Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
For a few years, I managed a combination of businesses on a very remote 100 hectare (250 acre) South Pacific island. The main businesses were a shipyard; a machine shop building aluminum boats and water tanks; a banking agency; a postal agency; a buying point for locals selling copra (dried coconut), beche-de-mer (sea cucumber), and trocus shell; and a trade store. About 80 acres of the island were planted to coconut, which was harvested and sold. In addition to getting into the 1000-Metre Sweat and the Two-Month Wait as Olympic events, I learned a lot about the logistics and the economics of running a business on an island in the middle of nowhere. The operation was, of course, diesel-powered. You can’t run a big lathe on a few batteries and some solar panels. So I know the problems of supplying fuel in remote islands in the most intimate and personal way, because I was the person who had to arrange the fuel supply, the guy who took the heat when it ran short. I have also looked very, very closely at the economics of coconut oil as an energy source.
As a result, I was both glad and sad to see that the island nation of Tokelau was switching their entire energy system to solar power plus coconut oil … because Tokelau is definitely in the middle of nowhere …
Figure 1. Where on Earth is Tokelau? Australia is at the lower left, and New Zealand is at the bottom center. Papua New Guinea is at the upper left. Tokelau is at the upper right.
Let me explain why I have mixed feelings about the changeover to the two alternative fuels, solar and coconut oil.
The first problem has nothing to do with energy sources. The difficulty is that as near as I can tell, the islanders have no stake in the project. The New Zealand Aid Programme is “advancing” the money to Tokelau, in the form of hiring a New Zealand company to purchase and install all of the solar gear. This kind of “parachute aid” tends not to last, because the local folks don’t have any skin in the game. If the people living in the area don’t take ownership of a project, if they don’t have to sweat to make the project happen, the odds of success plummet. I will be quite surprised if the “advance” of six million dollars from New Zealand Aid ever gets repaid. That’s a huge debt in a nation with the worlds smallest economy. Not just a small economy, the world’s smallest economy, and one of the poorest (182nd out of 194 countries in GDP/capita). So the project has a very shaky foundation.
Regarding solar and coconuts, let me take the easy one first, coconuts. Yes, you can run a diesel engine on coconut oil … if you have the oil. Figure 2 shows the main and largest atoll of the three atolls that make up Tokelau. It contains about half the land in the country. Like many atolls, it is in the form of a ring, with the widest and solidest individual islands on the windward side of the atoll. A coral atoll is not a solid thing. It is a hesitation in a storm-driven river of coral sand and rubble. As a result, on the side where the storms hit, the river of coral rubble is larger, and the islands are longer and more connected. Typically, none of the individual islands rise more than a few metres above sea level. The long island at the lower right of Figure 2 is only about 300 metres (1,000 ft) wide.
Figure 2. Nukunono, the main atoll of the three atolls (Atafu, Nukunono and Fakaofo) that make up the island nation of Tokelau. 5.53 miles equals ~ 9 km. There are about 1,200 people living in Tokelau, and there are about 5,000 Tokelauans living in New Zealand … go figure. Total land area is about 10 sq. km., but a good chunk of that is bare sand and uninhabited islets.
As you can see, there is very little usable land in Tokelau, and that’s the first problem with the coconut oil plan. It takes a heap of coconuts to equal the energy in a barrel of diesel. And it takes a heap of land to grow a heap of coconuts. I should know, coconuts were one of my businesses. And on the coral atolls of Tokelau, there’s very little spare land at all.
Next, humans and coconut palms have travelled together around the Pacific for a very good reason. Coconut palms are an astonishing plant. They can transubstantiate the worst soils, even the salty coral sands of tropical atolls, into rich oil, milk coconut meat, and fats. There are only a few food plants that can grow on the coral rubble and sand, so coconuts are very important to the nutrition of the children, because the coconut milk, meat, and foods cooked in coconut milk make up a large portion of the kids’ diet.
As a result of those issues, for me, on the atolls any coconut oil that gets burned is taken directly from the children’s nutrition … and I can’t see that as being a brilliant plan. Sure, on large volcanic islands like Fiji or the Solomon Islands it makes sense. Those islands have acres and acres of land on which they can and do plant coconuts. But on the atolls? Very doubtful.
Next, the solar question. In the US people say “What goes around, comes around.” In the South Pacific, I used to say “What goes around … stops.” The combination of heat, sand, humidity, and salt makes tropical islands one of the most corrosive and destructive natural environments. As a result, even “hardened” or “weatherized” systems tend to have both a high infant mortality rate and a short life expectancy.
