
Follow the money. It’s not a game to these folks.
Climate change where you’d least expect it
by Philippa Martyr at Quadrant Online
In case you hadn’t realised the seriousness of the problem, I thought I’d share these budding projects with you. Names of grantees and institutions have been omitted to protect the innocent, but I have included the FOR, or Field of Research as coded by the ARC, and the total grant monies. Enjoy.
Physiology: “Abrupt environmental changes can put natural populations at risk of extinction. The project will show to what extent individuals can compensate for temperature changes and thereby render populations resilient to climate change. This research will make theoretical advances and improve the power to predict impacts of future climate change.” ($370,000)
Civil Engineering: “This project will develop innovative light gauge steel roofing systems with considerably increased wind resistance and reliable design rules for cold-formed steel codes worldwide. It will contribute to the Australian government’s goal of increasing building resilience against future extreme and more frequent wind events caused by climate change.” ($320,000)
Public Health and Health Sciences: “This study will investigate the effects of extreme heat, increasing temperatures and consequences of climate change, on the population health of rural communities in South Australia. Findings will inform adaptation strategies to prevent an increase in heat-associated and climate change-associated morbidity and mortality in rural areas.” ($122,000 – 2 years)
Political Science: “Commonsense says that claims about how social and political life ought to be arranged must not make infeasible demands. This project will investigate this piece of commonsense and explore its implications for a number of pressing issues, such as climate change, multiculturalism, political participation, inequality, historical justice, and the rules of war.” ($408,587)
Sociology: “We know very little about the ways food security is governed in Australia. This study – the first social-science based study of food security in the nation -will allow us to understand how a multiplicity of agencies come together to ensure the delivery of food, especially at a time of climate change impacts.” ($100,000 – 2 years)
Psychology: “Climate change represents a moral challenge to humanity, and one that elicits high levels of emotion. This project examines how emotions and morality influence how people send and receive messages about climate change, and does so with an eye to developing concrete and do-able strategies for positive change.” ($197,302)
Journalism and Professional Writing: “This project will examine the use of news management or ‘spin’ by Australian governments. Is it a legitimate tool of government in the face of a hyper-adversarial news media or a technique which undermines democracy? It will examine ‘spin’ in connection with policies on climate change, economic policy, indigenous policy and asylum seekers policy.” ($95,000)
Literary Studies: “The project will devise and develop a new ‘cultural materialist’ paradigm for science fiction studies and apply it to a case study of science fictional representations of catastrophe, especially nuclear war, plague and extreme climate change.” ($239,000)
Historical Studies: “This project will produce a comprehensive new biography of H.V. Evatt, High Court judge, minister in the 1940s, President of the United Nations General Assembly and leader of the Australian Labor Party opposition during the 1950s. Evatt’s life resonates with modern challenges both of liberty in a time of terror, and of internationalism in a time of global warming.” ($185,000)
{well almost a perfect score, climate change is just another code word for global warming}
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Propaganda has always been well funded. GK
You know what? Take alla that money, add it all together, and triple it, no-quadruple it, and devote it to a study of…nonsense. Now that I’d gladly pay for. Trouble is, such a study would force these flea ridden, oozing, slimy, leeches to suck the blood out of something else.
See also an earlier post by JoNova on the same topic: http://joannenova.com.au/2012/05/want-climate-resistant-oysters-or-climate-justice-the-arc-has-millions-to-help-but-no-money-for-skeptics/
Philosophers have to eat too, you know…
Funny how it is “Political Science” that gets the biggest grant…
The physiology one is priceless. North Dakota can have a temperature swing of 140 degrees in a given year and they want to see how life can persist with another degree or two?
I am getting so fed up with this climate change thing.. Its become an excuse to collect, no steal, taxpayers money to come up with more useless cr*p about this non existing problem.
Really, some of these frauds should be brought to justice.
I’ve been saying this for years.
A mate of mine used to be a University lecturer (before he started drilling for shale gas in North West England) and he told me in about 1995 that people who were after grant money were increasing their chances by linking their applications to global warming..
To quote “Deep Throat” (the anonymous source of information that demolished the Nixon White House) ‘follow the money.’
