The Great Freeze Over The Great Lakes

This image shows the Great Lakes on February 19, 2014, when ice covered 80.3 percent of the lakes.
This image, acquired by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite, shows the Great Lakes on February 19, 2014, when ice covered 80.3 percent of the lakes. Image Credit: Jeff Schmaltz, LANCE/EOSDIS MODIS Rapid Response Team, NASA

At night, as cold settles in, lake ice creaks and groans. It’s been excessively cold, and I camped exposed on the snow-swept surface. Other than the lack of vegetation and the sounds at night, you’d never know you were on a lake. It feels like an empty plain. In some places, you see pressure ridges where ice has pushed into itself, sticking up like clear blue stegosaurus plates.  — Craig Childs

Author Craig Childs is not describing an Arctic lake. He’s describing the bitterly cold and frozen scene on Lake Superior, during his February 2014 trek on the ice near the coast of Ashland, Wisconsin.

Zoom out to view the scene from a satellite perspective and it’s apparent that Lake Superior is not the only lake to feel the freeze. The true-color image above, from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite, shows the mostly frozen state of the Great Lakes on Feb. 19. On that date, ice spanned 80.3 percent of the lakes, according to NOAA’s Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory in Ann Arbor, Mich.  

The ice reached an even greater extent on Feb. 13, when it covered about 88 percent of the Great Lakes – coverage not achieved since 1994, when ice spanned over 90 percent. In addition to this year, ice has covered more than 80 percent of the lakes in only five other years since 1973. The average annual maximum ice extent in that time period is just over 50 percent. The smallest maximum ice cover occurred in 2002, when only 9.5 percent of the lakes froze over.

Scientists say it’s understandable that the Great Lakes have had so much ice this year considering the cold temperatures in the region that persisted through the winter. Cold air temperatures remove heat from the water until it reaches the freezing point, at which point ice begins to form on the surface, explained Nathan Kurtz, cryospheric scientist NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

“Persistently low temperatures across the Great Lakes region are responsible for the increased areal coverage of the ice,” Kurtz said. “Low temperatures are also the dominant mechanism for thickening the ice, while secondary factors like clouds, snow, and wind also play a role.”

In early February 2014, writer Craig Childs looked out at the frozen Lake Superior from the Apostle Island Coast.
In early February 2014, writer Craig Childs looked out at the frozen Lake Superior from the Apostle Island Coast. The last time visitors could reach the area by foot was in 2009. Image Credit: Craig Childs

The freeze this year has local implications, including possible changes to snowfall amounts in the Great Lakes area, explained Walt Meier, also a cryospheric scientist at NASA Goddard. When the lakes are primarily open water, cold air picks up moisture from the relatively warm and moist lake water, often resulting in lake effect snow on the lee side of the lakes, on the eastern and southern shores. When the lakes freeze, the lake effect generally shuts down. “Although this year, they’re still picking up a fair amount of snow,” Meier said.

Lake levels could also see an impact by summer, as winter ice cover generally reduces the amount of water available to evaporate during winter months. If that turns out to be the case, it would be “good news for local water supplies, as well as for shipping and recreational use,” Meier said.

It remains to be seen when the Great Lakes will once again freeze to the extent reached in 2014, or at least enough to allow adventurers to reach the ice caves at Lake Superior’s Apostle Islands National Lakeshore by foot.

A 2012 study in the Journal of Climate by scientists at NOAA’s Great Lakes lab, which included data from MODIS, found that winter season ice cover on Lake Superior has decreased 79 percent from 1973 to 2010. The study also showed that ice cover on the lakes is highly variable and difficult to predict.

The harsh season this year “is a reminder that winters are variable and that weather can always throw an outlier our way,” said Gavin Schmidt, a climatologist and climate modeler at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York.

Source: NASA AQUA satellite page

================================================================

Readers might note that the reason that the ice coverage abruptly went from 88% to 80% likely had to do with wind compacting the ice, not any temperature change – Anthony

Related: The Great Lakes may hit record ice cover this year

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

139 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PiperPaul
March 1, 2014 10:21 am

Back in the old days, a common truism was, “Everybody talks about the weather but no one ever does anything about it.”
Now, the IPCC is finally trying to do something about it and deniers are complaining.
/sarc

March 1, 2014 10:25 am

Re: why Ontario is different than Erie:
Is it much deeper than Erie so volume/surface-area is larger?
Yep. Avg depth of Erie is 19 meters. Avg Depth of Ontario is 89 meters.
Ontario has about 3.5 times the water, but 3/4 of the surface area as Erie.
It might not be the only reason, but it is a reason.

mkelly
March 1, 2014 10:34 am

Curt says:
March 1, 2014 at 9:45 am
Can anyone
explain why Lake Erie is essentially totally frozen over, but Lake Ontario almost not at all?
Curt Erie has an average depth of 210′ and Ontario has average depth of 810′. Plus Ontario gets all the “warm” water from all the other lakes. Those are a couple of the reasons.

