Why being in a car during a lightning storm is the safest place to be
As watcher of weather, both as as a one-time storm chaser as well as a person who gets sent email about weather of all kinds, I’ll have to say I’ve never seen anything like this video. The National Weather Service lighting safety page reports that a person’s odds of being struck by lightning are around 1 in 775,000 at any given time with 1/10,000 in an 80 year lifetime. Capturing the event live on video has to be even higher odds.
A police car dashcam captured footage of a direct lightning strike the roof of a Toyota Landcruiser carrying a senior Russian official on a rainy Russian day – while driving down the freeway.
I was even more struck by the odds of the lightning hitting the SUV while there are taller light poles along the freeway and taller buildings in the vicinity. It was just a case of being in the wrong place and the wrong time.
While the internal electronics for the SUV are possibly fried, the occupant wouldn’t be.
So why is being in a car during a lightning storm is the safest place to be? Two words – Faraday Cage. From Wikipedia:
A Faraday cage or Faraday shield is an enclosure formed by conducting material or by a mesh of such material. Such an enclosure blocks external static and non-static electric fields. Faraday cages are named after the English scientist Michael Faraday, who invented them in 1836.
A Faraday cage’s operation depends on the fact that an external static electrical field will cause the electric charges within the cage’s conducting material to redistribute themselves so as to cancel the field’s effects in the cage’s interior. This phenomenon is used, for example, to protect electronic equipment from lightning strikes and electrostatic discharges.
A Faraday cage is best understood as an approximation to an ideal hollow conductor. Externally or internally applied electromagnetic fields produce forces on the charge carriers (usually electrons) within the conductor, generating electric currents that rearranges the charges. Once the charges have rearranged so as to cancel the applied field inside, the currents stop.
If the cage is grounded, the excess charges will go to the ground instead of the outer face, so the inner face and the inner charge will cancel each other out and the rest of the cage will retain a neutral charge.
=======================
Note: The SUV has steel belted radial tires, and thus is essentially grounded as lightning easily jumps that dielectric gap.
h/t to WUWT reader Newton Love

I remember having a bolt strike a tree ~400 yards from my house. Shattered the Yellow Poplar it hit (formerly emergent canopy position) throwing splinters over 200 yards. Difference in step potential between the House ground and the ground on the Cable line sent a surge that fried 2 DVD players, Cable modem, and network card. Strangest was the frying of a firewire card and drive cage from induced voltage (firewire cable ran parallel to the Co-ax). Loud boom followed by the smell of burning plastic, not fun.
carrying a senior Russian official on a rainy Russian day
It was the vodka. Its not called white lightning for nothing.
Driving in Arkansas on I-30 going North just past Texarkana when simultaneous flash bang of lightning strike. Spot on right rear door top top of ’85 Astro Van looked like a BB had hit it. Killed the cruise control, but did no other damage. Was kinda scary though.
Back in 1975, I was working for Green Giant Co. Ripon WI, as a field mechanic during peas, beans, and sweet corn harvesting seasons. We had a hard rain fall one day, that made harvesting impossible as the equipment was constantly getting stuck in the mud. The pea combine drivers were sent home, the foreman left the field, and I stayed behind to finish repairing a broken combine. There was a small bit of lightning on the horizon but none within 10 miles of the field site…. no problem!
A light rain was falling as I was stretched out under the broken combine, welding up a cracked frame member. I had a rubber rain coat under me to keep me off the wet ground and another one pulled over me to roll the hot sparks from the welding off of me as they fell. Of course, with a welders face shield over my head much of the time, my attention focused on the weld repair, and a noisy portable welder unit running near by, I wasn’t aware that another squall line was moving into the area.
The repair was progressing fairly well….. until a hickory tree in the fence row about 100 feet away was hit by lightning! The concussion sent me crab scuttling sidewise out from under the combine to see what had blown up! The tree had a steaming strip of barkless trunk about 2 inches wide running into the ground and up to the branches near the top. Bits of steaming bark had been blown out into the field and even the dirt had been blown up off of the root that had carried the the charge ‘to ground’! I could hardly hear my gas engine powered welder running, from the thunder clap after effects on my hearing.
I climbed into my mechanics truck for shelter and, after my hearing had returned to something approaching normal, I called the Green Giant mechanics shop (business band radio, “Truck 304 to Base….”) to tell them I was packing up and heading in to the plant. “Did you get that combine repaired?” I was asked. “No.” I replied. “Why are you coming in before the job is finished?” they queried. “Because I just had a direct order from God telling me it was time to quit!” I replied. “I’ll tell you all about it when I get there…”
Ahhhhh……. the Good Old Days!
