Brad Johnson's 'Frankenstorm' malfeasance masquerading as idiocy

Brad Johnson
Harsh headline, I know, but when you read what former Climate Progress propagandist Brad Johnson of the TV weathercaster pressure group “Forecast the Facts” has sent out in a press release late Friday regarding hurricane Sandy, you can only be left with one conclusion; he’s purposely anti-science and anti-factual wrapped up in a bought and paid for political wrapper.

This isn’t the first time he has claimed punishment from on high is retribution for not seeing climate issues his way, readers may recall he blamed conservative states for bringing tornadoes upon themselves by not acting on the climate issues he and his fellow propagandist, Joe Romm were pushing at the time. Three scientists, Kevin Trenberth, Michael Mann, and Gavin Schmidt provided quotes to make that exercise in Tabloid Climatology™  complete.

Here’s his press release today, followed by a factual rebuttal. Bolding in the body of the PR is mine.

==========================================================

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 26, 2012

CONTACT: Blair FitzGibbon : 202-503-6141 : blair@fitzgibbonmedia.com

Statement by Brad Johnson, campaign manager of Forecast the Facts and ClimateSilence.org:

“If the candidates won’t listen to the voters demanding they break their climate silence, maybe they will listen to Mother Nature’s October Surprise. We know the candidates will be asked about Hurricane Sandy, and will express their sympathy with those affected. They will rightly applaud the first responders, the compassion of neighbors, and the strength and resolve of the American people. But what their role as national leaders demands that they also do is explain that Hurricane Sandy is a true Frankenstorm, a monster created by man tampering with nature with oil, coal, and gas pollution.”

===========================================================

Lest you think this sort of logic affliction is unique to Brad Johnson, I’ll point out that his cheering section over at Grist says essentially the same thing in God’s latest warning:

Perhaps this weather scare that may well be much more than just a scare is God’s revenge for the refusal of the U.S. government to take action on the climate crisis. – Ted Glick

Can you imagine the howling from the left if some conservative evangelical said something like that? Whatever suits their purpose for the present I suppose is the new desperation dialog about climate.

The only way to deal with propagandic pinheads such as this is to counter with real facts, and then whenever his propaganda appears, put those facts right back into the venue wherever it appears through comments, emails, and letters. Clear headed people will understand, but you’ll never reach the science muggles that believe and push this sort of stuff while throwing facts to the wind.

By extension, Johnson and Glick’s claims are essentially that this Category 1 storm with 75MPH winds is somehow unique to American history, the result of “tampering” with “nature with oil, coal, and gas pollution.” And it hasn’t even made landfall yet. I don’t have to call BS on their idiotic claims, because the facts do it for me.

First, a historical review of October landfalling hurricanes. Data from the National Hurricane Center and Stormpulse.

OCTOBER HURRICANES MAKING LANDFALL IN THE USA

2005 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Wilma 175 MPH

2002 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Lili 145 MPH

1999 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Irene 110 MPH

1995 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Opal 150 MPH

1989 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Jerry 85 MPH

1987 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Floyd 75 MPH

1985 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Juan 85 MPH

1968 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Gladys 85 MPH

1966 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Inez 150 MPH

1964 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hilda 150 MPH
Isbell 125 MPH

1954 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hazel 140 MPH

1950 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
King 120 MPH

1949 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #10 130 MPH

1948 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #8 130 MPH

1947 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #9 120 MPH

1946 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 130 MPH

1944 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #11 120 MPH

1941 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 120 MPH

1924 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #7 120 MPH

1923 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #3 100 MPH

1921 Hurricane Season

Name Historic Name Max Winds
Hurricane #6 Tampa Bay 140 MPH

1916 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #13 120 MPH

1913 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Tropical Storm #4 60 MPH

1912 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 100 MPH

1910 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 150 MPH

1909 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #10 120 MPH

1906 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #8 120 MPH

1904 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #3 80 MPH

1899 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #8 110 MPH

1898 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #7 130 MPH

1894 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 120 MPH

1893 Hurricane Season

Name Historic Name Max Winds
Hurricane #9 —– 120 MPH
Hurricane #10 Chenier Caminanda 130 MPH

1888 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #7 110 MPH

1887 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #13 85 MPH

1886 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #10 120 MPH

1882 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #6 140 MPH

1880 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #9 80 MPH

1878 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #11 100 MPH

1877 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #4 120 MPH

1876 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 120 MPH

1873 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 120 MPH

1870 Hurricane Season

Name Historic Name Max Winds
Hurricane #6 Twin Key West (I) 120 MPH
Hurricane #9 Twin Key West (II) 100 MPH

1869 Hurricane Season

Name Historic Name Max Winds
Hurricane #10 Saxby 100 MPH

1867 Hurricane Season

Name Historic Name Max Winds
Hurricane #7 Galveston 100 MPH

1865 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #7 100 MPH

1860 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #6 100 MPH

1853 Hurricane Season

Name Max Winds
Hurricane #8 100 MPH

1852 Hurricane Season

Name Historic Name Max Winds
Hurricane #5 Middle Florida 100 MPH

That’s quite a list. From it you can conclude that strong October hurricanes hit the USA every few years, so Sandy is not in any way unique.

