![johnson_brad_bio[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/johnson_brad_bio1.jpg?resize=108%2C108&quality=83)
This isn’t the first time he has claimed punishment from on high is retribution for not seeing climate issues his way, readers may recall he blamed conservative states for bringing tornadoes upon themselves by not acting on the climate issues he and his fellow propagandist, Joe Romm were pushing at the time. Three scientists, Kevin Trenberth, Michael Mann, and Gavin Schmidt provided quotes to make that exercise in Tabloid Climatology™ complete.
Here’s his press release today, followed by a factual rebuttal. Bolding in the body of the PR is mine.
==========================================================
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 26, 2012
CONTACT: Blair FitzGibbon : 202-503-6141 : blair@fitzgibbonmedia.com
Statement by Brad Johnson, campaign manager of Forecast the Facts and ClimateSilence.org:
“If the candidates won’t listen to the voters demanding they break their climate silence, maybe they will listen to Mother Nature’s October Surprise. We know the candidates will be asked about Hurricane Sandy, and will express their sympathy with those affected. They will rightly applaud the first responders, the compassion of neighbors, and the strength and resolve of the American people. But what their role as national leaders demands that they also do is explain that Hurricane Sandy is a true Frankenstorm, a monster created by man tampering with nature with oil, coal, and gas pollution.”
===========================================================
Lest you think this sort of logic affliction is unique to Brad Johnson, I’ll point out that his cheering section over at Grist says essentially the same thing in God’s latest warning:
Perhaps this weather scare that may well be much more than just a scare is God’s revenge for the refusal of the U.S. government to take action on the climate crisis. – Ted Glick
Can you imagine the howling from the left if some conservative evangelical said something like that? Whatever suits their purpose for the present I suppose is the new desperation dialog about climate.
The only way to deal with propagandic pinheads such as this is to counter with real facts, and then whenever his propaganda appears, put those facts right back into the venue wherever it appears through comments, emails, and letters. Clear headed people will understand, but you’ll never reach the science muggles that believe and push this sort of stuff while throwing facts to the wind.
By extension, Johnson and Glick’s claims are essentially that this Category 1 storm with 75MPH winds is somehow unique to American history, the result of “tampering” with “nature with oil, coal, and gas pollution.” And it hasn’t even made landfall yet. I don’t have to call BS on their idiotic claims, because the facts do it for me.
First, a historical review of October landfalling hurricanes. Data from the National Hurricane Center and Stormpulse.
OCTOBER HURRICANES MAKING LANDFALL IN THE USA
2005 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Wilma | 175 MPH |
2002 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Lili | 145 MPH |
1999 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Irene | 110 MPH |
1995 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Opal | 150 MPH |
1989 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Jerry | 85 MPH |
1987 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Floyd | 75 MPH |
1985 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Juan | 85 MPH |
1968 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Gladys | 85 MPH |
1966 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Inez | 150 MPH |
1964 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hilda | 150 MPH | |
| Isbell | 125 MPH |
1954 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hazel | 140 MPH |
1950 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| King | 120 MPH |
1949 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #10 | 130 MPH |
1948 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #8 | 130 MPH |
1947 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #9 | 120 MPH |
1946 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | 130 MPH |
1944 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #11 | 120 MPH |
1941 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | 120 MPH |
1924 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #7 | 120 MPH |
1923 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #3 | 100 MPH |
1921 Hurricane Season
| Name | Historic Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #6 | Tampa Bay | 140 MPH |
1916 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #13 | 120 MPH |
1913 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Tropical Storm #4 | 60 MPH |
1912 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | 100 MPH |
1910 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | 150 MPH |
1909 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #10 | 120 MPH |
1906 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #8 | 120 MPH |
1904 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #3 | 80 MPH |
1899 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #8 | 110 MPH |
1898 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #7 | 130 MPH |
1894 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | 120 MPH |
1893 Hurricane Season
| Name | Historic Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #9 | —– | 120 MPH | |
| Hurricane #10 | Chenier Caminanda | 130 MPH |
1888 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #7 | 110 MPH |
1887 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #13 | 85 MPH |
1886 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #10 | 120 MPH |
1882 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #6 | 140 MPH |
1880 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #9 | 80 MPH |
1878 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #11 | 100 MPH |
1877 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #4 | 120 MPH |
1876 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | 120 MPH |
1873 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | 120 MPH |
1870 Hurricane Season
| Name | Historic Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #6 | Twin Key West (I) | 120 MPH | |
| Hurricane #9 | Twin Key West (II) | 100 MPH |
1869 Hurricane Season
| Name | Historic Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #10 | Saxby | 100 MPH |
1867 Hurricane Season
| Name | Historic Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #7 | Galveston | 100 MPH |
1865 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #7 | 100 MPH |
1860 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #6 | 100 MPH |
1853 Hurricane Season
| Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #8 | 100 MPH |
1852 Hurricane Season
| Name | Historic Name | Max Winds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane #5 | Middle Florida | 100 MPH |
That’s quite a list. From it you can conclude that strong October hurricanes hit the USA every few years, so Sandy is not in any way unique.