Old school rule is for a lighting rod or something that acts as one, the area protected must be under a slope of one foot hight for three feet distance. The other rules still apply such as it’s better to be inside and stay away from trees because they are not true lighting rods.
Our house got hit some years ago. The bolt hit the gable of our bedroom. It blew bricks off the gable. I slept through it.
Firstly, it is called “lightning” – not lighting (illumination); not lightening (make weigh less).
Secondly, lightning is a half-wave at very high frequency – not static electricity. So what you have from a lightning strike on a metal container is high frequency skin effect – NOT a Faraday Cage:
Skin Effect
_Jim:
“Ummm … no. It begins as a chaotic process involving gas molecules in a strong static electric field, with free electrons stripped from some gas molecules which begin to impinge on other gas molecules and at some point an ‘avalanche’ effect takes over eventually resulting in a ‘plasma path’ through which the bulk of the electron ‘charge’ is transferred.”
Basically, isn’t that what I said about the pointed umbrella and ions? I still say that lightning always follows the path of least resistance, cloud to ground or vice versa, and you are correct that ion streamers, “plasma paths”, caused by the local electric field strength are what weaken the resistance making that path the least one (but usually multi-branched and rarely a straight one). Also, there are usually even much smaller and weaker sub paths dissipating the change differences.
mwhite says: “I wonder [how] a car with a fibreglass or carbon fibre body would cope?”
Fiberglass might have trouble because it is an insulator.
However, carbon fiber is a conductor and should perform well. There even supposed to be some TEMPEST type products that use it to create EM shielding (faraday cage).
As long as we’re telling stories.
Weather permitting I always watch thunderstorms outside.
Once had lightning hit REALLY close, I instantly smelled burning hair.
It wasn’t mine, I checked.
??
Question for those knowledgeable. Will wrapping a grounded mast or vertical exposed metal pipe with barbed wire reduce the likelihood of a lightning strike?
eyesonu, more likely it would seems. Wasn’t it Franklin who discovered that sharp points on lightning rods were much better than smooth surfaces in drawing the lightning to itself?
Speaking of masts, I had a pretty large sailboat for over twenty years and never had a problem with lightning, but I guess that because the twenty-five foot mast was not stepped on the lead ballast but on the upper deck giving about a four foot gap that was merely a large dry timber within the cabin. But in stormy weather, and I did a lot of that running under storm jib only, I always made sure not to list too much, putting one of the stays down and very close to the water for that very reason.
I suppose on the open ocean or great lakes without trees nearby on the shore you would probably be a much greater target for a lightning hit. That ‘path of least resistance’ rule has never let me down to date. ☺
Man, you got that right. They are the world’s foremost exporter of incredible traffic accident videos!
Fully agree. But YouTube is way too tame and stuff just disappears. IMHO a much better site is LiveLeak.
They have too many dashcam recorded fatal car accidents in Russia to count. Example. Here is a nasty video of the aftermath of one of these crashes. Show these to your teenagers, you’ll be doing them a favor.
They have lots of Lightning Strikes too. Example.
And then there is the related category of Electrocution which also serve as a public service announcement to remind us of what happens with a very small fraction of the current of a lightning strike. Example. Here is Another.
Well Lightning strikes are a static electricity phenomenon; well; until it decides to zap you.
So whether it is a go or no go, is a question of static electric fields.
And I’m flabbergasted that nobody here seems to know the key parameters. The electric field near a charged wire is inversely proportional to the local radius of curvature of the wire, or 1/r^2 for three dimensional curvature so that is why it is sharply pointed objects that promote a breakdown of the air. Obviously nobdy seems to have smashed their plasma T&V screen yet. The plasma cells inside that display, use field emission electron sources. There are sharp points inside each pixel to create an electron beam under high electric fields.
So the usual advice if caught out in the open, in an electric storm, is to make yourself look like a “hemispherical boss on an infinite plan”e, so you should get down on the ground in the fetal position and make your self look as round as you can. Don’t worry, at those sort of electric fields, the lightning sees you as a perfect conductor.
