This ranks right up there with Heartland’s blunderous Unabomber billboard.
From their Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/iHeartClimateScientists
Are they irony impaired, since Jason is fictitious?
I wonder, do climate scientists really want Jason as a spokesperson for zealots to show their love? Inquiring minds want to know.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Do they even get the irony? Jason is a fictional character. No reason to worry about him at all.
The Unabomber is a real person that killed real people. Jason is a fictitious character that killed fictitious people.
Shame we don’t have global warming.
Ah, Jason Voorhees. Good choice. I can see they excel in fiction.
Jason is more logical and amenable to a civil debate on the scientific facts than these folks.
Hmmm, why not a picture of the snow falling today in Cairo?
oh wait, that’s just “weather”, not “climate change”. The kind of “weather” that hasn’t happened in about 100 years. (strangely, coincidentally, and of course completely unrelated, that last snowfall in Cairo happened during an extremely diminished solar cycle, too)
Real scientists have every right to challenge this slur on their good name.
No, nightmares are caused by Freddy Kreuger, which was the “Nightmare on Elm Street” horror franchise, not the “Friday the 13th” franchise. These guys can’t even keep their pop culture references straight.
These guys are getting good at a fiction. First Santa Claus, now Jason.
Funny, at first glance I read that as “I hate climate scientists”.
Apart from that, I have no idea who Jason is/was so the whole thing is lost on me.
“Are they irony impaired, since Jason is fictitious?”
Well Anthony, that seems the point they’re making. “Jason’s” fictitious. CAGW’s all too real. The weakness lies in the very fact they have to say it, the implicit acknowledgement being that many people don’t believe it’s real.
I wonder why…
Hm.
If the weight of scientific evidence means that we are really near the beginning of the end for the CAGW scare, the proponents will probably get a lot nastier before it is all over. Many have a great deal invested in careers and will be aggressive in protecting them. For others it may only be their self-delusion of choice, but some people will defend religion with violence.
The mentality of a 17 year old halfwit.
Maybe Josh can do something along the thought of “Truth, the Reality that Ate AGW”. Truth can be substituted with Facts, Data, or a few other terms.
I thought they had SuperMandia? Couldn’t he take on Jason?
So stupid, I am now dumber for having read that.
Will iHeartClimateScientists have to pay royalties for using the Jason image?
Who funds iHCS? Maybe they are syphoning off money for their warmunist buddies in Hollywood.
Jason is a good spokesperson. He butchers, they butcher (10-10 ad???).
If you count all the holes they have drilled in the skull it still doesn’t exceed the number of holes in their argument.
If I may suggest, perhaps a poster of “Dumb and Dumber” may have been more appropriate?
Also on the iHCS FaceBook page:
“New greenhouse gas 7,000 times more powerful than CO2”
Perfluorotributylamine is an unregulated, long-living industrial chemical that breaks all records for potential climate impacts
———————————————–
It’s worse than we thought!
WE’RE DOOOOOOMED!!!!!!
But enough about Belgium’s new euthanasia policy for children – how about those Broncos?
There is not a Bus short enough for those Morons.
Does a hockey stick go with that hockey mask?
Nope, no alarmism there. Just good sound scientific reasoning. Just hope it’s not too technical for some people.
…… Nor is there a full-body Helmet suitable to their need.