Bizarre: Anti-Defamation League apparently gives a green light to defamation of climate skeptics by comparing them to Holocaust Deniers

UPDATE: 2/27 6:30AM PST It seems the person making the attack, Shelley Rose, is part of a climate activist group, see below.

UPDATE: 2/27 2:50PM PST, The ADL Atlanta website has deleted comments on the issue, and has closed the press release to further comments. See below.

Boy, this is ugly, and I hope this boils down to simply an error in judgement by a lower tier administrator because this is like some bizzaro-world episode; on one hand the Anti-Defamation League is coming down against the “…type of comparison diminishes and trivializes the Holocaust.“, while on another they are giving a “get out of jail free card” to the people who have repeatedly done that very thing over several years.

Two telephone calls and two emails today requesting comment from ADL’s Southeast Interim Regional Director Shelly Rose have gone unanswered. She’s aware of my calls. I asked for her directly, gave my name and affiliation, and after a pause on hold her assistant asked if it would be OK to “send you to voice mail”. Ms Rose did provide a copy of the press release below, after I queried the main organization in New York after receiving a tip about this release, but found no evidence of its existence on the ADL Press Center website. The press release below still isn’t on the website as of this writing at 6:15PM EST well after close of business there. All of my requests were done during normal business hours for both the Atlanta and NYC office.

I have to wonder if the main organization is endorsing this press release, or if this is some regional director who went rogue.

Here is the press release. 

==============================================================

ADL_logo

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Shelley Rose (404) 262-3470 work; 678-938-1399 cell

srose@adl.org

ADL Condemns Spencer’s Nazi Analogy

February 25, 2014,  Atlanta, Georgia … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today denounced remarks by University of Alabama – Huntsville professor Roy Spencer who wrote on his blog that those who refer to him as a climate change “denier” should be called “global warming Nazis” and that they are supporting policies that will kill far more people than the Nazis ever did — all in the name of what they consider to be a righteous cause.”

He also claims those who advocate for policies to slow global warming are “like the Nazis” in that they are fascist and anti-capitalist. The post is also accompanied by an image of a swastika.

Shelley Rose, ADL Southeast Interim Regional Director issued the following statement:

University of Alabama Professor Roy Spencer’s analogy of proponents of global warming to Nazis is outrageous and deeply offensive.  This analogy is just the latest example of a troubling epidemic of comparisons to Hitler and the Holocaust.

It has become too common to use comparisons to the Holocaust and Nazi imagery to attack people with opposing views, whether the issue is global warming, immigration or stem-cell research.

The six million Jewish victims and millions of other victims of Hitler deserve better.  Their deaths should not be used for political points or sloganeering.  This type of comparison diminishes and trivializes the Holocaust. There is no place for it in civil discussions.

Shelley Rose |Interim Regional Director

Anti-Defamation League | 3490 Piedmont Road; Suite 610 | Atlanta, Georgia 30305

Phone: 404-262-3470 I Fax: 404-262-3548 I Cell: 678-938-1399 I srose@adl.org

ADL website I our blog I facebook I twitter I youtube I pinterest I google+ I linkedin

==============================================================

I queried Ms Rose for a comment on the last paragraph, asking:

Wouldn’t that also apply to the use of “denier” to denigrate people, including Dr. Spencer. whose research has nothing to do with the holocaust or denial of it?

I also asked her to comment on the “green light” as a working title, asking if it was an accurate representation of their position. It was clear to me from the lack of response to two emails and two telephone calls was ” no comment”.

From their website, apparently slurs in major league football rate higher in concern than comparing climate skeptics to holocaust deniers for the purpose of denigration:

ADL Welcomes NFL’s Willingness to Address Hate Speech

The League welcomed reports that the NFL is considering how to discourage the use of offensive slurs during the course of games and said that “the question of how to address offensive speech and the best ways to counter it on playing fields and in locker rooms is an important conversation.”

And that’s why I think this is bizarre. The selective hypocrisy is stunning. I’m hoping the main office in New York will come to their senses and disavow the press release from the “Interim Regional Director”. Surely they must see the ugly conundrum they’ve manufactured for themselves.

Dr. Roy Spencer responds:

Hypocrisy at the Anti-Defamation League?

