress-emma-thompson-targets-tony-abbott-on-climate-change-20140808-1023ze.html
Hi Steve
“The climate models are using “best guesses” as to what should be in a climate model while they leave out items they aren’t able to reproduce or don’t understand fully”
Its a good job entire western countries aren’t spending billions and billions based on a “best guest” isn’t it.
Imagine what good could be achieved in the UK for example if instead of subsidizing wind farms the billions of tax payers cash went on our health service instead.
We could have start of the art cancer drugs, national screening programs etc.
The amount of money being spent to “prevent” a best guess is frightening.
UK Residents are already paying £100’s of a year in green taxes based on these bloody “best guesses” though electricity bills, petrol taxes, Air Taxes.
The recent few decades seem to confirm an annual phase-locking of ENSO such that the start of a La Nina cooling of the East Pacific occurs either in summer – and the subsequent La Nina is weak, or at Christmas – and the following La Nina is stronger. Thus if the ENSO index bumps along just above neutral till the end of the year this would make possible a strong La Nina cooling at the start of 2015. This would be similar to the 2007-2008 La Nina which followed a period of several years of near ENSO neutrality – such as we are now also experiencing.
Stephen Richards says:
August 8, 2014 at 1:42 am
Steven Mosher
You can be such a pillock at times. Engage your brain before typing.
You and your incompetent colleagues claim to be able to forecast/project the climate and yet can’t predict an El Niño/a 3 months out. So is el niño a climate parameter or a weather parameter in your models.?
Evidentially,
When we have an El Nino that was modeled: Climate
When we do not have an El Nino that was modeled: Weather
/sarc
Reality gets it wrong again? Surely time for a replacement.