Increased tropical rainfall – seems like a negative feedback to me…

From MIT via press release, bear in mind this is just more model output based on estimates from observations. That said, thunderstorms and hurricanes are simply heat engines, and they transport heat from the lower atmosphere to the higher atmosphere. Willis’ thunderstorm hypothesis comes to mind.

Figure 2: Sensitivities (% K^−1) of the 99.9th percentile of precipitation for variability versus climate change in the CMIP3 simulations. The solid line shows the ordinary-least-squares best fit. Histograms show estimates (with uncertainty) of the observed sensitivity for variability and the inferred sensitivity for climate change.

When it rains, it pours

Study estimates rate of intensification of extreme tropical rainfall with global warming.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Extreme precipitation in the tropics comes in many forms: thunderstorm complexes, flood-inducing monsoons and wide-sweeping cyclones like the recent Hurricane Isaac.

Global warming is expected to intensify extreme precipitation, but the rate at which it does so in the tropics has remained unclear. Now an MIT study has given an estimate based on model simulations and observations: With every 1 degree Celsius rise in temperature, the study finds, tropical regions will see 10 percent heavier rainfall extremes, with possible impacts for flooding in populous regions.

“The study includes some populous countries that are vulnerable to climate change,” says Paul O’Gorman, the Victor P. Starr Career Development Assistant Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT, “and impacts of changes in rainfall could be important there.”

O’Gorman found that, compared to other regions of the world, extreme rainfall in the tropics responds differently to climate change. “It seems rainfall extremes in tropical regions are more sensitive to global warming,” O’Gorman says. “We have yet to understand the mechanism for this higher sensitivity.”

Results from the study are published online this week in the journal Nature Geoscience.

A warm rain will fall

Global warming’s effect on rainfall in general is relatively well-understood: As carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases enter the atmosphere, they increase the temperature, which in turn leads to increases in the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. When storm systems develop, the increased humidity prompts heavier rain events that become more extreme as the climate warms.

Scientists have been developing models and simulations of Earth’s climate that can be used to help understand the impact of global warming on extreme rainfall around the world. For the most part, O’Gorman says, existing models do a decent job of simulating rainfall outside the tropics — for instance, in mid-latitude regions such as the United States and Europe. In those regions, the models agree on the rate at which heavy rains intensify with global warming.

However, when it comes to precipitation in the tropics, these models, O’Gorman says, are not in agreement with one another. The reason may come down to resolution: Climate models simulate weather systems by dividing the globe into a grid, with each square on the grid representing a wide swath of ocean or land. Large weather systems that span multiple squares, such as those that occur in the United States and Europe in winter, are relatively easy to simulate. In contrast, smaller, more isolated storms that occur in the tropics may be trickier to track.

An intensity of extremes

To better understand global warming’s effect on tropical precipitation, O’Gorman studied satellite observations of extreme rainfall between the latitudes of 30 degrees north and 30 degrees south — just above and below the Equator. The observations spanned the last 20 years, the extent of the satellite record. He then compared the observations to results from 18 different climate models over a similar 20-year period.

“That’s not long enough to get a trend in extreme rainfall, but there are variations from year to year,” O’Gorman says. “Some years are warmer than others, and it’s known to rain more overall in those years.”

This year-to-year variability is mostly due to El Niño — a tropical weather phenomenon that warms the surface of the Eastern Pacific Ocean. El Niño causes localized warming and changes in rainfall patterns and occurs independent of global warming.

Looking through the climate models, which can simulate the effects of both El Niño and global warming, O’Gorman found a pattern. Models that showed a strong response in rainfall to El Niño also responded strongly to global warming, and vice versa. The results, he says, suggest a link between the response of tropical extreme rainfall to year-to-year temperature changes and longer-term climate change.

O’Gorman then looked at satellite observations to see what rainfall actually occurred as a result of El Niño in the past 20 years, and found that the observations were consistent with the models in that the most extreme rainfall events occurred in warmer periods. Using the observations to constrain the model results, he determined that with every 1 degree Celsius rise under global warming, the most extreme tropical rainfall would become 10 percent more intense — a more sensitive response than is expected for nontropical parts of the world.

“Unfortunately, the results of the study suggest a relatively high sensitivity of tropical extreme rainfall to global warming,” O’Gorman says. “But they also provide an estimate of what that sensitivity is, which should be of practical value for planning.”

