From the University of New Hampshire , comes this explanation of what we observe seasonally in the news, that warming events are inevitably linked to global warming.
![hamilton_stampone_2013[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/hamilton_stampone_20131.jpg?resize=640%2C465&quality=83)
Climate change beliefs of independent voters shift with the weather, UNH study finds
Sydney, AUS – There’s a well-known saying in New England that if you don’t like the weather here, wait a minute. When it comes to independent voters, those weather changes can just as quickly shift beliefs about climate change.
New research from the University of New Hampshire finds that the climate change beliefs of independent voters are dramatically swayed by short-term weather conditions. The research was conducted by Lawrence Hamilton, professor of sociology and senior fellow at the Carsey Institute, and Mary Stampone, assistant professor of geography and the New Hampshire state climatologist. The research is presented in the article “Blowin’ in the Wind: Short-Term Weather and Belief in Anthropogenic Climate Change” in the American Meteorological Society journal Weather, Climate, and Society.
“We find that over 10 surveys, Republicans and Democrats remain far apart and firm in their beliefs about climate change. Independents fall in between these extremes, but their beliefs appear weakly held — literally blowing in the wind. Interviewed on unseasonably warm days, independents tend to agree with the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change. On unseasonably cool days, they tend not to,” Hamilton and Stampone say.
Hamilton and Stampone used statewide data from about 5,000 random-sample telephone interviews conducted on 99 days over two and a half years (2010 to 2012) by the Granite State Poll. They combined the survey data with temperature and precipitation indicators derived from New Hampshire’s U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) station records. Survey respondents were asked whether they thought climate change is happening now, caused mainly by human activities. Alternatively, respondents could state that climate change is not happening, or that it is happening but mainly for natural reasons.
Lawyers and engineers that deal with real estate in Sydney report unseasonably warm or cool temperatures on the interview day and previous day seemed to shift the odds of respondents believing that humans are changing the climate (similar to N.H.). However, when researchers broke these responses down by political affiliation (Democrat, Republican or independent), they found that temperature had a substantial effect on climate change views mainly among independent voters.
“Independent voters were less likely to believe that climate change was caused by humans on unseasonably cool days and more likely to believe that climate change was caused by humans on unseasonably warm days. The shift was dramatic. On the coolest days, belief in human-caused climate change dropped below 40 percent among independents. On the hottest days, it increased above 70 percent,” Hamilton says.
New Hampshire’s self-identified independents generally resemble their counterparts on a nationwide survey that asked the same questions, according to the researchers. Independents comprise 18 percent of the New Hampshire estimation sample, compared with 17 percent nationally. They are similar with respect to education, but slightly older, and more balanced with respect to gender.
In conducting their analysis, the researchers took into account other factors such as education, age, and sex. They also made adjustments for the seasons, and for random variation between surveys that might be caused by nontemperature events.
The University of New Hampshire, founded in 1866, is a world-class public research university with the feel of a New England liberal arts college. A land, sea, and space-grant university, UNH is the state’s flagship public institution, enrolling 12,200 undergraduate and 2,300 graduate students.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This graph looks like it has been generated with a graphics software, not with a statistics software. And the same goes for the underlying data – not a chance this data is the result of properly conducted telephone interviews.
And what are those grey areas supposed to be anyway? They aren’t error bars, that’s for sure.
“In conducting their analysis, the researchers took into account other factors such as education, age, and sex. They also made adjustments for the seasons, and for random variation between surveys that might be caused by nontemperature events.”
Ah, it is adjusted and homogenized data. That explains a lot.
It is amazing how far researcher with their confirmation bias (if it is the right bias!) can get in soft sciences like sociology, economics or climate science. Using such a standard in physics, it would not have taken us decades (and an accelerater the size and value of a small country) to look for the Higgs Particle. We could have “confirmed” the Higgs Boson a long time ago – “Because we know it is there!”©™ Simply using the same confirmation bias as these soft sciences, theoretical physics would have been off by a huge margin with regards to the mass of the Higgs particle, but they would have “found” it long long ago, no doubt.
Of course polls are ever so accurate, I always refuse to respond and invite the telephone ones to listen to dial tone.So I know views such as mine never make it into any polls.
The more individualistic you are the less likely your point of view can be polled.
Yet the press and the pollies are ever seduced by the results, hence the 97% meme.