One storm in particular stands out as a parallel to Hurricane Sandy, and that’s Hurricane Hazel in 1954. Brad Johnson is of course too young to have any experience with it (and so am I) but unlike Johnson I pay attention to weather history rather than bloviate gloom and doom at the drop of hat for political purposes.
Hurricane Hazel, October 12-18, 1954
===============================================================
Hazel was first spotted east of the Windward Islands on October 5. It moved through the islands later that day as a hurricane, then it moved westward over the southern Caribbean Sea through October 8. A slow turn to the north-northeast occurred from October 9-12, with Hazel crossing western Haiti as a hurricane on the 12th. The hurricane turned northward and crossed the southeastern Bahamas on the 13th, followed by a northwestward turn on the 14th. Hazel turned north and accelerated on October 15, making landfall as a Category 4 hurricane near the North Carolina-South Carolina border. Subsequent rapid motion over the next 12 hours took the storm from the coast across the eastern United States into southeastern Canada as it became extratropical.
High winds occurred over large portions of the eastern United States. Myrtle Beach, South Carolina reported a peak wind gust of 106 mph, and winds were estimated at 130 to 150 mph along the coast between Myrtle Beach and Cape Fear, North Carolina. Washington, DC reported 78 mph sustained winds, and peak gusts of over 90 mph occurred as far northward as inland New York state. A storm surge of up to 18 ft inundated portions of the North Carolina coast. Heavy rains of up to 11 inches occurred as far northward as Toronto, Canada resulting in severe flooding.
Hazel was responsible for 95 deaths and $281 million in damage in the United States, 100 deaths and $100 million in damage in Canada, and an estimated 400 to 1000 deaths in Haiti.
For an interactive map of Hurricane Hazel visit the NOAA Coastal Services Center.
================================================================
The National Weather Service in Raleigh, NC has a history page on Hazel that says this:
The already remarkable damage Hazel inflicted was exacerbated by the timing at which the hurricane struck. Landfall occurred during the full moon of October – the highest lunar tide of the year. A storm surge in excess of 15 feet inundated southeastern North Carolina from Southport to Topsail Beach, with an astounding 18-foot surge reported at high tide at Calabash and on the island of Holden Beach. Incredibly, all but 12 of the 300 cottages in Holden Beach were destroyed. The surge also leveled many of shrimp houses that lined the riverfront, and put coastal Brunswick and New Hanover counties under water, effectively wiping out the beaches. The surge even reopened Mary’s Inlet, which had been artificially closed during the summer of 1955 by the Army Corps of Engineers.
Hazel’s Impact Felt Across the Eastern Seaboard and Southern Canada
A total of 15,000 homes or buildings were destroyed throughout the state, including some 39,000 damaged structures. Thousands of trees were downed by the combination of tropical-rain soaked ground and ferocious winds. 30 of North Carolina’s 100 counties sustained major damage. Based on reports from residents in the capital city of Raleigh, an average of two or three trees fell per city block, many on homes, automobiles, and power lines. In all, an estimated $136 million in damage occurred in North Carolina as a result of the mighty hurricane. Damage reached to nearly $281 million when the dollar damage in NC was combined with damage estimates from the rest of the United States. The storm went on to produce another $100 million in damage in Canada, as it accelerated northward and became extratropical. Most of the damage there resulted from heavy rain, nearly a foot in less than twenty four hours, associated with the remnants of Hazel. When all was said and done, the death toll included: 400-1000 in Haiti, 6 in the Bahamas, 95 in the US (including 19 deaths and 200 injured in North Carolina alone), and 100 more in Canada.
Hurricane Hazel produced the largest swath of hurricane force winds this century over Virginia and North Carolina. As active as the 1954 hurricane season was for North Carolinians, it was followed by an equally active 1955 hurricane season, when three more storms struck the state. However, none of those could match the fury of the historic Hurricane Hazel.
