Poll: Was Hurricane Sandy Caused by Global Warming?

US News and World Report is running a poll on whether or not Hurricane Sandy was caused by global warming.  Here is the poll results currently:

Since it is open to everyone, no matter what side of this opinion you come down on, see their web site to add your vote if you wish.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/10/30/was-hurricane-sandy-caused-by-global-warming

UPDATE: From reader input it seems this poll is apparently of even poorer quality than one would expect,  and allows multiple voting. NO to vote stuffing. Be honest, 1 vote per person please…though, they may allow you to think it was counted. Sigh, what a poor design for a national magazine. In any event none of that vote stuffing please. OTOH this lack of basic input control negates any value the poll may have. – Anthony

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

186 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
astateofdenmark
October 30, 2012 2:39 pm

It definitely lets you vote multiple times. Should just be pulled.

HRB in Edmonton
October 30, 2012 2:44 pm

Now at >59% “No”

kcom
October 30, 2012 2:46 pm

I admit I haven’t been paying much attention to the story. I’m not in the path and other things are going on. But from the little I have seen, it seems the hurricane made landfall with winds in the 90 mph range. Is that true? So, if so, doesn’t that mean the “major” hurricane streak is still alive? That we haven’t had a landfalling Cat 3 storm since 2005? Thanks.

JC
October 30, 2012 2:49 pm

What global warming?

stricq
October 30, 2012 2:52 pm

It’s 60/40 in favor of No at this time.

Aviator
October 30, 2012 3:02 pm

Currently -32C in Eureka – what “Global Warming”?

Robert A. Taylor
October 30, 2012 3:10 pm

A.39.13% Yes
B.60.87% No

Joezee
October 30, 2012 3:11 pm

update
yes 39
no 61
at 3:07 pm pdt

David Ball
October 30, 2012 3:13 pm

“That’s why we beat them at football nearly half the time”- Shelbyvillian mocking Springfielders.

Jim Clarke
October 30, 2012 3:14 pm

Since there has been no increase in Atlantic hurricane activity in over 100 years, there is no correlation between hurricane activity and any increase in temperature, whether natural or man made. Giants winning the World Series, however…

D.Patterson
October 30, 2012 3:14 pm

Currently:
A.38.23% Yes
B.61.77% No

Wanda Light
October 30, 2012 3:14 pm

I don’t think the hurricane was caused by global warming, just the heavy snow. I remember something in the New York Times last year about ‘the warmer it gets the more it snows’. Yeah, that’s it!

eric1skeptic
October 30, 2012 3:15 pm

kcom asked: “But from the little I have seen, it seems the hurricane made landfall with winds in the 90 mph range. Is that true?”
Less. The NHC said it made landfall with 80 mph winds. They send planes far and wide to search out the strongest sustained winds aloft and then estimate the ocean surface wind speed. The highest sustained ground wind on “land” that I heard about was on the Bay Bridge with 70 mph, not quite hurricane strength.

nigelf
October 30, 2012 3:16 pm

61.77 no, 38.23 yes. I voted no only once.

October 30, 2012 3:17 pm

What a dismally awful article! What should be discussed are the vast improvements in storm tracking and prediction and the many lives saved as a result. Compare “Sandy” with the 1900 Galveston hurricane (from Wikipedia):

The Hurricane of 1900 made landfall on September 8, 1900 in the city of Galveston, Texas, in the United States.[1] It had estimated winds of 145 miles per hour (233 km/h) at landfall, making it a Category 4 storm on the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale.[2] It was the deadliest hurricane in US history, and the second costliest hurricane in US history based on the US dollar’s 2005 value (to compare costs with those of Hurricane Katrina and others).
The hurricane caused great loss of life with the estimated death toll between 6,000 and 12,000 individuals;[3] the number most cited in official reports is 8,000, giving the storm the third-highest number of deaths or injuries of any Atlantic hurricane, after the Great Hurricane of 1780 and 1998’s Hurricane Mitch. The Galveston Hurricane of 1900 is the deadliest natural disaster ever to strike the United States. By contrast, the second-deadliest storm to strike the United States, the 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane, caused more than 2,500 deaths, and the deadliest storm of recent times, Hurricane Katrina, claimed the lives of approximately 1,800 people.

Nobody had any idea what was coming. Considering how much more densly populated we are now, without modern storm tracking and prediction and the communications network to get the word out, storms like Sandy would be much deadlier. Cleanup will be a bitch, but we won’t have to pave the streets of New York over thousands of unexcavated and uncounted bodies of storm victims as they did in Galveston.

David
October 30, 2012 3:19 pm

No is over 62%

Peter Hannan
October 30, 2012 3:19 pm

At 17.15 Eastern Time I gave my vote, and this result appeared: Yes 37.81%, No 62.19%.

October 30, 2012 3:23 pm

36.96% Yes
63.04% No

Annie
October 30, 2012 3:25 pm

63.04% as No now 22:25Z

Patrick (adelaide)
October 30, 2012 3:26 pm

Meaningless but for the propaganda benefit. Although I’m from Oz, I seem to recall the East coast gets hit by these storms every now and again with similar impact. Then someone makes a documentary 🙂
36.96% Yes
63.04% No

Justthinkin
October 30, 2012 3:27 pm

“OTOH this lack of basic input control negates any value the poll may have. ”
Au contrair,Anthony. This allows the leftard media to “adjust” the YES vote up to around 95% before shutting down this so called poll. Sorta reminds me of a climate model.

Corey S.
October 30, 2012 3:28 pm

63 No – 37 Yes

Annie
October 30, 2012 3:28 pm

I went back to read comments after the poll and there weren’t any. Also, interestingly, I wouldn’t have been able to vote again, not that I would have done so as I believe in fair play and honesty.

Truthseeker
October 30, 2012 3:29 pm

“Yes” is now 36% and “No” is 64%. Seems to me that WUWT has a greater reach than the traditional MSM.

Maxbert
October 30, 2012 3:30 pm

Make that 63% No and 36% Yes, at 3:31 pm Pacific Time.