One storm in particular stands out as a parallel to Hurricane Sandy, and that’s Hurricane Hazel in 1954. Brad Johnson is of course too young to have any experience with it (and so am I) but unlike Johnson I pay attention to weather history rather than bloviate gloom and doom at the drop of  hat for political purposes.

Hurricane Hazel, October 12-18, 1954

NHC describes Hazel this way:

===============================================================

Hazel was first spotted east of the Windward Islands on October 5. It moved through the islands later that day as a hurricane, then it moved westward over the southern Caribbean Sea through October 8. A slow turn to the north-northeast occurred from October 9-12, with Hazel crossing western Haiti as a hurricane on the 12th. The hurricane turned northward and crossed the southeastern Bahamas on the 13th, followed by a northwestward turn on the 14th. Hazel turned north and accelerated on October 15, making landfall as a Category 4 hurricane near the North Carolina-South Carolina border. Subsequent rapid motion over the next 12 hours took the storm from the coast across the eastern United States into southeastern Canada as it became extratropical.

High winds occurred over large portions of the eastern United States. Myrtle Beach, South Carolina reported a peak wind gust of 106 mph, and winds were estimated at 130 to 150 mph along the coast between Myrtle Beach and Cape Fear, North Carolina. Washington, DC reported 78 mph sustained winds, and peak gusts of over 90 mph occurred as far northward as inland New York state. A storm surge of up to 18 ft inundated portions of the North Carolina coast. Heavy rains of up to 11 inches occurred as far northward as Toronto, Canada resulting in severe flooding.

Hazel was responsible for 95 deaths and $281 million in damage in the United States, 100 deaths and $100 million in damage in Canada, and an estimated 400 to 1000 deaths in Haiti.

For an interactive map of Hurricane Hazel visit the NOAA Coastal Services Center.

================================================================

The National Weather Service in Raleigh, NC has a history page on Hazel that says this:

The already remarkable damage Hazel inflicted was exacerbated by the timing at which the hurricane struck. Landfall occurred during the full moon of October – the highest lunar tide of the year. A storm surge in excess of 15 feet inundated southeastern North Carolina from Southport to Topsail Beach, with an astounding 18-foot surge reported at high tide at Calabash and on the island of Holden Beach. Incredibly, all but 12 of the 300 cottages in Holden Beach were destroyed. The surge also leveled many of shrimp houses that lined the riverfront, and put coastal Brunswick and New Hanover counties under water, effectively wiping out the beaches. The surge even reopened Mary’s Inlet, which had been artificially closed during the summer of 1955 by the Army Corps of Engineers.

Hazel’s Impact Felt Across the Eastern Seaboard and Southern Canada

A total of 15,000 homes or buildings were destroyed throughout the state, including some 39,000 damaged structures. Thousands of trees were downed by the combination of tropical-rain soaked ground and ferocious winds. 30 of North Carolina’s 100 counties sustained major damage. Based on reports from residents in the capital city of Raleigh, an average of two or three trees fell per city block, many on homes, automobiles, and power lines. In all, an estimated $136 million in damage occurred in North Carolina as a result of the mighty hurricane. Damage reached to nearly $281 million when the dollar damage in NC was combined with damage estimates from the rest of the United States. The storm went on to produce another $100 million in damage in Canada, as it accelerated northward and became extratropical. Most of the damage there resulted from heavy rain, nearly a foot in less than twenty four hours, associated with the remnants of Hazel. When all was said and done, the death toll included: 400-1000 in Haiti, 6 in the Bahamas, 95 in the US (including 19 deaths and 200 injured in North Carolina alone), and 100 more in Canada.

Hurricane Hazel produced the largest swath of hurricane force winds this century over Virginia and North Carolina. As active as the 1954 hurricane season was for North Carolinians, it was followed by an equally active 1955 hurricane season, when three more storms struck the state. However, none of those could match the fury of the historic Hurricane Hazel.

