HATE WEEK on the Climate Certainty Channel™

Anthony
It’s always a mistake to mention any reference to Nazi Germany, because there are not a few fruitloops on here who appear to spend their waking hours linking everything they don’t like to the Nazis.
It’s bad enough that people like you are defamed for whether they believe that climate change is a scientific truth that may not be questioned, let alone tested, on pain of losing their immortal soul.
The most painful part for me is that the closer one is to actual examination of the real Nazi Holocaust, the more tasteless and abhorrent are the comparisons on either side of this wretched “debate”.
Enough is enough.

This is the UN’s own language from 1995: “multilevel modeling also provides a basis for time effective management and credible policy development in complex situations.” They are paraphrasing Marx and then Kurt Lewin: the purpose of a model is not to reflect physical reality, but to change it. The model creates the hype that results in political power to change society.
The FuturICT project Alex Pentland from MIT is involved in also acknowledges that the models exist to gain policy making power and force collective decision making.

I was a bit curious about Dr. Rowan Williams so I looked him up in Wikipedia and promptly discovered that his real name is:
‘Rowan Douglas Williams, Baron Williams of Oystermouth’
How did our former Archbishop travel the long path from the title of Archbishop, to Doctor, to Baron, and finally to Oystermouth? Again, according to Wikipedia:
‘…his new peerage was created on 8 January and gazetted on 11 January 2013 as “Baron Williams of Oystermouth”.’
Now, I promise, I promise, I promise I will not make any more fun of the title, Oystermouth, than is absolutely necessary. Indeed Dr. Williams, who certainly feels himself a cut above the rest of us (he must if he tolerates the title, Oystermouth), provides plenty of opportunities for a giggle or two through the knee slapping contradictions of his views. Let us start with his views on Social Issues. In Wikipedia his views start off with a smiling photo of him with this caption:
‘Williams speaking at the 2010 World Economic Forum in Davos.’
Now, I tend to doubt that Doctor (Why on Earth does he have that title as well?) Williams got to Davos on the wings of god. More likely he got there in an aluminum tube burning fossil fuels. In fact the man travels quite a bit. And certainly not on the back of a donkey. Heck, a donkey probably wouldn’t be appropriate for a really upscale ski resort such as Davos, Switzerland is. Nice travel opportunities, eh? But let us continue:
‘His interest in and involvement with social issues is longstanding. While Chaplain of Clare College, Cambridge, Williams took part in anti-nuclear demonstrations at United States bases.’
I wonder if he’s currently taking part in any anti-nuclear protests in say, Iran? Or, how about Pakistan, which is ramping up nuke production to possibly sell to Saudi Arabia? Or, Egypt? Perhaps because most people don’t seriously fear the US actually using one of these devices (only time was in the heat of a major world war 70 years ago) is the reason our brave Dr. Williams didn’t fear protesting them in the US. Or, maybe it’s because donkey rental rates are cheaper in the US? Let us continue.
‘He was in New York at the time of 11 September 2001 attacks, only yards from Ground Zero delivering a lecture; he subsequently wrote a short book, ‘Writing in the Dust’, offering reflections on the event. In reference to Al Qaeda, he claimed that terrorists “can have serious moral goals”‘
Ok, got that? The sheer vile sanctimoniousness of a supposed scholar reflecting on the moral provenance of such an act is probably sufficient grounds not to take anything seriously on any other subject. Ah, what the heck, let’s continue.
‘Williams has argued that the partial adoption of Islamic sharia law in the United Kingdom is “unavoidable” as a method of arbitration in such affairs as marriage, and should not be resisted.’
Ok, I didn’t delve enough into his background enough to know, but does Dr. Williams have a wife for crying out loud. Whaddaya think she has to say about marriage and sharia law? Of course it also appears this supporter of sharia law also supports gay rights. Wikipedia’s a little unclear about Dr. Williams’ viewpoint but apparently he supported the ‘Anglican Covenant’ which involved the consecration of homosexual bishops. Now, I happen to support gay rights, but I don’t happen to support sharia law: a feature of my opinions I find at least to be consistent. Maybe, just maybe, we can consider Dr. Williams consistent: consistent in his inconsistencies.
Before anybody, anywhere chooses to put any stock into what that man says about Western Society, consumerism, or global warming perhaps they should politely request that he travel to Iran, or Pakistan, to protest their possession, or upcoming possession of nuclear weapons, and also on behalf of gay rights. And until he does so, which he won’t, under no circumstances should we even remotely consider allowing him even a tiny possibility of getting his hands on the levers of the way we live.

The perpetrators of the Oxygen Catastrophe still go unpunished for this horrific crime.

Thanks, A. and Dr. Pielke Jr. and others that find the courage to speak their minds.
Please keep up the good work.
It has been some time since the cult was global cooling, now it’s climate change because global warming was stalled.
There was an all-powerful king that never failed to order the Sun to rise every morning and set every day [from Antoine de Saint Exupéry].
And yes, every time the IPCC has a report, the climate sensitivity could be smaller and the uncertainty larger.
And the scam wants to go on even though their models fail. But the climate has been changing since there was an Earth planet, no amount of penitence will stop it, no indulgences.

Lest we forget:
These people have blood on their hands.
“We have laws on the books to punish anyone whose lies contribute to people’s deaths.”
Tell it to Friday Mukamperezida, who was burnt alive so they could plant trees to “protect the environment and help fight global warming.”
WUWT coverage: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/25/they-had-to-burn-the-village-to-save-it-from-global-warming/
NYT coverage: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/22/world/africa/in-scramble-for-land-oxfam-says-ugandans-were-pushed-out.html?_r=5&scp=3&sq=uganda&st=cse&
Climate Justice? what about Justice for Friday Mukamperezida?

Not climate related directly however related to the same progressives that have caused the death of millions of Africans by getting DDT banned.

It does not surprise me that the totalitarian Climate Deceivers think Orwell’s ‘1984’ is actually a manual on ‘how to achieve your dreams …’ and actually a desirable outcome, especially as they see ‘Animal Farm’ as Phase 2 to be achieved through the delivery of Agenda-21 and world government via the superior beings selected by the UN.
I suggest that everyone reading this blog read about ‘Hate Week’ in 1984.

During his tenure Archbishop Rowan Williams did such a poor job defending his God and defending his Church that we should welcome him defending AGW.

Can someone feed them more rope?

The problem with the CAGW movement is advocating radical economic and social regulation. “The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity,” warns Czech President Vaclav Klaus, “is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious, arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism.”
The socialist intellectual elite has been handed the ultimate salvation: environmentalism.
They, the socialists, are preparing the supporting canonical legislation that will tell you how much you can travel, what kind of light you will read by, and at what temperature you may set your bedroom thermostat. The British parliamentary committee proposed that every citizen be required to carry a carbon card that must be presented, under penalty of law, when buying gasoline, taking an airplane or using electricity. The card contains your yearly carbon ration to be drawn down with every purchase, every trip, every swipe.
There is great social power in the power to ration. Along with food (10,000,000 Ukrainians that Stalin starved), there is no greater instrument of social control than rationing energy. Just ask those 31,000 souls who perished in Great Britain who had to make a choice between high priced energy or food.