Holdren Is Wrong – Cold Winters Are Not Getting More Common

By Paul Homewood

As WUWT points out, John Holdren is one of many who have tried to link the cold winter in the USA this year to global warming.

In his White House video in January, he had this to say:

“A growing body of evidence suggests that the kind of extreme cold being experienced by much of the United States as we speak is a pattern that we can expect to see with increasing frequency as global warming continues….

We also know that this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer, on average, because of greenhouse-gas pollution.”

But is there any evidence that extreme cold winters are becoming more common, or, for that matter, more extreme?

First, let’s check the temperature trends for the CONUS in winter.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/

Clearly, on a national basis, recent winters have not been unusually cold. In the last 10 years, only three winters have been colder than the 1901-2000 mean. Moreover, no winters in recent years have come anywhere near to being as cold as some of the winters in the 1970’s, for instance, or earlier.

But this graph only tells half the story. As it covers the whole country, it could cover up regional extremes. As we know, this winter has seen particularly cold weather in Mid West and East, but warmer conditions out West. The result is that, to some extent, they cancel each other out.

So, is there a way we can isolate the warm from the cold, and see whether cold winters are becoming more extreme in just parts of the country?

There is actually a very simple method, and that is to use NOAA’s own Climate Extremes Index. This provides the percentage of the country which have had extreme temperatures (or precipitation, drought etc) during the year. As both above average and below average temperatures are shown separately, we can look at extreme cold weather on its own.

The graphs below cover the Winter months (Dec to Feb) only, with the first using mean monthly maximum temperatures, and the second minimums. The results seem pretty similar.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/graph/1/12-02

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/graph/2/12-02

It is abundantly clear that much less of the country has been affected by extreme cold this winter, and indeed other recent ones, when compared with the 20thC. There is also no trend towards cold winters becoming more common.

What is also interesting is that there does not seem to be much of a trend towards milder winters taking over. Only the winter of 2011/12 stands out in this respect, and there have been plenty of similar years previously.

There has been nothing unusual or unprecedented about this winter. And, as cold winters have become less frequent in the last couple of decades, there is absolutely no evidence to support Holdren’s claim that “this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer”.

Technical Stuff

NOAA give this definition for the (maximum temperature) index:

The U.S. CEI is the arithmetic average of the following five or six# indicators of the percentage of the conterminous U.S. area:

  1. The sum of (a) percentage of the United States with maximum temperatures much below normal and (b) percentage of the United States with maximum temperatures much above normal.

And their definition for “much above normal”:

In each case, we define much above (below) normal or extreme conditions as those falling in the upper (lower) tenth percentile of the local, period of record. In any given year, each of the five indicators has an expected value of 20%, in that 10% of all observed values should fall, in the long-term average, in each tenth percentile, and there are two such sets in each indicator

The Climate Extremes Index can be accessed at the link below. It covers temperatures, drought,  rainfall and hurricanes, and can used on a seasonal or annual basis. There is also a regional section.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/introduction

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
140 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 18, 2014 10:53 am

Over a year ago, I saw a program on NGC that suggested AGW could cause another ice age. I guess cold winters would be much more common with glaciation.

April 18, 2014 10:53 am

Wait a gosh darn second. I thought that weather was not climate? Now Holdren is saying that it is? And that cold weather is proof of a warm climate?
And these buffoons wonder why there are so many millions of “skeptics?”

JJ
April 18, 2014 11:00 am

“A growing body of evidence suggests that the kind of extreme cold being experienced by much of the United States as we speak is a pattern that we can expect to see with increasing frequency as global warming continues….”

The only response necessary or appropriate to this is to point and laugh.
They have reached the point of self-parody, and don’t know it. Demonstrate that we do, and walk away, face in palm.

Brian R
April 18, 2014 11:00 am

So is it a Warmer Colder or a Colder Warmer that we’re going to get with AGW? I can’t keep it straight.
/sarc

Janice Moore
April 18, 2014 11:05 am

More excellent work, Mr. Homewood — thank you for sharing it with us.
And furthermore…
“… is there any evidence that extreme cold winters {are “because of greenhouse-gas pollution”}… ?”
Answer: No. There is no evidence AT ALL that “greenhouse gas pollution” causes ANY significant changes in the climate zones of the earth. Not one scintilla.
Note to any new readers:
95% of the “greenhouse” gases is…. WATER vapor.
(See: 1) http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html;
2) http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/07/climate-change-is-dominated-by-the-water-cycle-not-carbon-dioxide/)

Harry Passfield
April 18, 2014 11:11 am

Holdren?? One of the guys who thought cold Winters were a sign of global cooling way back….?

andy123
April 18, 2014 11:12 am

I really think that we need a more robust response to Dr. Holdren and his ilk. There is an unused tool, a petition to the White House on their website that could be used, if the petition reaches several thousand signatures collected on the website the White House is required to respond!…what I am thinking is that there could be a petition to the White House that Dr. Holdren’s comments on the linkage between climate change and extreme weather, etc be struck from the record since the science behind them is extremely weak. I suspect that we could get more than ten thousand signatures…that would perhaps create a “wave”

Janice Moore
April 18, 2014 11:17 am

John Holdren…
This message is for YOU — LOL!