Mac the Knife
March 1, 2014 10:38 am

From the Green Bay WI Press Gazette, today March 1.
Coldest winter ever? Green Bay sees record 49th day below zero
Its not a good winter to be a weather record in Wisconsin. Or anything else, for that matter.
A pair of records fell within hours of each other in Green Bay early Friday.
At midnight, Green Bay made it 49 days with subzero temperatures, the most in a winter. The previous record, 48 days, was set in 1976-77.
…more..
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20140228/GPG0101/302280167/Coldest-winter-ever-Green-Bay-sees-record-49th-day-below-zero

kakatoa
March 1, 2014 10:43 am

RealOldOne2,
Thanks for the link to the larger data set of Great Lakes Ice Extent!!!!
Given the Ice Extent during the winters of 85 and 86 I wouldn’t consider this winters extent an outlier. I don’t think the experts over at Wiki would either-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlier

March 1, 2014 10:48 am

I think Feb 28th ice must be pushing close to the record. Lake Michigan has frozen nearly over again after a dip a week ago (photo shows more open water) and the thawed parts of Huron and Superior are refrozen:
http://iceweb1.cis.ec.gc.ca/Prod20/page2.xhtml?CanID=11080&Lang=en

p@ Dolan
March 1, 2014 10:50 am

@R Babcock says:
March 1, 2014 at 5:28 am
“It will be interesting to see how much influence this much ice will have on the weather in the upper midwest of the US this spring. Right now it appears the arctic cold will persist through mid-March and with the warming south, there will no doubt be some doozy storms created at the boundaries of the two air masses through April. Lot’s of snow persisting into late Spring?”
Of note, my copy of Old Farmer’s 2014 Almanac says that Baltimore, somewhat north of me, can expect it’s last Spring Frost on April 11th.
I think tisdale said it best.
says:
March 1, 2014 at 9:45 am
“Can anyone explain why Lake Erie is essentially totally frozen over, but Lake Ontario almost not at all?”
See:
@RiHo08 says:
March 1, 2014 at 8:19 am
a little further upstream for a great description of what’s going on. I wondered about that too, but I believe my question was answered.

mkelly
March 1, 2014 10:54 am

Windsong says:
March 1, 2014 at 9:52
Penguins. That is funny.

Box of Rocks
March 1, 2014 11:04 am

So how does cold air “remove” heat???
Is it a mechanical process we don’t know about?
Either a very poor choice of words or someone who failed Thermo 101.
It is that delta T thingie that drives the energy transfer. Nothing is removed, it is nature at ‘work’!

Mac the Knife
March 1, 2014 11:07 am

Stephen Rasey says:
March 1, 2014 at 10:25 am
Re: why Ontario is different than Erie:
Is it much deeper than Erie so volume/surface-area is larger?
Yep. Avg depth of Erie is 19 meters. Avg Depth of Ontario is 89 meters.
Ontario has about 3.5 times the water, but 3/4 of the surface area as Erie.
It might not be the only reason, but it is a reason.

Stepan,
Your question stirred cogitation about another ‘potential’ contributor:
Lake Ontario is below Niagara Falls. Work is being done, when the potential energy of the Lake Erie water above the falls is converted into kinetic energy at the bottom of the falls. A small amount of heating will occur as a result. Small but continuous…. and always flowing into Lake Ontario.
Mac

Mac the Knife
March 1, 2014 11:12 am

Dang!
Sory aboot teh typo, Stephen Rasey!
Mac

Janice Moore
March 1, 2014 11:18 am

You also keep spelling your last name wrong, dear Mac (it is “Knight” {as in in Shining Armor}).
#(:))

maccassar
March 1, 2014 11:24 am

Lake Erie is quite shallow with a Maximum depth of 210 feet, about 700 feet shallower than Michigan and 1100 feet shallower than Superior. Great walleye fishing in Erie. Great Salmon fishing in Michigan. Great Lake Trout fishing in Superior. Actually great fishing in all the lakes for many species , just depending on what you are after. World’s best Muskie fishing in Lake St. Clair between Huron and Erie.