==============================================================

Sound familiar? Just watch and read the news reports warning of the storm surge from Sandy, and you’ll see its just a repeat performance of lunar timing coincidence. Here’s one from NBC:

Full moon could make Sandy’s impact worse

Gravitational tugs could make high tides rise even more

Heaven and Earth may be aligning to turn Hurricane Sandy into a real monster, just in time for Halloween.

Forecasters expect Sandy to make landfall along the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States on Monday or Tuesday. It may merge with a separate tempest hitting the region at about that time, creating an immensely powerful “Frankenstorm” whose effects could be magnified by the full moon.

When the moon waxes to its full phase Monday afternoon, high tides along the Eastern Seaboard will rise about 20 percent higher than normal, even without the help of Sandy’s storm surge, said Joe Rao, a meteorologist for News 12 in Westchester, N.Y. (Storm surges occur when a hurricane’s winds push the water surface above normal levels.)

Hazel had the same storm surge lunar magnifier, but the MSM is treating it as if this is something new and unique and there’s no mention of Hurricane Hazel in the NBC story.

And then there’s the New England Hurricane of 1938: (h/t to John Coleman)

The 1938 Hurricane, by the Works Project Administration – During this storm, Frank Schubert, last keeper of Coney Island Light, was aboard the buoy tender ship Tulip, which was thrown aground on top of some train tracks by the storm. Even Supermandia recognizes what an event that was.

Here’s the weather map for it from the US Weather Bureau:

File:1938 hurricane September 21, 1938 weather map.jpg

All that happened before Roger Revelle took his first CO2 measurement and published a paper that started it all. Nothing has been seen like Hurricane Hazel since.

Let’s look at CO2 and hurricanes

Why? Because if paid political shills like Brad Johnson are to be believed, CO2 increases in Earth’s atmosphere are the cause of all this “frankenweather” happening now.

This scatterplot graph (by Steve Goddard) shows the relation between atmospheric CO2 concentration and landfalling US Hurricanes.

There is no correlation between atmospheric CO2 and major hurricanes striking the US.

The majority of landfalling US hurricanes occurred when CO2 was around 300 ppm, i.e., the 1950’s. Ambient CO2 is about 394 ppm right now according to the latest NOAA CO2 data.

Source of base graph: http://www.planetforlife.com/co2history/index.html (annotated by Anthony)

That blows Brad Johnson’s political frankenpropaganda right out of the water.

Finally let’s look at hurricane related death rates from: Hurricane Fatalities, 1900–2010: Context in these Stormy Times (Aug 27th, 2011)

excerpt of Dr. Indur Goklany’s article:

Long term U.S. data on hurricane fatalities show that from 1900–09 to the 2009–10, hurricane deaths and death rates declined by 82% and 95%, respectively (see Figure 2).These estimates use data from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) provided in Blake et al. (2007) which has 1,525 deaths for 2005, the year of Katrina.

[Note that this month, the NHC, via Blake et al. (2011), put out a new report which has 1,225 deaths for 2005, while NWS’s Weather Fatalities website uses 1,016 for that year. I plan to keep on using the older NHC/Blake et al. estimate, pending consultation with Dr. Blake. I have contacted him, but to no one’s surprise, least of all mine, he has much more important things to do right now.]

Figure 2: U.S. hurricane deaths and death rates per year, 1900–2010. Sources: Updated from Goklany (2009), using USBC (2011) and NWS (2011). For 2005, this figure uses National Hurricane Center data from Blake et al. (2007), which has 1,525 deaths for that year, but Blake et al. (2011) has 1,225 deaths while NWS Weather Fatalities uses 1,016 deaths. This figure uses the Blake et al.’s older data, pending consultation with Dr. Blake. 

Conclusion

To any thinking person reading the above, clearly there’s no connection between Hurricane Sandy, atmospheric CO2 levels, or payback from God. It’s the worst example of climate propaganda since An Inconvenient Truth.

Don’t believe political shills like Brad Johnson as he doesn’t rely on facts, but rather, fear. That makes him and those like him that say Hurricane Sandy is some sort of “wrath” for human behavior he and his buddies don’t like not only unreliable and idiotic in their approach, but malfeasant to boot.

Call them on it wherever you see it.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
140 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Ball
October 27, 2012 9:06 am

greg Laden says:
October 27, 2012 at 8:57 am
“I had no idea.”
At least this part of your post is not misleading.

David Ball
October 27, 2012 9:12 am

Jeff Alberts says:
October 27, 2012 at 8:42 am
I am not a believer in any faith of any kind, but a thinking person has to entertain the possibility of “intelligent design” as there is no solid evidence one way or the other. This still leaves this on the field of possibility, no?

tjfolkerts
October 27, 2012 9:21 am

David Ball, you confuse me! You agree with Joel’s statement, then claim you fixed it!
Joel said

Johnson’s statement is also certainly beyond what the current science can support.

