Studies: Weaker solar activity means colder, and colder also means drier

Guest essay by David Archibald

There were two papers published in 2013 that, when considered together, paint a bleak picture of North American climate and agriculture for the rest of the century and beyond. Firstly from the abstract of “Multidecadal to multi-century scale collapses of Northern Hemisphere monsoons over the past millennium”1 by Asmerom et al.:

“Late Holocene climate in western North America was punctuated by periods of extended aridity called megadroughts.” And “Several megadroughts are evident, including a multicentury one, AD 1350–1650, herein referred to as Super Drought, which corresponds to the coldest period of the Little Ice Age. Synchronicity between southwestern North American, Chinese, and West African monsoon precipitation suggests the megadroughts were hemispheric in scale. Northern Hemisphere monsoon strength over the last millennium is positively correlated with Northern Hemisphere temperature and North Atlantic SST.And “the megadroughts, including the Super Drought, coincide with solar insolation minima, suggesting that solar forcing of sea surface and atmospheric temperatures may generate variations in the strength of Northern Hemisphere monsoons.”

So droughts in North America are coincident with solar insolation minima. We already know of the cause and effect relationship between solar cycle minima and East African rainfall. West African drought has been found to be linked to Atlantic sea surface temperatures2.

With that knowledge, all we need to predict the timing of the next megadrought in North America is a long term solar activity forecast. That was also provided in 2013 by Steinhilber and Beer3. They predict a deep low in solar activity starting straight away and continuing for 150 years. This is Figure 4 from that paper:

clip_image002

Figure 4 from Steinhilber and Beer – Prediction of solar activity on the left axis and total solar irradiance on the right axis. M, D and G refer to the Maunder, Dalton and Gleissberg minima respectively. The lighter grey band is based on FFT (fast Fourier transformation) and the darker grey band is based on WTAR (wavelet decomposition using autoregression). As the paper demonstrates, amplitudes of solar activity are better predicted by the FFT method than by the WTAR method.

In effect, Figure 4 predicts a megadrought for North America from at least 2050 to 2200. Generations of people will experience what a Dalton Minimum is like, all their lives. In the meantime it will get colder and drier. In terms of the effect on agricultural productivity, productivity of corn production in the Corn Belt falls by 10% for each 1°C fall in annual average temperature. The Corn Belt also moves south by 144 km for each 1°C fall in annual average temperature. Soil quality declines to the south of the Corn Belt though so farms won’t be as productive. For example, one hundred years ago Alabama had four million acres planted to cotton. Today only 1.3 million acres are devoted to all agricultural crops. Unable to compete with the Corn Belt as it is now, a lot of acreage in Alabama has reverted to pasture and woodland.

A fall in annual average temperature of 2.0°C might decrease production by 20% and the southward move to poorer soils might decrease production by 10% (purely a guess, but I do have a botany major). What drought might do on top of all that is a 30% fall for a total decrease in production in the range of 50% to 60%. Two big corne states, Illinois and Indiana, had corn production falls of 30% in the 2012 drought year:

clip_image004

The US could then feed 600 million vegetarians instead of the current 1.2 billion vegetarians. Food that we would want to eat will become expensive with wide price swings. That is what these two papers are saying about what the future holds for us.

David Archibald, a Visiting Fellow at the Institute of World Politics in Washington, D.C., is the author of Twilight of Abundance (Regnery, 2014).

References

  1. Asmerom, Y. et al., 2013, “Multidecadal to multi-century scale collapses of Northern Hemisphere monsoons over the past millennium” PNAS vol.110 no. 24 9651-9656
  2. Shanahan, T.M et al., 2009 “Atlantic Forcing of Persistent Drought in West Africa” Science, Vol. 324 no 5925 pp. 377-380
  3. Steinhilber, F. and Beer, J., 2013, “Prediction of solar activity for the next 500 years” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 118, 1-7
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

215 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 22, 2014 10:49 pm

…are you trying to put me [down] man?

May 22, 2014 11:03 pm

Leif,
That awkward moment when you referred to wikkipedia and it was about the “Kruger effect”.!

May 22, 2014 11:14 pm

Leif,
Having qualifications in psychology does not overrule the qualification of being a snail.

