John Holdren, President Obama’s Science Advisor, once tried to reframe the climate debate in terms of his prediction of “global climate disruption”. Holdren stated at the time, that the term “global warming” is “a dangerous misnomer”.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/16/the-morphology-of-global-warming/
The question – does John Holdren believe that “global climate disruption” might actually lead to global cooling? Is this why Holdren is unhappy with the term “global warming”? Is this the advice Holdren is giving to President Obama?
Because there is some very circumstantial evidence that America, and other governments, may already be planning ahead, for the possibility that the world will cool.
Over the last few years, a number of major Australian newspapers have posted stories about the rising issue of large scale foreign buyouts of Australian farmland.
For example:-
The big question is – why? Why would opaque Chinese and American companies, some of are believed to be government backed, be so interested in large scale ownership of Australian farmland, land which the IPCC and Australian CSIRO predict will shortly become worthless desert?
The reason of course is the land will not shortly become worthless. The land may shortly become very valuable indeed.
Back in 2006, the Russian Academy of Science predicted imminent severe global cooling, beginning in 2012-2015, peaking at around 2055.
http://en.ria.ru/russia/20060825/53143686.html
Their prediction is based on the historic correlation between solar cycles and global climate.
Humans have been aware of the 11 year climate cycle since the dawn of history – several good years followed by several bad years is a fact of life. But there are also other, longer, more powerful cycles, which have an even larger impact on global climate.
One of them is the 200 year cycle. Every 200 years or so, solar activity falls to a sustained low. These long periods of low activity, known by the names of the scientists who discovered them – Maunder, Dalton, etc. – coincided historically with periods of extreme cold – plummeting global temperatures, crashing food production, and drastically shorter and less reliable growing seasons in the Northern Hemisphere.
At the peak of the cold periods, history records widespread famines and other disasters, such as the Year Without a Summer in 1816, a food production catastrophe triggered by low solar activity during the Dalton Minimum, combining with an unusually severe series of major volcanic eruptions. In the Year without a Summer, over vast areas, crops in the Northern hemisphere were destroyed by snow and frost in mid Summer, which created global famine and social unrest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer
If the Russian Academy of Science is correct, the world is on the brink of a new cold period, which will start to bite in the next few years.
We could even see another year without a summer – there are several large volcanoes which are overdue for major eruptions, such as Katla in Iceland and Merapi in Indonesia. When they erupt, they shall add to downward pressure on global temperatures.
Given the risk, what could a nation whose grain belt is vulnerable to global cooling do, to protect its future food supply?
The obviously solution is to buy up farmland in another country.
A country which is warm enough, so that even if global temperatures fall significantly, the land they purchased would remain highly productive. A country with a strong tradition of respect for the rule of law. A country which would continue to respect the rule of law, even in the face of a global catastrophe.
A country like Australia.
===============================================================
Note: They key word in the title is “very speculative”, but I thought it was an interesting question. It may also simply be part of China’s economic expansion, which we have also witnessed in the USA with them buying up properties. – Anthony

Sparks says:
April 7, 2014 at 7:49 pm
this of course coincides with cooler periods
Yeah, “the science is settled” is what you claim.
Don’t get me started on earths orbital timing and orientation within our solar system.
Well, that is the only real thing and does control climate as Milankovich showed.
Leif,
You can debate science to your hearts content, right or less right the science is settled! apparently 🙂
Leif,
Have you found anything positive to argue about lately?
Sparks says:
April 7, 2014 at 8:49 pm
You can debate science to your hearts content, right or less right the science is settled! apparently 🙂
I tend to distrust people who claim the science is settled…
Sparks says:
April 7, 2014 at 9:07 pm
Have you found anything positive to argue about lately?
Say something that makes sense and I can try.
lsvalgaard says:
April 7, 2014 at 9:11 pm
“I tend to distrust people who claim the science is settled…
Interesting! it doesn’t prevent you from claiming that other good people are.
“Say something that makes sense and I can try.”
Is solar cycle activity binary? where maximum activity has a positive effect.
Sherry Moore says:
April 7, 2014 at 7:30 am
Sorry, but I can’t tell if you’re making fun of whacky conspiracy theories or promulgating them.
Surely you must know that the Bushs’ buying land on gas or water rich land in Paraguay is a hoax perpetrated by Cuba’s La Prensa, & that more than half of Paraguay lies in tropical, not temperate, latitudes.
Sparks says:
April 7, 2014 at 9:29 pm
“I tend to distrust people who claim the science is settled…”
Interesting! it doesn’t prevent you from claiming that other good people are.”
What other good people? and what are they?
“Say something that makes sense and I can try.”
Is solar cycle activity binary? where maximum activity has a positive effect.
Still doesn’t ,make enough sense to comment on…
Leif,
The question remains.
“Is solar cycle activity binary? where maximum activity has a positive effect.”
Sparks says:
April 7, 2014 at 10:32 pm
The question remains.
It is still meaningless.
Leif,
Answer the question!
lsvalgaard
the future belongs to the Sun, and winter in the south it will show.
Sparks says:
April 7, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Answer the question!
A meaningless question deserves a meaningless answer: “ferqwfdfh ssdfsdf gfdgdfgdll”
lsvalgaard says:
April 7, 2014 at 11:50 pm
A meaningless question deserves a meaningless answer: “ferqwfdfh ssdfsdf gfdgdfgdll”
It’s a question that you replied with some insult, and I quote “ferqwfdfh ssdfsdf gfdgdfgdll”
Just answer the question..
Sparks says:
April 8, 2014 at 12:16 am
Just answer the question..
It does not matter how many times you repeat that question. It is still meaningless. A standard answer to meaningless, silly questions might be NO. But in all fairness, if you want a good answer, ask a good question. Perhaps you think your question is good, but let me be the judge of my understanding of it [or rather lack thereof]. If you can’t formulate an understandable question, perhaps you should just slink away.
lsvalgaard says:
April 8, 2014 at 12:42 am
Answer an honest question and spare us all the nonsense!
Sparks says:
April 8, 2014 at 12:49 am
Answer an honest question and spare us all the nonsense!
As I said, the question is meaningless. And a simple answer to nonsense is NO.
lsvalgaard:
pearls before swine, and whatnot.
why bother?….
I mean really, like solar activity could EVER be characterized as a binary function?
why let yourself get drawn in to it?
you have to wonder “does this guy even know what binary means?”
geez.
its just such a waste of your time, and knowledge.
davideisenstadt says:
April 8, 2014 at 7:02 am
“like solar activity could EVER be characterized as a binary function?”
In context Leif wont admit that activity during solar maximum has a positive influence on earths climate, and therefore no activity during solar minimum would have a negative influence.
Do understand my binary reference now? 🙂
Sparks says:
April 8, 2014 at 10:48 am
In context Leif wont admit that activity during solar maximum has a positive influence on earths climate, and therefore no activity during solar minimum would have a negative influence.
You are still being meaningless. The Sun always has a positive influence on Earth’s climate, large during solar maximum and small during solar minimum, but always positive. Now some people are silly enough to believe that low solar activity means cooling. It is at least good to see that you are not among those.
You and sparks are both useless. Birds of the same feathers. Blood brothers perhaps.
HenryP says:
April 9, 2014 at 1:21 pm
I wouldn’t call Leif useless, his forecast for solar cycle 24 has been one of the most accurate, I believe he is acting with some professional misdirection 🙂