Beyond bizarre: University of Graz music professor calls for skeptic death sentences

[Update, Parncutt has pulled his page, the webcite link still works, 1:00 am PDT 12/24/12 ~mod]

UPDATE2:  9AM PST 1/24 The Parncutt page now gets a 404 “file not found” error, which to me suggests that University of  Graz officials pulled the plug on it rather than Parncutt, as Parncutt alludes to and expects the reactions in his ugly essay and was prepared for them. Based on his demeanor, if he had pulled it, I posit that he would have left some rationalization essay in its place. In the wake of well known mass shootings this year, I suspect the University of Graz didn’t want this PR disaster on their hands before it got beyond the blogging world and into the MSM. See below for the page that I archived using an established and accepted archiving service  – Anthony

UPDATE3: 5AM Dec 25th, Parcutt’s page has returned, completely rewritten without a hint of the ugliness of the previous one. It’s a Festivus miracle! I blame the airing of grievances. – Anthony

The bizarre world of AGW proponentry continues. I wonder how David Appell will react to this one? Jo Nova tells us of the latest climate ugliness that is beyond bizzare, and, even more disturbing, we see who’s motiviating this man’s hate. – Anthony

Richard Parncutt

Jo Nova writes:

Death threats anyone? Austrian Prof: global warming deniers should be sentenced to death

Richard Parncutt,  Professor of Systematic Musicology, University of Graz, Austria, reckons people like Watts, Tallbloke, Singer, Michaels, Monckton, McIntyre and me (there are too many to list) should be executed. He’s gone full barking mad, and though he says these are his “personal opinions” they are listed on his university web site.

For all the bleating of those who say they’ve had real “death threats“, we get discussions about executing skeptics from Professors, wielding the tyrannical power of the state. Was he paid by the state to write these simplistic, immature, “solutions”? Do taxpayers fund his web expenses? (And what the heck is systematic musicology?)

Here’s a quote from Parncutt:

“I have always been opposed to the death penalty in all cases…”

“Even mass murderers [like Breivik] should not be executed, in my opinion.”

“GW deniers fall into a completely different category from Behring Breivik. They are already causing the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. We could be speaking of billions, but I am making a conservative estimate.”

Read the whole story here at Jo Nova’s place: http://joannenova.com.au/2012/12/death-threats-anyone-austrian-prof-global-warming-deniers-should-be-sentenced-to-death/

=============================================================

This is the ranting of a person who has become propagandized.

Reading Parncutt’s web page at the University of Graz it becomes clear where his delusions originate from. He names the websites “Skeptical Science” and DeSmog blog as his sources.

“For a reputable summary of arguments for and against GW, see skepticalscience.”

“Much more would have happened by now if not for the GW deniers. An amazing number of people still believe that GW is a story made up by scientists with ulterior motives. For a long list of climate change deniers and their stories see desmogblog.”

As his affirmed sources for his article calling for the death of climate skeptics, John Cook and Jim Hoggan now own this despicable ugliness. The question is: will they care? And will they condemn this or agree by their silence?

My guess is neither John Cook nor Jim Hoggan will have the moral integrity to condemn this man’s delusional hatred. I hope to be proven wrong.

Since his page will likely be modified or disappeared once University of Graz officials realize they have a rogue PR disaster on their hands, I’ve permanently archived the page here:

Richard Parncutt. Death penalty for global warming deniers?. University of Graz. 2012-12-24. URL: http://www.uni-graz.at/richard.parncutt/climatechange.html. Accessed: 2012-12-24. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6D8yy8NUJ)

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

374 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 24, 2012 4:14 am

I wonder what sentence the professor would give to the advocates of biofuels, abandoning food farms for biofuel crops, thus causing famines, treatening some 11 million people
http://www.aidemocracy.org/students/famine-in-the-horn-of-africa-caused-by-biofuels/

December 24, 2012 4:22 am

I expect this Prof is so gullible that when he goes on a site called Skeptical Science he believes it is balanced summary, and then he gets angry and silly and puts up emotional junk on his website. The culprits are the ones who pull the strings of their puppet.
Unfortunately the puppet-masters are very clever at manipulation, whilst honest people shy away from providing simple sound bites and oversimplified summaries of the arguments. We have to counter this malign culture by putting out simplified and truthful press releases so that our message is not drowned out by this constant manipulation of the way the debate is being framed by our enemies for the media.