Janice Moore
March 1, 2014 11:25 am

Thank you, Steve in Rockwood, for that fine graph for historical context. (6:56am today)
Yes, Alan Robertson (“Hi,” she said in her extraordinary way, “hope all is well.”),
evidence for your keen-eyed correction (at 7:11am today) is found in Steve of Rockwood’s graph.

Janice Moore
March 1, 2014 11:44 am

For the (as usual) late to the party (“Duhhh, why are we, uuuh, talking about ice and stuff like that here? Hyuck, hyuck! Must mean ice is a rare thing these days.”) troll above…
THIS type of AGW spew about ice is why ice extent in the northern hemisphere is talked about:

{Note: This is a typical example, little troll-of-shaky-reasoning. We could provide you with many more, however, being the good teachers that we all are, here, we know that you will benefit far more if you do your own research.}

Editor
March 1, 2014 12:09 pm
Mac the Knife
March 1, 2014 12:33 pm

Janice Moore says:
March 1, 2014 at 11:18 am
You also keep spelling your last name wrong, dear Mac (it is “Knight” {as in in Shining Armor}).
#(:))

Awww gaawrchhhh, Sweet Pea,
Ya got me blushin’ in front of all these folks!
How’s things where you are?
Have had snow flurries off and on all morning here, just south of the Seattle Socialist Workers Paradise.
“Put another log on the fire…”
Mac

Leo Geiger
March 1, 2014 12:41 pm

Bruce Cobb says (in response to Leo Geiger): That’s just plain idiocy. First, I doubt there any more posts than usual this winter than any other (but, who’s counting?). Secondly, on what planet do you live, where cold winter weather is becoming less common? Here on planet Earth, indications are that we are in a cooling phase, despite the fervent imaginings of the Warmist ideologues.
I live on this planet:
The combined global land and ocean average temperature during January 2014 was 0.65°C (1.17°F) above the 20th century average. This was the warmest January since 2007 and the fourth highest since records began in 1880. This marks the ninth consecutive month (since May 2013) with a global monthly temperature among the 10 highest for its respective month.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/1
North America is not the world, and weather is not climate. But I can understand how people who use this blog as an information source might not have realized this past January was globally the 4th warmest on record.

Janice Moore
March 1, 2014 12:52 pm

Yes, indeed, Andres Valencia #(:)) (at 7:16am today).
For YEARS, now, the AGWers have been screaming that Polar Bears would have to order in boatloads of ice for their Cokes… penguins would take up hula dancing… “tropical hot spot,”…. and on and on….. .
For a bit of documentary evidence of their outlandish conjecture (the refuting of which, thus, makes the above post relevant), see a typical propaganda film:



Actually…. I hope they make MORE films like this one. Heh, heh.

Janice Moore
March 1, 2014 12:54 pm


(italics and bold make a difference!)

Janice Moore
March 1, 2014 12:57 pm

Hi, Mac!
Things are about the same up here as where you are.
Thanks for responding! Great info. re: your old stomping grounds above. Thanks for sharing with us.
Take care,
J.

Janice Moore
March 1, 2014 1:02 pm

Bruce Cobb says (re: Geiger the Troll) (at 9:40am) “… Warmist ideologues.”
Geiger substantiating Cobb at 12:41pm: “… this past January was globally the 4th warmest on record.”

CaligulaJones
March 1, 2014 1:07 pm

” this year, they’re still picking up a fair amount of snow,””
Um, yeah:
http://www.muskokaregion.com/news-story/4340377-record-snowfall-two-months-running/
(Note: this report is a month old, and “reporting fatigue” has set in.
BTW, this is what it looks like coming in:
https://twitter.com/CTVToronto/status/439055533476417536/photo/1

Akatsukami
March 1, 2014 1:08 pm

: unsurprising that temperature anomalies are so high, since you alarmists add so much heat in cooking the data.

March 1, 2014 1:13 pm

Leo Geiger says:
March 1, 2014 at 12:41 pm
This was the warmest January since 2007 and the fourth highest since records began in 1880.
On the other hand, for RSS, this was only the 9th warmest January.