You reply:

Alarmist’s statements are also certainly beyond what the current science can support.

Alarmism is “excessive or exaggerated alarm about a real or imagined threat e.g. the increases in deaths from infectious disease.”[wikipedia]. If you are agreeing that Johnson is being an alarmist by making an excessive or exaggerate claim, then you are agreeing with Joel and not fixing anything. (And if you are making a general statement, then you are simply restating the definition, and not “fixing” anything, either!)

tjfolkerts
October 27, 2012 9:41 am

David Ball says:
October 27, 2012 at 7:34 am

“When the winds of November come early”- Gordon Lightfoot
Brad Johnson’s article is another example why it is important that the public not be aware of history.

Ummm … people familiar with history will know that the incident you allude to is Lake Superior (the wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald), not the Atlantic coast. And it was not a huge storm, but a pretty typical November storm (40–58 mph winds were forecast). People familiar with history will know this reference is completely misleading!
I am no fan of what Brad Johnson wrote, but fighting poor information with other poor information is hardly an improvement!

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
October 27, 2012 9:56 am

Last night I decided to punch Anthony’s hurricane list into a spreadsheet (and wondered why is that 1913 tropical storm included).
Ah, if only one could bottle the effect, barely stayed awake through the end of it.
*puts on Halloween troll hat*
A. The last one has the highest wind speed! How can you deny they’re getting worse?
B. The linear trend line clearly shows the speeds are increasing 0.15mph per year! Okay, the R² is only 0.09, but the increase is there!
C. You must be cherrypicking, how else do you explain the long stretches between 1924-41 and 1968-85 where there were none?
*removes hat, watches it crawl away*
Actually the most remarkable things are how the earliest wind speeds were all 100mph, with 20mph increments until 1887. Are those just “must have been at least” guesses?

RockyRoad
October 27, 2012 10:12 am

David Ball says:
October 27, 2012 at 8:57 am

John Brookes says:
October 27, 2012 at 8:14 am
(I am leaving my response as empty as the post I am addressing)

Maybe so, but I chuckled a few times before I realized it.

John F. Hultquist
October 27, 2012 10:18 am

joeldshore says:
October 27, 2012 at 7:53 am
Okay…I’ll howl. etc. . . .

Thanks, Joel, I hadn’t seen that “call to truth.”
Except for the small bit about how Earth and we got here, that statement seems to make good sense and many readers would find themselves in agreement with much of it. I will only say that to demand a person extricate the self from one’s family and societal swamp before paying any heed to the other characteristics possessed is equivalent to rejecting the entire human race. Regarding the thus dismissed phrases, I have no compelling replacements or alternatives to suggest – and don’t care. Thus, I move on.
Consider the beliefs of Isaac Newton. Here is a book review of Michael White’s “Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer”:
http://www.sffchronicles.co.uk/forum/3711-isaac-newton-the-last-sorcerer.html
Nevertheless, Calculus still works and apples still fall from trees.

John Bell
October 27, 2012 10:21 am

I would love to follow Brad Johnson around driving in his car, and then when he goes to fill up the tank I would remind him of what he wrote, and film his reaction. You know he uses electricity and heats/cools his house and all, what a hypocrite he is!

cjames
October 27, 2012 10:23 am

I don’t know how many of you follow Dr. Ryan Maue on Twitter but he has stated this morning that:
“coastal effects look forecast to be worse than 1938 according to GFS — Long Island extreme winds will be 80 – 100 kts”
He also states that 12Z NAM shows snowfall for WVA mountains at around 3 ft max.

Louis
October 27, 2012 10:41 am

Is there an eleventh commandment in Brad Johnson’s Bible: “Thou shalt not emit CO2”? I hope Brad Johnson enjoys being in the same company as the people below. They, too, claimed to know the will of God, but they didn’t claim to be scientists.
Pastor John Hagee: “And I believe that the Hurricane Katrina was, in fact, the judgment of God against the city of New Orleans.”
Steve Lefemine, an antiabortion activist in Columbia, S.C., was looking at a full-color satellite map of Hurricane Katrina when something in the swirls jumped out at him: the image of an 8-week-old fetus. “In my belief, God judged New Orleans for the sin of shedding innocent blood through abortion,” said Lefemine.