The whole solar package consists of over 4,000 solar panels, 392 inverters, and 1,344 batteries. I would suggest that the lifetime of the batteries and the inverters will not be large. And who will do the repairs when they come due? I have looked at a variety of solar systems that have been installed in some of the more remote Pacific islands … hey, evaluating solar systems on tropical islands is a brutal job, but someone had to take it. Let me say that long-term success in Pacific solar systems is far less common than failure …
Finally, the entire concept of maintenance is quite foreign to the mindset of most Pacific Islanders. I ascribe this to the lack of winter. If you live in say Norway and you don’t plan ahead for the winter, you will die … which puts a real premium on, and selects for, folks who not only think about tomorrow, but act before tomorrow arrives. In the tropics, on the other hand, there is no winter, and no need to plan for the future. Here’s an example.
I once visited a lovely island in the outer reaches of Fiji in order to look at a solar system that they had installed. It was all designed to be foolproof … but the people in the islands are no fools, they are quite ingenious.
In order to keep the batteries from being killed by being drawn down too far, the people who designed the solar system had wisely designed it so that it would only provide power until the battery voltage fell below a certain threshold. At that point, the system was designed to shut off entirely to protect the battery. However, some enterprising soul found out that if you stuck a paper clip or a bit of wire between a certain pair of the contacts on the controller, it would let you drain the batteries entirely … and as a result, every battery on the island was stone, cold dead.
I was new to the Pacific at the time, and I didn’t understand that at all. Didn’t these folks think about what the future would bring when their batteries were dead? But it was all explained by what happened as I was leaving the island. We were all getting in the boat to depart, when a charming guy I’d met on the island came running up with a string of fish. He said “Here, I caught these, take these fish with you.”
I tried to demur, saying “Keep some for yourself, are you sure that you have enough for your wife and your kids?”, because I knew he had a whole passel of children.
“Oh, yes,” he said, “I have plenty. I have kept enough fish for all day tomorrow.”
I realized at that instant that I had just witnessed the long-term time horizon for event planning on a small island … the end of tomorrow. So I didn’t bother to lecture him on smoking fish and salting fish and pickling fish and all the stuff that a good Norwegian burgher would do. I took the fish, and I thanked him profusely.
And I realized later that his response was indeed much more reasonable than mine—the fish would keep much better swimming around in the lagoon than they would last as salted fish in a hot environment …
Sadly, however, while this point of view worked fine for many, many years, it doesn’t work all that well these days when it comes to the maintenance of complex machinery … and while solar systems are better than most in requiring minimum maintenance, they still do need to be maintained. This does not bode well for the future of the Tokelau solar system.
Fortunately, since the Kiwis are putting up the money, none of this really matters. Let me say, however, that my prediction is that in ten years, Tokelau will still be importing fossil fuels for a host of uses, and that much if not all of the solar system will be quietly rusting away … I could be wrong, and I truly hope that I am wrong. I hope that the good folks of Tokelau realize what they have, and that they learn to cherish and maintain and protect it so it serves them well, long into the future, and that they repay the six million dollar “advance” to the Kiwis …
I just wouldn’t bet any money on that happening.
w.
PS—Why do I think the “advance” from New Zealand won’t be repaid? Well, GDP per capita in Tokelau is about a thousand bucks a year … but that doesn’t mean that an average individual earns that much cash in a year, much of that is subsistence farming and fishing, or government income from tuna fishing licenses. What little money the people have goes to things like school fees and clothing and medicines and the like. Most people survive in large measure because of “remittances”, money sent back to the “old country” by Tokelauans living in New Zealand and elsewhere.
The CIA World Factbook says:
The people rely heavily on aid from New Zealand – about $10 million annually in 2008 and 2009 – to maintain public services. New Zealand’s support amounts to 80% of Tokelau’s recurrent government budget. An international trust fund, currently worth nearly US$32 million, was established in 2004 to provide Tokelau an independent source of revenue. The principal sources of revenue come from sales of copra, postage stamps, souvenir coins, and handicrafts. Money is also remitted to families from relatives in New Zealand.
The annual government expenses in Tokelau are four times their revenue … a neat trick made possible by the New Zealand Government making up the shortfall each and every year. In other words, forget about affording to repay the “advance”, they can’t even afford the government that they have.
Six million dollars divided by the 1,200 inhabitants of the atolls is a debt of about $5,000 for every man, woman, and child in Tokelau. Or we could divide it by the “labor force”, which the CIA Factbook puts at 440 souls, which means a debt of about $13,600 per adult …
Given that disparity, I see no feasible way that the advance will ever be repaid. Which is perfectly fine, it simply means that solar energy in Tokelau is just another NZ Aid project, good on ya, Kiwis … but let’s not pretend that it is a loan.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Aren’t a lot of pacific islanders lactose intolerant?
