From the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, a claim of 2 feet by 2050, but tide gauge data from Annapolis doesn’t support it, showing it will take well over 100 years at the historic rate to reach 2 feet, and there is no hint of acceleration in the record:
Source: NOAA Tides and Currents
Sea level along Maryland’s shorelines could rise 2 feet by 2050, according to new report
ANNAPOLIS, MD (June 26, 2013)—A new report on sea level rise recommends that the State of Maryland should plan for a rise in sea level of as much as 2 feet by 2050. Led by the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, the report was prepared by a panel of scientific experts in response to Governor Martin O’Malley’s Executive Order on Climate Change and “Coast Smart” Construction. The projections are based on an assessment of the latest climate change science and federal guidelines.
“The State of Maryland is committed to taking the necessary actions to adapt to the rising sea and guard against the impacts of extreme storms,” said Governor Martin O’Malley. “In doing so, we must stay abreast of the latest climate science to ensure that we have a sound understanding of our vulnerability and are making informed decisions about how best to protect our land, infrastructure, and most importantly, the citizens of Maryland.”
The independent, scientific report recommends that is it is prudent to plan for sea level to be 2.1 feet higher in 2050 along Maryland’s shorelines than it was in 2000 in order to accommodate the high end of the range of the panel’s projections. Maryland has 3,100 miles of tidal shoreline and low-lying rural and urban lands that will be impacted. The experts’ best estimate for the amount of sea level rise in 2050 is 1.4 feet. It is unlikely to be less than 0.9 feet or greater than 2.1 feet. Their best estimate for sea level rise by 2100 is 3.7 feet. They concluded that it is unlikely to be less than 2.1 feet or more than 5.7 feet based on current scientific understanding.
“This reassessment narrows the probable range of sea level rise based on the latest science,” said Donald Boesch, president of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science and chair of the group of experts that assembled the report. “It provides the State with sea level rise projections based on best scientific understanding to ensure that infrastructure is sited and designed in a manner that will avoid or minimize future loss or damage.”
These estimates were made based on the various contributors to sea level rise: thermal expansion of ocean volume as a result of warming, the melting of glaciers and Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, changing ocean dynamics such as the slowing of the Gulf Stream, and vertical land movement.
“While there is little we can do now to reduce the amount of sea level rise by the middle of the century, steps taken over the next 30 years to control greenhouse gas emissions and stabilize global temperatures will largely determine how great the sea level rise challenge will be for coastal residents at the end of this century and beyond,” said Dr. Boesch.
According to Joseph P. Gill, Secretary of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, impacts associated with sea level rise are already being seen along Maryland’s coast, such as the documented loss of islands within the Chesapeake Bay, as well as visible changes to wetland habitats all along Maryland’s low-lying eastern shore.
“Recognizing the importance of building resilience within our natural and built environments,” said Gill, “DNR’s CoastSmart Communities Program is dedicated to offering on-the-ground expertise, planning guidance, training, tools, and financial assistance to help others in state plan, prepare, and adapt.” For more information on CoastSmart, visit http://dnr.maryland.gov/CoastSmart/.
Governor O’Malley established the Maryland Commission on Climate Change on April 20, 2007. The Commission produced a Plan of Action that included a comprehensive climate change impact assessment, a greenhouse gas reduction strategy, and actions for reducing Maryland’s vulnerability to climate change. On December 28, 2012, Governor O’Malley issued an executive order that requires State agencies to consider the risk of coastal flooding and sea level rise to capital projects.
The 21-member panel comprised of sea level rise experts from the Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, reviewed projections from Maryland’s 2008 Climate Action Plan and provided updated recommendations based on new scientific results that can better inform projections of sea level rise for Maryland.
The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), is updating Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for communities in Maryland. The revised maps are the first update in the coastal areas of Maryland in 25 years and confirm both increases and decreases in the 100-year flood elevations over this period of time.
“MDE is working with seventeen Maryland coastal communities to go through the mapping process, which requires the communities to update their local floodplain management ordinances before the revised maps become effective,” said Maryland Department of the Environment Secretary Robert M. Summers. “Many communities choose to better prepare themselves by adopting higher freeboard elevations or additional safety requirements for new or substantially improved structures, which could lead to reductions in flood insurance.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I remain willing to buy oceanside property at a steep discount from any concerned owners. Please contact me through my blog. Thank you.
‘Don’t come bothering me with pesky things like real world measurements. I’ve got a model to run’. (Climatologist)
‘“It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong” (Feynman)
‘Feynman is right’ (Mother Nature)
Curious, all this sea-level rise stuff! If this is true around the globe, can anyone tell my why property around Sandbanks, near Poole in Dorset, are still valued at millions of squid? Personally I would have thought house value from the values would be plummeting already! Has Mr Gore’s sea-front property gone own in value from its $4M purchase price a few years ago now?
I have always been ammused by the graph of sea level at an area on the South Coast of England dispayed at
http://www.villagenet.co.uk/history/0000-romneymarsh.php
If that is what really happened then something big could had hit the Earth somewhere previously as an alternative explanation! Looks like a bell ringing to me 🙂
Looks like a big barrel of pork being cooked up for crony construction firms.
Thee errors typically made in these studies is in ignoring the effects of the ocean oscillations in the local trends that are then used to extrapolate the future trend.
A detailed discussion is in
1) Scafetta N., 2013. Discussion on common errors in analyzing sea level accelerations, solar trends and global warming. Pattern Recognition in Physics, 1, 37–57. (open access)
http://www.pattern-recogn-phys.net/1/37/2013/prp-1-37-2013.html
2) Scafetta N., 2013. Multi-scale dynamical analysis (MSDA) of sea level records versus PDO, AMO, and NAO indexes. Climate Dynamics. in press.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00382-013-1771-3
In (1) there is a detailed discussion of the sea level data from New York which is not far from Annapolis.
