How not to measure temperature – Part 94 – Maniitsoq, Greenland all time high temperature rescinded?

UPDATE: 7/12/13 1045 PDT DMI concedes the record may not be valid, see here

I’ve been working on this one for a week, and I finally confirmed my hunch about where the weather station is located. The story begins with Jason Samenow at the Washington Post, who made a big deal out of a new temperature record in Maniitsoq, Greenland:

Maniitsoq_WaPo

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/08/01/greenland-soars-to-highest-temperature-ever-recorded/

Any time I read about new record temperatures in the Arctic or Antarctic, I tend to think of this simple truth: In near polar settlements, temperature is measured close to that small human island of warmth , and since most such towns are completely dependent on aviation, the measurement is often done at the airport, since weather there is a go/no go factor of primary importance.

It turns out I was correct. What was surprising was just how correct my hunch turned out to be.

First, the Maniitsoq, Greenland data for July 30th, courtesy of Weather Underground:

Maniitsoq_wxdata

Source: http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/BGMQ/2013/7/30/DailyHistory.html?req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA&MR=1

Note the yellow highlights for the Tmax. This confirms Samenow’s story, though I find it curious that Weather Underground didn’t round up to 79F based on Samenow’s reported value of 78.6F (which he likes to say is nearly 80F). No matter, there are other issues that I was suspicious of.

First, this is a weather event, it doesn’t have anything to do with climate, as DMI indicated on their weather map for the day, strong warm winds behind a warm front washed over southwest Greenland, where Maniitsoq is located:

4880007af6

Weather pattern responsible for record warmth in southwest Greenland (Danish Meteorological Institute)

Samenow was correct in noting:

It adds the warmth may have been enhanced by a phenomenon known as the Foehn Effect, in which air flows over nearby elevated terrain and compresses and heats on its way down. In this case, DMI believes the air may have passed over the elevated Sugar Loaf ice cap and then dried and warmed up as it descended (or downsloped) on its leeward side into Maniitsoq.

But then falls back into the “it must somehow be related to global warming” position saying:

The DMI says the warmth was not “unnatural”, but explains it fits into a long-term pattern of climate warming.

“[T]here is an indisputable gradual increase in temperature in Greenland,” DMI writes. “Along the way, any ‘warm event’ thus have a higher probability of being slightly warmer than the previous one.”

As I pointed out at the beginning of this article, the temperature was measured at the airport. But how good is that weather station location? Is it biased by its placement at the airport? It took me a week to find it, but find it I did.

First, an overview from Google Earth of the town and the airport. You can clearly see the “nearby elevated terrain” near the airport.

Maniitsoq_wide

The winds were out of the Northeast at the time of the high reading after 5PM, note yellow highlights:

Maniitsoq_wxdata_graphs_all

Next, from aerial closeup and my experience with spotting hundreds of weather stations for the SurfaceStations project, this is where I thought the Stevenson Screen might be at the airport. try as I might though, I couldn’t find a photo of it.

Maniitsoq_closeup

It turned out that a video shot by a tourist (Bart Rietveld) confirmed my suspicion, I found it this morning during a bout of insomnia. Here’s the screencap from the video, looking Northwest from the tarmac at BGMQ aka Maniitsoq airport.

Maniitsoq_Stevenson_screen

Source: @ 0:15 into this video:

Here is what I conclude about the station placement:

  1. Maniitsoq airport is a recent development in the history of the area, it has been settled for almost 4000 years. It is an anomaly carved out of the landscape (see first Google Earth image).
  2. The weather station is surrounded by the airport runway and tarmac, which is unnatural ground cover. Note how dark it is in the tourist video.
  3. The dark albedo there is enough to melt snow in the winter, in fact they count on it to help keep the airport open. Just like I showed in Svalbard, they have to keep the runway open even after snowfall, and it becomes an albedo anomaly surrounded by snow.
  4. The local siting effects likely added to the temperature record on July 30th because the easterly wind would also have picked up some of the heat from the terminal building and tarmac and transported it to the weather station.
  5. For these reasons, it isn’t a good place to measure temperature for climate, but it is the best place to measure weather/temperature for aviation purposes: right next to the runway.

It seems that DMI agrees that this temperature is artificially elevated at the Maniitsoq airport, because according to this story in Nunatsiaq Online, DMI has discarded the record in favor of one in the town. They added this footnote to their story about record heat in Greenland:

[Note: the DMI later rescinded the claim that the July 30 temperature was a record-breaker, saying that the lower temperature recorded at another station in the community — 24 C — stands for that day. That’s 1.9 C lower than the record, which is still to be broken]

Note also that DMI had this to say in the original report on the event:

Whether the 25.9 ° C later elevated to a new record for Greenland will first be decided after further climatological study of the situation.

While I could not find the rescinding announcement at DMI, likely due to me being unable to effectively interpret the language on the DMI website, I can confirm that as of today, 11 days after the event, the old record still stands:

DMI_record_highs

Source: http://www.dmi.dk/groenland/arkiver/vejrekstremer/

It looks like Mr. Samenow at the Washington Post will need to issue a retraction. Ditto for Dr. Jason Box and who also bought into the event without questioning it or following up on it.