kim
December 24, 2012 4:23 am

Heh, for a small fee you can get the process expedited to list someone you don’t like DeSmog.
These people won’t sense it when they drift into criminal behaviour.
===========

RichieP
December 24, 2012 4:23 am

Here’s Parncutt’s email address. I’m sure some of us might wish to communicate with him.
richard.parncutt@uni-graz.at

Robert S
December 24, 2012 4:27 am

For the second time* – I would not have thought that sceptics and WUWT had sufficient impact in the EU and especially Austria to warrant a sceptic slayer to be brought against them.
*First time just disappeared.

commieBob
December 24, 2012 4:35 am

DesertYote says:
December 23, 2012 at 11:23 pm
Funny thing for a leftie to say, considering that socialism, in all of its guises, has been the greatest single cause of death of man. To them, a 100 Million deaths here and there does not matter as long as the cause is right. Now they want to condemn mankind to a future of poverty and death to satisfy their lust for power.

The same totalitarian pigs who wrapped themselves in the socialist flag would have also insisted that they were true democrats. You can’t use that as proof that all forms of socialism are bad any more than you can use it to prove that all forms of democracy are evil.

Jimbo
December 24, 2012 4:36 am

Richard Parncutt
GW deniers fall into a completely different category from Behring Breivik. They are already causing the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. We could be speaking of billions, but I am making a conservative estimate.
http://www.webcitation.org/6D8yy8NUJ

What a load of bollocks! Now two can play this game.
DDT = millions of dead children in the past and present.
Biofuels = food turned into fuel
UK excess cold winter deaths = promised mild winters by the Met Office
Diversion of global resources = away from solving life threatening diseases like Malaria
and so on……………………………….

Gail Combs
December 24, 2012 4:41 am

Logan in AZ says:
December 24, 2012 at 2:47 am
Ernest R. Hilgard was a famed experimental and theoretical psychology prof at Stanford who found that hypnotizability is more or less normally distributed. Thus, about 15% of the population is very suggestible…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thank you for that information. It certainly explains a lot.

Berényi Péter
December 24, 2012 4:44 am

In a nutshell the good professor of systematic musicology opposes the death penalty for mass murderers who have already killed their victims, but advocates the same fate for those now, whose current actions would “cause hundreds of millions of deaths” with high probability at some future date (according to skepticalscience, whose authority, presumably, should never be questioned under threat of capital punishment either).
For raping human rights this way and putting due process into a mass grave along with the rest of constitutional principles, he expects the Pope to turn him into a saint by 2050. Never mind the Pope does not even have such powers, except if nine theologians judged in advance the case had merit and two provable postmortem miracles occurred.
If this guy is not terminally mad, I’d eat my hat happily in public.

Gail Combs
December 24, 2012 4:49 am

papiertigre says:
December 24, 2012 at 2:55 am
Why do you assume he is intelligent? …..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

BRAMS is pleased to announce that Prof. Richard Parncutt (University of Graz, Austria) is an Invited Scholar from April 18th to July 8th 2012. While at BRAMS, Prof. Parncutt will be working on a book about systematic musicology (based on a lecture series at the University of Graz) and some empirical and theoretical papers….
ABOUT RICHARD PARNCUTT
Richard Parncutt is a musicologist specialising in the psychology of music. Since 1998, he has been Professor of Systematic Musicology at the University of Graz, Austria. His publications address musical structure (pitch, consonance, harmony, tonality, tension, rhythm, meter, accent), music performance (psychology, piano, applications), the origins of tonality and of music, and musicological interdisciplinarity. He holds qualifications in music and physics from the University of Melbourne and a PhD from the University of New England, Australia. He was guest researcher with Ernst Terhardt (Munich), Johan Sundberg (Stockholm), Annabel Cohen (Halifax, Canada), Al Bregman (Montreal), and John Sloboda (Keele, England). He is or was a board member of all leading music psychology journals, founding academic editor of the Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies (JIMS), and (co-) founder of three conference series: Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM), Conference on Applied Interculturality Research (cAIR), and International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology (SysMus)…..
http://www.brams.org/en/2012/05/parncutt/

Ye 10,000 little gods, psychology AND physics….

