El Niños and La Niñas are parts of naturally occurring, sunlight-fueled processes—amazing processes—that produce warm water and redistribute it from the tropical Pacific. When I was first able to fathom the processes, when they finally clicked for me, I was in awe of Mother Nature’s handiwork. Cloud cover, sunlight, ocean heat content, sea surface temperatures, sea level, surface winds, ocean currents, etc., all interwoven, all interdependent, with the events occurring at massive scales. I’ve been sharing their complexity, magnitude and aftereffects ever since. Hopefully, this post will allow you to gain some insight–or spark your interest.
El Niño and La Niña events are extremely important parts of Earth’s climate. They are the dominant mode of natural climate variability on annual, multiyear and decadal timeframes. El Niño and La Niña events impact everything from drought and rainfall to surface temperatures around the globe. Consider this: El Niños and La Ninas occur in the tropical Pacific, but more than a decade ago it was determined that they rearranged sea ice in the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica. Recently, they were even linked to temperature of the water below the Antarctic sea ice, through changes in ocean wind patterns. See Dutrieux et al. (2014) Strong Sensitivity of Pine Island Ice-Shelf Melting to Climatic Variability and the corresponding ScienceDaily article here.
The following is Section 1 from my ebook Who Turned on the Heat? This presentation was created to fill the gap between overly scientific texts and the basic (but way too simple) descriptions of El Niño and La Niña processes that are available on the internet. As I noted above, hopefully, it will help you to understand those seemingly complex processes. Please ask questions.
Notes: I’ve struck through text from the book (strikethrough) where it refers to other sections of the book, and I deleted a short note that refers to a feature of Abobe readers (the book is in pdf format). This post contains 29 illustrations, so it may take a little while to load. If they don’t appear full-sized, just give them a click.
[START OF SECTION 1 OF WHO TURNED ON THE HEAT?]
1.1 Preliminary Discussion of the ENSO Annotated Illustrations
Most introductions to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on the web include boiler-plate descriptions and three illustrations: one each for El Niño, La Niña and ENSO-neutral phases. The reader has to jockey back and forth, scrolling up and down, to read the text and compare it to the illustrations. Unfortunately, much of what’s discussed in the text of those ENSO introductions isn’t shown in the graphics. To overcome that, I’ve prepared a 29-cell series of annotated (cartoon-like) illustrations that first introduce readers to background information about the Pacific Ocean. There are also introductions to trade winds and ocean currents, both of which have important roles in ENSO. With multiple cartoon-like illustrations for each phase and the transitions between them, the reader is taken through a complete cycle of ENSO phases: ENSO neutral to El Niño, back to ENSO neutral, on to La Niña, and then back to ENSO neutral. At each phase, the interaction between sea surface temperatures across the tropical Pacific, trade winds, sea surface height, precipitation and subsurface ocean temperatures are illustrated and discussed. Also presented are the differences between El Niño and La Niña events and the reasons why global surface temperatures vary in response to ENSO events.
To reinforce and confirm what’s presented in this section, Section 3 includes more-detailed, data-reinforced descriptions and illustrations.
1.2 The ENSO Annotated Illustrations
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
Now’s a good time to take a quick break from the cartoon-like illustrations. We’ll go into more detail in Section 3 about the interrelated processes taking place before an El Niño, but it’s important now to reinforce what’s been discussed so far. I’ll reword the presentation a little with hope that it will help make things click for you.
The trade winds are an important part of our discussion of ENSO-neutral, or “normal”, conditions in the tropical Pacific. They blow from east to west across the surface and cause the surface waters to also travel from east to west. That makes sense. If you blow on a liquid long and hard enough, the surface of the liquid will move it the direction you’re blowing.
The trade winds also blow clouds toward the west. That’s not hard to imagine, either. This allows that wonderfully strong tropical sun to beat down on the surface of the tropical Pacific and to reach into the subsurface waters to depths of 100 meters. Though most of that sunlight is absorbed nearer the surface, in the top 10 meters (roughly 33 feet) or so, it does reach farther. All of Mother Nature’s glorious sunlight warms the tropical Pacific waters as they travel west.
