Environmental concern disappears with economic instability

From University of Southern California  another lesson from the economic train wreck that is Greece; people stop worrying about the environment when you make cleaner fuels too expensive to use.

The price for heating oil has skyrocketed in Greece over the last two years (the government raised the taxes on heating oil 450% this fall alone), and now many residents are turning to wood burning for winter heat since they can’t afford the oil, which has affected the city’s air quality:

athens smog
Smog from wood burning and other sources obscures The Parthenon in this photo. Source: Mediterranean Palimpsest

Greek economic crisis leads to air pollution crisis

Levels of dangerous air particulates jump 30 percent as people turn to burning cheaper fuel sources

In the midst of a winter cold snap, a study from researchers in the United States and Greece reveals an overlooked side effect of economic crisis – dangerous air quality caused by burning cheaper fuel for warmth.

The researchers, led by Constantinos Sioutas of the USC Viterbi School of Engineering, show that the concentration of fine air particles in one of Greece’s economically hardest hit areas has risen 30 percent since the financial crisis began, leading to potential long-term health effects.

These fine particles – measuring less than 2.5 microns in diameter (approximately 1/30th the diameter of a human hair) – are especially dangerous because they can lodge deep into the tissue of lungs, according to the EPA.

“People need to stay warm, but face decreasing employment and rising fuel costs,” explained Sioutas, senior author of the study in the journal Environmental Science & Technology and Fred Champion Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the USC Viterbi School. “The problem is economic hardship has compelled residents to burn low quality fuel, such as wood and waste materials, that pollutes the air.”

Unemployment in Greece climbed above 27 percent in 2013. Meanwhile, heating oil prices have nearly tripled in Greece during the Greek financial crisis of the last few years – driven in part by a fuel tax hike. Cold Greeks, it would appear (according to the air quality), have turned to wood as a major fuel source.

In their study, the researchers collected air samples that supported anecdotal evidence of Greek residents burning of wood and trash for heating. Taken over two-month stretches in Winter 2012 and again in Winter 2013, the samples reveal a dramatic increase in airborne fine particles since the beginning of the economic crisis.

The concentration of these particles, which has been linked to increased risk for heart disease and respiratory problems, rose from 26 to 36 micrograms per square meter over the study period, the researchers found. The EPA standard in the United States is an average of 20 micrograms per square meter over a 24-hour period. Worse yet, the concentrations of carcinogenic organic compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) increased five-fold during the study period, the researchers found.

The concentration of the particulates was highest in the evening, presumably when more people were burning fuel for warmth, the study found. An analysis of the air samples also showed a two-to-five-fold increase in the airborne concentrations of organic compounds such as levoglucosan, mannosan and galactosan, which indicate the burning of biomass. The presence of these compounds has been strongly correlated in past research to oxidative stress in human cells, which is linked to inflammation, aging and the development of age-related diseases.

“Wood’s cheap, but it’s having a major negative impact on air quality,” Sioutas said. The authors recommend active involvement of public authorities and local agencies to implement effective air pollution control strategies. They suggest increasing natural gas distribution in residential areas as a practical long-term solution. Catalytic domestic wood burners and increasing the energy efficiency of existing buildings might be additional possible solutions, according to the report.

###

Sioutas collaborated with researchers from USC, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and the University of Wisconsin-Madison on the study. Arian Saffari, a Provost PhD fellow at the USC Viterbi School, is lead author of the study. The research was funded by the USC Provost, the USC Viterbi School of Engineering and the City of Thessaloniki Mayor’s office.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rogerthesurf
December 20, 2013 7:55 pm

climateace says:
December 19, 2013 at 2:09 pm
rogerthesurf says:
‘In my city of Christchurch NZ where we have an earthquake recovery of sorts going on,(Its mostly still theoretical), all building is to meet the strictest CO2 emissions and land is being cleared to protect wetlands (aka swamps) and river banks according to Agenda21. ‘
I thought that the problem being addressed was liquefaction. Basically, the developers got it wrong and built suburbs on wetlands (swamps). With the big earthquake, the substrate liquefied, destroying or damaging the houses and urban infrastructure beyond economic repair. The New Zealand taxpayer is now paying clearing for buying those houses and land and is subsidising the rebuilding of replacement accommodation Government the offer elsewhere. Utilities would be simple
The developers, as they do, got away scot free with their profits.
But I suppose your theory, that government wants their land no matter what.complaining it is a UN Agenda 21 plot might be more correct.
Climateace,
The only catch with what you say is that the clearing of the river banks and former wetlands includes undamaged and marginally damaged properties as well. There are worse properties that are not red zoned. On top of that, the Government “offer” includes the proviso that of you don’t accept you will lose all your utilities. Even undamaged properties 10m or less from non red zoned properties (where connection to utilities would be simple should there be technical problems with the current supply) still have to move out. Residents are complaining that the government wants their land no matter what.
If you look on my blog, you will see the “Christchurch Central. Recovery plan” where on P41 it recites Agenda 21 very clearly. Also I have there government web pages where Agenda 21 is acknowledged and which legislation has been modified to accommodate it.
Think what you wish of that.
Cheers
Roger
http://www.thedemiseofchristchurch.com
Ps the land in question would have originally been approved for development by the council. The buck stops there on my view.

December 21, 2013 7:40 am

In the Hierarchy of Human Needs – starting with air; water; food; shelter … – smoke free environment comes a long way back. The British Clean Air Acts were produced in the 1950s so if that is where the greens are sending us their success guarantees their failure.
How long before the Greeks decide buying Chinese nuclear reactors are the best way to get their economy growing and eventually passing Germany’s. How long before that would work.If Greece managed China’s 10% growth they would pass Germany in about 14 years.