A new Vinerism: 'Climate change threatens Winter Olympics'

From the opportunist headlines department, and the department of Vinerisms “children just won’t know what snow is” comes this press release. Apparently Winter Olympics will be a thing of the past. Via Eurekalert:

Only six of the previous Winter Olympics host cities will be cold enough to reliably host the Games by the end of this century if global warming projections prove accurate. Even with conservative climate projections, only 11 of the previous 19 sites could host the Games in the coming decades, according to a new study from the University of Waterloo (Canada) and Management Center Innsbruck (Austria).

From the University of Waterloo

Climate change threatens Winter Olympics

Only 6 of previous Winter Games venues to be cold enough by late-century

Only six of the previous Winter Olympics host cities will be cold enough to reliably host the Games by the end of this century if global warming projections prove accurate.

Even with conservative climate projections, only 11 of the previous 19 sites could host the Games in the coming decades, according to a new study from the University of Waterloo (Canada) and Management Center Innsbruck (Austria).

This is a chart showing former Winter Olympic locations that are climatically suitable for future games. Credit: Daniel Scott, University of Waterloo

“The cultural legacy of the world’s celebration of winter sport is increasingly at risk,” said Professor Daniel Scott, a Canada Research Chair in Global Tourism and lead author of the study. “Fewer and fewer traditional winter sports regions will be able to host a Olympic Winter Games in a warmer world.”

The study finds that internationally renowned Olympic sites, such as Squaw Valley (USA), Garmisch-Partenkirchen (Germany), Vancouver (Canada) and Sochi (Russia) would no longer have climates suitable to reliably host the Games by the middle of the 21st century. With additional warming projected for later decades of this century, as few as six former host locations would remain climatically suitable.

“This report clearly points out the challenges that lie ahead for the Olympics because of climate change,” said Chris Steinkamp, executive director of Protect Our Winters and who was not involved with the study. “It’s particularly powerful to see how past Olympic host cities could be impacted under a higher emission scenario, so hopefully this will serve as a wake up call to the IOC and world leaders that major commitments to carbon reductions need to be made.”

The need for weather risk management strategies by Olympic organizers has intensified as the average February daytime temperature of Winter Games locations has steadily increased – from 0.4°C at Games held in the 1920-50s, to 3.1°C in Games during the 1960-90s, and 7.8°C in Games held in the 21st century.

“Today it would be difficult to imagine successfully delivering the diverse Games program exclusively on natural ice and snow, as it was in the early decades of the Olympic Winter Games,” said Dr. Robert Steiger of the Management Center Innsbruck.

Weather risk management will become even more important in the coming decades with average February temperatures in past Winter Olympic host locations expected to warm an additional 1.9 to 2.1°C by mid-century and 2.7 to 4.4°C in late century.

The study found that the success of the Games is often partially attributed to favourable weather, while poor weather is highlighted as one of the greatest challenges faced by Olympic Organizing Committees. Weather affects the ability to prepare for the Games and can directly impact outdoor opening and closing ceremonies, fairness of outdoor competitions, spectator comfort, transportation, and visibility and timing of television broadcasts.

The study also examines how technological advancements and strategies developed over several decades have been used to manage weather risk at the Winter Olympics. Technology like snowmaking, track/jump refrigeration and high-resolution weather forecasting are now critical components of staging a successful Winter Games.

“Despite technological advances, there are limits to what current weather risk management strategies can cope with,” said Professor Scott. “By the middle of this century, these limits will be surpassed in some former Winter Olympic host regions.”

The study provides an important opportunity for reflection on the long-term implications of global climate change for the world of sport and the world’s collective cultural heritage symbolized by the Olympic Movement. It also reveals that for some cities and regions interested in hosting a future Winter Olympics, the time to bid for the games might be sooner than later.

###

A full copy of the report can be downloaded from https://uwaterloo.ca/news/sites/ca.news/files/uploads/files/oly_winter_games_warmer_world_2014.pdf

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AlecM
January 23, 2014 9:12 am

Gawd help us to survive these lunatic claims.

Mike
January 23, 2014 9:15 am

And my alma mater (UofW) wonders why I don’t donate any more.
Vancouver and Sochi weren’t/aren’t winter sport cities in the first place…its the mountains stupid

January 23, 2014 9:16 am

LOL! I suggest Fargo, ND.

dp
January 23, 2014 9:16 am

It wouldn’t hurt a thing for the hand wringing climate tragedy projectors if the climate were to be changing, just now, but a 17 year pause as agreed to by the world pretty much puts the lie to this latest evidence that the hoax isn’t dead.
Open note to the greenies: Be very fearful if evidence shows absence of climate change. That is a very abnormal condition, unprecedented, and possibly deadly to all living things.

Aphan
January 23, 2014 9:17 am

I wonder how all those eliminated cities will react to a study like this making such bold claims based on such a weak “if”. “New study causes loss of millions (if not billions) of dollars in Olympic revenue to all but 6 cities!” I hope they react loudly.

steveta_uk
January 23, 2014 9:21 am
January 23, 2014 9:21 am

But fear not – help is at hand thanks to the Yale Climate Media Forum and their “Team Climate”. Five eager young activists from Yale are heading off to Sochi to spread their message of doom, gloom and self-righteous preachy activism to the athletes and spectators there:
http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2014/01/climate-change-as-an-olympics-issue-sochi-but-no-game/

mpainter
January 23, 2014 9:26 am

This is rank alarmism and in fact is deliberate propaganda. Goebbels would recognize the technique.