The trade winds push the waters up against the land masses of Indonesia and Australia. This causes the warm water to, in effect, pile up in the western tropical Pacific, in an area called the west Pacific Warm Pool. The trade winds driving the westward movement of surface waters also draw cool waters from below the surface of the eastern equatorial Pacific, in a process called upwelling. That upwelled water provides a continuous source of cool water at a relatively constant temperature that’s then warmed by the sun as it travels west. The water is, therefore, cooler in the eastern equatorial Pacific, in an area called the Cold Tongue Region, than it is in the west Pacific Warm Pool. Remember, the tropical Pacific stretches almost halfway around the globe, so that nice cool supply of water in the east travels a long way under the tropical sun before it reaches the warm pool in the west.
The trade winds cause the temperature difference between the east and west portions of the tropical Pacific. Now, here’s the interesting part. The temperature difference between the eastern and western tropical Pacific causes the trade winds to blow. That’s right. The temperature gradient of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures and the trade winds interact with one another in a positive feedback loop called Bjerknes feedback.
Why does that happen?
There nothing mysterious going on. The warmest water is in the western tropical Pacific. We’ve discussed that, and we’ll confirm it in Section 3. The warm water there heats the air above it, and that relatively hot air rises. All of that rising hot air has to be replaced by other air, and it’s the trade winds out of the east that supply the necessary make-up air. Because the tropical Pacific is cooler in the east, the air sinks there, and eastward-blowing upper winds complete the circuit. Overall, the warm air rises in the west; it cools as it’s carried east by the upper winds; then it sinks in the eastern tropical Pacific, where it heads back to the west as the trade winds. That circuit is called a Walker cell. The trade winds continuously push cool water from the east to the west, sunlight warms the water as it travels west, and when that warm water reaches the west Pacific Warm Pool, it supplies the heat necessary to maintain the updraft, which, in turn, causes to trade winds to blow. The briefest way to explain it: the trade winds and the sea surface temperatures are coupled, meaning they interact with one another.
With all of that warm water being piled up in the western tropical Pacific, and with all of the cool water being drawn from the eastern equatorial Pacific, the surface of the water—the sea level—in the west Pacific Warm Pool is about 0.5 meters (approximately 1.5 feet) higher in elevation than it is in Cold Tongue Region in the east.
Everything’s in tune, running in its normal state. The temperature difference between the east and west keeps the trade winds blowing—and—the trade winds maintain the temperature difference between east and west—and—the trade winds keep the warm water in the west Pacific Warm Pool at a higher elevation than it is in the eastern equatorial Pacific.
We can’t forget about gravity. It’s always there, our constant companion. Gravity would like the sea surface height in the west to equal the height in the east. It likes level playing fields. It’s working against the trade winds, and the trade winds are piling up the warm water against gravity. Still, everything is in relatively constant state of balance, with little gives and takes here and there.
Then some weather event—and that’s precisely what it is, a weather event or group of weather events—causes the trade winds to relax. That means the coupled ocean-atmosphere processes taking place in the tropical Pacific are no longer in balance. Sometimes, the weakened trade winds aren’t strong enough to hold the warm water in place in the west Pacific Warm Pool against gravity, so gravity takes over and all of that lovely warm water that was piled in the west Pacific Warm Pool suddenly sloshes to the east. That’s how an El Niño starts.
I’m now going discuss parts of the process that haven’t been shown in the illustrations yet.
The Pacific Ocean is awfully wide at the equator, so it takes a while, about 2 months, for the warm water to slosh to the east as far as the coast of South America.
Let’s put things into perspective. The west Pacific Warm Pool holds a massive amount of warm water. It varies in size. When it’s large, the west Pacific Warm Pool can cover a surface area of about 19 million square kilometers (7.3 million square miles) but it averages about 12 million square kilometers (4.6 million square miles). Numbers that large are hard to embrace, so, when the west Pacific Warm Pool is larger than normal, think of an area the size of Russia or a little less than twice the size of the United States. Refer to the Mehta and Mehta (2004) presentation Natural decadal-multidecadal variability of the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool and its impacts on global climate. Also imagine the warm water reaches depths of 300 meters (about 1000 feet). Sometimes, during a very strong El Niño, most of that water from the west Pacific Warm Pool will be transported east and much of it will spread across the surface of the central and eastern tropical Pacific. Now remember that the Pacific stretches almost halfway around the globe at the equator. An El Niño dwarfs all other weather-related events. How big are they? Sometimes it takes a pair of tropical cyclones just to trigger an El Niño. Yes, tropical cyclones as in hurricanes.