The results of the study are in line with scientists’ current understanding of how global warming affects rainfall, says Richard Allan, an associate professor of climate science at the University of Reading in England. A warming climate, he says, adds more water vapor to the atmosphere, fueling more intense storm systems.

“However, it is important to note that computer projections indicate that although the rainfall increases in the wettest regions — or similarly, the wet season — the drier parts of the tropics … will become drier still,” Allan says. “So policymakers may have to plan for more damaging flooding, but also less reliable rains from year to year.”

Written by: Jennifer Chu, MIT News Office

===============================================================

here’s the paper abstract:

Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change

Paul A. O’Gorman  Nature Geoscience (2012) doi:10.1038/ngeo1568

Precipitation extremes increase in intensity over many regions of the globe in simulations of a warming climate1, 2, 3. The rate of increase of precipitation extremes in the extratropics is consistent across global climate models, but the rate of increase in the tropics varies widely, depending on the model used3. The behaviour of tropical precipitation can, however, be constrained by observations of interannual variability in the current climate4, 5, 6.

Here I show that, across state-of-the-art climate models, the response of tropical precipitation extremes to interannual climate variability is strongly correlated with their response to longer-term climate change, although these responses are different. I then use satellite observations to estimate the response of tropical precipitation extremes to the interannual variability.

Applying this observational constraint to the climate simulations and exploiting the relationship between the simulated responses to interannual variability and climate change, I estimate a sensitivity of the 99.9th percentile of daily tropical precipitation to climate change at 10% per K of surface warming, with a 90% confidence interval of 6–14% K−1. This tropical sensitivity is higher than expectations for the extratropics3 of about 5% K−1. The inferred percentage increase in tropical precipitation extremes is similar when considering only land regions, where the impacts of extreme precipitation can be severe.

===============================================================

Related articles:

A Demonstration of Negative Climate Sensitivity

Further Evidence for my Thunderstorm Thermostat Hypothesis

In Which I Talk to the Thunderstorms

Willis publishes his thermostat hypothesis paper

The Thermostat Hypothesis

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

38 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gator69
September 17, 2012 10:13 am

“Global warming’s effect on rainfall in general is relatively well-understood:”
If that is true, why then are all alarmist models and predictions wrong?

Lance Wallace
September 17, 2012 10:35 am

“…with every 1 degree Celsius rise under global warming, the most extreme tropical rainfall would become 10 percent more intense”
OK, so considering it took a century or so to achieve a 0.7 C rise, we can calculate that the 10% increase will finally be achieved in 2155.

RockyRoad
September 17, 2012 10:39 am

This makes sense. But just call me analytical.

September 17, 2012 10:43 am

Temp in Lagos Nigeria today is 28 -29C (4 deg N lat.) pretty much the same as it was in 1964 when I was there. “The” global warming is 0.7C since the 1850s, so how have they “measured” the response. If it is only the rainfall events that take place over an ENSO cycle, then this is a ludicrous test. It just tests the effect of El Nino and La Nina. The tropics (Lagos for example) have not changed at all during the 100 years (50 of which I know from my own observations!) and even their climate models say this is to be expected – the heat is supplosed to be on in the temperate to polar regions. This is a totally ridiculous study – there will be no inundations in the tropics more than they have now. How can real climate scientists keep silent when crappy work is being done.

Bob B.
September 17, 2012 10:52 am

14 uses of the word “Extreme” in the press release, 7 uses of “Extreme” in the abstract. That’s pretty darned extreme.

Billy Liar
September 17, 2012 10:54 am

and found that the observations were consistent with the models …
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hahahahahahahaha!
Real life imitates climate science.

jorgekafkazar
September 17, 2012 10:59 am

“However, it is important to note that computer projections indicate that although the rainfall increases in the wettest regions — or similarly, the wet season — the drier parts of the tropics … will become drier still,” Allan says.
My BS detector just pegged.

Bloke down the pub
September 17, 2012 11:18 am

How does this fit with there being more hurricanes during colder periods?

Jimbo
September 17, 2012 11:21 am

Global warming’s effect on rainfall in general is relatively well-understood: As carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases enter the atmosphere, they increase the temperature, which in turn leads to increases in the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. When storm systems develop, the increased humidity prompts heavier rain events that become more extreme as the climate warms.