Global Warming / Climate Change is and always has been a clarion call, raising alarms of impending doom to panic the public (and the officials they have elected, and the officials appointed by the electees) into throwing money at ‘research’ programs which promise to do *something* that may help us deal with this Bogeyman. It matters not whether the work advances the stated objective. What counts is whether the elected officials, campaigning for re-election, can point to this and say “See! I care about your future!”
Sports Science: “This project will catalogue and quantify the varying impacts of climate change on the psychological performance of soccer players at important matches.”
Better stick me down for 400 large as I foresee a lot of travel involved.
And it’s bonus points all round if you can show that it’s part of an out-reach programme to the gay muslim and pregnant community.
hmm… I wonder if I did a study on all the emerging technologies coming to market as a result of “climate change” to help reduce carbon footprint of domestic dwellings, could I get three or four hunnerd grand to remodel my house?????
Chance
* Power plant stock falls 50% after EPA discovers water and poisonous CO2 going up stack
* Umbrella business bankrupted when research shows global warming will cause global cooling
* Home value falls when basement is confiscated to sequester CO2
* Pay Carbon-Rich Tax: $20,000
* You Are Assessed for Second-Hand Carbon Emissions
Just finishing off my seminal paper “The effects of climate change on haemorrhoids treatments”.
I think a grant of $1,000,000 for me to examine the possibility of changes due to Climate Change on the cultural and economic effects of tourism on the inhabitants of all the coutries of SE Asia, with particular attention to Thailand and the province of Petchabun.
The fact that I am retiring soon to 12 acres in Petchabun will be a valuable asset in my studies of the local population, restaurants, golf courses and hiking trails in that province.
I expect this study to take at least 20 years to complete.
Been there, done it, got the T-shirt etc. That was back in the late 1960s. The big funders in the UK then were cancer research. My intermediate boss was hell-bent on becoming “an item” He convinced a charity to fund research into UTI (urinary tract infections) to establish a link to cancer of the bladder. Utter BS but follow the money.
He successfully elevated himself from Registrar to Consultant. [non UK readers – just Google it and learn]
This man is possibly the most odious character I have ever met. What sickens me is that he is fat dumb and happy, whilst I am …….. enjoying watching “Revenge” on C5, and taking notes.
Authors of scientific studies don’t spend years on a topic of their choice, drafting a paper and word smithing every sentence without a funding source. The funding entity issues a request for proposal and the intent of the study is made clear. Very clear. The study validates the assumption of the proposal or the author will have a long wait before the next funded project.
Saying that 98 percent of climate change papers conclude that climate change is harmful and a result of human activity is true. It’s true because 98 percent of requests for climate change studies request an evaluation of just how harmful climate change may be.
An example of the circular proof of the climate change consensus goes something like “it’s true because I say it’s true”.
Tie me kangaroo down sport, tie me kangaroo down — then we tanned his hide when he died Clyde and that’s it hangin’ in the shed.
Physiology, Civil Engineering, Psychology, … The gyre widens!
It seems as if AGW has almost magical properties when it comes to undermining and debasing contemporary intellectual endeavor – as well as compromising almost everyone with credentials to carry out such endeavors.
I propose a Mars mission for Michael Mann, Phil Jones, Hansen, et al, to go to the planet Mars to study it to further our understanding of Climate Change. Then I propose in typical government fashion we fund the voyage to Mars, but defund the return mission, or at least heavily delay it, so they stay there a good, long time.
I see now that I could have added Veterinary Science to the list.
” …study of science fictional representations of catastrophe, especially nuclear war, plague and extreme climate change.” ($239,000)”
I thought it was all fiction. Is this the proof?
How Global Warming Affects Climate Change
Investigating how the Athropogenic Gllobal Warming has disrupted the Earth’s normal clomate cycles, and researching how to permanently remove humanity’s influence on global climate.
Should be worth at least $200,000, to start. And the preliminary work for the second part has already been done, by Stalin, and Pol Pot…
All I can say is climate change, climate change, climate change and global warming. Now where is go?
“Civil Engineering: “This project will develop innovative light gauge steel roofing systems with considerably increased wind resistance and reliable design rules for cold-formed steel codes worldwide.”
Newsreel of recent winds in Scotland have shown among other things:
Trampolines being blown away and fences being blown down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNSsFFW3Tls
Here is a photo of a traditional Scottish croft:
http://property-in-scotland.org/croft-lewis-scotland.jpg