Let’s return to the ENSO-neutral phase for a second. A weather event—for example, a couple of tropical cyclones or a pair of them that straddle the equator—a weather event that’s teeny by comparison, has caused the Pacific trade winds to relax, which in turn has unleashed a monstrously large phenomenon that is capable of raising global temperatures 0.4 degrees C in less than a year. In turn, there are heat waves and cold spells. Floods will strike some parts of the globe. Drought conditions form in others. Snowfall will pile to record heights in some areas, and in others it will decrease. These effects were studied and documented decades ago, and they’re still being studied, for example, to account for differences between Central Pacific and the more powerful East Pacific El Niño events.
Of course, some publicity seeking climate scientists continue to (very unwisely) blame carbon dioxide for the heat waves and cold spells, flooding and drought, blizzards and low snowfall, creating further disbelief in climate science. They have only themselves to blame for their loss of credibility. I digress.
An El Niño is one of Mother Nature’s ways of reminding us who’s in charge.
Back to the cartoon-like illustrations.
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
# # # # #
1.3 Recap of Section 1
Trade winds cause the sea surface temperature and height in the western tropical Pacific to be greater than they are in the east. El Niño events are started by the weakening of the trade winds. The weaker trade winds can no longer hold the warm water in place in the west Pacific Warm Pool, and this allows gravity to carry the warm water east, raising sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific.
El Niño events are the abnormal phase of ENSO. The Equatorial Countercurrent strengthens and carries a large volume of warm water from west to east, and that increased volume from west to east opposes the normal east-to-west flow during ENSO-neutral and La Niña phases. The winds also change directions during an El Niño, with trade winds becoming westerlies in the western tropical Pacific. On the other hand, during ENSO-neutral and La Niña phases, the trade winds are blowing in their normal east-to-west direction.
La Niña events are easy to describe. They are exaggerations on the ENSO neutral phase. However, La Niña events play the important role of replenishing the heat given off by the El Niño that precedes it, and sometimes a La Niña can create more warm water than was released by the El Niño.
Warm water that has traveled east during the El Niño and that is not “exhausted” by the El Niño does not remain in the eastern tropical Pacific. It is returned to the West Pacific and Indian Oceans, where much of it remains on the surface. Before the El Niño, most of that warm water is below the surface of the west Pacific Warm Pool and excluded from the surface temperature record. Then, after the El Niño, part of what remains of that warm water is now on the surface of the West Pacific and East Indian Oceans. The opposite does not occur during the La Niña phase. The result: strong El Niño events can raise global sea surface temperatures for extended periods of time. This will be discussed in detail in Section 5.
[END OF SECTION 1 OF WHO TURNED ON THE HEAT?]
Again, if you have any questions, please ask.
Now that you’ve run through the processes, here’s a one sentence description of ENSO: ENSO acts as a chaotic, naturally occurring, sunlight-fueled, recharge-discharge oscillator, where the La Niña phase acts as the recharge phase and El Niño acts as the discharge phase.
As long as the climate science community continues to treat ENSO as noise, they will make little progress in understanding the natural contribution to global warming, and it’s a sizeable contribution. We’ve discussed for years that the climate science community has failed to account for the “leftovers”, the residual warm water, from strong El Niños.
I also used those cartoon-like illustrations in my two-part video series “The Natural Warming of the Global Oceans”, which first aired on the WUWT-TV special in September 2012. That series is available on YouTube. Part 1 is here, and Part 2 is here.
I went into much more detail to explain ENSO processes and the aftereffects of El Niño and La Niña events in my ebook Who Turned on the Heat? I’ve lowered the price of Who Turned on the Heat? from U.S.$8.00 to U.S.$5.00…for a month or so, with hope of increasing sales a little bit. A free preview in pdf format is here. The preview includes the Table of Contents, the Introduction, the first half of section 1 (which was provided complete in this post), a discussion of the cover, and the Closing. Take a run through the Table of Contents. It is a very-detailed and well-illustrated book—using data from the real world, not models of a virtual world.