DirkH
December 24, 2012 4:54 am

Logan in AZ says:
December 24, 2012 at 2:47 am
“There is also an interesting phenomenon called ‘absorption’, which can be estimated by the Tellegen Absorption Scale (TAS). This has a modest (r=0.4) correlation to hypnotizability.”
Extremely interesting, Logan, thanks for the link!
And merry christmas to all of you!

Gail Combs
December 24, 2012 4:57 am

J Cooper says:
December 24, 2012 at 3:11 am
Geoff Sherrington
I agree this person should be ignored and hopefully he will go away….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If he was isolated madman chance met like a similar guy I ran across in Cambridge MA. then I would agree with you but he is not. He is a Professor and a well known one in his field. This type of mania HAS TO BE CALLED OUT NOW.
Vid

December 24, 2012 5:00 am

Is it worth making a list of these extreme statements? There are a bunch of them now and I’m not sure anyone has collected them all onto one page.
It might seem a little strange to do it but considering how often they quickly disappear I’m thinking they should be documented.
eg 10:10 video, Greenpeace’s “we know where you live”, Hansen’s “death trains”, Robyn Williams equating sceptics to paedophiles and now Parncutt’s “I think it is justified for a few heads to roll”.

Robert S
December 24, 2012 5:06 am

……practically unknown.

Gail Combs
December 24, 2012 5:07 am

AllanM says:
December 24, 2012 at 4:01 am
Alexander Feht says:
December 24, 2012 at 12:07 am
They have done the same thing to Art. That is why I am a chemist instead.

Charles.U.Farley
December 24, 2012 5:12 am

Poor Dick.
One minute he’s happily doing whatever a musicologist does and in the next uncle adolfs inherited dormant braincell is stuttering into life and shouting about Ubermensch, final solutions, Tod Klimawandel-Leugner!!!
We shouldnt really mock the afflicted though because as others have rightly pointed out, these people are actually dangerous.
Theyre dangerous to anyone with a differing point of view and to freedom.
For him to actually state that Breivik shouldnt face the death penalty for killing people and then try to justify that contrary held opinions deserve the death penalty purely on a belief is to my mind the symptom of a twisted mind.
Dicks rant is that of a psychopath, who else other than a psychopath would actually suggest that a child for instance should be “executed” ( as if using that word can legitimise such murders) simply for the offence of not “believing”?
The mind truly boggles at such peoples mindset.
This guy is in effect inciting murder of those on the desmoblog death list.
Im pretty sure incitement to commit murder is a criminal offence in most countries, the fact that Dicky states that opinions other than his are somehow unlawful, unreasonable or irrelevant shows how poorly vetted these “academics” are.
For sure people like Parncutt arent to be trusted around the minds of children or in fact anyone else, theyre pernicious little psychos pushing a religious fanaticism.
We should all stand against such people and what they stand for and be prepared to fight them however.

Doug
December 24, 2012 5:15 am

A quote from the “Systematic Musicology” Wiki page: “These questions tend to be answered either by analysing empirical data (based on observation) or by developing theory – or better, by a combination of both.”
In other words, if the data doesn’t work, make crap up to fit the meme.
See? He IS qualified to discuss issues of AGW.

Steve Keohane
December 24, 2012 5:20 am

Interesting what comes out in his vitriol.While the urge to reply in kind is strong, I certainly don’t want it on the www. What is it with people who are so impressed with whatever they can think of. No self-censure seems to me a sign of a lack of conscience. Without conscience. is there a case for empathy? I guess he teaches how death camps are wrought.