He asks exactly what I was thinking; where was ADL all these years when such ugly and hateful comparisons were being made:

Ms. Rose, where was your organization when journalists, politicians, and even some scientists, chose to call us skeptics “deniers”?

We don’t deny either “global warming” or “climate change”. Yet, we are called “deniers”. Ms. Rose, do you have any inkling why the term “denier” (which is a lie) might be used against us, rather than the term “skeptic” (which is accurate)? I think you know why.

I’d really like to know how ADL can turn a blind eye the use of “denier” for the purpose of denigration while at the same time calling out a victim of the denigration for fighting back after years of abuse.

There’s also a newspaper article about it:

UAH climate expert Roy Spencer calls critics ‘global warming Nazis’; Anti-Defamation League objects

http://blog.al.com/breaking/2014/02/uah_climate_expert_roy_spencer.html

UPDATE: The PR is now posted on the Atlanta ADL website here

http://atlanta.adl.org/news/adl-condemns-spencers-nazi-analogy/

Comments are allowed there. Be civil if you leave comments please.

The only thing that makes sense to me is that this person simply doesn’t know the history, and committed a terrible error in judgment.

UPDATE2: 2/27 6:30AM PST It seems the person making the attack, Shelly Rose, is part of a climate activist group, see photo and caption.

Shelly_rose_stepitup

The caption reads:

Congregations Caring for the Climate – Atlanta, GA

Bill Witherspoon, from Congregation Bet Haverim writes: This was taken Friday evening before Erev Shabbat Services. We had about three times this many for services eventually, but these were the ones who arrived in time for the photo. As part of our second week of the Omer to Honor the Earth, Shelley Rose (third from right, just right of our Torah scrolls) gave the d’var (sermon) on acting with awareness that we all breathe the same air, and Tovah Melaver (second from right) led a breathing meditation.

April 13, 2007

Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stepitup2007/464126698/

You can read all about this organization at http://stepitup2007.org

Of note is the list of “Friends and Allies” which reads like a who’s who in climate activism.

This whole episode makes a lot more sense now.

UPDATE3: 2/27 2:50PM PST, The ADL Atlanta website has deleted many comments on the issue, and has closed the press release to further comments. About an hour ago, I noted 90 comments were posted, now it is down to 50. See below.

ADL_website_delete

Meanwhile I’ve drafted and sent a letter by email and by fax to ADL National Director, ABRAHAM H. FOXMAN asking if ADL plans to comment on the issue, and to ask id they plan to apply their condemnation equally, along with examples of what climate skeptics have been subjected to over the years. I think they simply have been caught unaware in a conundrum created by their Atlanta Interim Director.

I ask that if anyone makes communications with this organization, please be factual and respectful – Anthony

 

 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
448 Comments
Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:32 pm

Aanthanur DC says:
February 28, 2014 at 12:47 pm
Jimbo
i would say because models got better and better, our understanding of the climate system and climate sensitivity got better…..

And as the models ‘got better and better’ the IPCC kept lowering its global surface temperature projections for 2100 report after report, getting closer and closer to the sceptics point of view. You are on a self-defeating trip my friend. Take a break in a cafe and stretch your legs.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:36 pm

Aanthanur DC says:
February 28, 2014 at 3:23 pm
” The expectation of any particular time period depends on the forcings that are going on”
exactly. and not only forcings, also the distribution of heat within the system.

But why did you not address his reply to the first question. because

If 1998 is not exceeded in all global temperature indices by 2013, you’ll be worried about state of understanding

It was not exceeded and Gavin said he would be worried.
Explain your “distribution of heat within the system” please?

February 28, 2014 3:40 pm

Wow, now the ADL has deleted all the comments.
Russell Cook (@questionAGW) wrote, “Nuts, daveburton didn’t snag an archive of my comment there about the ADL not apparently being concerned about the application of the phrase “crimes against humanity” to skeptic climate scientists…”
No, but fortunately the Yahoo search engine had a cashed copy, which I’ve saved here:
http://www.burtonsys.com/climate/adl-condemns-spencers-nazi-analogy.html
It has about 64 comments, including your excellent one.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:40 pm

