Holdren Is Wrong – Cold Winters Are Not Getting More Common

By Paul Homewood

As WUWT points out, John Holdren is one of many who have tried to link the cold winter in the USA this year to global warming.

In his White House video in January, he had this to say:

“A growing body of evidence suggests that the kind of extreme cold being experienced by much of the United States as we speak is a pattern that we can expect to see with increasing frequency as global warming continues….

We also know that this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer, on average, because of greenhouse-gas pollution.”

But is there any evidence that extreme cold winters are becoming more common, or, for that matter, more extreme?

First, let’s check the temperature trends for the CONUS in winter.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/

Clearly, on a national basis, recent winters have not been unusually cold. In the last 10 years, only three winters have been colder than the 1901-2000 mean. Moreover, no winters in recent years have come anywhere near to being as cold as some of the winters in the 1970’s, for instance, or earlier.

But this graph only tells half the story. As it covers the whole country, it could cover up regional extremes. As we know, this winter has seen particularly cold weather in Mid West and East, but warmer conditions out West. The result is that, to some extent, they cancel each other out.

So, is there a way we can isolate the warm from the cold, and see whether cold winters are becoming more extreme in just parts of the country?

There is actually a very simple method, and that is to use NOAA’s own Climate Extremes Index. This provides the percentage of the country which have had extreme temperatures (or precipitation, drought etc) during the year. As both above average and below average temperatures are shown separately, we can look at extreme cold weather on its own.

The graphs below cover the Winter months (Dec to Feb) only, with the first using mean monthly maximum temperatures, and the second minimums. The results seem pretty similar.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/graph/1/12-02

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/graph/2/12-02

It is abundantly clear that much less of the country has been affected by extreme cold this winter, and indeed other recent ones, when compared with the 20thC. There is also no trend towards cold winters becoming more common.

What is also interesting is that there does not seem to be much of a trend towards milder winters taking over. Only the winter of 2011/12 stands out in this respect, and there have been plenty of similar years previously.

There has been nothing unusual or unprecedented about this winter. And, as cold winters have become less frequent in the last couple of decades, there is absolutely no evidence to support Holdren’s claim that “this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer”.

Technical Stuff

NOAA give this definition for the (maximum temperature) index:

The U.S. CEI is the arithmetic average of the following five or six# indicators of the percentage of the conterminous U.S. area:

  1. The sum of (a) percentage of the United States with maximum temperatures much below normal and (b) percentage of the United States with maximum temperatures much above normal.

And their definition for “much above normal”:

In each case, we define much above (below) normal or extreme conditions as those falling in the upper (lower) tenth percentile of the local, period of record. In any given year, each of the five indicators has an expected value of 20%, in that 10% of all observed values should fall, in the long-term average, in each tenth percentile, and there are two such sets in each indicator

The Climate Extremes Index can be accessed at the link below. It covers temperatures, drought,  rainfall and hurricanes, and can used on a seasonal or annual basis. There is also a regional section.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/introduction

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
140 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 20, 2014 12:31 pm

ps
I feel sorry for all of you who have the snow on their front door
I hate cold feet, I remember that,

JBJ
April 20, 2014 12:44 pm

HenryP … I lived in Nunavut … cold was extreme but you get used to it. Just have to wear the right clothes 🙂

April 20, 2014 12:49 pm

@JBJ
what do you do, if like me, you have sweaty feet? when your feet are wet (due to any kind of action) …….
Anyway, I wanted to ask you, do you know/ remember if Canada was also affected by the great droughts 1932-1939?

JBJ
April 20, 2014 2:47 pm

Hi Henry … wet feet are definitely not good! There is an article here from the CBC on the dust bowl in Canada: http://www.cbc.ca/history/EPISCONTENTSE1EP13CH1PA2LE.html

April 20, 2014 11:46 pm

@JBJ
I am semi retired, I now run two charities from home
so it is easy for me
when I get too hot/sweaty
I jump in my pool.
Thanks for the link/
I expected this, anywhere inland, at greater than 40 latitudes
I am puzzled though as to why wheat prices tumbled during the drought? One would expect the opposite? Sounds like (US) government interference?

ren
April 21, 2014 1:15 am

HenryP herring winter in the south. It will be as interesting as the north. We can do it together.
http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/70hPa/orthographic=26.90,-71.92,365
Click Earth.

April 21, 2014 3:42 am

@ren
I still had a swim here yesterday (solar heated pool) and maybe today as well. But that will be the end of the season. The nights are getting much cooler now.
Do I understand from the presentation that we (in South Africa) must look out for the “hole” that will bring the cold?

ren
April 21, 2014 4:13 am

HenryP now creates a pattern in the south polar vortex. Please note the inhibition of Australia.
http://oi58.tinypic.com/zxk8wh.jpg
http://oi61.tinypic.com/25jxt2t.jpgRTH
This weakens the vortex and brings about blockade in the lower levels. Check on Earth.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/blocking/real_time_sh/500gz_anomalies_sh.gif

April 21, 2014 9:12 am

I don’t want to frighten you guys, but I did a general check, adding the results of 2012 and 2013 to a few of my sampled stations
It looks like the cooling rate from 2000 has almost doubled (just adding those two years)
……
I am stunned/
I don’t know where we will end up
I hope my planets arrive in time?

ren
April 21, 2014 11:54 am

This is yet another article which acknowledges that the weak polar vortex has nothing to do with global warming.
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/stuostro/comment.html?entrynum=30

venril
April 22, 2014 10:51 am

There has always been Global Warm— err, Cooling, in East-Asia… To say otherwise would be thoughtcrime.

1 4 5 6