Warren (in NZ) you can always sing like Dean Martin to Peggy Lee’s tune:
“…The faucet it is dripping and the fence is falling down,
My pocket needs some money so I can’t go into town,
My brother he ain’t working and my sister doesn’t care,
The car it needs a motor so I can’t go anywhere –
…Manana, manana, manana is soon enough for me”
“…The window it is busted and the rain is coming in,
If someone doesn’t fix it I’ll be soaking to my skin,
But if we wait a day or two the rain may go away,
And we don’t need a window on such a lovely day –
Manana, manana, manana is soon enough for me
Manana, manana, manana is soon enough for me”
Willis: I do think that “parachute projects” with little local buy-in and a lack of backup, training and support are not the best use of development funds.
I agree, but in your telling “parachute projects” are all that NZ provides, making the island a sort of colony of NZ.
And here we are, deep in the bowels of this thread, where no one actually reads. Our only hope here is that you, Mr. Eschenbach, will deign to read this and respond. But why should you? Why would you? All that I have to say here is that I read somewhere, sometime ago (note the citing and the direct link), that one big reason that hydrogen will never make it as power for cars is that they can’t get the hydrogen pure enough! (Apparently, the impurities clog the membrane.) Well, that’s it, folks. Back to sleep.
Thanks for that. I thought I was the only one that remembered Little Feat and “Time Loves A Hero”.
Excellent article, Thanks, Willis!
Let’s see, SOMEONE is going to get the contract to build that installations. I wonder what his connection is to the politicians who pushed the solar installation? Follow the money on this deal could be quite interesting. [I am getting more and more cynical about CAGW & Sustainability]
NZ Herald article about the installation
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10826025
Tokelau is made up of three atolls – Fakaofo, Nukunonu and Atafu – with Fakaofo the first to become fully solar powered this week.
Powersmart director Mike Bassett-Smith said the project would allow Tokelau to become the first wholly solar-powered nation on earth.
“This system is among the largest off-grid solar power systems in the world and the largest solar system being installed the South Pacific.”
After turning on the first system on Fakaofo, construction work would now begin on the second atoll.
Reblogged this on thewordpressghost and commented:
This was a great post.
IMHO that was.
It pointed out many of the inconstancies in our modern economies. We expect people to pay HUGE amounts of public debt back. Debt that does not directly result from their investment.
We expect solar to always work.
We expect maintenance to not be needed. What? I was supposed to change the oil in my car?
Great read.
Ghost.
Long story short: if you want Western technology to work consistently over the long term, you need it to be consistently maintained by Westerners over the same period. Preventive maintenance is an alien philosophy to lots of people raised in generally benign climates. It’s very hard to train the fear of future problems and deprivation into people whose cultural outlook barely extends into tomorrow.
I wonder if there is a practical small modular solar technology, either PV, of solar still, that will increase the availability of fresh water on the atol.
It has been commented before in many threads that the effort to turn wind power into 60 Hz electricity sync’d to the grid is a poor use of the power. However direct Wind to mechanical pumping has been a successful technology for hundreds of years.
Perhaps we should think of solar power in remote areas in similar fashion. Fresh water on a pacific atol could be a most valuable resource. It might be the secret to a more bountiful agriculture.
Well… U.S. government (known) debt to GDP ratios reached 100.67% first quarter of 2012, first time since the spike in spending after World War II. CBO’s projection shows us closing in on 200% by 2030, and the hockey stick blade still going up. If it weren’t for my renewable energy investments and plans for carbon trading in retirement I’d be genuinely concerned.
http://www.deptofnumbers.com/misc/debt-revenue-and-expenditures-as-a-fraction-of-gdp/
Which way to that fishing lagoon, again?
Excellent article and comments. But why are “we” involved in their lives? Their minds are not like ours. They cannot successfully adopt our ways. They live where and as they do by choice. They aren’t hurting anyone. Why not just let them be?
…Didn’t mean to imply above that you can pump fresh water from the subsurface.
It might be possible to use solar PV power to pump salt water through reverse osmosis to obtain fresh water. But I wonder if reverse osmosis is too mechanical to survive long on an atol.
Can a solar still, or multi-stage desalination be made to be near maintenance free, typhoon survivable, with solar PV to power pumps, and provide enough freshwater to make a difference?
