Sun's energy output may have led to marked natural climate change in Europe over the last 1000 years

From Cardiff University

Sun’s energy influences 1,000 years of natural climate variability in North Atlantic

Changes in the sun’s energy output may have led to marked natural climate change in Europe over the last 1000 years, according to researchers at Cardiff University.

Scientists studied seafloor sediments to determine how the temperature of the North Atlantic and its localised atmospheric circulation had altered. Warm surface waters flowing across the North Atlantic, an extension of the Gulf Stream, and warm westerly winds are responsible for the relatively mild climate of Europe, especially in winter. Slight changes in the transport of heat associated with these systems can led to regional climate variability, and the study findings matched historic accounts of climate change, including the notoriously severe winters of the 16th and 18th centuries which pre-date global industrialisation.

The study found that changes in the Sun’s activity can have a considerable impact on the ocean-atmospheric dynamics in the North Atlantic, with potential effects on regional climate.

Predictions suggest a prolonged period of low sun activity over the next few decades, but any associated natural temperature changes will be much smaller than those created by human carbon dioxide emissions, say researchers.

The study, led by Cardiff University scientists, in collaboration with colleagues at the University of Bern, is published today in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Dr Paola Moffa-Sanchez, lead author from Cardiff University School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, explained: “We used seafloor sediments taken from south of Iceland to study changes in the warm surface ocean current. This was done by analysing the chemical composition of fossilised microorganisms that had once lived in the surface of the ocean. These measurements were then used to reconstruct the seawater temperature and the salinity of this key ocean current over the past 1000 years.”

The results of these analyses revealed large and abrupt temperature and salinity changes in the north-flowing warm current on time-scales of several decades to centuries. Cold ocean conditions were found to match periods of low solar energy output, corresponding to intervals of low sunspot activity observed on the surface of the sun. Using a physics-based climate model, the authors were able to test the response of the ocean to changes in the solar output and found similar results to the data.

“By using the climate model it was also possible to explore how the changes in solar output affected the surface circulation of the Atlantic Ocean,” said Prof Ian Hall, a co-author of the study. “The circulation of the surface of the Atlantic Ocean is typically tightly linked to changes in the wind patterns. Analysis of the atmosphere component in the climate model revealed that during periods of solar minima there was a high-pressure system located west of the British Isles. This feature is often referred to as atmospheric blocking, and it is called this because it blocks the warm westerly winds diverting them and allowing cold Arctic air to flow south bringing harsh winters to Europe, such as those recently experienced in 2010 and 2013.”

Meteorological studies have previously found similar effects of solar variability on the strength and duration of atmospheric winter blockings over the last 50 years, and although the exact nature of this relationship is not yet clear, it is thought to be due to complex processes happening in the upper layers of the atmosphere known as the stratosphere.

Dr Paola Moffa-Sanchez added: “In this study we show that this relationship is also at play on longer time-scales and the large ocean changes, recorded in the microfossils, may have helped sustain this atmospheric pattern. Indeed we propose that this combined ocean-atmospheric response to solar output minima may help explain the notoriously severe winters experienced across Europe between the 16th and 18th centuries, so vividly depicted in many paintings, including those of the famous London Frost Fairs on the River Thames, but also leading to extensive crop failures and famine as corroborated in the record of wheat prices during these periods.”

The study concludes that although the temperature changes expected from future solar activity are much smaller than the warming from human carbon dioxide emissions, regional climate variability associated with the effects of solar output on the ocean and atmosphere should be taken into account when making future climate projections.

###

Notes for Editors:

Funding for this research has come from the Natural Environment Research Council, UK, the National Science Foundation, Switzerland, the European Commission and NCAR’s Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (CISL). This research forms part of the Climate Change Consortium of Wales (C3W; http://c3wales.org/).

==================================================================

The paper:

Solar forcing of North Atlantic surface temperature and salinity over the past millennium

Paola Moffa-Sánchez, Andreas Born, Ian R. Hall, David J. R. Thornalley & Stephen Barker

Nature Geoscience (2014) doi:10.1038/ngeo2094

Abstract:

There were several centennial-scale fluctuations in the climate and oceanography of the North Atlantic region over the past 1,000 years, including a period of relative cooling from about AD 1450 to 1850 known as the Little Ice Age1. These variations may be linked to changes in solar irradiance, amplified through feedbacks including the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation2. Changes in the return limb of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation are reflected in water properties at the base of the mixed layer south of Iceland. Here we reconstruct thermocline temperature and salinity in this region from AD 818 to 1780 using paired δ18O and Mg/Ca ratio measurements of foraminifer shells from a subdecadally resolved marine sediment core. The reconstructed centennial-scale variations in hydrography correlate with variability in total solar irradiance. We find a similar correlation in a simulation of climate over the past 1,000 years. We infer that the hydrographic changes probably reflect variability in the strength of the subpolar gyre associated with changes in atmospheric circulation. Specifically, in the simulation, low solar irradiance promotes the development of frequent and persistent atmospheric blocking events, in which a quasi-stationary high-pressure system in the eastern North Atlantic modifies the flow of the westerly winds. We conclude that this process could have contributed to the consecutive cold winters documented in Europe during the Little Ice Age.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
213 Comments
March 13, 2014 10:51 pm

Sparks says:
March 13, 2014 at 10:48 pm
Janice, Lief did, he even provided a “pertinent link”.
The link does not contain the word ‘orbit’, so stop the nonsense.