==============================================================
Sound familiar? Just watch and read the news reports warning of the storm surge from Sandy, and you’ll see its just a repeat performance of lunar timing coincidence. Here’s one from NBC:
Full moon could make Sandy’s impact worse
Gravitational tugs could make high tides rise even more
Heaven and Earth may be aligning to turn Hurricane Sandy into a real monster, just in time for Halloween.
Forecasters expect Sandy to make landfall along the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States on Monday or Tuesday. It may merge with a separate tempest hitting the region at about that time, creating an immensely powerful “Frankenstorm” whose effects could be magnified by the full moon.
When the moon waxes to its full phase Monday afternoon, high tides along the Eastern Seaboard will rise about 20 percent higher than normal, even without the help of Sandy’s storm surge, said Joe Rao, a meteorologist for News 12 in Westchester, N.Y. (Storm surges occur when a hurricane’s winds push the water surface above normal levels.)
Hazel had the same storm surge lunar magnifier, but the MSM is treating it as if this is something new and unique and there’s no mention of Hurricane Hazel in the NBC story.
And then there’s the New England Hurricane of 1938: (h/t to John Coleman)
The 1938 Hurricane, by the Works Project Administration – During this storm, Frank Schubert, last keeper of Coney Island Light, was aboard the buoy tender ship Tulip, which was thrown aground on top of some train tracks by the storm. Even Supermandia recognizes what an event that was.
Here’s the weather map for it from the US Weather Bureau:
All that happened before Roger Revelle took his first CO2 measurement and published a paper that started it all. Nothing has been seen like Hurricane Hazel since.
Let’s look at CO2 and hurricanes
Why? Because if paid political shills like Brad Johnson are to be believed, CO2 increases in Earth’s atmosphere are the cause of all this “frankenweather” happening now.
This scatterplot graph (by Steve Goddard) shows the relation between atmospheric CO2 concentration and landfalling US Hurricanes.
There is no correlation between atmospheric CO2 and major hurricanes striking the US.
The majority of landfalling US hurricanes occurred when CO2 was around 300 ppm, i.e., the 1950’s. Ambient CO2 is about 394 ppm right now according to the latest NOAA CO2 data.

That blows Brad Johnson’s political frankenpropaganda right out of the water.
Finally let’s look at hurricane related death rates from: Hurricane Fatalities, 1900–2010: Context in these Stormy Times (Aug 27th, 2011)
excerpt of Dr. Indur Goklany’s article:
Long term U.S. data on hurricane fatalities show that from 1900–09 to the 2009–10, hurricane deaths and death rates declined by 82% and 95%, respectively (see Figure 2).These estimates use data from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) provided in Blake et al. (2007) which has 1,525 deaths for 2005, the year of Katrina.
[Note that this month, the NHC, via Blake et al. (2011), put out a new report which has 1,225 deaths for 2005, while NWS’s Weather Fatalities website uses 1,016 for that year. I plan to keep on using the older NHC/Blake et al. estimate, pending consultation with Dr. Blake. I have contacted him, but to no one’s surprise, least of all mine, he has much more important things to do right now.]
Figure 2: U.S. hurricane deaths and death rates per year, 1900–2010. Sources: Updated from Goklany (2009), using USBC (2011) and NWS (2011). For 2005, this figure uses National Hurricane Center data from Blake et al. (2007), which has 1,525 deaths for that year, but Blake et al. (2011) has 1,225 deaths while NWS Weather Fatalities uses 1,016 deaths. This figure uses the Blake et al.’s older data, pending consultation with Dr. Blake.
Conclusion
To any thinking person reading the above, clearly there’s no connection between Hurricane Sandy, atmospheric CO2 levels, or payback from God. It’s the worst example of climate propaganda since An Inconvenient Truth.
Don’t believe political shills like Brad Johnson as he doesn’t rely on facts, but rather, fear. That makes him and those like him that say Hurricane Sandy is some sort of “wrath” for human behavior he and his buddies don’t like not only unreliable and idiotic in their approach, but malfeasant to boot.
Call them on it wherever you see it.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.




From Gunga Din on October 27, 2012 at 12:12 pm:
The proper costume requires three kids, two have to be twins. And those can’t be too small or all of them might be mistaken for water.
Primary benefit is the kids will stay together as a group, as long as it’s dark out and they don’t get wet. The other great benefit is the accompanying adult can dress up as a thermometer, then the kids will always be following the adult.