@Willis:
Harvesting a nit: As the panels will most likely be aluminum, not iron, I don’t think “rust” is the right description of their fate… Having lived on a 27 footer for a couple of years, just about everything either oxidized or mold ate it. Metal near warm humid salt water means either endless and continuous maintenance ( with Expensive and Imported cleaners, lubricants, protective sprays, …) or an interesting pile of very pretty colored oxides and chlorates… Even stainless steel starts to pit after a while… But I suppose for general use equating “rust” with oxidize and make chlorates is ‘close enough’ 😉
Per the solar panels, I have one word: Typhoon.
I’d not want to bet that a large sail like object will survive the first encounter with a Very Strong Wind… Hopefully they are not installed ‘upwind’ from the houses…
Per Coconut Oil and Diesels:
Yes, you can run them on plant oils and coconut is better than most… HOWEVER, it is best if the engine is purpose built for it, second best if the oil is heated a lot first, and in all cases be prepared for more maintenance inside the engine… ( that nice ‘seasoning’ you get on a cast iron cooking pan is not so helpful inside your engine…)
I’ve run plant (and animal) products in diesels since before it was trendy. I mostly run #2 Petroleum Diesel now…
In the local store, coconut oil sells for about $4 / pound. That would be about $32 / gallon. The Kiwis would be doing much better for everyone if they took the coconut oil, sold it in California, bought Diesel, and split the $24 or so profit / gallon with the islanders…
Willis, only in scale does your description of the brave future of Tokelau, differ from that depicted by Barry Sotello, coming here to the USA, in perhaps five months or so, and the same question can be asked; who the hell asked for this ?
As for the practicality of PV Solar; we have the example of “Solar City”. They put THEIR solar panels on YOUR roof, and generate some electricity, which they run backwards through YOUR electric meter to PG&E, who then sells YOU electricity at a discount. So what the hell do YOU care about how infficient THEIR solar panels are ?
I have a much better business model to offer to Solar City, or anyone else.
Let’s say for example, in NorCal, I have 100 square metres (1000 sq ft) of south facing roof area appropriately slanted to receive 100,000 Watts peak of noon day equinoxial solar energy, with clear skyline permitting a full 8 hours at more than 50,000 Watts, centered on noon.
So I will rent this 100 KW nominal peak solar energy source to SC for so much per 800KWH day; (I’ll let you young math majors do the trig integral to calculate the true insolation factor, for my place.
The going rate for raw solar insolation is of course set by the energy market, and can be found in WSJ or BARRONS each day, or just giggle it online.
So now Solar City can install their (stationary) solar panels in my valuable solar insolation space, and rent my solar energy, which THEY can keep for themselves or run it backwards through THEIR power meter, and piggy back it onto PG&E’s power line coming to my house OUTSIDE MY POWER METER.
So SC can negotiate a selling price to PG&E for electricity, which California says they have to switch to. So leave me out of it. SC can rent my space to mine my incoming solar energy, and they can make electricity or whatever out of some of it (I don’t care how much or how little), and I will just buy my juice from PG&E like I do now.
So SC can make their fortune , and I can sell my solar insolation to someone who wants it at the going solar energy market rate.
If SC can make a better solar panel with higher efficiency, I don’t mind them swtching units occasionally so they can get even richer, and I cn get a little beer money now and then selling my daily 800KWH solar energy to them.
Works for me !
“””””…..jim2 says:
August 10, 2012 at 7:28 am
New Zealand should be held accountable for the spread of lead pollution……”””””
So now where did you see this lead pollution ???
I wasn’t aware that growing coconuts involved lead; and solar cells certainly don’t. Have you noticed all the new electric cars running around with tons of lead acid batteries ??
I think you jim2 should be held accountable for WUWT noise pollution.
Maybe I found the lead pollution. It’s those pesky lead sinkers the Tokelauans use to catch all that fish for tomorrow.
No heck! That ain’t it either; they use old spark plugs for sinkers; no lead there !
Wave, if you like scaleable technology:
(see concepts at link especially if a do-it-yourselfer)
http://www.ecowavepower.com/category/video/
I’ve long retired from being on the sea &
parrot the wag who said:
“It is better to have sailed, than to sail!”
The land is only a few metres above sea level. Don’t they ever experience tsunamis?
Hi Brian W.:
29 Sept. 2009 an 8.3 earthquake’s tsunami hit Samoa:
“…On the island of Nukunono in Tokelau, preparations are under way in case any big waves arrive after this morning’s earthquake. The acting faipule or mayor of Nukunono, Mika Perez, says the men are bringing boats to shore and moving families inland.”