December 24, 2012 5:27 am

Josualdo says:
December 24, 2012 at 3:30 am
I went to desmogblog’s list of deniers and noticed I’m not listed there.
http://www.desmogblog.com/global-warming-denier-database
I may have to do something about it.
—————————————————————————————
Holy Cow! A list of my heroes complete with most excellent quotes that I can use when needed. Thank you Josualdo! I wish you luck in being added to this list of some of the most rational people on the planet.
I would also suggest the E.M. Smith be honored by inclusion as well.
Merry Christmas everyone!
Bennett

Gail Combs
December 24, 2012 5:38 am

leftturnandre says:
December 24, 2012 at 4:14 am
I wonder what sentence the professor would give to the advocates of biofuels, abandoning food farms for biofuel crops, thus causing famines, treatening some 11 million people….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You have not seen anything yet. The USA grows something like 25% of the worlds food and the USDA and the EPA under Obama are sharping their blades. The much hated traceability rule has just gone into effect and the EPA is also targeting farms.

…. farms: under federal permitting requirements, sources (i.e. a farm whose aggregate emissions exceed CAA permitting thresholds) would be required to comply with costly permitting mandates and pay an annual fee for each ton of greenhouse gas emitted on an annual basis. Known as the “cow tax”, there would be a cost-per-animal outcome. EPA itself estimates that in its best case scenario, there will be over 37,000 farms and ranches subject to greenhouse gas permits at an average cost of $23,000 per permit annually, affecting over 90% of the livestock production in the United States…. [the average farmer operates at a net LOSS of ~$15,000/yr last I checked]
[this would cover field and livestock run off]
EPA’s proposed new guidance document for waters covered by the CWA, proposed in April 2011, reinterprets recent Supreme Court decisions to allow EPA to expand federal control over virtually every body of water in the United States, no matter how small. EPA’s own analysis of the document estimated that up to 17% of current non-jurisdictional determinations would be considered jurisdictional using the new guidance. Further, the guidance applies to the entire CWA, which will result in additional regulatory responsibilities for states…..
Farm Dust Regulations: EPA has been regulating farm dust for decades and may tighten the standards as part its review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for coarse particulate matter (PM10). Tightening the PM10 NAAQS would have widespread implications for rural America, as it could be below the amount of dust created during normal farming operations, and therefore be impossible to meet. If the standard is tightened, the only option for farmers to comply will be to curb every-day farm activities, which could mean cutting down on numbers of livestock or the tilling of fields, or they may have to shrink or even end their businesses altogether….
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/obamas_epa_plans_for_2013.html

They are also starting to ‘show an interest’ in home gardens. I just heard there is a newly past law in NC regulating home gardens but I have not been able to track it down yet.

Editor
December 24, 2012 5:50 am

If he kills me, I’ll have my estate make him listen to the Portsmouth Sinfonia’s rendering of the Nutcracker’s Dance of the Brandied Sugar Plum Fairy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asYwFnm6X7I . That’ll learn him.

beng
December 24, 2012 5:52 am

Austrian? Death sentences? Really?
The guy’s gone off the deep end….

John West
December 24, 2012 5:58 am

Gail Combs
My father had a phrase for this type of person. “He’s educated way beyond his intelligence.”

alan
December 24, 2012 6:00 am

“Systematic Musicology” Indeed! The “Post-Modern” Musicology of today is as rife with fraud, PC and trendy jargon as climate science itself. And, as in climate science, Marxism has invaded academic musicology (see T. Adorno). Their publications are also mired in peer-pal review.
I speak as a composer with 40 years experience in an American university school of music.

David Archibald
December 24, 2012 6:00 am

For pre-Christmas drinks, I just had a bottle of Veuve and a bottle of very nice shiraz. Now I come to the PC to find that someone wants to kill all the sceptic scientists. That is a bit extreme. How about just one of them. Let me explain. Years ago, a warmer took the trouble to rank the sceptic scientists on the planet. He ranked me as No 2. I won’t say who he ranked as No 1, but No 1 is something like 91 years old and smokes. He may have other vices also, yet he lives, seemingly immortal. This is so unfair! I can’t wait forever! Dear Professor Parncutt, your photo makes you look like an earnest brownshirt from the 1930s so I would work on that, but nevertheless, I think you know now what should be done.

1 3 4 5 6 7 15
Verified by MonsterInsights