Aphan
January 23, 2014 9:27 am

Seriously….a 7.4C average temperature “increase” in temps since the 1920’s?? Except the locations CHANGE? wow

Tom in Florida
January 23, 2014 9:27 am

All the more reason to use only one site for the Games (winter and summer games having their own single location), build all the facilities once, stage the games there every time. No worries. While we are at it, let’s get rid of the national uniforms and team sports. Go back to the original idea of individual competition with everyone who qualifies wearing the same Olympic uniform.
There, problem solved, next.

mpainter
January 23, 2014 9:30 am

It won’t do them any good- it is the coldest winter evah and people are praying for warmth. Also, the day of climate alarmism has passed and people are either chuckling or yawning at this type of hype.

Annyong
January 23, 2014 9:30 am

Just freakin great! The one I live in is apparently going to be perfectly fine no matter how silly their model predictions become
Looks like 70 more years of shoveling snow for me *sigh*
Freakin unreliable global warming!

Resourceguy
January 23, 2014 9:31 am

The grand intelligence test for the public and and policymakers known as climate change claim of the week continues to unfold….and unravel. Or maybe no one really cares and this is just showmanship to go along with the paper mill efforts for tenure.

Louis Hooffstetter
January 23, 2014 9:32 am

“Only six of the previous Winter Olympics host cities will be cold enough to reliably host the Games by the end of this century if global warming projections prove accurate. ”
Stop right there! Global warming projections are a complete failure. No point in reading any further.

January 23, 2014 9:37 am

Erm…Sochi is almost subtropical in climate. Let’s wait for the Novaja Zemlja Games

SasjaL
January 23, 2014 9:40 am

Tom in Florida on January 23, 2014 at 9:27 am
That will only happen if IOC get a secret “donation” of several billion USD …

George Lawson
January 23, 2014 9:42 am

The absent minded Professor Scott is another so called scientist that I’ve added to my list of faux climate scientists who consistently ignore the facts even when they are staring them in the face, in order to secure additional funds to carry out additional research into the ‘problem’. This will then guarantee their employment for another few years. The scientific world is loosing its marbles.

Speed
January 23, 2014 9:44 am

It’s covered …
Upon witnessing the near-disastrous snow shortage at the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, he figured the services of his nimble one-man company, Snow Secure Ltd., could help the organizers of the subsequent games, scheduled to take place in the warmest region of Russia.”
[ … ]
… a three-pronged approach. First, organizers will rely on ordinary snow-making equipment. Then, there are nearly 500,000 cubic meters of snow that Mr. Martikainen has stored since last season in some 14 insulated piles tucked away in the Caucasus Mountains. Lastly, organizers have imported three machines guaranteed to produce snow in temperatures as high as 59 degrees Fahrenheit.

WSJ

Doug
January 23, 2014 9:45 am

I have a friend who was on the committee which selected Sochi. A concern at the time was that Austria would not have reliable snow by 2014. I don’t know how to get the real data out where it matters, but reports like this are one more sad example of the dilemma faced by people who must make decisions, but lack the expertise to know who to believe.

DonV
January 23, 2014 9:46 am

Once again this culture of whining and “chicken-little, the sky-is-falling” catastrophism targets fomenting radical cultural and political change without acknowledging that adaptation is far more likely to occur, if something like end-of-the-earth, exceptionally-high, unending warming actually happens. So what !!! if these sites can no longer host. Most of them didn’t even exist in their present form 80-90 years ago anyway, so 80-90 years into the future, brand new sites will vie for hosting the Olympics as well. . . . more importantly most of the “sport” that currently exists, as well as the “technology” necessary to support it (like refrigerated luge and ski jumping tracks, and the snow making mentioned) didn’t exist back then as well. Both “sport” and “technology” have evolved to SOLVE social desires and sport “problems”. How truly sad that these authors believe that along with Gorebal warming we are also going to experience a dearth in engineering and scientific creativity, as well as the creativity of our youth to “create” new death-defying, limb-breaking sports. Hockey exists in places that rarely see snow! Jamaica has a hilarious bobsled team! The “experts” who write this drivel can’t see past the ends of their own noses. They are clearly NOT the visionaries of our future, so why should we listen to them? I actually feel dumber for having read this.

Gail Combs
January 23, 2014 9:50 am

Dave says: January 23, 2014 at 9:16 am
LOL! I suggest Fargo, ND.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I second that (it is minus 10 °F with snow in the forecast) or how about Embarrass, Minnesota (-11.8 °F)

January 23, 2014 9:52 am

Let me see now, the end of century is 86 years off and the alarmist community haven’t yet got any predictions correct.
All that Arctic ice that was supposed to be gone in 2013 – er isn’t.
It’s more like tea leave reading than science.

JimS
January 23, 2014 9:56 am

Oh brother! Sochi has humid subtropical climate, and the last winter olympics in Vancouver, Canada is a city with a west coast marine climate (meaning a warm temperate climate where the mean monthly temperature all year round is well above freezing), perhaps the Olympic committee should choose better spots to hold the WINTER Olympics. For pete’s sake, it should be basic that the location of the “winter” Olympics should at least actually have a winter. No?

Frank K.
January 23, 2014 9:58 am

This is a joke, right?
(Current temperature at my location in New Hampshire 1 PM: 8 F).

Les Johnson
January 23, 2014 10:04 am

did they look at the snow coverage for the NH?
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_anom.php?ui_set=1&ui_region=nhland&ui_month=12
Its up over the entire record, and has been mostly positive over the last decade, with only 2 years of the last 10 being below average. The other 8 are ABOVE average.

1 2 3 4