Get help. It’s not too late. But, soon, very soon, it will be… .
Bwah, ha, ha, ha, haaaaaaaaa!
What a joke is RIGHT, J.J.!
#(:))

pokerguy
April 18, 2014 11:23 am

There was a time when I believed that people in highly positions….at least in a democracy….could not just make things up without paying a price. Now the scales have fallen from my eyes. You can say anything you want for the most part and get away with it. Holdren has been making ridiculous claims without being exposed as a serial liar in the MSM for a long time. Ditto Obama. I don’t think it was more than a year ago when the President of the U.S. simply made up his own facts about global warming by asserting that the globe was heating up even faster than the experts had predicted….which of course is utterly false. In fact there’s arguably been no warming at all for over 17 years.
Deeply, deeply depressing.

Hmmm
April 18, 2014 11:23 am

Oh he wasn’t saying he had any actual observed evidence, Holdren was relying completely on modeled “evidence” and the existence of a theory. Take a crappy theory, make a crappy model which matches the theory, and call the results tested evidence. That, in a nushell, is global warming science today.

Hmmm
April 18, 2014 11:25 am

I forgot to add the crucial step of ignoring reality, which is a very important part of global warming science.

Magma
April 18, 2014 11:39 am

Holdren says “cold spells”. Homewood shows Dec-Feb averages.
There is a difference.

wws
April 18, 2014 11:40 am

Pokerguy – your statement is ALMOST accurate – to be true, (and let me add, all of the available evidence supports this) your analysis should read:
“You can say anything you want for the most part and get away with it; IF YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT OR A LEFTIST.”: (but I repeat myself)
If, on the other hand, you speak the truth, but you speak a truth that contradicts currently popular left wing orthodoxy, you will be publicly crucified, and very quickly, too.

Janice Moore
April 18, 2014 11:43 am

Singin’ a different tune in 2009…
“among the effects of “unequivocal” warming, concludes the report by the U.S. Global Change Research Program. Winters are now shorter and warmer than they were 30 years ago, … {says} the report, released yesterday in Washington by White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director John Holdren… .”
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/06/17/17climatewire-us-study-projects-how-unequivocal-warming-wi-29186.html
What a clown.

April 18, 2014 11:43 am

When you have nothing to speak of in the way of accomplishments, you surround yourself with people that have even less. Holdren fit that bill. I doubt he could get the question “Are you awake?” correct.

JeffC
April 18, 2014 11:44 am

“this week’s cold spell is of a type there’s reason to believe may become more frequent in a world that’s getting warmer”
so its colder because its warmer …. riiiiight …

dorsai123
April 18, 2014 11:44 am

wait … MAYBE its getting warmer BECAUSE its getting colder …

Richard Day
April 18, 2014 11:48 am

So extreme cold is the result of global warming?
Is there ANYTHING global warming can’t do??????

MattN
April 18, 2014 11:52 am

It has gotten to the point that I really question the intelligence of anyone that can listen to this line of reasoning and believe it.

Janice Moore
April 18, 2014 11:55 am

Hey! Just found a little Envirostalinist Employee Training video of Holdren (with trainer) being battle hardened:
Daffy Holdren learning HOW TO SAY ANYTHING under fire
and not bat an eyelash:

April 18, 2014 11:55 am

Interesting to note that the CONUS Dec/Feb temp chart is almost a duplicate for the global temp chart. Has the main change that has been felt as warming been mainly due to warmer winters?

Jimbo
April 18, 2014 11:57 am

I remember back in the day when we were promised warmer winters due to global warming. Now Holdren says expect colder too. What if we get average winters? Will that have been also caused by global warming? If yes then it is not science but witchcraft voodoo Climastrology.

herkimer
April 18, 2014 11:58 am

Winters in Contiguous US have been getting cooler for 17 winters or since 1998 , but certainly not for the reasons that Holdren states. This recent decline in US winter temperatures is similar to the cooler US winter cycles of 1895-1920 and again 1954-1979 and is due to ocean cycles. They have nothing to do with global warming or greenhouse gases. It is amazing what nonsense science comes from a man who is the President’s science adviser. Here is the record from NCDC/NOAA Climate at a Glance web page . This is alos happening for the Northern Hemisphere and the Globe taken as a whole
CONTIGUOUS US WINTER temperatures have been declining at (-1.78 F/DECADE) since 1998 and each month has been declining at
DEC -1.21 F/decade (declining)
JAN -1.52 F (declining)
FEB -2.77 F (declining)

inMAGICn
April 18, 2014 12:00 pm

MattN:
“…reasoning…”?

1 2 3 6