I know we have just been through a period of global warming and the “hottes decade on the record.”
My question is this. Where is the evidence for “heavier rain events that become more extreme”? Just asking.
References:
http://www.agu.org/journals/pip/gl/2012GL052094-pip.pdf
http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2012/07/16/new-paper-weather-and-climate-analyses-using-improved-global-water-vapor-observations-by-vonder-haar-et-al-2012/

Jimbo
September 17, 2012 11:26 am

From my last comment see this image in relation to water vapor increase or not.
http://pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/vonderhaar-et-l-20121.jpg?w=500&h=176

Editor
September 17, 2012 11:46 am

Roy Spencer used to have a page up on the rain cycle as “nature’s thermostat.” When he revamped his website several years ago it somehow got dropped but I always thought it was important so about a year ago I retrieved it from the Wayback Machine and posted a copy on my own website. You can still find it on Wayback here (snapshot dated July 1, 2008):
http://web.archive.org/web/20080701133815/http://www.weatherquestions.com/Roy-Spencer-on-global-warming.htm

September 17, 2012 11:58 am

Tropical rainfall is part geography. Take 2 Panama forested locations at same 200 meter elevation & close average temperatures. On the Pacific side (by Cocoli River) annual rainfall was historically (to year 2000) measuring 2,030 mm but about 60 Km away on the Atlantic side (by ex-base Sherman) annual rainfall was (historically ) 2,892 mm.
I experience this at my coastal 100 meter elevation tropical property (not in Panama). During rainy season different coastal friends have told me they didn’t come over as scheduled because it was raining heavily for days. Often my reply is they should’ve come the 60+ Km (as a crow flies) because out at my place it was nice and sunny/dry. Their average annual rainfall is (historically) 25% higher & now my side of the mountain will become even drier if study accurate.

george e. smith
September 17, 2012 12:09 pm

“””””…..With every 1 degree Celsius rise in temperature, the study finds, tropical regions will see 10 percent heavier rainfall extremes, with possible impacts for flooding in populous regions……”””””
Well instead of their MIT data simulant, why not use the real actual data; as reported in Wentz et al, SCIENCE for July 7, 2007 “How much more Rain, will Global Warming bring ?”
Their actual observations show that a one deg C Temperature rise actually results in a 7% increase in precipitation; not the 10% simulated MIT rainfall.
Hey more rain for more evaporation is NOT “heavier rainfall extremes”, it is more rain/snow/sleet/hail/frogs/whatever; get used to it, and stop using provocative adjectives, that real observations don’t support.
So why are taxpayers still funding slush fund grants for people to keep running their Terraflop simulants when we have the real observed data ?
And why would the flooding be concentrated only in populous regions. They got more flooding in New Orleans because the gummint built the swimming pool walls higher; not because the place is populous.

David Ball
September 17, 2012 12:33 pm

Perhaps one day we will be able to accurately model climate. Today is not that day.

JJ
September 17, 2012 12:49 pm

Where does one start with this?
Conflation of model results with reality:
“With every 1 degree Celsius rise in temperature, the study finds, tropical regions will see 10 percent heavier rainfall extremes, with possible impacts for flooding in populous regions.”
What? No study can “find” anything about the future. Models can predict, studies can estimate, people can guess, about the future. Findings are strictly limited to what has been observed.
“For the most part, O’Gorman says, existing models do a decent job of simulating rainfall outside the tropics — for instance, in mid-latitude regions such as the United States and Europe. In those regions, the models agree on the rate at which heavy rains intensify with global warming.
However, when it comes to precipitation in the tropics, these models, O’Gorman says, are not in agreement with one another.”

What? Models are judged to “do a decent job of simulating rainfall ” if they agree with other models? No. Models do a decent job of simulating rainfall if they agree with observations of rainfall.
“Models that showed a strong response in rainfall to El Niño also responded strongly to global warming, and vice versa. The results, he says, suggest a link between the response of tropical extreme rainfall to year-to-year temperature changes and longer-term climate change.”
Yeah. They suggest a link between the response of tropical extreme rainfall to year-to-year temperature changes and longer-term climate change in the models. Duh. If you want to know if such a link exists, just ask the programmer.
“O’Gorman then looked at satellite observations to see what rainfall actually occurred as a result of El Niño in the past 20 years, and found that the observations were consistent with the models in that the most extreme rainfall events occurred in warmer periods.”
Found that the observations were consistent with the models? What? I guess that means we can use those observations, then.
“Using the observations to constrain the model results, he determined that with every 1 degree Celsius rise under global warming, the most extreme tropical rainfall would become 10 percent more intense — “
So, you:
1) make some observations of temperature and rainfall. Then you:
2) run those observations thru a model, and then:
3) determine the relationship between temperature and rainfall from what comes out of the model.
Helloooo … why don’t you leave the model out, and figure out the relationship between temperature and rainfall from the observations? If you don’t have sufficient data to determine that relationship empirically, how are you paramaterizing your models?