Who Turned on the Heat? is only available in pdf format…and will only be available in that format. Click here to purchase a copy. Thanks. Unless I can find funding for my research, it will be book sales and tips/donations that allow me to return to blogging full-time.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





























Bob, thanks for the clear explanations.
I already bought the book. I wanted to support you. $ 5 for a PDF over 500 pages, it is a gift.
Thank you, Mr Tisdale, for this concise and clear description of what had been for me something of a mystery. No longer. I originally thought the heat was produced by undersea volcanos…
I’m homeschooling a young lad. When we get to the weather in his Physical Science course I would like to use this if it is okay with you Bob. Great presentation.
@John L Kelly
Why does this happen every 10 years or so ; OK , the geothermal gradient assures the upward branch of the thermohaline circulation ; and possibly events like D-O events during glaciations ; but why would the oceanic crust release its heat with such a regular timing ?
MCourtney, The rest of the ocean doesn’t rise. It has to stay where it is while the higher water from the west falls on top of it.
Exaggerated example:
BEFORE
111
222222
333333333
AFTER
222222111
333333333
The water volume represented by the 1s above has fallen down one level. Yes, the level at that point has risen from where it has, but it has done so by means of water seeking a lower level. The potential energy represented by a half meter fall is converted into the kinetic energy strengthening the equatorial counter-current. Eventually, that kinetic energy becomes heat. Every kilogram of water that falls a half meter will release 4.9 joules of energy. The sheer area of the Pacific Ocean means that it will be a significant amount of energy in total, but when divided over that same area, the contribution to surface temperatures is probably insignificant.
Thank you. Excellent pictures that are worth a thousand words.
Thanks a lot it was very helpful. I never really understood El Niño/La Nina before, I thought I did but if I was quizzed on the basics yesterday I would have flunked.
As I’ve posted at Bob’s site, everyone contact your local library and see if they support ebooks (mine does). If so ask them to buy a copy. It is first rate material and needs a wide audience.
The Monster (@SumErgoMonstro),January 10, 2014 at 11:35 am:
Thanks,
You are right.
I was wrong.
The Monster (@SumErgoMonstro) says:
January 10, 2014 at 11:35 am
The potential energy represented by a half meter fall is converted into the kinetic energy strengthening the equatorial counter-current.
I am not convinced there is any net gain in kinetic energy. With regard to the 0.5 m first of all, if the far left side dropped half of that, namely 0.25 m, and if the right side gained this amount, then the surface would be flat. Also, this relative height of 0.25 m only applies to the far left. It goes to 0 m in the middle and to -0.25 m on the right side.
Of course we can calculate the gain in kinetic energy if a mass is dropped in a vacuum a distance of 0.25 m, however for all intents and purposes, the friction in this case would make it more similar to a feather falling in air in that terminal velocity would be reached almost immediately.
Darn. If I waited, I could have saved $8. But then, at my age, I needed the remedial review. Was that redundant?
Nice work. Thanks.
Bob, you will find this blog post quite interesting:
http://notrickszone.com/2014/01/10/oops-trenberth-concedes-natural-ocean-cycles-contributed-to-1978-1998-warming-after-all-co2-diminishes-as-a-factor/
Bob,
Thank you for this excellent work. Question: how do e-books work- can they run on any computer, or do they require a kendle type reader?
Andy Halloran says: “What causes trade winds to become stronger during a La Nina?”

Because the trade wind strength and the temperature gradient between the eastern and western tropical Pacific are interrelated, an increase in the temperature gradient would cause stronger trade winds.