Aanthanur DC, can you explain for me the main cause of the global surface temperature rise between 1910 to 1940?
See these temperature graphs for reference.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/image/j/l/warmingtrend.gif
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/_nhshgl.gif
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A2.gif
Also can you explain the main cause of the huge warming in the Arctic between 1920 to 1940? I will provide you with reference links after this comment.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:41 pm

Aanthanur, here they are.
1920s to 1940s Arctic Warm Period

Richard D
February 28, 2014 3:48 pm

Wow, the troll is still spouting off. Encounters with things like it (the troll) do give me pause. Gratitude, as WFB espoused. So I give thanks that I was not publically educated in the cesspool that passes for education in the united states, nor will any of my children or nieces/nephews and progeny.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:49 pm

Aanthanur, maybe I missed it but I asked you to tell me what was the most important greenhouse gas in our atmosphere? Please answer the question. Thanks.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:55 pm

Aanthanur DC says:
February 28, 2014 at 3:42 pm
what is there to adress? sure, its clear that we do not fully understand the system, and especially as something happened that was not expected, the stagnation of SAT. and they are clearly worried about the understanding, and are working hard to understand what is going on.
but non of that contradicts AGW.

AGW is real. Man’s greenhouse gases have warmed the planet some since 1950, but there is NO EVIDENCE that man’s greenhouse gases were responsible for most of the warming since 1950 or since the late 1970s. Did you see the last IPCC statement that referred to man’s activities and not gases. In their previous reports they referred to our gases. Why the omission now?

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:56 pm

They wanted to sneak in land use changes that’s why.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 3:57 pm

Aanthanur DC says:
February 28, 2014 at 3:53 pm
what do you mean with most important?

What greenhouse gas is responsible for most of the warming in our atmosphere?

Richard D
February 28, 2014 3:59 pm

Jimbo,
It (the troll) is incapable of any rational argument much less discussing basic science.
Let’s resolve to ignore it, the troll.
It’s hard as it’s entertaining to crush such creatures with facts and reason but the troll in its own stupid world is beyond understanding. But you know that 🙂
In these instances I miss Richard Courtney.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 4:10 pm

Aanthanur DC since you have to ask me “what do you mean with most important [greenhouse gas]?” then I guess you are just getting started. May you enjoy your new journey into CAGW scepticism. 😉

IPCC – Climate Change 2007: Working Group I
Water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas, and carbon dioxide (CO2) is the second-most important one. “

Aanthanur, I may be going to another thread or to bed right now. I just hope you spend more time exploring the issues and less time defending a difficult position.
PS As I write this I am using candle light because our electricity supply has gone out again. It has been doing this regularly in this part of the Third World. Energy is important to me so I hope you can understand my reluctance to have less of it while climate campaigners like Al Gore and maybe yourself are unaffected. It’s enough to make many people very, very angry at what is going on. I do sincerely hope you take on board by condition.

February 28, 2014 4:12 pm

Jimbo, but now i ask a question.
you seem to think not rising SAT while CO2 is rising means CO2 has little influence on the global temperature.
do you conclude the same when global temperatures fell while solar activity rose? do you also conclude from that, the sun has little influence on global temperature?

Richard D
February 28, 2014 4:13 pm

At Jimbo and WUWT community
Let’s shut this troll down.
No more responses to it….
We are censored everywhere and most warmest threads deny our participation.
We allow the troll to speak but don’t engage with it….
Roll, troll…..

Mark Bofill
February 28, 2014 4:16 pm

Anathanur,

funny , i stoped using the D word, i try to answer all questions posed to me. yet i keep getting called troll ….. why because i do not agree with you on AGW?

Don’t let it faze you. 🙂
Dissent is good. I like having somebody to argue with. Sure, it’s not very productive or entertaining to have a conversation with somebody who comes in with attack mode on, as you appeared to, and who violates Anthony’s house rules, but if we’re past that then I hope you stick around.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Aanthanur DC says:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/26/bizzare-anti-defamation-league-apparently-gives-a-green-light-to-defamation-of-climate-skeptics-by-comparing-them-to-holocaust-deniers/#comment-1579391
I am aware of all that you mention. You are obviously new here. The IPCC’s first report was in 1990. This is not a new theme.