Another example of the phenomenon is the Geiger counter, which consists of a very fine usually Tungsten wire in the center of a metallized glas cylinder. A high Voltage is applied between the wire and the surface metallization, so it sets up an electric field that increases in strength the closer it is to the wire. When an ionizing particle strikes a gas atom in the cyclinder (low pressure) it ionizes the gas, and electrons are swept towards the wire, with the ions then drifting towards the glass. If the Voltage is high enough the electrons accelerate enough to ionize another atom or molecule, so that the current can be greater than just the number of electrons released in the original ionization event. In this range, it is usually called a proportional counter, and the total charge released is proportional to the energy of the ionizing particle, so it is using positive feedback to create a charge gain.
At higher Voltages still, the electrons gain energy so fast, that they create a veritable avalanche of charge, and the ionisation starts right at the tube wall. In this mode, the thing is totally non-linear, and the same total chage is released from the very first ionisation event, no matter what the energy. This is the Geiger region, and the pulses are now saturated and independent of ionising radiation energy. Such tubes can also detect non charged particles like neutrons and gamma rays. The incoming neutron strikes an atom and kicks out a proton from the nucleus. This “knock on” proton then starts the accelerated charge ionisation process. In the case of gamma rays (high energy photons), it is an electron that is kicked out of the atom. Proportional counter tubes designed for neutron detection usually contain carboniferous gases and materials, because carbon is a good source of knock on protons . Even so, proportional gas counters for neutrons are quite inefficient, and maybe only count one in 10^4 neutrons, but they can be made totally insensitive to gamma radiation. Modern scintillation crytals and materials like Anthracene and Stilbene are much better neutron detectors.
Bt it is that 1/r electric field or 1/r^2 for spherical points that promotes the discharge. I believe there are some quite recent papers, that show the lightning rod process is somewhat more complicated than just the sharp point business.
But once the zap gets going it will go where it damn well pleases
Having been hit once by lightning all I recall is the biggest camera flash imaginable going off in my face and being thrown backwards about 3 meters. Other wise no injuries apart from a few bruises and singes. I was out in the open, but never sure as to why I was not more seriously injured.
TomRude says: September 27, 2012 at 8:22 am
OT: The Wikipedia page of Marcel Leroux is under attack by some zealots.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marcel_Leroux
To those here who have read his work, help would be appreciated.
Done. Like I did (thanks to someone else’s find of the article on the Wayback Machine) for Tim Ball, an even more scandalous deletion by WhackaPedia.
This page has a world map of lightning frequency distribution.
Russia seems far less likely to receive lightning strikes than the US.
There are a lot of good YouTubes on lightning strikes, I’d say many are more interesting than the above.
I took out single frames from one of these, in order to observe how the path, narrow at first, is widened during the strike in order to let the electric plasma through more efficiently.
I was a commerical pilot for 35 years and and have been struck by lighting only once. The plane was a DC-9 and the strike burst the navigation lights on the right wing and made several pinholes in the wing tip. No other signs of the strike . The thunder clap was very loud. Many times in other cases static electricity grew so strong on the a/c you could see spikes moving back and forth from the nose of the plane. Sometimes this charge would jump off on a cloud and cause what appeared to be a lighting strike along with a loud clap of thunder. This seems to be the cause of lots of “lighting strikes” and it is really static build-up. You can stop the build up sometimes by slowing down or turning , but sometimes in daylight you don’t see the build-up before the discharge.
The driver thought he had hit a typical Russian pot hole 😉
You should check the “we love Russia” compilations on Youtube for crazy Russian stuff!
Some one mentioned that an aircraft is also a good faraday cage, that can depend on your definition of good. In a 727 as a flight engineer out of darwin, a rather tropical place we faced thunderstorms to 70,000ft with with no gaps. We were climbing and descending at 10,000ft per minute without doing anything when the lightning started.
Then it got interesting, it fried and blew off or up every aerial on the aircraft and took out the electrical system. Thus we had a boy scout compass on the combing panel and a battery that powered enough instruments to tell us which way was up for twenty minutes. So far a lot of fun then the saint Elmo’s fires crept all over the cockpit.
That was special, could hardly see the instruments and everyones hair was standing on end, that was the fun part, the turbulence was so rapid that we suffered eye ball bounce whereby your eyes can not keep up with the movement, blurred vision and creepy green fire was a tad surreal.
We were continually struck by lightning maybe five hundred times by the burn marks later counted.
The problem of no generating power was the foremost problem, Boeing in their wisdom made the system such that the fault that shut down the generators could only be reset by turning off the battery and thus not knowing which way was up. That was a gamble, not knowing if it would turn back on again, that was a small problem, the blurred vision and the hands going up and down trying to manipulate switches and circuit breakers was a real challenge.