As you’ll recall, there is a flood of warm water traveling from west to east at the start of an El Niño, much of it below the surface. That’s called a warm “downwelling Kelvin wave”. According to the “delayed oscillator theory” of ENSO, that downwelling Kelvin wave initiates cool but slow moving “upwelling Rossby waves” moving in the opposite direction. They reflect off of the land masses and eventually make their way eastward along the equator as a cool “upwelling Kelvin wave” which helps to shut down the El Niño. That cooler subsurface water is drawn to the surface along the eastern equatorial Pacific, which increases the temperature gradient between east and west, which in turn causes stronger trade winds.
NOAA has a brief answer at their La Niña FAQ webpage here. See “What causes a La Niña?”:
http://www.elnino.noaa.gov/lanina_new_faq.html
And IRI has an introduction to the delayed oscillator theory here:
http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/theory/
I also present it in Chapter 4.9 of my book, using another group of cartoons as reference:
lurker, passing through laughing says: “Thank you for this excellent work. Question: how do e-books work- can they run on any computer, or do they require a kendle type reader?”
My ebook “Who Turned on the Heat?” is only available in PDF form, which means it will run on any computer that has Abobe Reader software.
My other books are available in PDF and Kindle formats. Kindle Reader software is available (free from Amazon) for computers and handheld devices, so it can run on just about anything.
John L Kelly says: “This all sounds absolutely wonderful. However you, like the rest of the world, continue to underestimate the Heat From Within the planet…”
Unfortunately, there are little to no subsurface data at the depths you’re talking about to support your hypothesis.
John L Kelly says: “Consider, if the sun is the main ingredient here, then why doesn’t this oceanic heating occur all over the planet?”
The Atlantic has El Nino events. aka Atlantic Equatorial Mode and Atlantic NINO:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Equatorial_mode
John L Kelly says: “If you refuse to see this, fine. I personally don’t care. That’s your problem.”
There’s no problem, John. Everything I’ve presented is supported by data. You’ve presented speculation.
Pethefin, thanks for the link.
chemman: Okay with me. In fact, I’d be honored by your use of it.
Rich Carman says: “When global warming and global cooling do actually occur over extended periods of time (such as variations in thr earth’s orbit or sun’s activity), how might this affect the intensity of the processes you described?”
Rich, there is no way to tell with the lack of ENSO “data” over paleoclimatological timescales.
Rich Carman says: “I haven’t seen the video yet, but is it possible to make a widely distributed motion animation of these processes? If so, how might that be accomplished?”
I wish I had animation skills but I don’t.
Rich Carman says: “What kind of resistance have you run into with respect to this information?”
I don’t believe the ENSO basics presented in this post are controversial. On the other hand, my presentations of the long-term effects of ENSO (i.e. the natural warming of the global oceans) are not well received by the AGW camp. They call me nasty names in response.
Lance Wallace says: “If ENSO is just a natural oscillation, why do we see these step-like shifts in global atmospheric temperatures after powerful El Ninos such as 1997-98?”
And in response to the 1986/87/88 El Nino.
That was basically the basis for part of my questions in the “Manmade Global Warming Challenge?”:
http://bobtisdale.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/the-manmade-global-warming-challenge.pdf
Ron Richey says: “What happens to ENSO during an ice age? Does ENSO cause or contribute to ice ages or warm ages?”
I haven’t studied ENSO on paleoclimatological terms due the absence of data. In fact, I normally stick to the satellite era.
PeterB in Indianapolis says: “It seems like we have been bouncing around in then ENSO-Neutral range for quite some time now. Do you see a “breakout” in one direction or another any time soon?”
Sorry to say, but I don’t make predictions. The models are edging toward weak El Nino conditions toward summer, but it’s still early. We haven’t yet passed the “spring prediction barrier” for ENSO.
http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/background/prediction.html#barrier
Michael Barnes says: “Since the water in the West Pacific Warm Pool is warmer than the water in the Cold Tongue Region, the water in the West is less dense than the water in the East. Is this explicitly accounted for? How much does it matter?”
I don’t believe I’ve ever seen your questions addressed anywhere.
Gary Pearse: Sorry. Can’t answer your questions. I haven’t studied the density or salinity of the waters involved in ENSO, and I don’t recall any papers that address those topics, but I didn’t look for them, either.
@ur momisugly Bob Does this ocean process drive cyclones and hurricanes when it couples with the stratosphere ?