The Chesapeake Bay has been wrecked by Big Government.
The hordes of people who moved to the region to feed at the government trough caused massive development and colossal urban sprawl. Sediment, sewage and pollutants washed into the estuary from the resultant gigantic concrete pad.
Within living memory, Annapolis was a working harbor rather than the urban hellhole it’s become.
Nicola Scafetta says:
June 27, 2013 at 4:28 am
“Pattern Recognition in Physics”
I would like to know your opinion on these two low pass filter studies of UAH and CET.
http://s1291.photobucket.com/user/RichardLH/story/73127
http://s1291.photobucket.com/user/RichardLH/story/70051
An example of pattern recognition in Temperature data?
@John W Garrett
Seriously? Annapolis is still a quaint town with a working harbor for small sail craft. your rhetoric is a little over the top. Also, our weasel-in-chief Gov. O’malley’s report admitted that some of the coastal sea level rise is due to subsidence. I would add that the only time the bay area gets huge hurricane damage is when the storm takes a path that pushes water into the bay.None of the recent “big” storms are a result of sea level rise, but of the hurricane track.
Flood plain expansion is economic stimulation through baseless legislation. People of modest means cannot afford to live east of US-17, neither can State Farm Ins. Co.
Delete previous. The strike codes did not work.
WUWT hasn’t updated Nicola Scafetta’s (commenter in this article) Widget in a year. I see at http://people.duke.edu/~ns2002/#astronomical_model-1 (bottom of page) it still looks good.
GPS receivers in the area shows that the region is generally sinking due to glacial isostatic rebound (glacial forebulge sinking that is). The rate is as much as -2.81 mm/yr although the Annapolis station (USNA) was the lone station in the region rising at 0.59 mm/yr.
So, there was going to be sea level rise here regardless of global warming and there has been sea level rise here since the ice glaciers melted back 10,000 years ago. V_GPS in this table is the average vertical change in mm/yr from GPS receivers which have been in place long enough to tease out a solid signal.
Site DOMES Lon Lat V_GPS
USN3 40451S007 -77.0662 38.9205 -0.81
USNO 40451S003 -77.0662 38.9189 -0.81
GODE 40451M123 -76.8268 39.0217 -1.23
ANP1 49908S101 -76.6092 39.0102 -1.49
ANP5 99992M001 -76.6092 39.0102 -1.49
GLPT 49467M001 -76.4994 37.2485 -2.29
USNA 49908S001 -76.4793 38.9833 0.59
MDSI 99910M001 -76.4538 38.3189 -2.81
SOL1 49907S001 -76.4538 38.3188 -2.81
HNPT 49913S001 -76.1303 38.5888 -1.95
http://www.sonel.org/IMG/png/ulr5_vvf-2.png
http://www.sonel.org/-GPS-Solutions-.html?lang=en
Bob Shapiro says:
June 27, 2013 at 5:00 am
“WUWT hasn’t updated Nicola Scafetta’s (commenter in this article) Widget in a year. I see at http://people.duke.edu/~ns2002/#astronomical_model-1 (bottom of page) it still looks good.”
Unfortunately it is possible that there are Earth bound natural perodic cycles that may dominate any Solar/Earth interactions much beyond 4 years.
That is what I believe.
After coming out of the ‘hottest decade on the record’ how long do we have to wait for the acceleration in the rate of sea level rise? I have been assured that the heat went deep sea diving, thermal expansion is here, the glaciers are in runaway meltdown, Antarctica is melting and expanding with collapsing ice sheets, Greenland is hot, hot, hot, snowfalls are no more…………
2 Feet? Yea, during the next full moon high tide.
Anyone wanting to unload their beach front property now, I will generously take it off your hands for the cost of only the property taxes. What can I say? I am a nice guy.
“Reality is the murder of a beautiful theory by a gang of ugly facts.”
— RobertGlass?
“The great tragedy of science — the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.”
— Thomas Huxley
It’s going to suddenly start rocketing up in Sydney too. 40cm by 2050.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/global-warming/sealevel-rise-threat-to-coast/2008/10/28/1224956039688.html
We first noticed that sea level was rising about 22,000 years ago. It has been rising ever since. If it keeps up at this rate, the whole coastline will be under water.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png
FerdinandAkin says:
June 27, 2013 at 5:40 am
“We first noticed that sea level was rising about 22,000 years ago. It has been rising ever since.”
Rising might be a big claim for the whole Earth!
http://www.villagenet.co.uk/history/0000-romneymarsh.php
This skeer has been going up the east coast. First in NC, then in VA and now in Maryland. The fall back on why we aren’t seeing it now is that the rise will be exponential. Wonderful to create a panic and do all sorts of spendy things for an effect no one will see for some time.
If a gov’t must spend large amounts of money on non problems… then spending it on strengthened coastal infrastructure seems like a good place to invest it. We don’t need AGW, as an excuse, to strengthen coastal defenses, however, prudent people should NOT be paying for the risk undertaken by the wealthy, in order to facilitate, their sea side residences and view. Any residence, located on flood plains, is hardly prudent. GK
Climate alarmists need to learn the term “relative sea level change”, accounting for land level as well as sea level. In many areas, including the Chesapeake, the former is changing faster than the latter.
Calgary, Alberta had a potential $5 billion flood last week. Does anyone know how much water was in the flood control dams upstream when it started raining? The operators must have known the spring snow melt was delayed this year and should have been dumping water as soon as the computer models forecasted heavy rain.
Thanks Tom K
My math says ~5 inches by 2050.