October 27, 2012 10:43 am

From the “weather is not climate” division.
Much of the UK’s east coast has been hit by snow in the last 24 hours. Snow, in October.
We didn’t have a summer. Honestly, we had a few warm days here and there but nothing a resident of Arizona or California would call hot.
I think the Brits would welcome a bit of global warming.
I hope the impact of this hurricane for those in it’s path is not as bad as the fearmongers are wishing for. Be safe.

Tom Gray
October 27, 2012 10:50 am

http://www.hurricanehazel.ca/ssi/about_community.shtml
Hurricane Hazel’s effect on the Toronto area. Hazel merged with a cold front just over Toronto.

October 27, 2012 10:53 am

Wasn’t AIDS supposed to be God’s punishment to gays?

Richard deSousa
October 27, 2012 10:55 am

What gives? Sandy is going to be Category 1 or Category 2 hurricane at the most so why the fuss? Are the crazy CAGW freaks out because there’s going to be a full moon on Halloween? I can just imagine hearing those idiots baying at the moon!

October 27, 2012 10:59 am

I’m an idiot. that’s what a few thousand miles of separation & not finishing reading the article before you comment does for you. I thought this storm was happening now! Doh.

David Ball
October 27, 2012 11:14 am

David Ball says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
October 27, 2012 at 11:13 am
tjfolkerts says:
October 27, 2012 at 9:21 am
Huh? you have confused yourself.

David Ball
October 27, 2012 11:15 am

Mods, please delete my comment at 11:13 as it is incorrect. Corrected post at 11:14. Thank you

David Ball
October 27, 2012 11:20 am

Trying to get out the door for children’s Halloween party. Sorry for the confusion.

Michael
October 27, 2012 11:58 am

I think it would be swell if Frankenstorm 2.0 packed as much punch as Frankenstorm 1.0 that struck the North East and Long Island on September 21, 1938.
We should Re-Brand the description of this storm ourselves “Frankenstorm 2.0”, in light of our newly discovered 1938 Hurricane information.
I think these people pointing the finger at and blaming the wrong men, the general public, for Human Induced Climate Change, should be pointing the finger at themselves, and we should be pointing our fingers at them, for the Geo Engineering experiments they have been conducting on us.
Ken Caldeira discussing his article in the September 2012 issue of Scientific American.
The Great Climate Experiment: How far can we push the planet? Ken Caldeira [Scientific American]

Frank Kotler
October 27, 2012 12:05 pm

Obviously, the earlier storms were punishment for whale oil! (do I need to say “sarc/”?)
Is my memory playing tricks, or were there even earlier storms listed back when this article was all on the “front page”?

October 27, 2012 12:12 pm

David Ball says:
October 27, 2012 at 11:20 am
Trying to get out the door for children’s Halloween party. Sorry for the confusion.
==================================================================
Did any of your kids dress up as a CO2 molecule? 😎

October 27, 2012 1:19 pm

Anthony, as a weatherman can you comment on the front that is progressing across to the Eastern seaboard and its effect on this storm? From what I have seen in the past of these fronts pushing Hurricanes out to sea, how in the hell is this storm going to make a 90 degree turn toward land on Monday?
REPLY: Joel did a pretty good job in a comment below, I’ve been away from the computer – Anthony

Bob Berwyn
October 27, 2012 1:22 pm

Huh? You’re just as much of a shill for the other side. so it’s like the pot calling the kettle black, and actually, you’re even worse for downplaying a potentially dangerous storm that’s already proven deadly. Plus, you’re showing your true nature in vitriolic ad hominem attack disguised as some sort of a science-based screed.
REPLY: You might try reading it and understanding it, rather than simply screeching about it. Otherwise, you become part of the problem – Anthony

wayne
October 27, 2012 1:58 pm

The kids ask, if a flap of a wing can cause a tornado far away can’t a correct flap of a wing also destroy a hurricane? Ah, the beauty of a child’s insight. So I told them, God’s speed to our winged warriors, do battle against Brad Johnson’s ‘Frankenstorm’, but caution, for it must be the correct wing and the correct flap, the wrong one just might feed to its power!
(should take at least a few years for them to properly digest that thought)☺

Chuck Nolan
October 27, 2012 2:27 pm

“Perhaps this weather scare that may well be much more than just a scare is God’s revenge for the refusal of the U.S. government to take action on the climate crisis. – Ted Glick”
Oh noes, there must be someone out there who has spoken directly to God and He has given His answer.
There are so many of the sane, wise and sage among our members of the cloth.
Let’s ask Pat Robertson, he’ll know. I heard God told him to run for president. Maybe they’re still talking.
/sarc/off
Where do we find these Glicks, Gleiks and kooks?
cn