Matt G
September 17, 2012 1:06 pm

When the planet warms and cools from ice ages to interglaciers it is well known that there is little change in the tropics. Global warming has the smallest affect in the tropics and this could be partly down to increased albedo and precipitation in this region. Out going long wave radiation in the tropics since the 1970’s has only really responded to ENSO with El Nino and La Nina’s. Therefore this model output/conclusion blames observations elsewhere for increased rainfall in the tropics mainly related to a short period covering ENSO that has not even completed a full cycle.

JJ
September 17, 2012 1:20 pm

Lance Wallace says:
“…with every 1 degree Celsius rise under global warming, the most extreme tropical rainfall would become 10 percent more intense”
OK, so considering it took a century or so to achieve a 0.7 C rise, we can calculate that the 10% increase will finally be achieved in 2155.
.
No. The 0.7C rise in surface temp is for the planet as a whole. The rise has mostly been at the poles (well, at the pole – given that it has mostly been the arctic). This “study” was directed at the tropics, where the rise has been less is and is expected to remain much less that the globe as a whole by those who have such expectations. So that 10% increase over today is waaaaaayyyyy out there.

stumpy
September 17, 2012 1:39 pm

“It seems rainfall extremes in tropical regions are more sensitive to global warming,” O’Gorman says. “We have yet to understand the mechanism for this higher sensitivity.”
Err, becuase its hotter and moister

Steve C
September 17, 2012 2:16 pm

That graph is a beauty, practically a one-shot illustration of “The Problem”.

charles nelson
September 17, 2012 3:39 pm

I’m a great believer in ‘the evidence of one’s own eyes’.
It would appear that the authors of the above paper have not spent much time looking at images such as this…
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu
…wherein it can be seen quite clearly that increased tropical convective activity results in the movement of moist air to sub tropical areas and beyond.

Philip Bradley
September 17, 2012 3:54 pm

Measuring rainfall from satellites runs into calibration issues, which we know is an invitation to confirmation bias. Ground rainfall measurements in tropical SE Asia show declining precipitation. Which throws doubt on the accuracy of satellite measurements.
http://wildsingaporenews.blogspot.com.au/2009/07/less-rain-in-singapore-over-last-30.html
Climate models simulate weather systems by dividing the globe into a grid, with each square on the grid representing a wide swath of ocean or land. Large weather systems that span multiple squares, such as those that occur in the United States and Europe in winter, are relatively easy to simulate. In contrast, smaller, more isolated storms that occur in the tropics may be trickier to track.
We understand the processes that lead to mid-latitude rainfall well enough to predict when and where it will rain. We don’t understand the processes that lead to tropical rainfall well enough to predict.
When I lived in the tropics I used to joke that they could issue the same weather forecast every day.
“It might rain today. On the other hand it might not.”

old construction worker
September 17, 2012 5:40 pm

“Looking through the climate models, which can simulate the effects of both El Niño and global warming, O’Gorman found a pattern. Models that showed a strong response in rainfall to El Niño also responded strongly to global warming, and vice versa. The results, he says, suggest a link between the response of tropical extreme rainfall to year-to-year temperature changes and longer-term climate change.”
If this is true then what do La Nina years tell them?

buck smith
September 17, 2012 6:14 pm

What does a 10% increase in tropical rainfall translate to in heat transfered away from the surface? Based on the classic IPCC diagram of heat flows evaporation/ tranport = 80 w/m2 globally. A ten percent increase would pretty much cancel global warming, right?

Chuck Nolan
September 17, 2012 8:02 pm

Models mentioned 15 times. Not once even whispered “data”.
“It’s models all the way down” W.E.
cn

September 17, 2012 9:33 pm

Buck,
In a recent tussle I coined a new term for Warmists; Water Vapour Convection Deniers!
What do you think?