Janice Moore
March 13, 2014 10:58 pm

Hi, Sparks!
LOL, Dr. Svalgaard (we’re not on a first name basis as you two are) provided a link to support what he said. Not to support what you imagine he said.
You appear unable to receive any transmissions from “Janice said” or “Leif Svalgaard said.” Try asking “Carla said” to explain to you the difference between “orbit” and “rotation (of the earth)”.
Hm are YOU just pretending to not understand just to be FUNNY? Sorry, Sparks. Nice try, but, well, it’s just kind of annoying.
DID YOU RECEIVE THIS TRANSMISSION?
PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE WITH THREE SHORT BLASTS ON THE WHISTLE.
(chuckling)
Janice

March 13, 2014 11:00 pm

What is the length of day on earth governed by?

Janice Moore
March 13, 2014 11:00 pm

Oh, please, oh, please, oh, please, let Carla appear and start to explain everything to Sparks. Christmas in March.

March 13, 2014 11:08 pm

It’s an open question, What is the length of day on earth governed by?

Janice Moore
March 13, 2014 11:10 pm

In the off chance that you receive THIS transmission, dear Sparks:
The answer to your question at 11pm today is:
“Love Makes the World Go ‘Round” — Deon Jackson
(on the CARLA, lol, label — on video at 0:06)

March 13, 2014 11:14 pm

Sparks says:
March 13, 2014 at 11:08 pm
It’s an open question, What is the length of day on earth governed by?
Read the link, then explain in your own words what you have understood.

March 13, 2014 11:20 pm

Janice,
I’m with you on that idea that “Love Makes the World Go ‘Round”.

Janice Moore
March 13, 2014 11:29 pm

Oh, hooray, Sparks! Good note to end on.
Good night.

March 13, 2014 11:31 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 13, 2014 at 11:14 pm
Read the link, then explain in your own words what you have understood.
(I promise to read the link)
The question I would like you to reply to is, as follows!
What is the length of day on earth governed by?

March 13, 2014 11:37 pm

Good night Janice, 🙂

goldminor
March 14, 2014 9:27 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 13, 2014 at 11:14 pm
———————————————
OT…but would be interested in how you would view the step decline in Oulu over the last 23 days. There are 4 steps in that period, with most of the steps being a full % point.

March 14, 2014 9:35 pm

goldminor says:
March 14, 2014 at 9:27 pm
OT…but would be interested in how you would view the step decline in Oulu over the last 23 days
The steps are real, c.f. other stations http://www.leif.org/research/Neutron-Monitors-Real-Time.htm
and are due to four CMEs ejected from the rather active Sun during that time.

goldminor
March 14, 2014 10:31 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 14, 2014 at 9:35 pm
—————————————–
Thank you, and for the link also.

March 17, 2014 7:49 pm

Leif,
As Promised I’ve read the wiki link you have provided, which claims “These tiny fluctuations have periods which range from a few weeks to a few years. They are attributed to interactions between the dynamic atmosphere and the Earth”
I still disagree. Weather variability does not cause “These tiny fluctuations”. Earths atmosphere interacting with earths core is pure BS, It’s Absurd waffle.

March 17, 2014 7:58 pm

Sparks says:
March 17, 2014 at 7:49 pm
Earths atmosphere interacting with earths core is pure BS, It’s Absurd waffle.
That is not what the link said. The LOD is influenced by the atmosphere AND by [unrelated] movements in the core.

March 17, 2014 8:34 pm

lsvalgaard says:
March 17, 2014 at 7:58 pm
lsvalgaard says:
March 17, 2014 at 7:58 pm
That is not what the link said. The LOD is influenced by the atmosphere AND by [unrelated] movements in the core.
Earths Atmosphere does not effect our planets core in any way, nor does weather effect the length of day in relation to the earths core.

March 17, 2014 8:36 pm

Sparks says:
March 17, 2014 at 8:34 pm
Earths Atmosphere does not effect our planets core in any way, nor does weather effect the length of day in relation to the earths core.
To repeat:
1) the atmosphere influences LOD
2) core movements influence LOD
1) and 2) are unrelated.

March 17, 2014 8:52 pm

Lief,
Earth itself has no influence on its own LOD.
REPLY: BZZZT! Sorry, your statement is incorrect. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/11/length-of-day-governed-by-earths-core-processes/
Also, please learn to spell Dr. Svalgaard’s first name correctly – Anthony

March 17, 2014 9:48 pm

Sorry Leif, happy Anthony? 🙂

March 17, 2014 10:09 pm

I don’t believe I have ever called Leif- Lief!

March 17, 2014 10:34 pm

LOD is not determined by weather. Which is my original point.

March 17, 2014 10:36 pm

To be honest earths core processes do not change earths weather either!

March 17, 2014 10:38 pm

Sparks says:
March 17, 2014 at 10:09 pm
I don’t believe I have ever called Leif- Lief!
Sparks says:
March 17, 2014 at 8:52 pm
Lief,
———–
Sparks says:
March 17, 2014 at 10:34 pm
LOD is not determined by weather. Which is my original point.
It is influenced by, not caused by. Weather redistributes the mass of the air, thus changes the moment of inertia of the Earth. Since the angular momentum does not change, LOD must. End of story.

March 17, 2014 10:40 pm

Sparks says:
March 17, 2014 at 10:36 pm
To be honest earths core processes do not change earths weather either!
But changes the moment of inertia. Since the angular moment is constant, the LOD must change [and does].