Abstract
1987
The flux of carbon from terrestrial ecosystems to the atmosphere in 1980 due to changes in land use: geographic distribution of the global flux
Recent analyses of land-use change in the tropical regions and in the temperate and boreal regions of the earth were combined to yield a global estimate of 1.0 – 2.6 times 1015 g C for the net release of carbon to the atmosphere in 1980 from changes in land use. Deforestation in the tropics accounted for nearly all of the flux; the net release of carbon from temperate and boreal regions was only 0.1 times 1015 g C. The average global value of 1.8 times 1015 g C in 1980 was distributed geographically among tropical countries and other regions on the basis of deforestation rates and carbon stocks.
The net release of carbon from changes in land use worldwide is inconsistent with the results of geochemical models of the carbon cycle. The discrepancy is smaller than in previous analyses, but is large enough to exceed the errors of the analysis. Possible explanations for the discrepancy include the possibility of a net accumulation of carbon in undisturbed ecosystems as a result of CO2 fertilization or changes in climate. Even if the terms of the global carbon equation were to appear balanced at present, current knowledge is insufficient to predict whether terrestrial ecosystems will act as a positive or negative feedback on the anticipated CO2-caused global warming.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0889.1987.tb00277.x/abstract

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 4:18 pm

Aanthanur DC, no more responses from me. There is one more in moderation though. Have a nice life.

February 28, 2014 4:19 pm

Jimbo. i answered that right before you posted, i knew that , nothing new. we could go into detail.
watervapor has a huge disadvantage, its dependent on the Air temperature. so watervapor on itself does not change much. and it has a very short live time.
CO2 is air temperature independent and has a very long airborn lifetime.
and as i said, i do not expect the 3rd world to take any action. its the first world countries that caused the problem, we are the ones with the huge per capita CO2 footprint, not the 3rd world.
i spend more than 10 years on AGW. i read alot of scientific papers on this topic. and get non of my info about it from the mainstream media.
but i will spend surely more time exploring this . i find it a very interesting and very important topic.
but as you did not know about land use change, i recoomend that you spend a bit more time reading scientific studies and less time on WUWT 🙂
have a good night.

Richard D
February 28, 2014 4:22 pm

As I write this I am using candle light because our electricity supply has gone out again.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
That’s a start. Better yet you would have had no electricity your whole life and then be stricken by a killer virus after price Phillip, World Wildlife Fund President, is reincarnated per his expressed wish and desire as a non cellular killer human pathogen.

Jimbo
February 28, 2014 4:24 pm

Anthony, the ADL have deleted ALL THE COMMENTS as pointed out by an earlier commenter.
http://atlanta.adl.org/news/adl-condemns-spencers-nazi-analogy/

Hot under the collar
February 28, 2014 4:25 pm

Can I suggest everyone stops feeding “Aanthanur DC” and ignore, it has just filled the whole thread up with boring irrelevance – probably by design.
I appreciate some people are attempting sensible discussion but communication is supposed to be a two way process, if you ‘don’t go out much’ and attempt to read through the comments most of it is total drivel, you will probably get more satisfaction discussing it with a 2 year old.

February 28, 2014 4:25 pm

Jimbo
then why did you claim “Did you see the last IPCC statement that referred to man’s activities and not gases. In their previous reports they referred to our gases. Why the omission now?”
and
“They wanted to sneak in land use changes that’s why.”
and now you claim you knew already. so you lied about the IPCC sneaking it in? or had you forgoten it?
it was already in the very first report. can you explain?
and im new here posting, but not reading, i come here since more than 2 years to read some articles. and to learn the arguments i will face soon 🙂 but yeah sure not as often as you do.

Richard D
February 28, 2014 4:28 pm

Hot under the collar says: February 28, 2014 at 4:25 pm
Can I suggest everyone stops feeding “Aanthanur DC” and ignore, it has just filled the whole thread up with boring irrelevance – probably by design.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Exactly, let’s not feed the troll.

Richard D
February 28, 2014 4:33 pm

I’m a solid supporter of Jews and Israeli and always will be….and I am a supporter 0f African Americans. Yet, I’ll have to lump the ADL in with the NAACP – just another hypocritical self serving pressure group

Richard D
February 28, 2014 4:43 pm

Mark Bofill says:February 28, 2014 at 4:16 pm
I like having somebody to argue with.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We need a better class of trolls…..