Franken – a part of Bavaria which is known as Franconia to English speakers.Franks native to central Germany moved west and founded th e empire of the Franks : France.
Hurricanes and Franckenstorms in the same basket with CO2…? Well, you are asking for it. During the biggest hurricane; on the other 98% of the planet was beautiful weather… with SAME CO2 level…
Well too many bullshine addicts – > demand controls supply.
Bob Berwyn says:
October 27, 2012 at 1:22 pm
You have to indicate who you are directing your post to.
Gunga Din says:
October 27, 2012 at 12:12 pm
We had a zombie and Vlad Dracula. Good clean spooky fun.
tjfolkerts says:
October 27, 2012 at 9:41 am
Back to you. What was that you were saying?
This storm appears to be similar to the 1991 “Perfect Storm”. It was never given a name, but was a category 1 hurricane combined with a nor’easter. A buoy off Nova Scotia recorded 100′ waves. It was primarily a coastal storm, whereas the current storm looks like it will go well inland. Exactly the same time of year. So, more evidence that it is not unprecedented.
Statement by Brad Johnson, campaign manager of Forecast the Fibs.
“But what their role as national leaders demands that they also do is explain that Hurricane Sandy is a true Frankenstorm, a monster created by man tampering with nature with oil, coal, and gas pollution.”
Can anybody be more deluded then this?
I’ll get some oil, coal and gas and create a hurricane in my back garden shall I?
It’s a hurricane and no different from any others, can’t be distinguished between any others and occurs often during history. A desperate agenda is still in full flow with the Frakenstorm nonsense and it is quite literally embarrassing. It is a cat 1 hurricane and for a time in between was downgraded to a tropical storm. Thanks for letting the public know what a load of rubbish alarmist global warming views are.
Witches apparently have a lower carbon footprint. When they were started to be burned, the Medieval warm period ended.
If it is idiocy masquerading it is a most excellent and convincing disguise.
Sounds like Johnson’s the real “Frankenweenie”.
(My apologies to Tim Burton.)
October 27, 2012 at 8:14 am |John Brookes says:
Damn those Democrats for organising a storm for the election. It’ll remind everyone just how incompetent the last Republican president was! Is there nothing these democracy hating communists won’t stoop to?
———————————————————
LOL ! Commie John 😉 Nice to see you here … this storm is clearly God’s punishment of those filthy democrats anticipating voting for continued malfeasance of its leadership. Brad Johnson clearly implies this.
The rest of us are OK with God.
Great coincidental internet moment: I clicked onto an article about Sandy in the WaPo, and in the sidebar was a chart titles: “Learn About Homicides in Your Neighborhood”. Great how everyone gears up for the fake-as-f***-all pseudo tragedies, because they know they can get air time, while almost everyone can ignore the real and real-time tragedies that happening every day, because murders (especially ghetto murders) are so quotidian.
““It’s about our survival as a species.”I don’t get it. If we’re so destructive, why would anyone wish for our continued existence? Let me guess, we just need more “education”, also now as “thought alignment”: “If you don’t think like me, I simply haven’t invented the right ‘fact’ to convince you. Here, let’s try again. Don’t worry, I won’t be turning up the amperage on the shock-o-matic just yet.”
Dennis Ray Wingo says:
From what I understand, the problem is that the front / trough is not making all that much forward progress (it is stalled out just east of us here in Western NY) because of significant blocking in the atmosphere. It is this blocking and the trough in the Eastern U.S. that are expected to force Sandy to hook back toward the coast. You can see some discussion of it in the latest (as of 11pm EDT) forecast discussion here: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2012/al18/al182012.discus.023.shtml?
I love the wordplay to identify the bloodsucker.
I lived in SE Pennsylvania when Hazel hit. As a rather stupid wee tot, I loved the way the wind looked through the windows; horizontal rain, leaves, things. So I opened the door and went out. My parents caught me a few houses down. I wasn’t light enough to go fully wind borne, but I sure couldn’t resist it.
Franky baby storm even as it sits in the Atlantic is no Hazel. And that’s a comparison to a Hazel after it’d already crawled over two states.
Doctor Gray has been warning East Coasters for decades that they’re building where storms visit. Maybe this will be a wake-up call for those folks who think tidal estuaries are great places for condos and beach rentals. If TS (I don’t think hurricane is the correct descriptor anymore) Sandy was a cat 4 like Hazel, then it’d be a true lesson in coastal construction disaster.