We survived and arrived with one generator and two fried ones and an aircraft with almost nothing working, lightning is not very friendly. Willis’s thunder storms to get rid of the heat are a reality.
I have several lightning related stories I will tell my most memorable. A friend invited me sailing one evening in Tampa Bay. A typical afternoon thunderstorm rolled through with strong gusts of wind and occasional lightning. We furled the sails set the anchor and asked the ladies to go below.
The anchor pulled and we were struggling to keep from being driven ashore when when suddenly we were in the most spectacular lightning storm I have ever experienced. Bolts were snapping at a rate of one per second! It seemed to last for a hour but I am certain it was less than 5 minutes. It lasted long enough for both my friend and I to see the big aluminum mast with suspicion and to our horror discover the fuel tank for the kicker motor under the boom with lines inches from it. After moving the fuel tank as far from the boom as possible we waited for the storm to pass while fighting our continued drift with the dragging anchor and the kicker motor.
Nothing more than extreme apprehension occurred and a memory of hundreds of snap boom lightning strikes at a rate I would have considered impossible.
@Paul Jackson
>…if it were a Faraday cage your cell phone would not get any reception while inside the car.
Unless, as explained above, the openings in the cage are larger than about 1/4 of a wavelength in which case the signel passes right through. A radio wave ‘reflector’ does not have to be a solid object, only have holes smaller than 1/4 of a wavelength such as chicken wire and a TV signal.
That is why a microwave oven has a perforated metal plate behind the glass in the door. It keeps all the microwaves inside because the hole is much smaller than the wavelength of the EM bouncing around inside.
i did. It’s above. You just missed it. And no mention in yours about stepped leaders, and which accounts for the crazy circuitous routes lightning takes sometimes since it is the *stepped leaser* which establishes the path for the return strike and its large and more visible current flow (but to your credit you did mention the avalanche effect). Maybe you are adverse to my shorter blurb rather than a dissertation on the subject?
How does this work for lakes and other flat bodies of nothing but water (I have witnessed this and it was while I was transiting the Lake Texoma dam bridge during a thunderstorm while on field assignment with a cellular carrier)? I ask rhetorically … but the answer lies in the downward-moving leader and the local ‘breakdown’ of successive air parcels (and in different directions each time based on what has been seen during observations) as the stepped leader progresses downward …
.
Well, I latched onto your statement “Doesn’t lightning always just follow the path of least resistance?” and actually there is no ‘path’ of least resistance until the stepped leader has finished its work, and since lightning *begins* with that DOWNWARD stepped leader process until that part is over, there isn’t any path even!
Lightning is a little more complicated than most folks visualization of a simple series circuit and the simple application of Ohm’s Law determining ‘paths of least resistance’ and where current will flow; lightning involves high voltage static field, gas molecules, free electrons, an avalanche effect evolving into a “conductive gas plasma” and what has been described as the “4th state of matter” … since each stepped leader segment is about 50 meters in length (see: Uman’s book for the research on this) it is the LAST leader segment that determines what gets hit … and ANYTHING that enhances the BREAKDOWN of the air and subsequent avalanche effect in that last parcel will determine the eventual target of that leader and then become the source of the return stroke … present thinking is that SHARP POINTY OBJECTS on potential *ground* targets *reduces* the possibility of the object with the SHARP POINTY THINGY being the *object* or target of the downward-stepping leader stroke, and THIS CONCEPT runs COUNTER to most people’s thoughts on this subject re: ‘paths of least resistance’ et al, as inspection of comments on this thread seems to show …
I think the category of device you are describing is an “ESE Devices” – for Early Streamer Emission devices … there is a debate currently before certain technical committees regarding manufactures claims, and the legitimacy of those devices and the ‘claimed’ protection radius; they are *not* living up to claims …
This is the Yahoo group on this topic if you are interested:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/LightningProtection/
.
The statement would mean a probability of 1/775,000 of being struck by lightning on any particular day.
with a world population of something over 7 billion, wouldn’t that mean that ~10,000 people get struck by lightning every day? This would seem very high.
or does it mean that there are 10,000 lightning strikes every day, one of which would have to hit you?
or that of the 10,000 daily strikes, one in 775,000 hits a person? meaning one person gets hit every 77 days? This would seem low (with 400-500 reported every year in the US alone).
I suspect that this is 1/775,000 in the US. With a population of 300 million, this would work out to about 400 people per day, which is about right.
math is easy. communication is what’s hard…