Carla
May 23, 2014 8:51 pm

Leif Svalgaard says:
May 22, 2014 at 1:31 pm
Sparks says:
May 22, 2014 at 1:12 pm
the correct sequence of events are that the Polar field reversal drives the differential rotation between the polar regions
..What drives what is something called the ‘plasma beta’ which is the ratio of gas pressure to magnetic pressure. If beta is greater than one, the gas moves the magnetic field around. If beta is less that one, the magnetic field drives the gas. In the photosphere and below, beta is larger than one so the differential rotation determines the magnetic field [not as you claim the other way around], see e.,g. http://www.vega00.com/2011/03/what-is-plasma-beta.html
——————————————————————————–
Thank you Dr. S.
The link mentions mid, upper and super corona..
So then, we need to know what kind of rotation might be present and low and behold the corona rotates and there is an asymmetry in the corona rotation. Now why wouldn’t I thought that before..
Now why would the asymmetry change sign in odd and even activity cycles?
How far out past 5 solar radii does the, is it super corona extend? In this present solar cycle period?
North–south asymmetry in the solar coronal rotation
Hari Om Vats1,* and
Satish Chandra2,*
7 MAR 2011
ABSTRACT
…The solar images at 17 GHz by the Nobeyama Radio Heliograph and in X-rays by the soft X-ray telescope (SXT) on board the Yohkoh satellite have been of particular interest for the estimation of solar coronal rotation using the flux modulation approach. These studies established that the solar corona rotates differentially. The radio images estimate an equatorial rotation period lower than those estimated by the X-ray images. The latitude profiles of the coronal rotation have temporal variability. It is very interesting that the space–time plots of sidereal rotation period clearly reveal north–south (NS) asymmetry. The asymmetry appears to change its sign in odd and even activity cycles of the Sun….
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01025.x/abstract

May 28, 2014 6:12 pm

I think the toroidal explanation for the solar dynamo is wrong, at solar maximum the polar field may take the shape of a toroid and obviously the physics of magnetic behavior in a toroid is the template for the for sunspot activity, The toroid explanation is flawed because it assumes that it is the currents and electrical activity that cause the suns polarity reversal even though currents and the electrical activity always have to travel in one direction being east to west on the sun (therefor the right hand rule applies and sunspots should always be moving away from the equator) they do not.
In my opinion it is the suns polar reversal that produces the toroidal shape during solar maximum and it is also the cause of the differential rotation between the poles and the equator, and therefor the cause of observable sunspot activity and magnetic behavior.
The Strength of sunspot activity is dependent on how quickly the north/south polar field interacts with itself at the equator, when the suns N/S Polarities are moving faster there is a more active interaction at solar maximum, greater sunspot number and a more pronounced semi-circular shape to the observed magnetic activity that even your work verifies, It also means weaker solar activity has a slower N/S Polarity reversal and it has a weaker interaction with itself at the equator and produce a less pronounced semi-circular shape to the observed magnetic activity.

May 28, 2014 10:03 pm

Sparks says:
May 28, 2014 at 6:12 pm
I think the toroidal explanation for the solar dynamo is wrong…
You may think so, but as we have discussed so [too?] many times, just about every statement you make is dead wrong, observationally and theoretically [physically].

May 28, 2014 11:41 pm

@sparks
to go back to the argument, which was that when it becomes cooler it also becomes drier:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/05/19/the-effect-of-gleissbergs-secular-smoothing/#comment-1646077
not that I find (again and again!) that there is a turning point, or deadend stop, if you please, at the sun around 2015 or 2016 indicating that some process comes to an end and another one starts up.

May 28, 2014 11:42 pm

for clarity (due to mtype error: note that I find (again and again!) that there is a turning point, or deadend stop, if you please, at the sun around 2015 or 2016 indicating that some process comes to an end and another one starts up.

May 29, 2014 1:09 am

HenryP says:
May 28, 2014 at 11:42 pm
This is what our solar system currently looks like:comment image
This what our sun currently looks like:comment image
This is what our solar system looked like in 1947:comment image
This what our sun looked like in 1947:comment image

May 29, 2014 1:22 am

lsvalgaard says:
May 28, 2014 at 10:03 pm
“Just about every statement you make is dead wrong, observationally and theoretically [physically].”
Really? 10+10=20
Your statement about me is falsified.

1 7 8 9