Why do I doubt Sandy’s hurricane status? That storm is looking downright disorganized now with center circulation not very clear. Still a massive and dangerous storm with plenty of precipitation. That alone may make it very similar to Hazel. Expect lots of flooding if those clouds go stationary and drain.
Anthony, one piece of advice: “Don’t feed the trolls!”
Well I know of at least one other group that is convinced that God hates America. Is Glick related to the Phelps perhaps?
What I am puzzled about is what will make this storm system do a sharp left turn? I have looked through a lot of historical tracks and I haven’t found one that will do anything beyond a slow creep NNE or NE. There is obviously a good reason for this track prediction . . http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at201218_5day.html
but what is it?
“One storm in particular stands out as a parallel to Hurricane Sandy, and that’s Hurricane Hazel in 1954. Brad Johnson is of course too young to have any experience with it (and so am I) but unlike Johnson I pay attention to weather history rather than bloviate gloom and doom at the drop of hat for political purposes.”
I wasn’t. As a 7 year old, I huddled with my parents in the dark – power went out, early, in a then small city east of Toronto as the wind and rain roared around and over us. I still VIVIDLY remember trying to see out my bedroom window into the backyard darkness at the very tip of one of my neighbour’s 70 foot Lombardy poplars brushing up and down on my bedroom window. Five feet taller and it would have been in my bedroom. Four of five of these polars toppled that night, and the fifth was too root-weakened to leave up. A couple of days later, my parents and I took a bit of a drive up the Holland Marsh area north of Toronto to see the massive pumps trying get water off the land. If you’ve never lived through a storm of that ferocity, you have no idea….
“ October 28, 2012 at 12:24 am
What I am puzzled about is what will make this storm system do a sharp left turn? I have looked through a lot of historical tracks and I haven’t found one that will do anything beyond a slow creep NNE or NE. There is obviously a good reason for this track prediction . . http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at201218_5day.html
but what is it?
There’s an “anomalous” (NHC’s word – must be AGW/ Bush’s/Mitt’s/Ann Coulter’s fault), blocking high sitting up over the Canadian Maritimes that’s preventing Sandy from going straight up the coast. There is also a well defined high pressure ridge N-S over the US midwest behind the low pressure trough, also N-S, over the east-central US, that is effectively channelling the storm into the trough. The weather systems in the trough have nowhere to go because of the highs and they and Sandy will eventually mash together over the US Northeast and southeastern Canada.
Thanks Paul, muchos gracias.
Why do I doubt Sandy’s hurricane status? That storm is looking downright disorganized now with center circulation not very clear. Still a massive and dangerous storm with plenty of precipitation. That alone may make it very similar to Hazel. Expect lots of flooding if those clouds go stationary and drain.
Sandy actually hasn’t been a hurricane for the last 36 hours, based on measurable wind strength. However, the storm is so large, and there remains a strong low pressure core, so the decision was taken that the probability that hurricane force winds do likely exist in the storm, and also that there was a good possiblilty that intensification would occur as an extra-tropical cyclone. Its hung on the Saffir-Simpson boundary for the last 36 hours, and hunter aircraft have not had flight radials over some areas that appear to be stronger. The concern is not the intensity per se, its the size of the wind field and overall potential. IOW – its significant because, even though its intensity is borderline, its sheer size makes the aggregate threat just as serious. Remains to be seen if it holds together, but its now expected to break down fairly quickly once it makes landfall. Won’t help the coast though.
Keith AB says: What I am puzzled about is what will make this storm system do a sharp left turn?
The wunderground knows {somebody} is playing the “HAARP”.
http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/2012/10/east-coast-haarp-mega-storm-brewing-for-next-week-2444474.html
😉
I see the hurricane hunter (at wunderground) plots no surface winds over 65 mph, however it is still listed as a 75mph hurricane with gusts op to 90 at 12:54 EDT Sunday.
Seems that BAMD might end up to be the track that is followed. CLP5 and all of the BAM tracks are going to keep it far offshore. Keep you eyes on the northward mid-Atlantic blocking high and low coupled with the jet stream. If they keep ticking eastward it may never make landfall at all. Just a hunch right now, but we’ll see.
One of our neighbours had a barn he wanted to tear down and, hearing that hurricane Hazel was on the way, cut a huge hole in the side with a chainsaw. It was reduced to a pile of firewood in an instant!
I only remember the wind and the broken trees. The eye went directly over our home in Pickering Ontario.