And these news articles need corrections (readers can help by sending notes to them):

===================================================================

UPDATE Dr. Richard Keen adds in comments:

All this discussion of a degree or two is a moot point, since even the “nearly 80 degrees”, i.e. 79F, is still 7 degrees short of the record high for Greenland.

That honor belongs to Ivigtut, down on the southern tip of Greenland (probably not far from Maniitsoq), where it was 86F (30.1C) sometime before 1940. This record is published in:

Climates of the World, in Climate and Man – Yearbook of Agriculture, US Dept of Agriculture, 1941

reprinted in:

Climates of the World, US Dept. Commerce, 1969

and even in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivittuut

So you know it’s valid.

I don’t know the exact date of the record, but suffice it to say it’s before 1940, which explains why the DMI chose to use records starting in 1958. After all, Greenland weather records go back to 1784 (Vinther et al., Extending Greenland temperature records into the late eighteenth century, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, D11105, doi:10.1029/2005JD006810, 2006). It’s a common ploy for the Warmers to act as though climate started in 1958, when Keeling starting recording CO2 on Mauna Loa, or 1947, when the PDO went cool, or 1970, when Arctic temperatures bottomed out, to get their upward trends.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
87 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DirkH
August 11, 2013 9:45 am

Steinar Midtskogen says:
August 10, 2013 at 11:43 am
“Anthony, I think you’re putting a bit too much emphasis on albedo. First, it’s not really a problem for catching trends if the surroundings stay pretty much the same. In the Svalbard case, the weather station was established when the airport was built. ”
And human infrstructure is known to never change. /sarc

August 11, 2013 6:27 pm

The old record referred to by dr Richard Keen is the 30.1°C maximum reading from Ivigtut on 23 June 1915. It is probably an error of at least 5°C, but the weather conditons on this particular day were conductive to high temperatures. There were three thermometers at this station at this time, a maximum thermometer, a minimum thermometer and a regluar one read at fixed times. The highest reading on that thermomter was 21.0°C at 20 pm on 23 June. For some unclear reason this value is in some derivative printed records said to have taken place on 23 April – which is clearly an error, according to the DMI yearbook the maximum that day was only 0.4°C. I don’t have access to the original observation list (only the yearbook) but I don’t belive that the April and June mixup has been made in the yearbook, but when the tabels there have been copied to some other list. Regarding >20°C in Greenland one must keep in mind that the inland stations which regularly observe so high temperatures only started to observe after or during the 2nd world war so the 1958 date that the DMI uses is perfectly natural. In the older records there are many >20°C observations but the anomalous 30.1°C at Ivigtut is the only one above 25°C that I have found before 1920.

August 11, 2013 7:52 pm

No problems with any other site, any advice from posters would be very welcome!

Get a PC. 😉

August 11, 2013 8:46 pm

hahah….I got confused reading your article…!! I’m not such a good weather theorist =)

MattN
August 12, 2013 8:17 am

They’ll issue a retraction like they did for the north pole meltout: “yeah, we were wrong, but it doesn’t matter because (insert ridiculous rationalization here)….”

richard verney
August 12, 2013 9:15 am

Slightly O/T but about Greenland. See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2389991/Global-warming-Scientists-discover-heat-INSIDE-Earth-melting-areas-Arctic-ice.html
Of course this is substantially a model led piece of research, but nonetheless, the point raised is of interest.

Jeremy
August 12, 2013 9:26 am

Anthony, just a heads up that Samenow has posted an article following up on the issue. Hasn’t issued a retraction yet because DMI hasn’t offiically invalidated the record quite yet. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/08/12/greenland-may-not-have-recorded-its-highest-summer-temperature/

Sedron L
August 12, 2013 10:56 am

We’ve retooled it entirely,…
Did I miss the follow-up press release announcing this?
PS: Do you or do you not receive funding from the Heartland Institute?

Maximiliano Herrera
August 12, 2013 2:00 pm

There is NO 30.1c AT Ivigtut in 1915, That record is 100% BOGUS. The reading was 20.1C but it wqs miswrote as 20.1C The all time highest temperature at Ivigtut NEVER EXCEEDED the 24C, I have all its complete serie, so get your facts right.

Reply to  Maximiliano Herrera
August 12, 2013 3:41 pm

The 30.1°C value is printed in the DMI yearbook (p.47). Do you have a copy of the observation journal for June 1915? The value is, as I have said before, almost certainily wrong, we don’t have to argue about that, but it is printed NOT in April, but in June along with other observations of the same day, one of these (at 20 pm) being 21,0°C – higher than 20.1°C you mention. Is that reading a bogus as well? On 13 July the maximum temperature in Ivigtut is printed as 21.4°C and 23.3 on 9 July in Ammasalik, the minimum there on the same day printed as 14.4°C – very high for Greenland.

Sedron L
August 13, 2013 12:47 pm

PS (again): Do you or do you not receive funding from the Heartland Institute?
Do you receive money from _anyone_ to blog or do climate-related work?